Xun HY,Su XW,Hu FC,et al.Effects of advanced platelet-rich fibrin/chitosan thermosensitive hydrogel on full-thickness skin defect wound healing in diabetic rats[J].Chin J Burns Wounds,2024,40(5):451-460.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20231020-00127.
Citation: Wang XX,Xiang Y,Meng Y,et al.Clinical effects of negative pressure wound therapy in treating the poor healing of incisions after different abdominal operations[J].Chin J Burns,2021,37(11):1054-1060.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210518-00194.

Clinical effects of negative pressure wound therapy in treating the poor healing of incisions after different abdominal operations

doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210518-00194
Funds:

General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China 81871559

The 234 Subject Peak Climbing Plan of the First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University 2019YXK045

More Information
  • Corresponding author: Xiao Shichu, Email: huangzhuoxiao4@hotmail.com
  • Received Date: 2021-05-18
  •   Objective  To investigate the clinical effects of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in treating the poor healing of incisions after different abdominal operations.  Methods  The retrospective observational study was conducted. From June 2019 to December 2020, 42 patients with poor healing of incisions after abdominal surgery were admitted to Center of Burns and Trauma of the First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, including 29 males and 13 females, aged 23-81 years. The disease course of poor healing of abdominal incision was 3-60 d. The preoperative examination of patients was completed after admission, and NPWT was used after debridement. According to the dehiscence level of incision, the negative pressure value of -10.64 to -6.65 kPa was set. The incisions were sutured in the second stage when the incisions had good blood circulation. The cause of abdominal surgery, the dehiscence level and the cause of poor healing of abdominal incision were investigated, and the final healing of abdominal incision and the occurrence of complication were observed.  Results  The causes of abdominal operations in this group of patients who ocurred poor healing of abdominal incisions were ranked according to the composition ratio, with the top 4 causes being colon cancer (9 cases, accounting for 21.4%), bile duct disease (8 cases, accounting for 19.0%), liver cancer (5 cases, accounting for 11.9%), and appendicitis (4 cases, accounting for 9.5%). There were 25 cases (59.5%) with dehiscence of abdominal incision in the deep fascia layer, and the other 17 cases (40.5%) with dehiscence of abdominal incision in the superficial fascia layer. The causes of poor healing of abdominal incision were ranked according to the composition ratio, with the top 3 causes being infection (24 cases, accounting for 57.1%), fat liquefaction (11 cases, accounting for 26.2%), and suture reaction (5 cases, accounting for 11.9%). The blood circulation in 40 patients was improved after being treated with NPWT, and the incisions were sutured in the second stage. The incisions healed well when the suture lines were removed in the second to third week. Intestinal fistula and bile leakage developed during the NPWT treatment, respectively in the other 2 patients, in which negative pressure equipment was removed subsequently, and the incisions healed after adequate drainage and conventional dressing changes.  Conclusions  NPWT is effective in treating poor healing of abdominal incision after different abdominal surgeries. The clinicians need to comprehensively assess the patient's condition to determine when and how to use NPWT to avoid the occurrence of intestinal fistula, bile leakage, and other complications.

     

  • [1]
    AllegranziB, ZayedB, BischoffP, et al. New WHO recommendations on intraoperative and postoperative measures for surgical site infection prevention: an evidence-based global perspective[J]. Lancet Infect Dis, 2016, 16 (12): e288-e303. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30402-9.
    [2]
    中国医师协会创伤外科医师分会. 负压封闭引流技术腹部应用指南[J]. 中华创伤杂志,2019,35(4):289-302. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-8050.2019.04.001.
    [3]
    Sandy-HodgettsK, LeslieGD, ParsonsR, et al. Prevention of postsurgical wound dehiscence after abdominal surgery with NPWT: a multicentre randomised controlled trial protocol[J]. J Wound Care 2017,26(Suppl 2): S23-26. DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2017.26.Sup2.S23.
    [4]
    林小婷,吴美宁,谢小蔓,等. 外科手术患者医院感染的危险因素分析[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志,2015,25(15): 3497-3498,3524. DOI: 10.118116/cn.ni.2015-142020.
    [5]
    刘源炜,陈必成,陈杰,等.结肠癌根治术患者术后切口感染病原菌及影响因素分析[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2018,28(15):2341-2344.DOI: 10.11816/cn.ni.2018-173279.
    [6]
    陈涛,金曜.急性胆囊炎术后医院感染病原菌及影响因素[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2020,30(14):2184-2187.DOI: 10.11816/cn.ni.2020-190118.
    [7]
    周建春,赵孝杰,彭启平,等.胆道手术患者胆汁培养及抗菌药物耐药性分析的临床研究[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2011,21(7):1464-1467.
    [8]
    承文龙,齐永强,陈勇军.肝癌肝切除术后感染并发症相关危险因素的Meta分析[J].中华肝胆外科杂志,2016,22(1):5-8.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-8118.2016.01.002.
    [9]
    WellsCI, RatnayakeCBB, PerrinJ, et al. Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy in closed abdominal incisions: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials[J]. World J Surg, 2019,43(11):2779-2788. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-019-05116-6.
    [10]
    WillyC, AgarwalA, AndersenCA, et al. Closed incision negative pressure therapy: international multidisciplinary consensus recommendations[J]. Int Wound J, 2017, 14(2): 385- 398. DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12612.
    [11]
    GaoJ, WangY, SongJ, et al. Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical site infections: a systematic review and meta- analysis [J]. J Adv Nurs, 2021, 77(10):3980-3990. DOI: 10.1111/jan.14876.
    [12]
    JentzschT,OsterhoffG,ZwolakP,et al.Bacterial reduction and shift with NPWT after surgical debridements: a retrospective cohort study[J].Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2017,137(1):55-62.DOI: 10.1007/s00402-016-2600-z.
    [13]
    MoogP,JenschM,BetzlJ,et al.Bacterial bioburden of wounds: influence of debridement and negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT)[J].J Wound Care,2021,30(8):604-611.DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2021.30.8.604.
    [14]
    BorgquistO,IngemanssonR,MalmsjöM.Wound edge microvascular blood flow during negative-pressure wound therapy: examining the effects of pressures from -10 to -175 mmHg[J].Plast Reconstr Surg,2010,125(2):502-509.DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181c82e1f.
    [15]
    谢闪亮,郭光华,闵定宏.封闭负压引流技术在创面愈合中的应用及机制研究进展[J].中华烧伤杂志,2017,33(6):397-400.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2017.06.024.
    [16]
    陈孝强,张伟,李学拥.负压伤口疗法促进创面愈合的生物力学效应研究进展[J].中华烧伤杂志,2018,34(4):243-246.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.04.010.
    [17]
    JiS,LiuX,HuangJ,et al.Consensus on the application of negative pressure wound therapy of diabetic foot wounds[J/OL].Burns Trauma,2021,9:tkab018[2021-10-20]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34212064/. DOI: 10.1093/burnst/tkab018.
    [18]
    TopazM,AshkenaziI,BarzelO,et al.Minimizing treatment complexity of combat-related soft tissue injuries using a dedicated tension relief system and negative pressure therapy augmented by high-dose in situ antibiotic therapy and oxygen delivery: a retrospective study[J/OL].Burns Trauma,2021,9:tkab007[2021-10-20]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34212059/. DOI: 10.1093/burnst/tkab007.
    [19]
    SogorskiA,LehnhardtM,GoertzO,et al.Improvement of local microcirculation through intermittent negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT)[J].J Tissue Viability,2018,27(4):267-273.DOI: 10.1016/j.jtv.2018.08.004.
    [20]
    AydinD,PaulsenIF,BentzenVE,et al.Reconstruction of massive full-thickness abdominal wall defect: successful treatment with nonabsorbable mesh, negative pressure wound therapy, and split-skin grafting[J].Clin Case Rep,2016,4(10):982-985.DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.649.
    [21]
    BertelsenCA,FabriciusR,KleifJ,et al.Outcome of negative-pressure wound therapy for open abdomen treatment after nontraumatic lower gastrointestinal surgery: analysis of factors affecting delayed fascial closure in 101 patients[J].World J Surg,2014,38(4):774-781.DOI: 10.1007/s00268-013-2360-7.
    [22]
    JefferySL.The use of an antimicrobial primary wound contact layer as liner and filler with NPWT[J].J Wound Care,2018,23(8 Suppl):S3-14.DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2014.23.Sup8.S1.
    [23]
    吕国忠,杨敏烈.规范应用负压伤口疗法提高创面修复水平[J].中华烧伤杂志, 2020,36(7):523-527. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200522-00280.
    [24]
    ZeidermanMR,PuLLQ.Contemporary approach to soft-tissue reconstruction of the lower extremity after trauma[J/OL].Burns Trauma,2021,9:tkab024[2021-10-21]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34345630/. DOI: 10.1093/burnst/tkab024.
    [25]
    FuX. Wound healing center establishment and new technology application in improving the wound healing quality in China[J/OL]. Burns Trauma, 2020, 8:tkaa038[2021-05-18]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33134399/. DOI: 10.1093/burnst/tkaa038.
    [26]
    ChengHT,HsuYC,WuCI.Efficacy and safety of negative pressure wound therapy for Szilagyi grade III peripheral vascular graft infection[J].Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg,2014,19(6):1048-1052.DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivu289.
    [27]
    NolffMC, Meyer-LindenbergA. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in small animal medicine. Mechanisms of action, applications and indications[J]. Tierarztl Prax Ausg K Kleintiere Heimtiere,2016,44(1):26-37; quiz 38. DOI: 10.15654/TPK-150957.
    [28]
    ChengB, TianJ, PengY,, et al. Iatrogenic wounds: a common but often overlooked problem[J/OL]. Burns Trauma, 2019, 7:18[2021-05-18]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31165077/. DOI: 10.1186/s41038-019-0155-2.
    [29]
    CristaudoA,JenningsS,GunnarssonR,et al.Complications and mortality associated with temporary abdominal closure techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Am Surg,2017,83(2):191-216.
    [30]
    赵耀华, 夏成德, 邵国益, 等. 软组织分层放置自制引流管行负压伤口疗法的临床应用33例[J]. 中华烧伤杂志,2020,36(6):493-496. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20190327-00142.
    [31]
    SeternesA,RekstadLC,MoS,et al.Open abdomen treated with negative pressure wound therapy: indications, management and survival[J].World J Surg,2017,41(1):152-161.DOI: 10.1007/s00268-016-3694-8.
    [32]
    张永存, 王亮, 鲁晋,等. 腹部巨大切口术后胀裂伴感染一例[J]. 中华烧伤杂志,2017,33(10):644-645. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2017.10.013.
    [33]
    张连阳.腹部外科中的负压封闭引流现状及展望[J]. 创伤外科杂志, 2016, 18(8): 449-451. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-4237.2016.08.001.
    [34]
    郑涛, 解好好, 吴秀文, 等. 全国多中心肠外瘘诊治情况调查及预后风险分析[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志,2019, 22(11): 1041-1050. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2019.11.007.
    [35]
    于安星, 吴承先, 刘哲. 腹腔镜胆总管切开一期缝合术后胆漏的原因及处理方法[J]. 中华肝胆外科杂志,2016.22(7):490-492. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-8118.2016.07.018.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]Sun Linli, Liu Lihong, Xiang Luyan, Ding Li, Liu Wenjun. Interpretation of the 2023 American Burn Association "Clinical practice guidelines for burn shock resuscitation"[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2024, 40(10): 996-1000. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20240218-00061
    [2]Li Haisheng, Luo Gaoxing, Yuan Zhiqiang. Research advances on the prevention and treatment strategies of burn wound progressive deepening[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2021, 37(12): 1199-1204. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200828-00396
    [3]The Burn and Trauma Branch of Chinese Geriatrics Society. National experts consensus on prevention and treatment of burn shock (2020 version)[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2020, 36(9): 786-792. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200623-00323
    [4]Zeng Qingling, Wang Qingmei, Li Ning, Luo Qizhi. Advances in the research of application of urine output monitoring in prevention and treatment of burn shock[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2018, 34(1): 29-31. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.01.006
    [5]Xu Qinglian, Fang Linsen. To further enhance the comprehensive prevention and treatment of burn infection[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2015, 31(1): 9-10. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2015.01.003
    [6]YOU Xiao-en, CHEN Jiong, ZHOU Jian-jun, XING Nan, SHI Jian-wu, SU Guo-liang. Effects of resuscitation with different kinds of colloids on pulmonary edema in swine in shock stage of severe burn injury[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2013, 29(3): 272-276. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2013.03.011
    [7]LUO Gao- zing, PENG Yi-zhi, WU Jun. A propose to suspend the use of hydroxyethyl starch for flu- id resuscitation in shock phase of severe burns[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2013, 29(5): 421-423. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2013.05.003
    [8]ZHAO Li-ping, HUANG Yue-sheng, HE Ting, HU Xiao-gang. Clinical study on hematocrit used as a predictor for evaluation of resuscitation effect in the early shock stage after burn[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2013, 29(3): 235-238. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2013.03.004
    [9]HUAN Jing-ning. Advances in the research of fluid resuscitation for burn shock[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2013, 29(3): 285-288. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2013.03.014
    [10]CHAI Jia-ke. Diagnosis and comprehensive management of sepsis after burn[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2013, 29(2): 105-108. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2013.02.003
    [11]HUANG Yue-sheng. Roles and mechanism of vascular and cardiac factors in the pathogenesis of burn shock and its prevention and treatment[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2013, 29(2): 109-112. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2013.02.004
    [12]XIA Zhao-fan, WANG Guang-yi. Discussion on the fluid resuscitation and monitoring during bum shock period[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2008, 24(4): 241-244.
    [13]YANG Zong-cheng. Pay great attention to research on monitoring burn shock[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2008, 24(4): 245-247.
    [14]CHAI Jia-ke, SHENG Zhi-yong. The present strategy and ponderation on prevention and treatment of burn sepsis and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome(MODS)[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2008, 24(5): 378-380.
    [15]HUANG Yue-sheng. Myocardial injury after bum at early stage and its treatment[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2008, 24(5): 369-371.
    [16]CHAI Jia-ke, SHENG Zhi-yong. A brief account of prevention and treatment of infection in burn patients[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2008, 24(2): 84-86.
    [17]HUANG Yue-sheng. The potential clinical strategies for prevention and treatment of isehemie/hypoxie myocardial damage following severe bums[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2007, 23(3): 161-163.
    [18]ZHAN Jian-hua, QIAN Hua, YAN Ji, ZHANG Hong-yan, CHAO Guo-xiang, XIN Guo-hua, LI Guo-hui. Analysis of correlation factors affecting the incidence of burn shock[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2006, 22(5): 340-342.
    [19]CAO Yong-qian, WANG De-chang. Clinical analysis of severe burn patients with sepsis during shock stage[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2004, 20(3): 155-157.
    [20]Advances in the study on the management and molecular mechanism of early postburn myocardial injury[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2004, 20(5): 257-259.
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0405101520
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 7.3 %FULLTEXT: 7.3 %META: 77.1 %META: 77.1 %PDF: 15.6 %PDF: 15.6 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 2.9 %其他: 2.9 %其他: 1.1 %其他: 1.1 %China: 4.7 %China: 4.7 %Indonesia: 0.1 %Indonesia: 0.1 %United States: 0.3 %United States: 0.3 %[]: 0.1 %[]: 0.1 %三明: 0.4 %三明: 0.4 %上海: 2.6 %上海: 2.6 %上饶: 0.3 %上饶: 0.3 %东京都: 0.1 %东京都: 0.1 %东莞: 0.5 %东莞: 0.5 %乌海: 0.2 %乌海: 0.2 %乌鲁木齐: 0.2 %乌鲁木齐: 0.2 %乐山: 0.1 %乐山: 0.1 %九江: 0.2 %九江: 0.2 %佛山: 0.6 %佛山: 0.6 %佳木斯市向阳区: 0.1 %佳木斯市向阳区: 0.1 %保定: 0.1 %保定: 0.1 %兰州: 0.3 %兰州: 0.3 %内江: 0.6 %内江: 0.6 %凉山: 0.1 %凉山: 0.1 %包头: 0.1 %包头: 0.1 %北京: 2.1 %北京: 2.1 %北方邦: 0.1 %北方邦: 0.1 %南京: 1.9 %南京: 1.9 %南充: 0.1 %南充: 0.1 %南宁: 0.3 %南宁: 0.3 %南昌: 1.9 %南昌: 1.9 %南通: 0.6 %南通: 0.6 %台州: 0.5 %台州: 0.5 %合肥: 0.4 %合肥: 0.4 %吉林: 0.1 %吉林: 0.1 %呼和浩特: 0.4 %呼和浩特: 0.4 %咸阳: 0.4 %咸阳: 0.4 %哈尔滨: 0.3 %哈尔滨: 0.3 %哥伦布: 0.2 %哥伦布: 0.2 %嘉兴: 0.3 %嘉兴: 0.3 %墨尔本: 0.1 %墨尔本: 0.1 %天津: 0.6 %天津: 0.6 %太原: 3.7 %太原: 3.7 %宁波: 1.0 %宁波: 1.0 %岳阳: 0.1 %岳阳: 0.1 %巴音郭楞: 0.1 %巴音郭楞: 0.1 %常州: 0.1 %常州: 0.1 %平顶山: 0.3 %平顶山: 0.3 %广州: 1.6 %广州: 1.6 %张家口: 2.4 %张家口: 2.4 %徐州: 0.1 %徐州: 0.1 %德阳: 0.2 %德阳: 0.2 %成都: 2.1 %成都: 2.1 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.3 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.3 %新乡: 0.3 %新乡: 0.3 %新加坡: 0.1 %新加坡: 0.1 %无锡: 0.2 %无锡: 0.2 %日照: 0.1 %日照: 0.1 %昆明: 3.0 %昆明: 3.0 %晋城: 0.6 %晋城: 0.6 %曲靖: 0.1 %曲靖: 0.1 %朝阳: 0.3 %朝阳: 0.3 %杭州: 1.7 %杭州: 1.7 %柳州: 0.1 %柳州: 0.1 %榆林: 0.1 %榆林: 0.1 %武汉: 1.1 %武汉: 1.1 %沈阳: 0.5 %沈阳: 0.5 %洛阳: 0.1 %洛阳: 0.1 %济南: 1.8 %济南: 1.8 %海口: 0.4 %海口: 0.4 %海得拉巴: 0.3 %海得拉巴: 0.3 %淮安: 0.1 %淮安: 0.1 %深圳: 0.3 %深圳: 0.3 %温州: 0.9 %温州: 0.9 %湛江: 0.1 %湛江: 0.1 %滨州: 0.3 %滨州: 0.3 %漯河: 0.2 %漯河: 0.2 %漳州: 0.2 %漳州: 0.2 %潍坊: 0.6 %潍坊: 0.6 %玉林: 0.3 %玉林: 0.3 %石家庄: 0.7 %石家庄: 0.7 %福州: 0.9 %福州: 0.9 %肇庆: 0.2 %肇庆: 0.2 %芒廷维尤: 15.0 %芒廷维尤: 15.0 %芝加哥: 0.3 %芝加哥: 0.3 %苏州: 1.1 %苏州: 1.1 %荆门: 0.2 %荆门: 0.2 %莆田: 0.3 %莆田: 0.3 %菏泽: 0.3 %菏泽: 0.3 %葫芦岛: 0.2 %葫芦岛: 0.2 %衡水: 0.6 %衡水: 0.6 %襄阳: 0.2 %襄阳: 0.2 %西宁: 5.5 %西宁: 5.5 %西安: 1.5 %西安: 1.5 %西雅图: 0.1 %西雅图: 0.1 %许昌: 0.3 %许昌: 0.3 %贵阳: 2.0 %贵阳: 2.0 %赤峰: 0.1 %赤峰: 0.1 %达州: 0.1 %达州: 0.1 %运城: 0.1 %运城: 0.1 %遵义: 0.9 %遵义: 0.9 %重庆: 10.2 %重庆: 10.2 %铜仁: 0.1 %铜仁: 0.1 %锦州: 0.2 %锦州: 0.2 %长春: 1.0 %长春: 1.0 %长沙: 1.5 %长沙: 1.5 %长治: 0.3 %长治: 0.3 %阜阳: 0.4 %阜阳: 0.4 %阿克苏地区: 0.7 %阿克苏地区: 0.7 %随州: 0.1 %随州: 0.1 %青岛: 0.4 %青岛: 0.4 %韶关: 0.1 %韶关: 0.1 %马鞍山: 0.1 %马鞍山: 0.1 %驻马店: 0.5 %驻马店: 0.5 %黄冈: 0.6 %黄冈: 0.6 %齐齐哈尔: 0.1 %齐齐哈尔: 0.1 %其他其他ChinaIndonesiaUnited States[]三明上海上饶东京都东莞乌海乌鲁木齐乐山九江佛山佳木斯市向阳区保定兰州内江凉山包头北京北方邦南京南充南宁南昌南通台州合肥吉林呼和浩特咸阳哈尔滨哥伦布嘉兴墨尔本天津太原宁波岳阳巴音郭楞常州平顶山广州张家口徐州德阳成都拉贾斯坦邦新乡新加坡无锡日照昆明晋城曲靖朝阳杭州柳州榆林武汉沈阳洛阳济南海口海得拉巴淮安深圳温州湛江滨州漯河漳州潍坊玉林石家庄福州肇庆芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州荆门莆田菏泽葫芦岛衡水襄阳西宁西安西雅图许昌贵阳赤峰达州运城遵义重庆铜仁锦州长春长沙长治阜阳阿克苏地区随州青岛韶关马鞍山驻马店黄冈齐齐哈尔

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(2)  / Tables(2)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (326) PDF downloads(58) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return