留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

负压伤口疗法治疗不同腹部手术后切口愈合不良的临床效果

王雪欣 相阳 孟尧 马兵 胡晓燕 唐洪泰 贲道锋 肖仕初

王雪欣, 相阳, 孟尧, 等. 负压伤口疗法治疗不同腹部手术后切口愈合不良的临床效果[J]. 中华烧伤杂志, 2021, 37(11): 1054-1060. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210518-00194.
引用本文: 王雪欣, 相阳, 孟尧, 等. 负压伤口疗法治疗不同腹部手术后切口愈合不良的临床效果[J]. 中华烧伤杂志, 2021, 37(11): 1054-1060. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210518-00194.
Wang XX,Xiang Y,Meng Y,et al.Clinical effects of negative pressure wound therapy in treating the poor healing of incisions after different abdominal operations[J].Chin J Burns,2021,37(11):1054-1060.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210518-00194.
Citation: Wang XX,Xiang Y,Meng Y,et al.Clinical effects of negative pressure wound therapy in treating the poor healing of incisions after different abdominal operations[J].Chin J Burns,2021,37(11):1054-1060.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210518-00194.

负压伤口疗法治疗不同腹部手术后切口愈合不良的临床效果

doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210518-00194
基金项目: 

国家自然科学基金面上项目 81871559

海军军医大学第一附属医院“234学科攀峰计划” 2019YXK045

详细信息
    通讯作者:

    肖仕初,Email:huangzhuoxiao4@hotmail.com

Clinical effects of negative pressure wound therapy in treating the poor healing of incisions after different abdominal operations

Funds: 

General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China 81871559

The 234 Subject Peak Climbing Plan of the First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University 2019YXK045

More Information
    Corresponding author: Xiao Shichu, Email: huangzhuoxiao4@hotmail.com
  • 摘要:   目的  探讨采用负压伤口疗法(NPWT)治疗不同腹部手术后切口愈合不良的临床效果。  方法  采用回顾性观察性研究。2019年6月—2020年12月,海军军医大学第一附属医院烧创伤中心收治42例腹部手术后切口愈合不良的患者,其中男29例、女13例,年龄23~81岁,腹部切口愈合不良病程3~60 d。患者入院后完善术前检查,清创后采用NPWT治疗,根据切口裂开层次将负压值设置为-10.64~-6.65 kPa。待切口血运良好,进行Ⅱ期切口缝合。统计腹部手术原因、腹部切口裂开层次和愈合不良原因,观察腹部切口最终愈合情况及并发症发生情况。  结果  本组患者出现腹部切口愈合不良的腹部手术原因按构成比排名,前4位是结肠癌(9例,占21.4%)、胆管疾病(8例,占19.0%)、肝癌(5例,占11.9%)和阑尾炎(4例,占9.5%)。腹部切口裂开层次在深筋膜层者25例(59.5%)、浅筋膜层者17例(40.5%)。腹部切口愈合不良原因按构成比排名,前3位是感染(24例,占57.1%)、脂肪液化(11例,占26.2%)、缝线反应(5例,占11.9%)。40例患者经NPWT治疗,切口血运改善,行Ⅱ期缝合,第2~3周拆除缝线,切口愈合良好;另外2例患者在使用NPWT治疗期间分别出现了肠瘘、胆漏,拆除负压装置,经充分引流和常规换药治疗后切口愈合。  结论  NPWT治疗不同腹部疾病手术后切口愈合不良,效果较佳,但临床医师需综合评估患者病情决定NPWT的使用时机和使用方式,避免肠瘘、胆漏等并发症的发生。

     

  • 1  采用负压伤口疗法(NPWT)治疗例1患者右半结肠癌切除、回结肠断端吻合术后腹部切口愈合不良。1A.NPWT治疗第5天,可见肠液外溢;1B.NPWT治疗第5天,拆除负压装置可见肠液持续外溢;1C.常规换药治疗1周,瘘口位于切口下端,肠液引流量减少;1D.常规换药治疗3周,瘘口缩小,切口新鲜,肉芽组织增生明显;1E.常规换药治疗5周,瘘口闭合,切口部分愈合;1F.常规换药治疗7周,切口愈合良好

    2  采用负压伤口疗法(NPWT)治疗例2患者胆囊切除、胆总管切开取石、胆道T型引流管置入术后腹部切口愈合不良。2A.入院时腹部切口感染、裂开;2B.NPWT治疗切口第2天;2C.使用NPWT治疗第3天,胆汁持续从切口渗出;2D.拆除负压装置,常规换药治疗3周,切口基本愈合

    表1  42例腹部切口愈合不良患者腹部手术的原因

    腹部手术原因分类及具体原因例数构成比(%)
    恶性肿瘤
    结肠癌921.4
    肝癌511.9
    胃癌37.1
    胆囊癌12.4
    胰腺癌12.4
    肾癌12.4
    前列腺癌12.4
    良性疾病
    胆管疾病819.0
    阑尾炎49.5
    消化道穿孔37.1
    结肠造口还纳24.8
    肝脓肿12.4
    脐疝12.4
    其他
    剖宫产24.8
    下载: 导出CSV

    表2  42例腹部切口愈合不良患者腹部切口裂开层次及愈合不良原因

    裂开层次及原因例数构成比(%)
    浅筋膜层1740.5
    脂肪液化1126.2
    切口感染614.3
    深筋膜层2559.5
    缝线反应511.9
    腹腔感染716.7
    切口感染1126.2
    异物排斥12.4
    营养不良12.4
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] AllegranziB, ZayedB, BischoffP, et al. New WHO recommendations on intraoperative and postoperative measures for surgical site infection prevention: an evidence-based global perspective[J]. Lancet Infect Dis, 2016, 16 (12): e288-e303. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30402-9.
    [2] 中国医师协会创伤外科医师分会. 负压封闭引流技术腹部应用指南[J]. 中华创伤杂志,2019,35(4):289-302. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-8050.2019.04.001.
    [3] Sandy-HodgettsK, LeslieGD, ParsonsR, et al. Prevention of postsurgical wound dehiscence after abdominal surgery with NPWT: a multicentre randomised controlled trial protocol[J]. J Wound Care 2017,26(Suppl 2): S23-26. DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2017.26.Sup2.S23.
    [4] 林小婷,吴美宁,谢小蔓,等. 外科手术患者医院感染的危险因素分析[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志,2015,25(15): 3497-3498,3524. DOI: 10.118116/cn.ni.2015-142020.
    [5] 刘源炜,陈必成,陈杰,等.结肠癌根治术患者术后切口感染病原菌及影响因素分析[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2018,28(15):2341-2344.DOI: 10.11816/cn.ni.2018-173279.
    [6] 陈涛,金曜.急性胆囊炎术后医院感染病原菌及影响因素[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2020,30(14):2184-2187.DOI: 10.11816/cn.ni.2020-190118.
    [7] 周建春,赵孝杰,彭启平,等.胆道手术患者胆汁培养及抗菌药物耐药性分析的临床研究[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2011,21(7):1464-1467.
    [8] 承文龙,齐永强,陈勇军.肝癌肝切除术后感染并发症相关危险因素的Meta分析[J].中华肝胆外科杂志,2016,22(1):5-8.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-8118.2016.01.002.
    [9] WellsCI, RatnayakeCBB, PerrinJ, et al. Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy in closed abdominal incisions: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials[J]. World J Surg, 2019,43(11):2779-2788. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-019-05116-6.
    [10] WillyC, AgarwalA, AndersenCA, et al. Closed incision negative pressure therapy: international multidisciplinary consensus recommendations[J]. Int Wound J, 2017, 14(2): 385- 398. DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12612.
    [11] GaoJ, WangY, SongJ, et al. Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical site infections: a systematic review and meta- analysis [J]. J Adv Nurs, 2021, 77(10):3980-3990. DOI: 10.1111/jan.14876.
    [12] JentzschT,OsterhoffG,ZwolakP,et al.Bacterial reduction and shift with NPWT after surgical debridements: a retrospective cohort study[J].Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2017,137(1):55-62.DOI: 10.1007/s00402-016-2600-z.
    [13] MoogP,JenschM,BetzlJ,et al.Bacterial bioburden of wounds: influence of debridement and negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT)[J].J Wound Care,2021,30(8):604-611.DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2021.30.8.604.
    [14] BorgquistO,IngemanssonR,MalmsjöM.Wound edge microvascular blood flow during negative-pressure wound therapy: examining the effects of pressures from -10 to -175 mmHg[J].Plast Reconstr Surg,2010,125(2):502-509.DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181c82e1f.
    [15] 谢闪亮,郭光华,闵定宏.封闭负压引流技术在创面愈合中的应用及机制研究进展[J].中华烧伤杂志,2017,33(6):397-400.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2017.06.024.
    [16] 陈孝强,张伟,李学拥.负压伤口疗法促进创面愈合的生物力学效应研究进展[J].中华烧伤杂志,2018,34(4):243-246.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.04.010.
    [17] JiS,LiuX,HuangJ,et al.Consensus on the application of negative pressure wound therapy of diabetic foot wounds[J/OL].Burns Trauma,2021,9:tkab018[2021-10-20]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34212064/. DOI: 10.1093/burnst/tkab018.
    [18] TopazM,AshkenaziI,BarzelO,et al.Minimizing treatment complexity of combat-related soft tissue injuries using a dedicated tension relief system and negative pressure therapy augmented by high-dose in situ antibiotic therapy and oxygen delivery: a retrospective study[J/OL].Burns Trauma,2021,9:tkab007[2021-10-20]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34212059/. DOI: 10.1093/burnst/tkab007.
    [19] SogorskiA,LehnhardtM,GoertzO,et al.Improvement of local microcirculation through intermittent negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT)[J].J Tissue Viability,2018,27(4):267-273.DOI: 10.1016/j.jtv.2018.08.004.
    [20] AydinD,PaulsenIF,BentzenVE,et al.Reconstruction of massive full-thickness abdominal wall defect: successful treatment with nonabsorbable mesh, negative pressure wound therapy, and split-skin grafting[J].Clin Case Rep,2016,4(10):982-985.DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.649.
    [21] BertelsenCA,FabriciusR,KleifJ,et al.Outcome of negative-pressure wound therapy for open abdomen treatment after nontraumatic lower gastrointestinal surgery: analysis of factors affecting delayed fascial closure in 101 patients[J].World J Surg,2014,38(4):774-781.DOI: 10.1007/s00268-013-2360-7.
    [22] JefferySL.The use of an antimicrobial primary wound contact layer as liner and filler with NPWT[J].J Wound Care,2018,23(8 Suppl):S3-14.DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2014.23.Sup8.S1.
    [23] 吕国忠,杨敏烈.规范应用负压伤口疗法提高创面修复水平[J].中华烧伤杂志, 2020,36(7):523-527. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200522-00280.
    [24] ZeidermanMR,PuLLQ.Contemporary approach to soft-tissue reconstruction of the lower extremity after trauma[J/OL].Burns Trauma,2021,9:tkab024[2021-10-21]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34345630/. DOI: 10.1093/burnst/tkab024.
    [25] FuX. Wound healing center establishment and new technology application in improving the wound healing quality in China[J/OL]. Burns Trauma, 2020, 8:tkaa038[2021-05-18]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33134399/. DOI: 10.1093/burnst/tkaa038.
    [26] ChengHT,HsuYC,WuCI.Efficacy and safety of negative pressure wound therapy for Szilagyi grade III peripheral vascular graft infection[J].Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg,2014,19(6):1048-1052.DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivu289.
    [27] NolffMC, Meyer-LindenbergA. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in small animal medicine. Mechanisms of action, applications and indications[J]. Tierarztl Prax Ausg K Kleintiere Heimtiere,2016,44(1):26-37; quiz 38. DOI: 10.15654/TPK-150957.
    [28] ChengB, TianJ, PengY,, et al. Iatrogenic wounds: a common but often overlooked problem[J/OL]. Burns Trauma, 2019, 7:18[2021-05-18]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31165077/. DOI: 10.1186/s41038-019-0155-2.
    [29] CristaudoA,JenningsS,GunnarssonR,et al.Complications and mortality associated with temporary abdominal closure techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Am Surg,2017,83(2):191-216.
    [30] 赵耀华, 夏成德, 邵国益, 等. 软组织分层放置自制引流管行负压伤口疗法的临床应用33例[J]. 中华烧伤杂志,2020,36(6):493-496. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20190327-00142.
    [31] SeternesA,RekstadLC,MoS,et al.Open abdomen treated with negative pressure wound therapy: indications, management and survival[J].World J Surg,2017,41(1):152-161.DOI: 10.1007/s00268-016-3694-8.
    [32] 张永存, 王亮, 鲁晋,等. 腹部巨大切口术后胀裂伴感染一例[J]. 中华烧伤杂志,2017,33(10):644-645. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2017.10.013.
    [33] 张连阳.腹部外科中的负压封闭引流现状及展望[J]. 创伤外科杂志, 2016, 18(8): 449-451. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-4237.2016.08.001.
    [34] 郑涛, 解好好, 吴秀文, 等. 全国多中心肠外瘘诊治情况调查及预后风险分析[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志,2019, 22(11): 1041-1050. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2019.11.007.
    [35] 于安星, 吴承先, 刘哲. 腹腔镜胆总管切开一期缝合术后胆漏的原因及处理方法[J]. 中华肝胆外科杂志,2016.22(7):490-492. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-8118.2016.07.018.
  • 加载中
图(2) / 表(2)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  167
  • HTML全文浏览量:  91
  • PDF下载量:  55
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2021-05-18

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回