尺动脉近端穿支皮瓣联合髂骨移植再造部分拇或手指的临床效果

张玉军; 巨积辉; 赵强; 王本元; 程贺云; 王桂洋; 侯瑞兴

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210707-00238

尺动脉近端穿支皮瓣联合髂骨移植再造部分拇或手指的临床效果

doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210707-00238

苏州大学瑞华骨科医院手外科，苏州　　215104

基金项目:

苏州市科技计划项目 SYSD2018052

详细信息

通讯作者:
巨积辉，Email：jjh2006@263.net

计量
- 文章访问数: 151
- HTML全文浏览量: 55
- PDF下载量: 20
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-07-07
- 网络出版日期: 2022-10-24

Clinical effects of proximal ulnar artery perforator flap combined with iliac bone graft in the reconstruction of subtotal thumb or finger defects

Department of Hand Surgery, Suzhou Ruihua Orthopaedic Hospital, Suzhou 215104, China

Funds:

Suzhou Science and Technology Program SYSD2018052

More Information

Corresponding author: Ju Jihui, Email: jjh2006@263.net

摘要

摘要: 目的探讨应用尺动脉近端穿支皮瓣联合髂骨移植再造部分拇、手指的临床效果。方法采用回顾性观察性研究方法。2016年8月—2019年8月，苏州大学附属瑞华医院收治7例符合入选标准的机械损伤致拇、手指毁损患者，其中男6例、女1例，年龄46~58岁。均采用髂骨移植恢复指体长度，切取的髂骨长度为2.0~3.0 cm，植骨后，患指皮肤软组织缺损面积为2.8 cm×2.2 cm~6.0 cm×3.2 cm，采用面积为3.0 cm×2.4 cm~6.5 cm×3.5 cm的游离尺动脉近端穿支皮瓣覆盖创面；将髂骨部供区和皮瓣供区创面直接缝合。术后1周观察皮瓣的成活情况，术后2周观察供区创面愈合情况。随访时观察和评定患指外观和感觉功能，骨愈合情况及供区创面瘢痕增生情况；末次随访时，参照中华医学会手外科学会上肢部分功能评定试用标准评价患指的功能恢复情况。结果术后1周，皮瓣均成活。术后2周，髂骨部及前臂供区创面均愈合。随访5~13个月，皮瓣外观良好，无明显色素沉着；5例患者感觉功能恢复到S₂级，2例患者感觉功能恢复到S₀级；移植的髂骨均骨性愈合，无明显骨吸收；供区创面愈合良好，仅有轻度瘢痕形成。末次随访时，再造指外形与健侧指接近，功能评定：优3例、良4例。结论应用尺动脉近端穿支皮瓣联合髂骨移植再造部分拇、手指，可恢复部分外形及功能，供区损伤较小，是对再造指外观及功能期望值不高者的一种较好选择。
- 显微外科手术 /
- 外科皮瓣 /
- 指损伤 /
- 组织移植 /
- 创面修复
Abstract: Objective To explore the clinical effects of proximal ulnar artery perforator flap combined with iliac bone graft in the reconstruction of subtotal thumb or finger defects. Methods A retrospective observational study was conducted. From August 2016 to August 2019, 7 patients with thumb or finger defects caused by mechanical damage who met the inclusion criteria were admitted to Ruihua Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, including 6 males and 1 female, aged 46 to 58 years. Their length of fingers was repaired with iliac bone, with length of 2.0 to 3.0 cm. After the bone graft, the skin defect area of the affected finger ranged from 2.8 cm×2.2 cm to 6.0 cm×3.2 cm. Then the free proximal ulnar artery perforator flap with area of 3.0 cm×2.4 cm to 6.5 cm×3.5 cm was used to cover the wounds. The wounds in donor sites of iliac crest and flap were directly sutured. The survival of flap in one week post surgery and the donor site wound healing in 2 weeks post surgery were observed, respectively. During the follow-up, the appearance and sensory function of the affected finger, bone healing, and scar hypertrophy of wound in the donor site were observed and evaluated. At the last follow-up, the functional recovery of the affected finger was evaluated with trial standard for the evaluation of functions of the upper limbs of the Hand Surgery Society of Chinese Medical Association. Results In one week post surgery, all the flaps survived. In 2 weeks post surgery, the iliac bone and the wounds in forearm donor site healed. During the follow-up of 5 to 13 months, the flap was good in appearance, without obvious pigmentation; the sensory recovery reached level S₂ in 5 patients and S₀ in 2 patients; all the grafted iliac bones were bony union without obvious resorption; the wounds in donor site healed well, with only mild scar formation. At the last follow-up, the shape of the reconstructed finger was close to the healthy finger, and the functional evaluation results were excellent in 3 cases and good in 4 cases. Conclusions The use of proximal ulnar artery perforator flap combined with iliac bone graft to reconstruct subtotal thumb or finger can partially restore part of the appearance and function, with less damage to the donor site. It is a good choice for patients who have low expectations of appearance and function for the reconstructed finger.
- Microsurgery /
- Surgical flaps /
- Finger injuries /
- Tissue transplantation /
- Wound repair
所有作者均声明不存在利益冲突

HTML全文

1 游离左尺动脉近端穿支皮瓣联合髂骨移植再造部分左拇指。1A.术前，左拇指近末节部分皮肤软组织发黑、坏死；1B.术中，左拇指末节指骨缺血、坏死；1C.切除左拇指坏死组织后见指骨及皮肤软组织缺损；1D.切取髂骨；1E.左尺动脉近端穿支皮瓣切取中；1F.髂骨克氏针交叉固定及皮瓣移植中；1G.术后2周，皮瓣成活；1H.术后3个月，X线片示骨愈合良好，骨折线消失；1I.术后3个月，X线片示内固定取出后无骨吸收，左、右图分别为正位、斜位；1J、1K、1L.均为术后13个月随访图，依次分别显示左拇指皮瓣外观、对指功能良好，左拇指长度与健侧接近，左前臂供区瘢痕轻微

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

参考文献(36)

[1]	程国良.中国足趾移植拇手指再造的发展与提高[J].中华显微外科杂志,2017,40(1):5-7.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-2036.2017.01.003.
[2]	王增涛.拇指及手指的全形再造[J].中华显微外科杂志,2020,43(5):424-434.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441206-20200824-00328.
[3]	李雷,巨积辉,崔龙杰,等.拇趾甲皮瓣与第2足趾侧方皮瓣同蒂修复电烧伤后拇指缺如[J].中华烧伤杂志,2015,31(2):137-139.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2015.02.015.
[4]	吕文涛,巨积辉,刘跃飞,等.𧿹甲皮瓣联合第二趾胫侧皮瓣加髂骨植骨修复拇指末节缺损[J].中华手外科杂志,2013,29(4):220-222.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-054X.2013.04.012.
[5]	潘达德,顾玉东,侍德,等.中华医学会手外科学会上肢部分功能评定试用标准[J].中华手外科杂志,2000,16(3):130-135.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-054X.2000.03.003.
[6]	曹胜军,王凌峰,巴特,等.足趾复合组织瓣游离移植再造电烧伤致坏死拇指四例[J].中华烧伤杂志,2019,35(10):761-763.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2019.10.011.
[7]	唐举玉,魏在荣,张世民,等.穿支皮瓣的临床应用原则专家共识[J].中华显微外科杂志,2016,39(2):105-106.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-2036.2016.02.001.
[8]	ZhangGL,JuJH,ZhaoQ,et al.Combined ipsilateral and contralateral second toe flaps for repair of finger degloving injury[J].Microsurgery,2014,34(7):540-546.DOI: 10.1002/micr.22253.
[9]	周健辉,周丽杏,冷树立,等.𧿹甲皮瓣联合足底内侧皮瓣再造Ⅱ和Ⅲ度缺损手指[J].中华显微外科杂志,2018,41(5):492-494.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-2036.2018.05.020.
[10]	李木卫,马立峰,张喆,等.携带部分末节趾骨的𧿹甲瓣联合髂骨植骨再造Ⅲ度缺损的拇指[J].中华显微外科杂志,2018,41(2):129-132.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-2036.2018.02.007.
[11]	李雷,巨积辉,邓伟,等.𧿹甲皮瓣联合尺动脉腕上皮支下行支皮瓣并髂骨植骨再造拇指[J].中华手外科杂志,2019,35(5):395-397.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-054X.2019.05.029.
[12]	刘毅.重视供区的美容修复[J].中华烧伤杂志,2020,36(2):81-84.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2020.02.001.
[13]	杜伟力,沈余明,胡骁骅,等.供瓣区美学修复方法的探讨[J].中华烧伤杂志,2020,36(2):97-105.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2020.02.004.
[14]	王凯,巨积辉,金光哲,等.髂骨联合同蒂𧿹趾甲皮瓣和足背皮瓣分区再造拇指近节平面缺损[J].中华整形外科杂志,2019,35(2):162-165.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-4598.2019.02.012.
[15]	ZhangG,JuJ,LiL,et al.Combined two foot flaps with iliac bone graft for reconstruction of the thumb[J].J Hand Surg Eur Vol,2016,41(7):745-752.DOI: 10.1177/1753193415626586.
[16]	张玉军,巨积辉,周广良,等.游离足趾动脉皮瓣修复手指热压伤67例[J].中华烧伤杂志,2014,30(5):417-419.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2014.05.011.
[17]	周健,魏在荣,孙广峰,等.游离第3足趾胫侧微型皮瓣修复手指末节指腹皮肤软组织缺损[J].中华烧伤杂志,2019,35(3):205-208.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2019.03.008.
[18]	白辉凯,谢振军,赵国红,等.应用游离尺动脉腕上皮支皮瓣修复手部小面积皮肤缺损[J].中华手外科杂志,2017,33(2):153-154.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-054X.2017.02.031.
[19]	顾荣,王海文,江新民,等.“U”形修薄髂腹股沟皮瓣移植修复四肢皮肤软组织缺损[J].中华显微外科杂志,2016,39(4):340-343.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-2036.2016.04.008.
[20]	PanJD, LiMZ, HuangYP,et al. Pure perforator free sensory proximal ulnar artery perforator flap for resurfacing hand defects[J]. J Int Med Res,2020,48(5): 30300060520922396.DOI: 10.1177/0300060520922396.
[21]	柯于海,李征,周望高,等.前臂近端尺动脉穿支皮瓣修复手指指背软组织缺损[J].中华显微外科杂志,2020,43(6):592-594.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441206-20190903-00297.
[22]	郭俊建,朱创新,胡前平.游离尺动脉近端穿支皮瓣修复手部创面[J].中华手外科杂志,2020,36(6):439-440.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn311653-20191217-00343.
[23]	王思月,王钦航,冯满林,等.带感觉神经的尺动脉近端穿支皮瓣修复手指掌侧皮肤缺损[J].中华手外科杂志,2016,32(3):233-234.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-054X.2016.03.031.
[24]	潘佳栋,李苗钟,王科杰,等.改良法重建感觉的近端尺动脉穿支皮瓣修复相邻指腹缺损的临床观察[J].中华显微外科杂志,2018,41(4):329-333.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-2036.2018.04.004.
[25]	赵海洋,韩军涛,刘佳琦,等.手持续被动运动系统联合功能训练与压力手套治疗手背部烧伤后早期瘢痕挛缩的效果[J].中华烧伤杂志,2021,37(4):319-326.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20201020-00443.
[26]	张广亮,侯瑞兴,李祥军,等.游离第2趾胫侧皮瓣结合压力治疗修复指腹缺损[J].实用手外科杂志,2013,27(3):341-343,351.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2722.2013.03.012.
[27]	唐辉,徐永清,郑天娥.硫酸钙治疗骨缺损的研究进展[J].中华创伤杂志,2009,25(1):82-85.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-8050.2009.01.24.
[28]	李雷,巨积辉,崔龙杰,等.𧿹甲皮瓣联合足背皮瓣移植并髂骨植骨拇指再造5例[J].中华手外科杂志,2016,32(5):325-328.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-054X.2016.05.002.
[29]	熊胜,巨积辉,金光哲,等.游离同侧多块小腿腓浅动脉穿支皮瓣修复手部多发创面效果观察[J].中华烧伤杂志,2019,35(9):655-660.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2019.09.003.
[30]	GuiottoM, di SummaPG, ArgentinoG,et al. The proximal ulnar perforator flap (PUPF) for hand digital reconstruction:an anatomical study[J]. J Plast Surg Hand Surg,2021,55(4):255-259.DOI: 10.1080/2000656X.2021.1873793.
[31]	MathyJA, MoaveniZ, TanST. Perforator anatomy of the ulnar forearm fasciocutaneous flap[J].J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg,2012,65(8):1076-1082.DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2012.03.010.
[32]	SiegP, BierwolfS. Ulnar versus radial forearm flap in head and neck reconstruction: an experimental and clinical study[J]. Head Neck,2001,23(11):967-971.DOI: 10.1002/hed.1140.
[33]	王思夏,战杰,孙鹏.尺动脉近段穿支皮瓣修复手指软组织缺损11例[J].中华显微外科杂志,2020,43(5):492-494.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441206-20200214-00057.
[34]	YuPR, ChangEI, SelberJC,et al. Perforator patterns of the ulnar artery perforator flap[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg,2012,129(1):213-220.DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182362a9c.
[35]	EbraheimNA, ElgafyH, XuR. Bone-graft harvesting from iliac and fibular donor sites: techniques and complications[J]. J Am Acad Orthop Surg,2001,9(3):210-218.DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200105000-00007.
[36]	王延玲,常艳,李三亮,等.高频彩色多普勒超声辅助下拇指尺侧指背动脉逆行岛状皮瓣修复同指远端皮肤软组织缺损的方法与效果[J].中华烧伤杂志,2021,37(6):555-561.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210223-00063.