Wang Yanqiong, Huang Jianqiong, Wu Zhihui, et al. Effects of stepwise acute pain management on acute pain and post-traumatic stress disorder in children with burns: a prospective randomized controlled study[J]. Chin j Burns, 2021, 37(3): 237-242. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200210-00048
Citation: Wang Ai, Ma Wenguo, Wang Chengde, et al. Clinical effects of autologous platelet rich plasma gel combined with vacuum sealing drainage techno-logy in repairing refractory wounds[J]. Chin j Burns, 2021, 37(1): 42-48. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200105-00004

Clinical effects of autologous platelet rich plasma gel combined with vacuum sealing drainage techno-logy in repairing refractory wounds

doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200105-00004
  • Received Date: 2020-01-05
    Available Online: 2021-10-28
  • Publish Date: 2021-01-20
  • Objective To investigate the clinical effects of autologous platelet rich plasma (PRP) gel in combination with vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) technology in repairing refractory wounds. Methods From March 2011 to January 2015, 44 patients with refractory wounds meeting the inclusion criteria were recruited into VSD alone group, who were admitted to the Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery of the Yidu Central Hospital of Weifang and received intermittent VSD treatment. From February 2015 to September 2019, 43 patients with refractory wounds meeting the inclusion criteria were recruited into PRP+ VSD group, who were admitted to the same unit as above-mentioned and received PRP combined with intermittent VSD treatment. The retrospective cohort study was conducted. There were 24 males and 20 females with age of (37.5±2.2) years in VSD alone group, and there were 25 males and 18 females with age of (37.0±2.5) years in PRP+ VSD group. The wound exudate of patients in the two groups before and 7 and 14 d after the first treatment were collected for bacterial culture, and the positive rate of bacterial culture was calculated. The wound healing of patients in the two groups was observed on 7, 14, and 21 d after the first treatment, and the wound healing rate was calculated. The complete wound healing time of patients in the two groups was recorded. The degree of wound pain of patients in the two groups was evaluated by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) before and 14 d after the first treatment. The scar hyperplasia of patients in the two groups was evaluated by the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) in 1 and 2 months after the wound healed completely. The occurrence of adverse reactions of patients in the two groups during the whole period of treatment was observed and the incidence of adverse reactions was calculated. Data were statistically analyzed with analysis of variance for repeated measurement, chi-square test, paired

    t

    test, and Bonferroni correction. Results The positive rates of bacterial culture in wound exudate of patients in PRP+ VSD on 7 and 14 d after the first treatment were 37.2% (16/43) and 11.6% (5/43), which were significantly lower than 56.8% (25/44) and 29.5% (13/44) in VSD alone group,

    χ

    2=4.212, 4.255,

    P

    <0.05. The wound healing rates of patients in PRP+ VSD group on 7 and 14, and 21 d after the first treatment were respectively (58±14)%, (70±13)%, (89±12)%, which were significantly higher than (41±11)%, (60±11)%, (74±12)% in VSD alone group,

    t

    =6.323, 3.820, 5.751,

    P

    <0.01. The complete wound healing time of patients in PRP+ VSD group was (30±6) d, which was significantly shorter than (61±8) d in VSD alone group,

    t

    =20.890,

    P

    <0.05. The VAS score of patients in PRP+ VSD group was significantly lower than that in VSD alone group on 14 d after the first treatment (

    t

    =13.904,

    P

    <0.01). The VSS score of patients in PRP+ VSD group was significantly lower than that in VSD alone group in 1 and 2 months after the wound healed completely (

    t

    =3.307, 3.637,

    P

    <0.01). The incidence of adverse reactions of patients in PRP+ VSD group during the whole period of treatment was 7.0% (3/43), which was significantly lower than 22.7% (10/44) in VSD alone group,

    χ

    2=4.245,

    P

    <0.05. Conclusions Autologous PRP gel combined with VSD technology in repairing refractory wounds not only has good bacteriostatic effect, but also can increase wound healing rate, shorten wound healing time, alleviate wound pain, reduce scar hyperplasia, with less adverse reaction, which is worthy of promotion.

     

  • Relative Articles

    [1]Zhou Rixing, Dong Yongsheng, Zhou Wangbiao. Treatment of chronic refractory wound with autologous platelet-rich plasma in a hemophilia A patient after knee joint surgery[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2022, 38(4): 369-372. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210202-00045
    [2]Jiang Shan, Li Kang, Xiong Yan, Xie Kun, Qi Xin, Wen Bing. Clinical application of negative-pressure wound therapy in uncomplicated cardiac pacemaker pocket infection[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2021, 37(3): 288-291. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20201030-00450
    [3]Lyu Guozhong, Yang Minlie. Normative application of negative-pressure wound therapy to improve the wound repair level[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2020, 36(7): 523-527. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200522-00280
    [4]Li Shaohui, Zhang Wanfu, Hu Xiaolong, Wang Yunchuan, Han Fei, Ji Peng, Han Fu, Hu Dahai, Guan Hao. Clinical application of negative-pressure wound therapy in split-thickness skin grafting at hard-to-fix sites[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2020, 36(7): 528-533. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200224-00086
    [5]Jiang Tao, Wu Hangqing, Cao Tong, Song Deheng, Zhang Jianjun. Debridement combined with negative-pressure wound therapy and local flap for treating a case of stingray sting[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2020, 36(9): 873-875. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20190714-00298
    [6]Yang Minlie, Zhou Xiaojin, Zhu Yugang, Jiang Donglin, Ding Lintao, Chu Guoping, Zhao Peng, Cheng Jia, Lyu Guozhong, Li Qingfeng. Clinical efficacy and influencing factors of different modes of continuous negative pressure wound therapy on venous ulcer wounds of lower limbs[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2020, 36(12): 1149-1158. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200316-00173
    [7]Li Xueli, Jiang Lei, Huang Yong, Che Haijie. One patient with poor healing of sinus after implant of vascular prosthesis due to infected abdominal aortic aneurysms treated with negative pressure wound therapy combined with local flap[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2020, 36(2): 133-136. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2020.02.010
    [8]Li Fang, Li Quan, Wang Lingfeng. Advances in the research of effects of mesenchymal stem cells, exosomes, and platelet-rich plasma in wound repair[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2019, 35(10): 764-768. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2019.10.012
    [9]Li Yang, Zheng Jiansheng, Wang Biao, Xue Wenjiao. Effects of autologous platelet-rich plasma in the repair of soft tissue defects of rabbits with free flap[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2019, 35(9): 683-689. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2019.09.007
    [10]Feng Guang, Hao Daifeng, Yao Dan, Zhang Xinjian, Yang Yi. Clinical effects of autologous platelet-rich plasma gel in the repair of chronic wounds[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2019, 35(6): 451-455. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2019.06.010
    [11]Yang Sisi, Xiao Chengzhi. Advances in the research of effects of autologous platelet-rich plasma on the treatment of burn wounds[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2018, 34(12): 910-913. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.12.017
    [12]Chen Xiaoqiang, Zhang Wei, Li Xueyong. Advances in the research of biomechanical effects of negative-pressure wound therapy in promoting wound healing[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2018, 34(4): 243-246. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.04.010
    [13]Lei Xiaoxuan, Xu Pengcheng, Zhang Lei, Pang Mengru, Tian Ju, Cheng Biao. Effects of human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells and platelet-rich plasma on healing of wounds with full-thickness skin defects in mice[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2018, 34(12): 887-894. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.12.013
    [15]Liu Yang, Hu Dahai. Advances in the research of molecular mechanism of negative pressure wound therapy in improving wound healing[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2017, 33(11): 718-720. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2017.11.015
    [16]Shao Huawei, Wang Xin′gang, You Chuan′gang, Han Chunmao. Advances in the research of negative-pressure wound therapy inducing the vascularization of dermal substitute[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2017, 33(8): 523-525. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2017.08.019
    [18]Hao Daifeng, Feng Guang, Li Tao, Chu Wanli, Chen Zequn, Li Shanyou, Zhang Xinjian, Zhao Jingfeng, Zhao Fan. Curative effects of platelet-rich plasma combined with negative-pressure wound therapy on sternal osteomyelitis and sinus tract after thoracotomy[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2016, 32(6): 331-335. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2016.06.004
    [19]ZHOU Ye-ping. Current situation of negative-pressure wound therapy[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2011, 27(4): 253-254. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2011.04.003
    [20]HU Kai-xuan, ZHANG Hong-wei, ZHOU Fang, YAO Gang, Sill Jing- ping, CHENG Zhi, WANG Li-fu, HOU Zuo-qiong. Observation on the therapeutic effects of negative-pressure wound therapy on the treatment of complicated and refractory wounds[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2009, 25(4): 249-252.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(57)

    1. 林传兴,陈建崇,黄家欣,温雪晶,张斌斌. 湿润烧伤膏联合PRP治疗糖尿病足溃疡的效果. 中国医学创新. 2025(07): 60-63 .
    2. 吕姣姣,吴巧珍. 实施负压封闭引流干预对骨科下肢手术患者手术创面及自我疼痛评价的影响. 山西医药杂志. 2024(04): 275-278 .
    3. 苏锦绣,黎莹,石庆芬,汪莉. 自体富血小板血浆在慢性创面治疗中的应用研究进展. 微创医学. 2024(01): 72-74 .
    4. 郭忠梁,刘元媛,刘应平,王静,徐敏,王国昌. 胸壁窦道病人应用富血小板血浆凝胶联合负压封闭引流的临床疗效观察. 临床外科杂志. 2024(03): 318-322 .
    5. 葛星月,杨雅量,李文武,竺仕林,姚明哲,唐乾利. MEBT/MEBO对糖尿病大鼠创面中CaN/NFAT信号通路表达的影响. 重庆医学. 2024(07): 965-971 .
    6. 黄红梅,李永,张选平,简丽,吴绮楠. 黄马酊联合3M液体敷料治疗慢性难愈性创面的临床效果研究. 重庆医学. 2024(09): 1433-1436 .
    7. 张倩. 持续封闭负压引流技术在难愈性创面修复中的应用效果. 中国医药导报. 2024(17): 116-119 .
    8. 夏振兰,杨晓君,周永林,杨逸禧,陈月玲,陈丽萍,刘泽炫. 造口治疗师主导富血小板血浆联合湿性敷料治疗术后不愈合慢性伤口的效果观察. 中国实用护理杂志. 2024(23): 1761-1767 .
    9. 唐代玉,赵雪瑞. 自体富血小板血浆联合负压封闭引流技术在治疗糖尿病难治性创面中的应用. 临床血液学杂志. 2024(10): 725-728 .
    10. 苏志学,刘广星,曾宏宇,黄洪然,黄小玲,唐强. 富血小板血浆联合治疗在慢性创面中的应用及作用机制研究进展. 中国医药导报. 2024(24): 49-52+73 .
    11. 保砚,范斌,黄文杰,尹安,唐兵兵. 胶原凝胶联合血肿方外敷在腹部切口愈合不良中应用效果. 中外医学研究. 2024(27): 125-128 .
    12. 祝天华,郜天田,李小雪. 自体富血小板凝胶对烧伤创面修复作用及血清炎症因子水平的影响. 罕少疾病杂志. 2024(11): 135-136+142 .
    13. 简有源,张建丹,卢占洲. 负压封闭引流技术结合肌瓣转移游离植皮在难愈性创面修复中对患者疼痛及外观满意度影响分析. 外科研究与新技术(中英文). 2024(04): 323-326 .
    14. 段东东,石华峰,谢辉,黄文文,胡寿勇,王庆伟,孙熊. 富血小板血浆联合人工皮负压吸引修复腓骨长短肌腱外露及软组织缺损的临床研究. 生物骨科材料与临床研究. 2023(01): 53-55+61 .
    15. 孙诚,付丹妹,陈建民,刘国印. 富血小板血浆联合创面负压疗法在慢性难愈性创面中的应用研究进展. 转化医学杂志. 2023(01): 69-72 .
    16. 尚立宏. 在面部烧伤整形中采用负压封闭引流技术治疗的效果. 中国医药指南. 2023(05): 94-96 .
    17. 张艳,林威钢. 负压封闭引流联合银离子敷料治疗难愈性创面的临床疗效. 浙江创伤外科. 2023(03): 464-466 .
    18. 刘宏君,张乃臣,吴凡,王天亮,袁超群,陆一鸣,张文忠. PRP在手背皮肤缺损创面的治疗. 实用手外科杂志. 2023(01): 33-35 .
    19. 骆渊城,朱滨,杨威,王奎. 益气活血生肌方对难愈性创面愈合及血管再生的影响. 中国医药导报. 2023(12): 30-34 .
    20. 赵霞,郭杏,丁晓斌,谭美云. 自体富血小板血浆联合负压吸引疗法治疗慢性创面的Meta分析. 中国美容医学. 2023(05): 71-78 .
    21. 吕德珍,曹丽,赵艮萍,陈建民,刘国印. 负压封闭引流技术在压力性损伤慢性创面修复中的治疗进展. 海南医学. 2023(13): 1967-1971 .
    22. 曾泓铭,凌小元,郑琴秀. 自体富血小板凝胶治疗难愈性糖尿病足溃疡的临床疗效分析. 糖尿病新世界. 2023(08): 168-170+174 .
    23. 刘韶轩. 自体富血小板血浆联合负压封闭引流技术在压疮创面修复中的应用效果. 临床医学. 2023(07): 62-64 .
    24. 郭莹. 经负压封闭引流技术在电击伤致截肢残端皮肤缺损患者中的应用效果. 实用中西医结合临床. 2023(12): 65-68 .
    25. 杨雅量,葛星月,李文武,竺仕林,姚明哲,唐乾利. MEBT/MEBO治疗慢性难愈合创面疗效和安全性的Meta分析. 现代医学. 2023(09): 1183-1189 .
    26. 周湘荣,林小永,郑臣校. 桃红四物汤加减方联合弹力绷带对植皮术后供皮区增生性疤痕的疗效观察. 广州中医药大学学报. 2023(11): 2764-2768 .
    27. 顾梦雪,王淑娟,聂雅悦,林倩. 负压封闭引流术结合双氧水皮瓣修复在小腿中段开放性骨折合并皮肤缺损创面修复中的应用. 临床和实验医学杂志. 2023(23): 2531-2535 .
    28. 宋承骏,王俊,刘芳,马柏强,应乐园. 富血小板血浆联合负压封闭引流对慢性难愈性创面的影响. 浙江实用医学. 2023(03): 196-199 .
    29. 鲍磊,付丹妹,陆晶,刘国印. 封闭负压引流联合富血小板血浆在压力性损伤慢性创面治疗中的研究进展. 保健医学研究与实践. 2023(10): 138-142 .
    30. 连涛,郑全好,崔国航,相阳. 富含血小板血浆凝胶技术联合VSD治疗上肢大面积皮肤脱套伤患者的效果观察. 华夏医学. 2022(01): 105-108 .
    31. 周晓春,陈晓明,王惠,芮睿,徐旭. 波动式负压引流技术在穿支皮瓣移植修复难愈性创面中的应用. 中国美容医学. 2022(02): 21-25 .
    32. 杨冠龙,王丽英,石凡超,徐绍君,王莉杰,黄红军. 封闭负压引流联合自体富血小板血浆修复糖尿病皮肤慢性难愈合创面的临床研究. 右江医学. 2022(03): 210-213 .
    33. 陈锦荣,李燕玲,蒋壮志,黄广恩. 负压封闭引流技术联合氧疗机局部治疗慢性难愈性创面的临床观察. 当代医学. 2022(11): 103-105 .
    34. 付丹妹,孙诚,陈建民,刘国印. 负压创面治疗联合富血小板血浆治疗慢性难愈性创面的研究进展. 医学研究生学报. 2022(02): 196-201 .
    35. 莫骁群,庞梦茹,孙宇,冯丹,袁媛. 自体单采富血小板血浆凝胶治疗慢性难治性创面的临床研究. 中国美容整形外科杂志. 2022(04): 222-225 .
    36. 张健,刘小龙,查天建,刘利华. 富血小板血浆在糖尿病足创面修复中的作用研究. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版). 2022(02): 131-134 .
    37. 季超,肖仕初. 负压伤口疗法在创面治疗中的临床应用及其相关研究进展. 中华烧伤与创面修复杂志. 2022(06): 585-589 . 本站查看
    38. 李忠兴,王嘉欣,何金凤,张亚辉,付永峰,任娟,单楠. 富血小板血浆对下肢慢性难愈合伤口的修复作用及外观影响. 中国美容医学. 2022(07): 51-55 .
    39. 罗玉娟,曾彪,江光荣,黄晓辉,聂艳芳. 自体富血小板血浆对难愈性烧伤创面的修复作用研究. 中国医学创新. 2022(22): 34-38 .
    40. 谢丰松,吕朝阳,陈传亮,邓磊,黄成,姜凡. VSD技术与药物治疗碱烧伤创面患者的疗效及对炎症因子的影响. 中国医师杂志. 2022(08): 1264-1266 .
    41. 朱艳玲,杨今言,王一硕,卢娟,田燕. 超脉冲点阵CO_2激光联合富血小板血浆治疗面部痤疮后瘢痕的修复效果及机制研究. 中国美容医学. 2022(09): 58-62 .
    42. 高欣,孙业祥. 中西医并重治疗慢性难愈合创面十年回顾. 中国烧伤创疡杂志. 2022(05): 310-313 .
    43. 秦峰,陈建民,吴宇,刘国印. 负压封闭引流联合富血小板血浆在压力性损伤慢性创面修复中的应用进展. 华南国防医学杂志. 2022(10): 836-840 .
    44. 黎伙聪. 创面封闭式负压引流术在难愈性创面治疗中的应用. 大医生. 2022(22): 47-49 .
    45. 段冰冉,徐袁丁,董训忠,李娟. 皮肤保护膜对行负压封闭引流治疗的慢性伤口患者潮湿相关性皮肤损伤发生率的影响. 临床与病理杂志. 2022(11): 2719-2725 .
    46. 周文涛,何国,谢恩光,蔡翰翔,马焕霞. 皮肤牵张闭合器联合封闭负压引流技术在难愈性创面修复中的应用. 中国医药科学. 2022(18): 127-130 .
    47. 袁媛,陈祥军,黄吉娥,莫骁群. 自体富血小板血浆修复足踝部难愈性创面. 中国美容医学. 2022(10): 20-24 .
    48. 何玲. 负压封闭引流联合自体富血小板血浆对慢性难愈性创面疼痛程度的影响. 医疗装备. 2022(24): 107-110 .
    49. 朱正新. 自体富血小板血浆凝胶联合皮瓣移植对股骨内侧难愈合性创面的修复效果. 中外医学研究. 2021(13): 35-37 .
    50. 林颜,陈晓东,阮树斌,杨荣华,王婧薷. 重组人碱性成纤维细胞生长因子对难愈性创面愈合相关指标表达的影响研究. 中国医学创新. 2021(14): 59-63 .
    51. 韦瑞丽,马辉,余芳,孙敏,韦丽娇,钟荣桂,王月. 自制简易负压引流装置联合普朗特液体伤口敷料治疗腹部感染性伤口的效果分析. 结直肠肛门外科. 2021(03): 280-283 .
    52. 唐天生,邓朝,陈兴爱,谭显春,李彤红,何侨蔚,何芳. VSD联合银离子冲洗对骨科感染创面愈合及血清hs-CRP、TNF-α、IL-1表达影响的研究. 解放军医药杂志. 2021(08): 57-61 .
    53. 李津,夏清建,何舟,吴碧珊,谭建恒. 负压伤口疗法联合富血小板血浆治疗慢性难愈性创面的作用研究. 吉林医学. 2021(10): 2478-2479 .
    54. 章梓格,孙文利,李振华. 难治性糖尿病足溃疡1例多学科协作救治体会. 湘南学院学报(医学版). 2021(03): 56-59 .
    55. 吴小李,董永盛,周日兴,何小洁,郑小江. 自体富血小板血浆治疗糖尿病患者难治性创面的效果观察. 中国医学创新. 2021(33): 24-27 .
    56. 杨榕,李明,李宜橙,高栋梁. 富血小板血浆联合负压封闭引流技术的临床应用研究进展. 新乡医学院学报. 2021(11): 1095-1100 .
    57. 孙丰华,杨阳,张茂红,胡云健,孙诚,黄玉萍,陈建民,刘国印. 自体富血小板血浆联合负压封闭引流技术治疗压疮的临床疗效分析. 东南国防医药. 2021(06): 576-581 .

    Other cited types(8)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040102030405060
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 11.9 %FULLTEXT: 11.9 %META: 69.0 %META: 69.0 %PDF: 19.0 %PDF: 19.0 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 4.5 %其他: 4.5 %其他: 1.7 %其他: 1.7 %China: 0.9 %China: 0.9 %Falls Church: 0.2 %Falls Church: 0.2 %United States: 0.2 %United States: 0.2 %上海: 1.0 %上海: 1.0 %东京: 0.2 %东京: 0.2 %乌鲁木齐: 0.7 %乌鲁木齐: 0.7 %九江: 1.0 %九江: 1.0 %佛山: 0.7 %佛山: 0.7 %佳木斯: 0.3 %佳木斯: 0.3 %六盘水: 0.3 %六盘水: 0.3 %北京: 2.8 %北京: 2.8 %北方邦: 0.2 %北方邦: 0.2 %南京: 1.6 %南京: 1.6 %南宁: 0.9 %南宁: 0.9 %南昌: 1.2 %南昌: 1.2 %卡尔加里: 0.7 %卡尔加里: 0.7 %厦门: 0.3 %厦门: 0.3 %周口: 0.2 %周口: 0.2 %呼和浩特: 0.2 %呼和浩特: 0.2 %哈尔滨: 0.3 %哈尔滨: 0.3 %哥伦布: 0.3 %哥伦布: 0.3 %唐山: 0.3 %唐山: 0.3 %嘉兴: 0.2 %嘉兴: 0.2 %圣彼得堡: 0.2 %圣彼得堡: 0.2 %大连: 0.2 %大连: 0.2 %天津: 0.5 %天津: 0.5 %威海: 0.5 %威海: 0.5 %山景城: 1.2 %山景城: 1.2 %常州: 0.5 %常州: 0.5 %平顶山: 0.2 %平顶山: 0.2 %广州: 0.3 %广州: 0.3 %廊坊: 0.2 %廊坊: 0.2 %张家口: 6.6 %张家口: 6.6 %成都: 1.0 %成都: 1.0 %揭阳: 0.3 %揭阳: 0.3 %昆明: 0.5 %昆明: 0.5 %朝阳: 0.2 %朝阳: 0.2 %杭州: 0.7 %杭州: 0.7 %桂林: 0.3 %桂林: 0.3 %比勒费尔德: 2.6 %比勒费尔德: 2.6 %洛阳: 0.3 %洛阳: 0.3 %海口: 1.0 %海口: 1.0 %深圳: 0.5 %深圳: 0.5 %湖州: 0.2 %湖州: 0.2 %湛江: 0.2 %湛江: 0.2 %漯河: 0.3 %漯河: 0.3 %潍坊: 0.3 %潍坊: 0.3 %石家庄: 0.3 %石家庄: 0.3 %芒廷维尤: 35.5 %芒廷维尤: 35.5 %苏州: 0.7 %苏州: 0.7 %衡水: 0.3 %衡水: 0.3 %衡阳: 0.2 %衡阳: 0.2 %襄阳: 0.2 %襄阳: 0.2 %西宁: 5.0 %西宁: 5.0 %西安: 1.7 %西安: 1.7 %许昌: 0.7 %许昌: 0.7 %贵阳: 1.4 %贵阳: 1.4 %达州: 0.2 %达州: 0.2 %运城: 3.6 %运城: 3.6 %邢台: 0.5 %邢台: 0.5 %邯郸: 0.7 %邯郸: 0.7 %郑州: 0.3 %郑州: 0.3 %重庆: 7.3 %重庆: 7.3 %长沙: 0.7 %长沙: 0.7 %青岛: 0.7 %青岛: 0.7 %其他其他ChinaFalls ChurchUnited States上海东京乌鲁木齐九江佛山佳木斯六盘水北京北方邦南京南宁南昌卡尔加里厦门周口呼和浩特哈尔滨哥伦布唐山嘉兴圣彼得堡大连天津威海山景城常州平顶山广州廊坊张家口成都揭阳昆明朝阳杭州桂林比勒费尔德洛阳海口深圳湖州湛江漯河潍坊石家庄芒廷维尤苏州衡水衡阳襄阳西宁西安许昌贵阳达州运城邢台邯郸郑州重庆长沙青岛

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (397) PDF downloads(109) Cited by(65)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return