Email Alerts
RSS
Volume 39 Issue 11
Nov.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS  > 2023  >  39(11): 1064-1071
Wang Yanqiong, Huang Jianqiong, Wu Zhihui, et al. Effects of stepwise acute pain management on acute pain and post-traumatic stress disorder in children with burns: a prospective randomized controlled study[J]. Chin j Burns, 2021, 37(3): 237-242. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200210-00048
Citation: Yu JA,Wang JZ,Wang JQ,et al.Effects of modified lytic cocktail on organ function of severely scalded rats[J].Chin J Burns Wounds,2023,39(11):1064-1071.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20230329-00105.
shu

Effects of modified lytic cocktail on organ function of severely scalded rats

doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20230329-00105

  • Department of Burn, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China

Funds:

General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China 82072173, 82172199

Shanghai Directed Projects of Biopharmaceutical Field 22DX1900600

Shanghai Municipal Key Clinical Specialty of China shslczdzk02302

Shanghai Specialized Research Fund for Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine in General Hospitals ZHYY-ZXYJHZX-201911

More Information
  • Corresponding author: Liu Yan, Email: rjliuyan@126.com
  • Received Date: 2023-03-29
    Abstract
  •   Objective   To compare the effects of the modified lytic cocktail and the classic lytic cocktail on organ function of severely scalded rats.   Methods   The experimental study method was applied. Twenty-four about 10-week-old male Sprague-Dawley rats were assigned into sham injury group, scald alone group, classic lytic cocktail group, and modified lytic cocktail group according to the random number table, with 6 rats in each group. In scald alone group, classic lytic cocktail group, and modified lytic cocktail group, rats were subjected to a 30% total body surface area (TBSA) full-thickness scald on the back. Rats in sham injury group underwent a simulated injury process to mimic a sham injury. Immediately after injury, rats in classic lytic cocktail group were intraperitoneally injected with a classic lytic cocktail (12 mL/kg) consisting of pethidine, chlorpromazine, and promethazine, supplemented with gavage using normal saline; and rats in modified lytic cocktail group were intraperitoneally injected with a mixed drug (2 mL/kg) consisting of midazolam and fentanyl, supplemented with gavage using cetirizine. Subsequently, rats in four groups were all intraperitoneally injected with lactated Ringer's solution for fluid resuscitation, with a total fluid and administration volume of 2 mL·kg -1·TBSA -1. On the following day, rats in the two lytic cocktail groups were administered medication once again as above. On post injury day (PID) 3, the abdominal aortic blood, liver, small intestine, and lung tissue were collected from rats in each group. The plasma levels of interleukin-1β (IL-1β), IL-10, and IL-6 were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The plasma levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), γ-glutamyl transferase (γ-GT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), LDH isoenzyme 1 (LDH-1), creatine kinase (CK), CK isoenzyme (CK-MB), urea, creatinine, and uric acid were detected using an automated biochemical analyzer. The histological changes of liver, small intestine, and lung tissue were observed after performing hematoxylin and eosin staining. Data were statistically analyzed with one-way analysis of variance and Tukey's test.   Results   On PID 3, the plasma level of IL-10 of rats in classic lytic cocktail group was (44±16) pg/mL, which was significantly higher than (20±9) pg/mL in modified lytic cocktail group and (21±6) pg/mL in scald alone group (with Pvalues all <0.05); there was no statistically significant difference in the plasma levels of IL-1β or IL-6 of rats among the four groups ( P>0.05). On PID 3, the plasma levels of ALT and AST of rats in scald alone group were (77±14) and (213±65) U/L, respectively, which were significantly higher than (59±5) and (108±10) U/L in sham injury group ( P<0.05); the plasma levels of ALT and AST in modified lytic cocktail group were (61±3) and (116±11) U/L, respectively, which were significantly lower than (81±13) and (207±54) U/L in classic lytic cocktail group ( P<0.05); the plasma level of AST of rats in modified lytic cocktail group was significantly lower than that in scald alone group ( P<0.05). On PID 3, there was no statistically significant difference in the plasma levels of γ-GT, ALP, LDH, LDH-1, CK, CK-MB, creatinine, or uric acid of rats among the four groups ( P>0.05); although there was a statistically significant overall difference in the plasma level of urea of rats among the four groups ( P<0.05), the comparisons between scald alone group and each of sham injury group, classic lytic cocktail group, and modified lytic cocktail group, and the comparison between classic lytic cocktail group and modified lytic cocktail group showed no statistically significant differences ( P>0.05). On PID 3, compared with those in sham injury group, rats in scald alone group exhibited diffuse microvesicular and vacuolar degeneration of hepatocytes in liver tissue, noticeable loose edema in the villous stroma in small intestine tissue, and significantly widened alveolar septa in large area of lung tissue. Compared with those in scald alone group, rats in the two lytic cocktail groups showed alleviated hepatocellular steatosis and vacuolar degeneration, relieved thickening of alveolar walls and edema in the villous stroma of the intestine. The histopathological manifestations of organs in rats of modified lytic cocktail group were closer to those in sham injury group.   Conclusions   The classic lytic cocktail may have a stronger anti-inflammatory effect, while the modified lytic cocktail exhibits better protection of liver function, but both of the two lytic cocktails can alleviate the histopathological injury of the liver, lungs, and small intestine in severely scalded rats. For the liver, lungs, and small intestine, the modified lytic cocktail provides organ protection comparable to that of the classic lytic cocktail.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(28)
  • [1]
    刘琰,王际壮.烧伤应激反应及其调控策略[J].中华烧伤杂志,2021,37(2):126-130.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20201125-00499.
    [2]
    ChakrobortyD,GoswamiS,BasuS,et al.Catecholamines in the regulation of angiogenesis in cutaneous wound healing[J].FASEB J,2020,34(11):14093-14102.DOI: 10.1096/fj.202001701R.
    [3]
    ZhangM,YangP,YuT,et al.Lytic cocktail: an effective method to alleviate severe burn induced hyper-metabolism through regulating white adipose tissue browning[J].Heliyon,2022,8(3):e09128.DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09128.
    [4]
    EdinoffAN,KaplanLA,KhanS,et al.Full opioid agonists and tramadol: pharmacological and clinical considerations[J].Anesth Pain Med,2021,11(4):e119156.DOI: 10.5812/aapm.119156.
    [5]
    GirgisRR,ZoghbiAW,JavittDC,et al.The past and future of novel, non-dopamine-2 receptor therapeutics for schizophrenia: a critical and comprehensive review[J].J Psychiatr Res,2019,108:57-83.DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.07.006.
    [6]
    王世筠,许伟石,曹启栋,等.抑制应激对严重烧伤大鼠炎症反应的影响[J].中华烧伤杂志,2002,18(5):268-271.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2002.05.004.
    [7]
    乔亮,袁克俭,杨惠忠,等.冬眠合剂对严重烫伤大鼠肺损伤的保护作用[J].中华烧伤杂志,2008,24(4):251-253.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2008.04.004.
    [8]
    邵庆波,章雄,陈雪莲,等.早期应用冬眠合剂对严重烫伤大鼠小肠的保护作用[J].中华烧伤杂志,2010,26(3):180-184.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2010.03.004.
    [9]
    WangJ,LuC,LiuX,et al.Histamine H1 receptor antagonist attenuates catecholamine surge and organ injury after severe burns[J].Front Endocrinol (Lausanne),2023,14:1068925.DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1068925.
    [10]
    KulpGA,HerndonDN,LeeJO,et al.Extent and magnitude of catecholamine surge in pediatric burned patients[J].Shock,2010,33(4):369-374.DOI: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e3181b92340.
    [11]
    MertinV,MostP,BuschM,et al.Current understanding of thermo(dys)regulation in severe burn injury and the pathophysiological influence of hypermetabolism, adrenergic stress and hypothalamic regulation-a systematic review[J/OL].Burns Trauma,2022,10:tkac031[2023-03-29].https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36168403/.DOI: 10.1093/burnst/tkac031.
    [12]
    OsborneT,WallB,EdgarDW,et al.Current understanding of the chronic stress response to burn injury from human studies[J/OL].Burns Trauma,2023,11:tkad007[2023-03-29].https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36926636/.DOI: 10.1093/burnst/tkad007.
    [13]
    WangJ,LuC,ZhangJ,et al.Lytic cocktail attenuates catecholamine surge after severe burns by blocking histamine H1 receptor/PKA/CREB/tyrosine hydroxylase signaling in chromaffin cells[J].Shock,2022,58(2):158-168.DOI: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001963.
    [14]
    MatthayZA,FieldsAT,Nunez-GarciaB,et al.Importance of catecholamine signaling in the development of platelet exhaustion after traumatic injury[J].J Thromb Haemost,2022,20(9):2109-2118.DOI: 10.1111/jth.15763.
    [15]
    ParisiGF,LeonardiS,CiprandiG,et al.Cetirizine use in childhood: an update of a friendly 30-year drug[J].Clin Mol Allergy,2020,18:2.DOI: 10.1186/s12948-020-00118-5.
    [16]
    方治平,刘小康,肖逸,等.盐酸西替利嗪的抗组胺作用[J].中国药学杂志,2001(4):28-32.
    [17]
    LiK,FanY,XuZ,et al.Role of AhR and Foxo1 in skin inflammation in burn animal model via MAPK signaling pathway[J].Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand),2020,66(2):53-58.
    [18]
    PalackicA,JayJW,DugganRP,et al.Therapeutic strategies to reduce burn wound conversion[J].Medicina (Kaunas),2022,58(7):922.DOI: 10.3390/medicina58070922.
    [19]
    邵庆波,章雄,陈雪莲,等.冬眠合剂对严重烫伤大鼠早期肺组织的保护作用[J].上海交通大学学报(医学版),2010,30(11):1338-1342.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2010.11.005.
    [20]
    JeschkeMG,LopezON,FinnertyCC.24 - The hepatic response to thermal injury[M]//David N. Herndon.Total burn care.5th ed.Edinburgh: Elsevier,2018:259-267.e3.
    [21]
    BortolinJA,QuintanaHT,Tomé TdeC,et al.Burn injury induces histopathological changes and cell proliferation in liver of rats[J].World J Hepatol,2016,8(6):322-330.DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v8.i6.322.
    [22]
    AbuBakrHO,AljuaydiSH,Abou-ZeidSM,et al.Burn-induced multiple organ injury and protective effect of lutein in rats[J].Inflammation,2018,41(3):760-772.DOI: 10.1007/s10753-018-0730-x.
    [23]
    HouschyarM,BorrelliMR,TapkingC,et al.Burns: modified metabolism and the nuances of nutrition therapy[J].J Wound Care,2020,29(3):184-191.DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2020.29.3.184.
    [24]
    KorkmazHI,FlokstraG,WaasdorpM,et al.The complexity of the post-burn immune response: an overview of the associated local and systemic complications[J].Cells,2023,12(3):345.DOI: 10.3390/cells12030345.
    [25]
    FengY,HuangY,WangY,et al.Severe burn injury alters intestinal microbiota composition and impairs intestinal barrier in mice[J/OL].Burns Trauma,2019,7:20[2023-03-29].https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31312663/.DOI: 10.1186/s41038-019-0156-1.
    [26]
    JeschkeMG,van BaarME,ChoudhryMA,et al.Burn injury[J].Nat Rev Dis Primers,2020,6(1):11.DOI: 10.1038/s41572-020-0145-5.
    [27]
    CurtisBJ,BoeDM,ShultsJA,et al.Effects of multiday ethanol intoxication on postburn inflammation, lung function, and alveolar macrophage phenotype[J].Shock,2019,51(5):625-633.DOI: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001188.
    [28]
    WonYH,ChoYS,JooSY,et al.The effect of a pulmonary rehabilitation on lung function and exercise capacity in patients with burn: a prospective randomized single-blind study[J].J Clin Med,2020,9(7):2250.DOI: 10.3390/jcm9072250.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]Zhou Rixing, Dong Yongsheng, Zhou Wangbiao. Treatment of chronic refractory wound with autologous platelet-rich plasma in a hemophilia A patient after knee joint surgery[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2022, 38(4): 369-372. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210202-00045
    [2]Jiang Shan, Li Kang, Xiong Yan, Xie Kun, Qi Xin, Wen Bing. Clinical application of negative-pressure wound therapy in uncomplicated cardiac pacemaker pocket infection[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2021, 37(3): 288-291. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20201030-00450
    [3]Lyu Guozhong, Yang Minlie. Normative application of negative-pressure wound therapy to improve the wound repair level[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2020, 36(7): 523-527. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200522-00280
    [4]Li Shaohui, Zhang Wanfu, Hu Xiaolong, Wang Yunchuan, Han Fei, Ji Peng, Han Fu, Hu Dahai, Guan Hao. Clinical application of negative-pressure wound therapy in split-thickness skin grafting at hard-to-fix sites[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2020, 36(7): 528-533. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200224-00086
    [5]Jiang Tao, Wu Hangqing, Cao Tong, Song Deheng, Zhang Jianjun. Debridement combined with negative-pressure wound therapy and local flap for treating a case of stingray sting[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2020, 36(9): 873-875. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20190714-00298
    [6]Yang Minlie, Zhou Xiaojin, Zhu Yugang, Jiang Donglin, Ding Lintao, Chu Guoping, Zhao Peng, Cheng Jia, Lyu Guozhong, Li Qingfeng. Clinical efficacy and influencing factors of different modes of continuous negative pressure wound therapy on venous ulcer wounds of lower limbs[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2020, 36(12): 1149-1158. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200316-00173
    [7]Li Xueli, Jiang Lei, Huang Yong, Che Haijie. One patient with poor healing of sinus after implant of vascular prosthesis due to infected abdominal aortic aneurysms treated with negative pressure wound therapy combined with local flap[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2020, 36(2): 133-136. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2020.02.010
    [8]Li Fang, Li Quan, Wang Lingfeng. Advances in the research of effects of mesenchymal stem cells, exosomes, and platelet-rich plasma in wound repair[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2019, 35(10): 764-768. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2019.10.012
    [9]Li Yang, Zheng Jiansheng, Wang Biao, Xue Wenjiao. Effects of autologous platelet-rich plasma in the repair of soft tissue defects of rabbits with free flap[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2019, 35(9): 683-689. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2019.09.007
    [10]Feng Guang, Hao Daifeng, Yao Dan, Zhang Xinjian, Yang Yi. Clinical effects of autologous platelet-rich plasma gel in the repair of chronic wounds[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2019, 35(6): 451-455. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2019.06.010
    [11]Yang Sisi, Xiao Chengzhi. Advances in the research of effects of autologous platelet-rich plasma on the treatment of burn wounds[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2018, 34(12): 910-913. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.12.017
    [12]Chen Xiaoqiang, Zhang Wei, Li Xueyong. Advances in the research of biomechanical effects of negative-pressure wound therapy in promoting wound healing[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2018, 34(4): 243-246. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.04.010
    [13]Lei Xiaoxuan, Xu Pengcheng, Zhang Lei, Pang Mengru, Tian Ju, Cheng Biao. Effects of human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells and platelet-rich plasma on healing of wounds with full-thickness skin defects in mice[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2018, 34(12): 887-894. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.12.013
    [15]Liu Yang, Hu Dahai. Advances in the research of molecular mechanism of negative pressure wound therapy in improving wound healing[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2017, 33(11): 718-720. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2017.11.015
    [16]Shao Huawei, Wang Xin′gang, You Chuan′gang, Han Chunmao. Advances in the research of negative-pressure wound therapy inducing the vascularization of dermal substitute[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2017, 33(8): 523-525. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2017.08.019
    [18]Hao Daifeng, Feng Guang, Li Tao, Chu Wanli, Chen Zequn, Li Shanyou, Zhang Xinjian, Zhao Jingfeng, Zhao Fan. Curative effects of platelet-rich plasma combined with negative-pressure wound therapy on sternal osteomyelitis and sinus tract after thoracotomy[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2016, 32(6): 331-335. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2016.06.004
    [19]ZHOU Ye-ping. Current situation of negative-pressure wound therapy[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2011, 27(4): 253-254. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2011.04.003
    [20]HU Kai-xuan, ZHANG Hong-wei, ZHOU Fang, YAO Gang, Sill Jing- ping, CHENG Zhi, WANG Li-fu, HOU Zuo-qiong. Observation on the therapeutic effects of negative-pressure wound therapy on the treatment of complicated and refractory wounds[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2009, 25(4): 249-252.
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(57)

    1. 林传兴，陈建崇，黄家欣，温雪晶，张斌斌. 湿润烧伤膏联合PRP治疗糖尿病足溃疡的效果. 中国医学创新. 2025(07): 60-63 .
    2. 吕姣姣，吴巧珍. 实施负压封闭引流干预对骨科下肢手术患者手术创面及自我疼痛评价的影响. 山西医药杂志. 2024(04): 275-278 .
    3. 苏锦绣，黎莹，石庆芬，汪莉. 自体富血小板血浆在慢性创面治疗中的应用研究进展. 微创医学. 2024(01): 72-74 .
    4. 郭忠梁，刘元媛，刘应平，王静，徐敏，王国昌. 胸壁窦道病人应用富血小板血浆凝胶联合负压封闭引流的临床疗效观察. 临床外科杂志. 2024(03): 318-322 .
    5. 葛星月，杨雅量，李文武，竺仕林，姚明哲，唐乾利. MEBT/MEBO对糖尿病大鼠创面中CaN/NFAT信号通路表达的影响. 重庆医学. 2024(07): 965-971 .
    6. 黄红梅，李永，张选平，简丽，吴绮楠. 黄马酊联合3M液体敷料治疗慢性难愈性创面的临床效果研究. 重庆医学. 2024(09): 1433-1436 .
    7. 张倩. 持续封闭负压引流技术在难愈性创面修复中的应用效果. 中国医药导报. 2024(17): 116-119 .
    8. 夏振兰，杨晓君，周永林，杨逸禧，陈月玲，陈丽萍，刘泽炫. 造口治疗师主导富血小板血浆联合湿性敷料治疗术后不愈合慢性伤口的效果观察. 中国实用护理杂志. 2024(23): 1761-1767 .
    9. 唐代玉，赵雪瑞. 自体富血小板血浆联合负压封闭引流技术在治疗糖尿病难治性创面中的应用. 临床血液学杂志. 2024(10): 725-728 .
    10. 苏志学，刘广星，曾宏宇，黄洪然，黄小玲，唐强. 富血小板血浆联合治疗在慢性创面中的应用及作用机制研究进展. 中国医药导报. 2024(24): 49-52+73 .
    11. 保砚，范斌，黄文杰，尹安，唐兵兵. 胶原凝胶联合血肿方外敷在腹部切口愈合不良中应用效果. 中外医学研究. 2024(27): 125-128 .
    12. 祝天华，郜天田，李小雪. 自体富血小板凝胶对烧伤创面修复作用及血清炎症因子水平的影响. 罕少疾病杂志. 2024(11): 135-136+142 .
    13. 简有源，张建丹，卢占洲. 负压封闭引流技术结合肌瓣转移游离植皮在难愈性创面修复中对患者疼痛及外观满意度影响分析. 外科研究与新技术(中英文). 2024(04): 323-326 .
    14. 段东东，石华峰，谢辉，黄文文，胡寿勇，王庆伟，孙熊. 富血小板血浆联合人工皮负压吸引修复腓骨长短肌腱外露及软组织缺损的临床研究. 生物骨科材料与临床研究. 2023(01): 53-55+61 .
    15. 孙诚，付丹妹，陈建民，刘国印. 富血小板血浆联合创面负压疗法在慢性难愈性创面中的应用研究进展. 转化医学杂志. 2023(01): 69-72 .
    16. 尚立宏. 在面部烧伤整形中采用负压封闭引流技术治疗的效果. 中国医药指南. 2023(05): 94-96 .
    17. 张艳，林威钢. 负压封闭引流联合银离子敷料治疗难愈性创面的临床疗效. 浙江创伤外科. 2023(03): 464-466 .
    18. 刘宏君，张乃臣，吴凡，王天亮，袁超群，陆一鸣，张文忠. PRP在手背皮肤缺损创面的治疗. 实用手外科杂志. 2023(01): 33-35 .
    19. 骆渊城，朱滨，杨威，王奎. 益气活血生肌方对难愈性创面愈合及血管再生的影响. 中国医药导报. 2023(12): 30-34 .
    20. 赵霞，郭杏，丁晓斌，谭美云. 自体富血小板血浆联合负压吸引疗法治疗慢性创面的Meta分析. 中国美容医学. 2023(05): 71-78 .
    21. 吕德珍，曹丽，赵艮萍，陈建民，刘国印. 负压封闭引流技术在压力性损伤慢性创面修复中的治疗进展. 海南医学. 2023(13): 1967-1971 .
    22. 曾泓铭，凌小元，郑琴秀. 自体富血小板凝胶治疗难愈性糖尿病足溃疡的临床疗效分析. 糖尿病新世界. 2023(08): 168-170+174 .
    23. 刘韶轩. 自体富血小板血浆联合负压封闭引流技术在压疮创面修复中的应用效果. 临床医学. 2023(07): 62-64 .
    24. 郭莹. 经负压封闭引流技术在电击伤致截肢残端皮肤缺损患者中的应用效果. 实用中西医结合临床. 2023(12): 65-68 .
    25. 杨雅量，葛星月，李文武，竺仕林，姚明哲，唐乾利. MEBT/MEBO治疗慢性难愈合创面疗效和安全性的Meta分析. 现代医学. 2023(09): 1183-1189 .
    26. 周湘荣，林小永，郑臣校. 桃红四物汤加减方联合弹力绷带对植皮术后供皮区增生性疤痕的疗效观察. 广州中医药大学学报. 2023(11): 2764-2768 .
    27. 顾梦雪，王淑娟，聂雅悦，林倩. 负压封闭引流术结合双氧水皮瓣修复在小腿中段开放性骨折合并皮肤缺损创面修复中的应用. 临床和实验医学杂志. 2023(23): 2531-2535 .
    28. 宋承骏，王俊，刘芳，马柏强，应乐园. 富血小板血浆联合负压封闭引流对慢性难愈性创面的影响. 浙江实用医学. 2023(03): 196-199 .
    29. 鲍磊，付丹妹，陆晶，刘国印. 封闭负压引流联合富血小板血浆在压力性损伤慢性创面治疗中的研究进展. 保健医学研究与实践. 2023(10): 138-142 .
    30. 连涛，郑全好，崔国航，相阳. 富含血小板血浆凝胶技术联合VSD治疗上肢大面积皮肤脱套伤患者的效果观察. 华夏医学. 2022(01): 105-108 .
    31. 周晓春，陈晓明，王惠，芮睿，徐旭. 波动式负压引流技术在穿支皮瓣移植修复难愈性创面中的应用. 中国美容医学. 2022(02): 21-25 .
    32. 杨冠龙，王丽英，石凡超，徐绍君，王莉杰，黄红军. 封闭负压引流联合自体富血小板血浆修复糖尿病皮肤慢性难愈合创面的临床研究. 右江医学. 2022(03): 210-213 .
    33. 陈锦荣，李燕玲，蒋壮志，黄广恩. 负压封闭引流技术联合氧疗机局部治疗慢性难愈性创面的临床观察. 当代医学. 2022(11): 103-105 .
    34. 付丹妹，孙诚，陈建民，刘国印. 负压创面治疗联合富血小板血浆治疗慢性难愈性创面的研究进展. 医学研究生学报. 2022(02): 196-201 .
    35. 莫骁群，庞梦茹，孙宇，冯丹，袁媛. 自体单采富血小板血浆凝胶治疗慢性难治性创面的临床研究. 中国美容整形外科杂志. 2022(04): 222-225 .
    36. 张健，刘小龙，查天建，刘利华. 富血小板血浆在糖尿病足创面修复中的作用研究. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版). 2022(02): 131-134 .
    37. 季超，肖仕初. 负压伤口疗法在创面治疗中的临床应用及其相关研究进展. 中华烧伤与创面修复杂志. 2022(06): 585-589 . 本站查看
    38. 李忠兴，王嘉欣，何金凤，张亚辉，付永峰，任娟，单楠. 富血小板血浆对下肢慢性难愈合伤口的修复作用及外观影响. 中国美容医学. 2022(07): 51-55 .
    39. 罗玉娟，曾彪，江光荣，黄晓辉，聂艳芳. 自体富血小板血浆对难愈性烧伤创面的修复作用研究. 中国医学创新. 2022(22): 34-38 .
    40. 谢丰松，吕朝阳，陈传亮，邓磊，黄成，姜凡. VSD技术与药物治疗碱烧伤创面患者的疗效及对炎症因子的影响. 中国医师杂志. 2022(08): 1264-1266 .
    41. 朱艳玲，杨今言，王一硕，卢娟，田燕. 超脉冲点阵CO_2激光联合富血小板血浆治疗面部痤疮后瘢痕的修复效果及机制研究. 中国美容医学. 2022(09): 58-62 .
    42. 高欣，孙业祥. 中西医并重治疗慢性难愈合创面十年回顾. 中国烧伤创疡杂志. 2022(05): 310-313 .
    43. 秦峰，陈建民，吴宇，刘国印. 负压封闭引流联合富血小板血浆在压力性损伤慢性创面修复中的应用进展. 华南国防医学杂志. 2022(10): 836-840 .
    44. 黎伙聪. 创面封闭式负压引流术在难愈性创面治疗中的应用. 大医生. 2022(22): 47-49 .
    45. 段冰冉，徐袁丁，董训忠，李娟. 皮肤保护膜对行负压封闭引流治疗的慢性伤口患者潮湿相关性皮肤损伤发生率的影响. 临床与病理杂志. 2022(11): 2719-2725 .
    46. 周文涛，何国，谢恩光，蔡翰翔，马焕霞. 皮肤牵张闭合器联合封闭负压引流技术在难愈性创面修复中的应用. 中国医药科学. 2022(18): 127-130 .
    47. 袁媛，陈祥军，黄吉娥，莫骁群. 自体富血小板血浆修复足踝部难愈性创面. 中国美容医学. 2022(10): 20-24 .
    48. 何玲. 负压封闭引流联合自体富血小板血浆对慢性难愈性创面疼痛程度的影响. 医疗装备. 2022(24): 107-110 .
    49. 朱正新. 自体富血小板血浆凝胶联合皮瓣移植对股骨内侧难愈合性创面的修复效果. 中外医学研究. 2021(13): 35-37 .
    50. 林颜，陈晓东，阮树斌，杨荣华，王婧薷. 重组人碱性成纤维细胞生长因子对难愈性创面愈合相关指标表达的影响研究. 中国医学创新. 2021(14): 59-63 .
    51. 韦瑞丽，马辉，余芳，孙敏，韦丽娇，钟荣桂，王月. 自制简易负压引流装置联合普朗特液体伤口敷料治疗腹部感染性伤口的效果分析. 结直肠肛门外科. 2021(03): 280-283 .
    52. 唐天生，邓朝，陈兴爱，谭显春，李彤红，何侨蔚，何芳. VSD联合银离子冲洗对骨科感染创面愈合及血清hs-CRP、TNF-α、IL-1表达影响的研究. 解放军医药杂志. 2021(08): 57-61 .
    53. 李津，夏清建，何舟，吴碧珊，谭建恒. 负压伤口疗法联合富血小板血浆治疗慢性难愈性创面的作用研究. 吉林医学. 2021(10): 2478-2479 .
    54. 章梓格，孙文利，李振华. 难治性糖尿病足溃疡1例多学科协作救治体会. 湘南学院学报(医学版). 2021(03): 56-59 .
    55. 吴小李，董永盛，周日兴，何小洁，郑小江. 自体富血小板血浆治疗糖尿病患者难治性创面的效果观察. 中国医学创新. 2021(33): 24-27 .
    56. 杨榕，李明，李宜橙，高栋梁. 富血小板血浆联合负压封闭引流技术的临床应用研究进展. 新乡医学院学报. 2021(11): 1095-1100 .
    57. 孙丰华，杨阳，张茂红，胡云健，孙诚，黄玉萍，陈建民，刘国印. 自体富血小板血浆联合负压封闭引流技术治疗压疮的临床疗效分析. 东南国防医药. 2021(06): 576-581 .

    Other cited types(8)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040102030405060
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 11.9 %FULLTEXT: 11.9 %META: 69.0 %META: 69.0 %PDF: 19.0 %PDF: 19.0 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 4.5 %其他: 4.5 %其他: 1.7 %其他: 1.7 %China: 0.9 %China: 0.9 %Falls Church: 0.2 %Falls Church: 0.2 %United States: 0.2 %United States: 0.2 %上海: 1.0 %上海: 1.0 %东京: 0.2 %东京: 0.2 %乌鲁木齐: 0.7 %乌鲁木齐: 0.7 %九江: 1.0 %九江: 1.0 %佛山: 0.7 %佛山: 0.7 %佳木斯: 0.3 %佳木斯: 0.3 %六盘水: 0.3 %六盘水: 0.3 %北京: 2.8 %北京: 2.8 %北方邦: 0.2 %北方邦: 0.2 %南京: 1.6 %南京: 1.6 %南宁: 0.9 %南宁: 0.9 %南昌: 1.2 %南昌: 1.2 %卡尔加里: 0.7 %卡尔加里: 0.7 %厦门: 0.3 %厦门: 0.3 %周口: 0.2 %周口: 0.2 %呼和浩特: 0.2 %呼和浩特: 0.2 %哈尔滨: 0.3 %哈尔滨: 0.3 %哥伦布: 0.3 %哥伦布: 0.3 %唐山: 0.3 %唐山: 0.3 %嘉兴: 0.2 %嘉兴: 0.2 %圣彼得堡: 0.2 %圣彼得堡: 0.2 %大连: 0.2 %大连: 0.2 %天津: 0.5 %天津: 0.5 %威海: 0.5 %威海: 0.5 %山景城: 1.2 %山景城: 1.2 %常州: 0.5 %常州: 0.5 %平顶山: 0.2 %平顶山: 0.2 %广州: 0.3 %广州: 0.3 %廊坊: 0.2 %廊坊: 0.2 %张家口: 6.6 %张家口: 6.6 %成都: 1.0 %成都: 1.0 %揭阳: 0.3 %揭阳: 0.3 %昆明: 0.5 %昆明: 0.5 %朝阳: 0.2 %朝阳: 0.2 %杭州: 0.7 %杭州: 0.7 %桂林: 0.3 %桂林: 0.3 %比勒费尔德: 2.6 %比勒费尔德: 2.6 %洛阳: 0.3 %洛阳: 0.3 %海口: 1.0 %海口: 1.0 %深圳: 0.5 %深圳: 0.5 %湖州: 0.2 %湖州: 0.2 %湛江: 0.2 %湛江: 0.2 %漯河: 0.3 %漯河: 0.3 %潍坊: 0.3 %潍坊: 0.3 %石家庄: 0.3 %石家庄: 0.3 %芒廷维尤: 35.5 %芒廷维尤: 35.5 %苏州: 0.7 %苏州: 0.7 %衡水: 0.3 %衡水: 0.3 %衡阳: 0.2 %衡阳: 0.2 %襄阳: 0.2 %襄阳: 0.2 %西宁: 5.0 %西宁: 5.0 %西安: 1.7 %西安: 1.7 %许昌: 0.7 %许昌: 0.7 %贵阳: 1.4 %贵阳: 1.4 %达州: 0.2 %达州: 0.2 %运城: 3.6 %运城: 3.6 %邢台: 0.5 %邢台: 0.5 %邯郸: 0.7 %邯郸: 0.7 %郑州: 0.3 %郑州: 0.3 %重庆: 7.3 %重庆: 7.3 %长沙: 0.7 %长沙: 0.7 %青岛: 0.7 %青岛: 0.7 %其他其他ChinaFalls ChurchUnited States上海东京乌鲁木齐九江佛山佳木斯六盘水北京北方邦南京南宁南昌卡尔加里厦门周口呼和浩特哈尔滨哥伦布唐山嘉兴圣彼得堡大连天津威海山景城常州平顶山广州廊坊张家口成都揭阳昆明朝阳杭州桂林比勒费尔德洛阳海口深圳湖州湛江漯河潍坊石家庄芒廷维尤苏州衡水衡阳襄阳西宁西安许昌贵阳达州运城邢台邯郸郑州重庆长沙青岛

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(2)  / Tables(2)

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (235) PDF downloads(13) Cited by(65)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Copyright © Chinese Journal of Burns京ICP备07035254号-14

    E-mail：shaoshangzazhi@163.com

    Website：https://zhsszz.xml-journal.net/

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return