A prospective randomized controlled study on the effects of bicycle ergometer rehabilitation training on quadriceps and walking ability of patients with lower limb dysfunction caused by extensive burns
-
摘要:
目的 探讨功率自行车康复训练对大面积烧伤致下肢功能障碍患者股四头肌和步行能力的影响。 方法 采用前瞻性随机对照研究方法。选择武汉大学同仁医院暨武汉市第三医院2017年12月—2020年12月收治的符合入选标准的40例大面积烧伤患者，将其按照随机数字表法分为常规训练组［男16例、女4例，年龄（45±10）岁］和联合训练组［男13例、女7例，年龄（39±8）岁］。对常规训练组患者进行关节松动、下肢力量训练、步行能力训练和压力治疗等常规康复治疗，联合训练组患者在常规康复治疗的基础上增加功率自行车康复训练。针对2组患者，于治疗前和治疗2个月后，采用超声诊断仪测量股四头肌厚度，采用便携式肌力测试仪测试股四头肌肌力，采用6 min和10 m步行测试检测步行能力，应用改良李克特量表评估患者对训练效果的满意度。对数据行独立样本或配对样本t检验、Mann-Whitney U检验、Wilcoxon符号秩和检验和χ2检验。 结果 治疗2个月后，联合训练组患者股四头肌厚度为（3.76±0.39）cm，明显大于常规训练组的（3.45±0.35）cm（t=2.67，P<0.05）；常规训练组和联合训练组患者治疗2个月后的股四头肌厚度均明显大于治疗前（t值分别为5.99、8.62，P<0.01）。治疗2个月后，联合训练组患者股四头肌肌力明显大于常规训练组（Z=2.69，P<0.01）；常规训练组和联合训练组患者治疗2个月后的股四头肌肌力均明显大于治疗前（Z值分别为3.92、3.92，P<0.01）。治疗2个月后，联合训练组患者6 min步行距离为（488±39）m，明显长于常规训练组的（429±25）m（t=5.66，P<0.01）；常规训练组和联合训练组患者治疗2个月后的6 min步行距离均明显长于治疗前（t值分别为13.16、17.92，P<0.01）。治疗2个月后，联合训练组患者10 m步行时长明显短于常规训练组（t=3.20，P<0.01）；常规训练组和联合训练组患者治疗2个月后的10 m步行时长均明显短于治疗前（t值分别为7.21、13.13，P<0.01）。治疗2个月后，联合训练组患者对治疗效果的满意度得分明显高于常规训练组（Z=3.14，P<0.01）；常规训练组和联合训练组患者治疗2个月后对治疗效果的满意度得分均明显高于治疗前（Z值分别为3.98、4.04，P<0.01）。 结论 功率自行车康复训练可以改善大面积烧伤致下肢功能障碍患者的股四头肌厚度、肌力以及步行能力，提高患者对治疗效果的满意度，值得推广。 Abstract:Objective To explore the effects of bicycle ergometer rehabilitation training on quadriceps and walking ability of patients with lower limb dysfunction caused by extensive burns. Methods A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted. A total of 40 patients with extensive burns who met the inclusion criteria and were admitted to Tongren Hospital of Wuhan University＆Wuhan Third Hospital from December 2017 to December 2020 were selected. According to the random number table, the patients were divided into conventional training group (16 males, 4 females, aged (45±10) years) and combined training group (13 males, 7 females, aged (39±8) years). Patients in conventional training group were given conventional rehabilitation therapy such as joint loosening, lower limb strength training, walking training, and pressure therapy, while patients in combined training group were given additional bicycle ergometer rehabilitation training on the basis of conventional rehabilitation. For patients in the 2 groups before and after a 2-month's treatment, the thickness of quadriceps was measured by ultrasonic diagnostic instrument, the muscle strength of quadriceps was measured by portable muscle strength tester, the walking ability was tested with a 6-min and a 10-meter walk tests, and the patients' satisfaction for treatment effects was assessed using the modified Likert scale. Data were statistically analyzed with independent or paired sample t test, Mann-Whitney U test, Wilcoxon signed rank test, or chi-square test. Results After 2-month's treatment, the quadriceps thickness of patients in combined training group was (3.76±0.39) cm, which was significantly thicker than (3.45±0.35) cm in conventional training group (t=2.67, P<0.05); quadriceps thickness of patients in conventional training group and combined training group after 2-month's treatment was significantly thicker than that before treatment (with t values of 5.99 and 8.62, respectively, P<0.01). After 2-month's treatment, the quadriceps muscle strength of patients in combined training group was significantly greater than that in conventional training group (Z=2.69, P<0.01); quadriceps muscle strength of patients in conventional training group and combined training group after 2-month's treatment was significantly greater than that before treatment (with Z values of 3.92 and 3.92, respectively, P<0.01). After 2-month's treatment, the 6-min walking distance of patients in combined training group was (488±39) m, which was significantly longer than (429±25) m in conventional training group (t=5.66, P<0.01); the 6-min walking distance of patients after 2-month's treatment in conventional training group and combined training group was significantly longer than that before treatment (with t values of 13.16 and 17.92, respectively, P<0.01). After 2-month's treatment, the 10-meter walking time of patients in combined training group was significantly shorter than that in conventional training group (t=3.20, P<0.01); and the 10-meter walking time in conventional training group and combined training group was significantly shorter than that before treatment (with t values of 7.21 and 13.13, respectively, P<0.01). The patients' satisfaction score for treatment effects in combined training group was significantly higher than that in conventional training group (Z=3.14, P<0.01), and the patients' satisfaction scores for treatment effects in conventional training group and combined training group after 2-month's treatment were significantly greater than those before treatment (with Z values of 3.98 and 4.04, respectively, P<0.01). Conclusions Bicycle ergometer rehabilitation training can be used to improve quadriceps thickness, muscle strength, and walking ability of patients with lower limb dysfunction caused by extensive burns. It can also improve the satisfaction of patients with the treatment outcome, and therefore is worthy of promotion. -
参考文献
(35) [1] HartDW, WolfSE, MlcakR, et al. Persistence of muscle catabolism after severe burn[J]. Surgery, 2000,128(2):312-319. DOI: 10.1067/msy.2000.108059. [2] EbidAA, AhmedMT, Mahmoud EidM, et al. Effect of whole body vibration on leg muscle strength after healed burns: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Burns, 2012,38(7):1019-1026. DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2012.02.006. [3] PorterC, HardeeJP, HerndonDN, et al. The role of exercise in the rehabilitation of patients with severe burns[J]. Exerc Sport Sci Rev, 2015,43(1):34-40. DOI: 10.1249/JES.0000000000000029. [4] ClarkA, ImranJ, MadniT, et al. Nutrition and metabolism in burn patients[J/OL]. Burns Trauma, 2017,5:11[2022-04-12].https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28428966/.DOI: 10.1186/s41038-017-0076-x. [5] TanJ, ChenJ, ZhouJ, et al. Joint contractures in severe burn patients with early rehabilitation intervention in one of the largest burn intensive care unit in China: a descriptive analysis [J/OL]. Burns Trauma, 2019,7:17[2022-04-08]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31139664/.DOI: 10.1186/s41038-019-0151-6. [6] 中华医学会烧伤外科学分会, 中国医师协会烧伤科医师分会. 烧伤康复治疗指南(2013版)[J].中华烧伤杂志,2013,29(6):497-504. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2013.06.001. [7] AliMN, SethiK, NoohuMM. Comparison of two mobilization techniques in management of chronic non-specific low back pain[J]. J Bodyw Mov Ther, 2019,23(4):918-923. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2019.02.020. [8] Garnacho-CastañoMV, DomínguezR, Muñoz GonzálezA, et al. Exercise prescription using the Borg rating of perceived exertion to improve fitness[J]. Int J Sports Med, 2018,39(2):115-123. DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-120761. [9] 郇京宁. 再议烧伤瘢痕治疗[J].中华烧伤杂志,2018,34(10):672-676. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.10.005. [10] Li-TsangCW, ZhengYP, LauJC. A randomized clinical trial to study the effect of silicone gel dressing and pressure therapy on posttraumatic hypertrophic scars[J]. J Burn Care Res, 2010,31(3):448-457. DOI: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3181db52a7. [11] 支海君, 李勇, 贾春梅, 等. 床旁超声测量肢体骨骼肌厚度对机械通气患者ICU获得性衰弱的预测价值[J].中国急救医学,2020,40(7):633-636. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1949.2020.07.011. [12] JacksonSM, ChengMS, SmithAR, et al. Intrarater reliability of hand held dynamometry in measuring lower extremity isometric strength using a portable stabilization device[J]. Musculoskelet Sci Pract, 2017,27:137-141. DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2016.07.010. [13] OlssonL, SwedbergK. Six minute walk test[J]. Eur Heart J,2005,26(20):2209; author reply 2209-2210. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi452. [14] Andrade LimaC, Dornelas de AndradeA, CamposSL, et al. Six-minute walk test as a determinant of the functional capacity of children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis: a systematic review[J]. Respir Med, 2018,137:83-88. DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2018.02.016. [15] 陈飞, 刘洪举, 覃婷, 等. 悬吊训练对不完全性脊髓损伤患者步行能力和康复效果的影响[J].中国老年学杂志,2021,41(15):3212-3215. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2021.15.019. [16] 茹天峰, 李菲虹, 陈佩, 等. 关节活动训练系统治疗深度烧伤后关节功能障碍的临床效果[J]. 中华烧伤杂志,2017,33(5): 267-271. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2017.05.003. [17] 刘美快, 徐乐义, 李海燕, 等. 肌电生物反馈疗法改善脑卒中患者腓肠肌形态结构的超声研究[J].中国康复医学杂志,2020,35(7):847-850. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1242.2020.07.015. [18] St-PierreDM, ChoinièreM, ForgetR, et al. Muscle strength in individuals with healed burns[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1998,79(2):155-161. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(98)90292-1. [19] PorterC, HerndonDN, BørsheimE, et al. Uncoupled skeletal muscle mitochondria contribute to hypermetabolism in severely burned adults[J]. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, 2014,307(5):E462-467. DOI: 10.1152/ajpendo.00206.2014. [20] WetzelJL, GiuffridaC, PetrazziA, et al. Comparison of measures of physiologic stress during treadmill exercise in a patient with 20% lower extremity burn injuries and healthy matched and nonmatched individuals[J]. J Burn Care Rehabil, 2000,21(4):359-366;discussion 358. DOI: 10.1067/mbc.2000.108093. [21] WillisCE, GrisbrookTL, ElliottCM, et al. Pulmonary function, exercise capacity and physical activity participation in adults following burn[J]. Burns, 2011,37(8):1326-1333. DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2011.03.016. [22] 茹天峰, 李菲虹, 袁林, 等. 阿基米德悬吊系统在深度烧伤后膝关节屈曲功能障碍康复中的临床效果[J]. 中华烧伤杂志,2019,35(6):428-433. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2019.06.006. [23] 赵海洋, 韩军涛, 刘佳琦, 等. 手持续被动运动系统联合功能训练与压力手套治疗手背部烧伤后早期瘢痕挛缩的效果[J].中华烧伤杂志,2021,37(4):319-326. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20201020-00443. [24] 田凌云, 李映兰, 吴英, 等. 压力疗法治疗增生性瘢痕患者有效性的荟萃分析[J].中华烧伤杂志,2019,35(9):668-675. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2019.09.005. [25] BermanB, MaderalA, RaphaelB. Keloids and hypertrophic scars: pathophysiology, classification, and treatment[J]. Dermatol Surg, 2017,43(Suppl 1):S3-18. DOI: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000819. [26] 刘悦, 王连召. 瘢痕综合治疗的临床实践与思考[J].中华整形外科杂志,2020,36(10):1069-1074. DOI: 10.3760/cma.cn114453-20201009-00523. [27] ShirakamiE, YamakawaS, HayashidaK. Strategies to prevent hypertrophic scar formation: a review of therapeutic interventions based on molecular evidence[J/OL]. Burns Trauma, 2020,8:tkz003[2022-04-15].https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32341924/.DOI: 10.1093/burnst/tkz003. [28] 李长顺, 崔贵祥, 冯金平, 等. 下肢功率自行车运动对脑卒中偏瘫患者步行能力的影响[J].中国康复理论与实践,2008,14(2):121-123. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2008.02.008. [29] 张小凡, 叶新华. 抗阻运动对骨骼肌胰岛素抵抗的影响机制[J].中华糖尿病杂志,2020,12(7):558-561. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115791-20200314-00148. [30] 孙天宝, 方璐, 贾延兵,等. 有氧训练对大面积烧伤患者运动功能的影响[J]. 中国康复, 2015,3:204-206.DOI: 10.3870/zgkf.2015.03.013 [31] 赵永才,高炳宏.运动诱导骨骼肌线粒体生物合成调控机制研究进展[J].中国运动学杂志,2020,39(1):79-84.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6710.2020.01.012. [32] KonopkaAR, AsanteA, LanzaIR, et al. Defects in mitochondrial efficiency and H2O2 emissions in obese women are restored to a lean phenotype with aerobic exercise training[J]. Diabetes, 2015,64(6):2104-2115. DOI: 10.2337/db14-1701. [33] 孙天宝, 郭钦, 王俊, 等. 有氧训练对大面积烧伤患者康复早期心肺功能的影响[J].中国康复医学杂志,2015,30(2):182-184. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1242.2015.02.020. [34] 吴浩, 孙兴国, 顾文超, 等. 功率自行车下肢亚极量运动对慢性阻塞性肺疾病康复影响的临床报告[J].中国应用生理学杂志,2015,31(4):382-384. DOI: 10.13459/j.cnki.cjap.2015.04.021. [35] 胡玲玉. 功率自行车对脑卒中偏瘫患者下肢肌张力及平衡功能的影响[J].医疗装备,2020,33(1):193-194. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2376.2020.01.111. -
2 下肢股四头肌萎缩和步行能力障碍患者采用功率自行车联合常规康复训练治疗前后股四头肌厚度。2A.治疗前患者右下肢股四头肌厚度为2.66 cm；2B.治疗2个月后患者右下肢股四头肌厚度为4.15 cm
表1 大面积烧伤致股四头肌萎缩和/或步行能力障碍的2组患者临床资料比较
组别 例数 性别（例） 体重（kg， 年龄（岁， 烧伤总面积（%TBSA， 下肢烧伤面积（%TBSA， 下肢Ⅲ度烧伤面积［%TBSA，M（Q1，Q3）］ 创面基本愈合时间（d， 创面基本愈合后纳入本研究时间（d， 男 女 常规训练组 20 16 4 64±11 45±10 47±8 22±8 12（8，14） 56±7 14±6 联合训练组 20 13 7 63±11 39±8 44±9 20±6 13（9，16） 59±5 13±4 统计量值 χ2=1.13 t=0.37 t=1.96 t=1.17 t=0.89 Z=0.86 t=1.63 t=0.42 P值 0.288 0.711 0.057 0.248 0.380 0.392 0.112 0.675 注：联合训练组在常规训练组常规康复训练的基础上增加功率自行车康复训练；TBSA为体表总面积 
下载: 导出CSV
表2 大面积烧伤致股四头肌萎缩和/或步行能力障碍的2组患者治疗前后股四头肌厚度比较（cm，
组别 例数 治疗前 治疗2个月后 t值 P值 常规训练组 20 2.94±0.15 3.45±0.35 5.99 <0.001 联合训练组 20 2.97±0.21 3.76±0.39 8.62 <0.001 t值 0.58 2.67 P值 0.607 0.011 注：联合训练组在常规训练组常规康复训练的基础上增加功率自行车康复训练
下载: 导出CSV
表3 大面积烧伤致股四头肌萎缩和/或步行能力障碍的2组患者治疗前后股四头肌肌力比较[N，M（Q1，Q3）]
组别 例数 治疗前 治疗2个月后 Z值 P值 常规训练组 20 88.0（83.3，98.5） 146.0（134.3，164.0） 3.92 <0.001 联合训练组 20 94.0（77.0，97.0） 170.5（147.3，176.8） 3.92 <0.001 Z值 0.46 2.69 P值 0.645 0.007 注：联合训练组在常规训练组常规康复训练的基础上增加功率自行车康复训练
下载: 导出CSV
表4 大面积烧伤致股四头肌萎缩和/或步行能力障碍的2组患者治疗前后6 min步行距离比较（m，
组别 例数 治疗前 治疗2个月后 t值 P值 常规训练组 20 290±36 429±25 13.16 <0.001 联合训练组 20 280±37 488±39 17.92 <0.001 t值 0.93 5.66 P值 0.357 <0.001 注：联合训练组在常规训练组常规康复训练的基础上增加功率自行车康复训练
下载: 导出CSV
表5 大面积烧伤致股四头肌萎缩和/或步行能力障碍的2组患者治疗前后10 m步行时长比较（s，
组别 例数 治疗前 治疗2个月后 t值 P值 常规训练组 20 16.5±3.9 9.1±1.9 7.21 <0.001 联合训练组 20 15.9±2.7 7.6±0.8 13.13 <0.001 t值 0.58 3.20 P值 0.564 0.004 注：联合训练组在常规训练组常规康复训练的基础上增加功率自行车康复训练
下载: 导出CSV
表6 大面积烧伤致股四头肌萎缩和/或步行能力障碍的2组患者治疗前后对训练效果的满意度得分比较[分，M（Q1，Q3）]
组别 例数 治疗前 治疗2个月后 Z值 P值 常规训练组 20 1（1，1） 3（3，3） 3.98 <0.001 联合训练组 20 1（0，1） 4（3，4） 4.04 <0.001 Z值 0.47 3.14 P值 0.637 0.002 注：联合训练组在常规训练组常规康复训练的基础上增加功率自行车康复训练
下载: 导出CSV
-
图(3) / 表(6)
计量
- 文章访问数: 1840
- HTML全文浏览量: 92
- PDF下载量: 70
- 被引次数: 0
