Deliberation on the similarities and differences of the diagnosis and treatment of scars and keloids in China and Japan
-
摘要:
瘢痕及瘢痕疙瘩的发病情况及临床表现在不同人种中有所不同,亚洲人较高加索人更易罹患此病。中日两国是亚洲医学发展的代表性国家,尚无针对两国学术界在瘢痕及瘢痕疙瘩诊断和治疗方面异同的全面研究。本文通过比较分析两国最新瘢痕及瘢痕疙瘩领域的专家共识,了解到两国共识制作的专家组形式、主要内容基本相似,但是在专家组构成、共识内容的组织形式与逻辑思路、瘢痕评估及诊断和治疗的具体方案细节方面具有明显差异。中日两国瘢痕及瘢痕疙瘩诊断和治疗的差异之处可能提示未来合作研究的方向,中日两国学术界有必要加强学术交流,努力合作开展瘢痕及瘢痕疙瘩防治领域的高质量研究。
Abstract:The incidence and clinical manifestations of scars and keloids are different in different races, and Asians are more likely to suffer from this disease than Caucasians. China and Japan are the representative countries for medical development in Asia. There is no comprehensive study on the similarities and differences between the academic circles in the two countries in the diagnosis and treatment of scars and keloids. By comparing and analyzing the latest expert consensus in the field of scars and keloids between the two countries, we found that the organization form of expert team and main contents of the consensus from the two countries are basically similar. However, there are obvious differences in the composition of experts, logical thinking and organizational form of consensus contents, and details of the specific schemes for scar assessment, diagnosis, and treatment. The differences in the diagnosis and treatment of scars and keloids in China and Japan may indicate the direction of future cooperative research. It is necessary for the academic circles of China and Japan to strengthen academic exchanges and work hard to cooperate in high-quality research in the field of scars and keloids.
-
参考文献
(11)
计量
- 文章访问数: 381
- HTML全文浏览量: 60
- PDF下载量: 136
- 被引次数: 0