膜诱导技术联合局部肌皮瓣修复大转子区窦腔型压力性损伤的临床疗效

佟琳; 张万福; 韩飞; 官浩

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20231029-00144

膜诱导技术联合局部肌皮瓣修复大转子区窦腔型压力性损伤的临床疗效

doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20231029-00144

空军军医大学第一附属医院全军烧伤中心，烧伤与皮肤外科，西安　　710032

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金面上项目 82272268

详细信息

通讯作者:
官浩，Email：guanhao@hotmail.com

计量
- 文章访问数: 175
- HTML全文浏览量: 46
- PDF下载量: 26
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2023-10-29

Clinical efficacy of membrane induction technique combined with local myocutaneous flap in repairing sinus cavity pressure injury in the greater trochanteric region

Department of Burns and Cutaneous Surgery, Burn Center of PLA, the First Affiliated Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an 710032, China

Funds:

General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China 82272268

More Information

Corresponding author: Guan Hao, Email: guanhao@hotmail.com

摘要

摘要: 目的探讨膜诱导技术联合局部肌皮瓣修复大转子区窦腔型压力性损伤的临床疗效。方法该研究为回顾性病例系列研究。2020年1月—2023年1月，空军军医大学第一附属医院烧伤与皮肤外科收治12例符合入选标准的大转子区窦腔型压力性损伤且伴有不同程度感染的患者，其中男8例、女4例，年龄42~76岁，单侧大转子区压力性损伤者9例、双侧大转子区压力性损伤者3例，3例患者并发脓毒症。清创前压力性损伤创面外口面积为1.5 cm×1.0 cm~3.0 cm×3.0 cm，术中清创时测量的内腔面积为10.0 cm×8.5 cm~20.0 cm×10.0 cm。改善全身一般状况后，Ⅰ期行清创后抗生素骨水泥覆盖/填塞，Ⅱ期移植面积为10.0 cm×9.0 cm~22.5 cm×11.5 cm局部肌皮瓣修复创面，将供瓣区创面直接缝合。对比所有患者Ⅰ期术前与Ⅰ期术后7 d的白细胞计数、C反应蛋白、降钙素原、红细胞沉降率等炎症指标水平及创面分泌物标本微生物培养阳性比，记录并发脓毒症患者Ⅰ期术前与Ⅰ期术后3 d精神状况、体温、心率、呼吸频率，观察所有患者Ⅱ期术后局部肌皮瓣成活及创面愈合情况，随访所有患者压力性损伤复发情况及肌皮瓣外观和质地。结果 12例患者Ⅰ期术后7 d的白细胞计数、C反应蛋白水平、降钙素原水平、红细胞沉降率均较Ⅰ期术前明显下降（t值分别为6.67、7.71、2.72、3.52，P<0.05）；Ⅰ期术后7 d创面分泌物标本微生物培养阳性比为2/12，较Ⅰ期术前的11/12明显降低（P<0.05）。3例并发脓毒症患者Ⅰ期术后3 d精神状况较Ⅰ期术前明显好转，体温恢复正常，心率<90次/min，呼吸频率<20次/min。共15个创面经局部肌皮瓣移植修复，Ⅱ期术后14个局部肌皮瓣存活良好，创面愈合；1个局部肌皮瓣远端少部分坏死，经床旁清创缝合后14 d愈合。Ⅱ期术后随访3~24个月，所有患者压力性损伤均未复发，肌皮瓣不臃肿，肌皮瓣颜色与周围皮肤组织近似且质地柔软。结论采用膜诱导技术联合局部肌皮瓣治疗大转子区窦腔型压力性损伤，可以通过抗生素骨水泥的覆盖/填塞降低患者全身炎症指标水平，减轻创面处的细菌负荷，形成诱导膜，为后期创面修复提供良好基础；局部肌皮瓣展现出了成活率高、并发症少、外观佳的良好临床效果，术后压力性损伤复发率低。
- 压力性溃疡 /
- 外科皮瓣 /
- 膜诱导技术 /
- 创面修复 /
- 大转子 /
- 局部肌皮瓣
Abstract: Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of membrane induction technique combined with local myocutaneous flap in repairing sinus cavity pressure injury in the greater trochanteric region. Methods The study was a retrospective case series study. From January 2020 to January 2023, 12 patients with sinus cavity pressure injury in the greater trochanteric region combined with varying degrees of infection who met the inclusion criteria were admitted to the Department of Burns and Cutaneous Surgery of the First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University, including 8 males and 4 females, aged 42-76 years. There were 9 patients with unilateral greater trochanteric pressure injury and 3 patients with bilateral greater trochanteric pressure injury. Three patients were complicated with sepsis. The external wound opening area of pressure injury before debridement was 1.5 cm×1.0 cm-3.0 cm×3.0 cm, and the internal cavity area measured during intraoperative debridement was 10.0 cm×8.5 cm-20.0 cm×10.0 cm. After the general condition of the whole body was improved, the covering/filling with antibiotic bone cement after debridement was performed in stage Ⅰ, the wound was repaired with local myocutaneous flap with the area of 10.0 cm×9.0 cm-22.5 cm×11.5 cm in stage Ⅱ, and the wound in the donor area was sutured directly. The levels of inflammatory indexes including white blood cell count, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate, as well as the positive proportions of bacterial culture in wound exudation samples of all patients before and at 7 days after stage Ⅰ surgery were compared. The mental status, body temperature, heart rate, and respiratory rate of patients complicated with sepsis before and at 3 days after stage Ⅰ surgery were recorded. The survival of local myocutaneous flap and wound healing were observed in all patients after stage Ⅱ surgery. The recurrence of pressure injury and the appearance and texture of the myocutaneous flap were followed up in all patients. Results Compared with those before stage Ⅰ surgery, the white blood cell count, C-reactive protein level, procalcitonin level, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate of 12 patients at 7 days after stage Ⅰ surgery were significantly decreased (with t values of 6.67, 7.71, 2.72, and 3.52, respectively, P<0.05). The proportion of positive bacterial culture in wound exudation samples at 7 days after stage Ⅰ surgery was 2/12, which was significantly lower than 11/12 before stage Ⅰ surgery (P<0.05). The mental state of 3 patients complicated with sepsis improved significantly at 3 days after stage Ⅰ surgery, which was improved as compared with that before stage Ⅰ surgery, their body temperature returned to normal, heart rate was <90 times/min, and respiratory rate was <20 times/min. A total of 15 wounds were repaired by local myocutaneous flaps, 14 local myocutaneous flaps survived well after stage Ⅱ surgery and the wounds were healed, while a partial necrosis occurred at the distal end of one local myocutaneous flap, which was healed at 14 days after bedside debridement and suturing. Follow-up for 3 to 24 months after stage Ⅱ surgery showed that the pressure injury was not recurrent in any patient, the flap was not bloated, the color of the myocutaneous flap was similar to the surrounding skin tissue, and the myocutaneous flap was soft in texture. Conclusions Membrane induction technique combined with local myocutaneous flap in the treatment of sinus cavity pressure injury in the greater trochanteric region can decrease the systematic levels of inflammatory indexes of patients and reduce the bacterial load of the wound by covering or filling with antibiotic bone cement, and form the induction membrane to provide a good basis for later wound repair. The local myocutaneous flap shows good clinical effects including a high survival rate, few complications, good appearance, and low recurrence rate of postoperative pressure injury.
- Pressure ulcer /
- Surgical flaps /
- Membrane induction technique /
- Wound repair /
- Greater trochanter /
- Local myocutaneous flap
佟琳：撰写文章、分析数据并实施手术；张万福：酝酿和设计研究并实施手术；韩飞：病例随访以及数据采集；官浩：对文章知识性内容进行批判性审阅，提供经费、技术支持

所有作者均声明不存在利益冲突

HTML全文

参考文献(31)

[1]	张伟,黄红军,张俊峰,等.Ⅲ期与Ⅳ期压疮患者入院时并发下肢深静脉血栓形成情况及其危险因素[J].中华烧伤与创面修复杂志,2022,38(6):549-554.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210419-00134.
[2]	HajhosseiniB,LongakerMT,GurtnerGC.Pressure injury[J].Ann Surg,2020,271(4):671-679.DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003567.
[3]	MunozN,PosthauerME.Nutrition strategies for pressure injury management: implementing the 2019 International Clinical Practice Guideline[J].Nutr Clin Pract,2022,37(3):567-582.DOI: 10.1002/ncp.10762.
[4]	周孝亮,涂家金,叶华,等.岛状股后复合组织瓣修复坐骨结节及大转子区窦腔型压疮的临床效果[J].中华烧伤与创面修复杂志,2023,39(1):65-70.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20220420-00148.
[5]	SimsicJM,DolanK,HowitzS,et al.Prevention of pressure ulcers in a pediatric cardiac intensive care unit[J].Pediatr Qual Saf,2019,4(3):e162.DOI: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000162.
[6]	ChengJ,ZhangQ,FengS,et al.Clover-style fasciocutaneous perforator flap for reconstruction of massive sacral pressure sores[J].Ann Plast Surg,2021,86(1):62-66.DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002442.
[7]	刘本全,董德升,史明艳,等.En bloc切除清创联合臀大肌肌瓣治疗坐骨结节压疮合并慢性骨髓炎的临床效果[J].中华烧伤与创面修复杂志,2022,38(4):363-368.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210122-00032.
[8]	孙佳琳,郭鹏飞,崔正军,等.臀上动脉穿支接力皮瓣修复骶尾部压疮的临床效果[J].中华烧伤杂志,2020,36(8):726-729.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20190607-00265.
[9]	SingerM,DeutschmanCS,SeymourCW,et al.The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3)[J].JAMA,2016,315(8):801-810.DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
[10]	MangramAJ,HoranTC,PearsonML,et al.Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee[J].Am J Infect Control,1999,27(2):97-132; quiz 133-134; discussion 96.
[11]	WeissSL,PetersMJ,AlhazzaniW,et al.Surviving sepsis campaign international guidelines for the management of septic shock and sepsis-associated organ dysfunction in children[J].Pediatr Crit Care Med,2020,21(2):e52-e106.DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002198.
[12]	KimS,BishopAR,SquireMW,et al.Mechanical, elution, and antibacterial properties of simplex bone cement loaded with vancomycin[J].J Mech Behav Biomed Mater,2020,103:103588.DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103588.
[13]	钟云雪,李莉,王达利,等.扩创联合抗生素骨水泥在严重感染糖尿病足溃疡治疗中的应用研究[J/CD].中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版),2022,17(1):60-64.DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2022.01.010.
[14]	LiuC,YouJX,ChenYX,et al.Effect of induced membrane formation followed by polymethylmethacrylate implantation on diabetic foot ulcer healing when revascularization is not feasible[J].J Diabetes Res,2019,2019:2429136.DOI: 10.1155/2019/2429136.
[15]	肖伟平.改良V-Y臀大肌筋膜皮瓣在骶部褥疮治疗中的应用[J].首都医科大学学报,2012,33(4):552-553.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7795.2012.04.028.
[16]	赵行琪,余斌,胡岩君.感染性骨缺损局部抗生素载体的临床应用[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2019,21(2):173-181.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-7600.2019.02.014.
[17]	LiuX,LiangJ,ZaoJ,et al.Vacuum sealing drainage treatment combined with antibiotic-impregnated bone cement for treatment of soft tissue defects and infection[J].Med Sci Monit,2016,22:1959-1965.DOI: 10.12659/msm.896108.
[18]	陈华,高磊,程景波,等.负压封闭引流下骨水泥联合股后带蒂肌皮瓣移植治疗坐骨结节Ⅳ期压疮的疗效分析[J].中国美容整形外科杂志,2022,33(6):350-352,362.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-7040.2022.06.010.
[19]	陈伟,常树森,周健,等.抗生素骨水泥联合游离股前外侧组织瓣序贯治疗糖尿病足溃疡的临床疗效[J].中华烧伤与创面修复杂志,2023,39(4):319-324.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20220628-00267.
[20]	CalhounJH,AngerDM,LedbetterBR,et al.The Ilizarov fixator and polymethylmethacrylate-antibiotic beads for the treatment of infected deformities[J].Clin Orthop Relat Res,1993(295):13-22.
[21]	姜金珠,王少根,丁云林,等.皮瓣转移联合负压创面治疗技术一期修复复杂压疮创面[J].中国美容医学,2022,31(9):18-22.DOI: 10.15909/j.cnki.cn61-1347/r.005239.
[22]	孙丽欣,郝秋华,王虹,等.银离子敷料联合水凝胶在疮面治疗中的效果观察[J].中国美容医学,2013,22(8):811-812.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-6455.2013.08.005.
[23]	韦铭,杨诚勇,蓝芳令,等.太极皮瓣联合庆大霉素骨水泥治疗骶尾部巨大压疮效果观察[J].山东医药,2020,60(26):83-85.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-266X.2020.26.023.
[24]	王莎,王超.银离子敷料在慢性难愈性创面愈合中的抗菌作用及促进创面愈合疗效[J].中华实验外科杂志,2021,38(12):2476-2479.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn421213-20210506-01141.
[25]	李嵩鹏,郑威,徐振文,等.抗生素骨水泥覆盖治疗感染性创面的疗效观察[J].创伤外科杂志,2021,23(7):522-527.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-4237.2021.07.011.
[26]	范金柱,从飞,任小宇,等.皮瓣联合膜诱导技术治疗创伤后胫骨骨髓炎伴软组织缺损[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2022,36(5):614-618.DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.202201031.
[27]	孙勇,宋建东,王峰,等.太极皮瓣联合万古霉素骨水泥串珠治疗骶尾部压力性损伤13例[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2022,30(3):62-64,69.
[28]	王欣,梁尊鸿,黄阳君,等.多部位难愈性压疮的个体化序贯性治疗[J/CD].中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版),2019,14(4):300-302.DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2019.04.012.
[29]	BambaR,MaddenJJ,HoffmanAN,et al.Flap reconstruction for pressure ulcers: an outcomes analysis[J].Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open,2017,5(1):e1187.DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001187.
[30]	LuoJ,CarterGC,AgarwalJP,et al.The 5-factor modified frailty index as a predictor of 30-day complications in pressure ulcer repair[J].J Surg Res,2021,265:21-26.DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.03.011.
[31]	韩涛,郝建强,李文波,等.抗生素骨水泥治疗骨关节感染的优势与问题[J].中国组织工程研究,2023,27(3):470-477.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

1 膜诱导技术联合臀部肌皮瓣修复患者大转子区窦腔型压力性损伤的效果。1A.入院后，CT检查可见左侧股骨头缺如（箭头所指），周围结构紊乱；1B.清创前左侧大转子区压力性损伤创面伴有明显的潜行窦腔；1C.Ⅰ期清创（去除坏死骨质）+抗生素（万古霉素）骨水泥填塞后即刻；1D.Ⅰ期术后7 d于臀部健康皮肤设计臀部肌皮瓣；1E.Ⅱ期转移臀部肌皮瓣修复大转子区压力性损伤术后即刻；1F.Ⅱ期术后12个月随访，患者压力性损伤未复发，肌皮瓣外观好、无臃肿

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表1 12例大转子区窦腔型压力性损伤患者Ⅰ期术前和Ⅰ期术后7 d炎症指标水平比较（x¯±s）

表1. Comparison of inflammation index levels in 12 patients with sinus cavity pressure injury in the greater trochanteric region before and at 7 days after stage Ⅰ surgery