Email Alerts
RSS
Volume 37 Issue 10
Oct.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Article Navigation >  CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS  > 2021  >  37(10): 911-920
Li HS,Yuan ZQ,Song HP,et al.Clinical application of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the treatment of burn patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a retrospective analysis and systematic review[J].Chin J Burns,2021,37(10):911-920.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210803-00266.
Citation: Li HS,Yuan ZQ,Song HP,et al.Clinical application of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the treatment of burn patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a retrospective analysis and systematic review[J].Chin J Burns,2021,37(10):911-920.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210803-00266.
shu

Clinical application of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the treatment of burn patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a retrospective analysis and systematic review

doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210803-00266

  • State Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burns and Combined Injury, Institute of Burn Research, the First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University (the Third Military Medical University), Chongqing Key Laboratory for Disease Proteomics, Chongqing 400038, China

Funds:

National Natural Science Foundation of China for Youth 82002036

Science Fund for Creative Research Group of Chongqing Natural Science Foundation cstc2019jcyj-cxttX0001

  • Received Date: 2021-08-03
    Abstract
  •   Objective  To analyze the clinical effect of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in the treatment of burn patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).  Methods  The retrospective observational study and the systematic review were applied. From March 2014 to July 2020, five burn patients with ARDS received ECMO treatment in the First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University (the Third Military Medical University). All the five patients were male, aged from 40 to 62 years. The average total burn surface area was 58.8% total body surface area (TBSA) and four cases had severe inhalation injury. Patient's ECMO starting time, duration and mode, and whether successfully weaned or the cause of death, and others. were recorded. Furthermore, the changes of oxygenation and infection before, during, and after utilizing ECMO were analyzed. PubMed and Web of Science from the establishment of each database to August 2021 were searched using "Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation", "ECMO", "burn", "inhalation" as the search terms and "Title/Abstract" as the field to retrieve the clinical articles that meet the selection criteria . Basic information were extracted from the articles, including sample size, gender, age, total burn area, inhalation injury, the indication of ECMO, the start and lasting time of ECMO, ECMO mode, rate of successful weaning, complications of ECMO, mortality, the combined application of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT).  Results  Five patients started venovenous ECMO on an average of 10.2 days after injury and lasted an average of 180.4 hours. Three out of 5 patients were weaned successfully with one patient survived. Four patients died of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) and septic shock. Compared with those before ECMO treatment, the arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2) and oxygen saturation in arterial blood (SaO2) of three successfully weaned patients obviously increased during and after ECMO treatment. The fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) decreased below 50% and PaO2/FiO2 ratio increased above 200 mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) during and after ECMO. Furthermore, lactic acid and respiratory rate decreased, basically. Compared with those before ECMO, PaO2 and SaO2 in the other two patients during ECMO, who failed to be weaned, continuously decreased while lactic acid increased. Before and during ECMO, the PaO2/FiO2 ratios of unsuccessfullg weaned cases were less than 200 mmHg, and partial pressure of carbon dioxide in arterial blood (PaCO2) were more than 40 mmHg. Compared with those before ECMO, there were no significant changes in body temperature during and after ECMO, which were less than 38 ℃. Compared with those before ECMO, the leucocyte number (the index without this in unsuccessfully weaned cases was omitted, the same as below) in four patients showed a significant decrease during ECMO, but rose after removal of ECMO. The proportion of neutrophils in three patients were slightly higher during ECMO than before ECMO, and did not change significantly after removal of ECMO. Compared with those before ECMO, platelet counts in three patients were significantly reduced during ECMO, and all five patients during ECMO were below normal levels. Compared with those before ECMO, the procalcitonin levels in four deaths were significantly increased during ECMO. Catheter culture of microorganism was performed in three successfully weaned patients, all of which were negative. A total of 13 literature were included, ranging from 1990 to 2019. The sample size in 6 studies was less than 10, and the sample size in 4 studies was between 10 and 20, and only 2 literatures had a sample size larger than 50. ECMO was applied in 295 burn patients with overall mortality of 48.8% (144/295), including 157 adults and 138 children. The most common indication of ECMO was severe ARDS. Among 157 adult burn patients (95 males and 65 females), 36 cases had inhalation injury. The average burn area was 27%-37%TBSA in 5 reported studies and was more than 50%TBSA in 2 reported studies. The most common mode was venovenous ECMO. ECMO treatment began 26.5 hours to 7.4 days after injury and lasted from 90 hours to 18 days, and the rate of successful weaning ranged from 50% to 100%. The most common complications were bleeding and infection. The mortality was 52.9% (83/157). MODS and sepsis were the leading causes of death. Among 138 pediatric burn patients (77 boys and 61 girls), 29 patients had inhalation injury. The average burn area was 17%-50.2%TBSA in 3 studies. ECMO treatment lasted from 165.2 hours to 324.4 hours. Bleeding was the most common complication. The mortality was 44.2% (61/138).  Conclusions  ECMO is an effective strategy for the salvage treatment of burns complicated with ARDS. Furthermore, the prevention and treatment of bleeding, infection and organ dysfunction should be emphasized during the use of ECMO. More importantly, evidence-based guidelines for burns are urgently needed to further improve the clinical effect of ECMO.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
  • loading
    • References(43)
  • [1]
    LiH, ZhouJ, PengY,et al.The progress of Chinese burn medicine from the Third Military Medical University-in memory of its pioneer, Professor Li Ao[J/OL].Burns Trauma,2017,5:16[2021-08-23]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28573147/.DOI: 10.1186/s41038-017-0082-z.
    [2]
    LiH,YaoZ,TanJ,et al.Epidemiology and outcome analysis of 6325 burn patients: a five-year retrospective study in a major burn center in Southwest China[J].Sci Rep,2017,7:46066.DOI: 10.1038/srep46066.
    [3]
    SongH,YuanZ,PengY,et al.Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation combined with continuous renal replacement therapy for the treatment of severe burns: current status and challenges[J].Burns Trauma,2021,9:tkab017[2021-08-23]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34212063/.DOI: 10.1093/burnst/tkab017.
    [4]
    OmbrellaroM,GoldthornJF,HarnarTJ,et al.Extracorporeal life support for the treatment of adult respiratory distress syndrome after burn injury[J].Surgery,1994,115(4):523-526.
    [5]
    PuQ,QianJ,TaoW,et al.Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation combined with continuous renal replacement therapy in cutaneous burn and inhalation injury caused by hydrofluoric acid and nitric acid[J].Medicine (Baltimore),2017,96(48):e8972.DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008972.
    [6]
    张永宏,郭光华,沈国良,等.“八二”昆山工厂铝粉尘爆炸事故特重度烧伤患者重度吸入性损伤救治分析[J].中华烧伤杂, 2018,34(7) : 455-458. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.07.007.
    [7]
    RanieriVM,RubenfeldGD,ThompsonBT,et al.Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition[J].JAMA,2012,307(23):2526-2533.DOI: 10.1001/jama.2012.5669.
    [8]
    中国心胸血管麻醉学会,中华医学会麻醉学分会,中国医师协会麻醉学医师分会,等.不同情况下成人体外膜肺氧合临床应用专家共识(2020版)[J].中国循环杂志,2020,35(11):1052-1063.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3614.2020.11.002.
    [9]
    吕琳,高国栋,龙村.体外膜肺氧合在严重烧伤救治中的应用进展[J].中华烧伤杂志,2015,31(6):468-470.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2015.06.023.
    [10]
    血液净化急诊临床应用专家共识组.血液净化急诊临床应用专家共识[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2017,26(1):24-36.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2017.01.007.
    [11]
    PageMJ,McKenzieJE,BossuytPM,et al.The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews[J].J Clin Epidemiol,2021,134:178-189.DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.001.
    [12]
    ThompsonKB,DawoudF,CastleS,et al.Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support for pediatric burn patients: is it worth the risk?[J].Pediatr Crit Care Med,2020,21(5):469-476.DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002269.
    [13]
    EldredgeRS,ZhaiY,CochranA.Effectiveness of ECMO for burn-related acute respiratory distress syndrome[J].Burns,2019,45(2):317-321.DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2018.10.012.
    [14]
    KaneTD,GreenhalghDG,WardenGD,et al.Pediatric burn patients with respiratory failure: predictors of outcome with the use of extracorporeal life support[J].J Burn Care Rehabil,1999,20(2):145-150.DOI: 10.1097/00004630-199903000-00030.
    [15]
    PierreEJ,ZwischenbergerJB,AngelC,et al.Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the treatment of respiratory failure in pediatric patients with burns[J].J Burn Care Rehabil,1998,19(2):131-134.DOI: 10.1097/00004630-199803000-00009.
    [16]
    MarcusJE,PiperLC,AinsworthCR,et al.Infections in patients with burn injuries receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation[J].Burns,2019,45(8):1880-1887.DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2019.04.023.
    [17]
    DadrasM,WagnerJM,WallnerC,et al.Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute respiratory distress syndrome in burn patients: a case series and literature update[J/OL].Burns Trauma,2019,7:28[2021-08-23]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31696126/.DOI: 10.1186/s41038-019-0166-z.
    [18]
    SzentgyorgyiL,ShepherdC,DunnKW,et al.Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in severe respiratory failure resulting from burns and smoke inhalation injury[J].Burns,2018,44(5):1091-1099.DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2018.01.022.
    [19]
    ChiuYJ,MaH,LiaoWC,et al.Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support may be a lifesaving modality in patients with burn and severe acute respiratory distress syndrome: experience of Formosa Water Park dust explosion disaster in Taiwan[J].Burns,2018,44(1):118-123.DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2017.06.013.
    [20]
    AinsworthCR,DellavolpeJ,ChungKK,et al.Revisiting extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for ARDS in burns: a case series and review of the literature[J].Burns,2018,44(6):1433-1438.DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2018.05.008.
    [21]
    NosanovLB,McLawhornMM,Vigiola CruzM,et al.A national perspective on ECMO utilization use in patients with burn injury[J].J Burn Care Res,2017,39(1):10-14.DOI: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000555.
    [22]
    HsuPS,TsaiYT,LinCY,et al.Benefit of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in major burns after stun grenade explosion: experience from a single military medical center[J].Burns,2017,43(3):674-680.DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2016.08.035.
    [23]
    BurkeCR,ChanT,McMullanDM.Extracorporeal life support use in adult burn patients[J].J Burn Care Res,2017,38(3):174-178.DOI: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000436.
    [24]
    SoussiS,GallaisP,KachatryanL,et al.Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in burn patients with refractory acute respiratory distress syndrome leads to 28% 90-day survival[J].Intensive Care Med,2016,42(11):1826-1827.DOI: 10.1007/s00134-016-4464-7.
    [25]
    BanavasiH,NguyenP,OsmanH,et al.Management of ARDS - what works and what does not[J].Am J Med Sci,2021,362(1):13-23.DOI: 10.1016/j.amjms.2020.12.019.
    [26]
    HebertS,ErdoganM,GreenRS,et al.The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in severely burned patients: a survey of north American burn centers[J].J Burn Care Res,2021,6:irab103.DOI: 10.1093/jbcr/irab103.
    [27]
    GrantAA, GhodsizadA, IngramW. ECMO in the burn patient: the time has come[J]. Current Trauma Reports,2019(5):154-159.
    [28]
    GopalakrishnanR,VashishtR.Sepsis and ECMO[J].Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2020,37(Suppl 2):S1-8.DOI: 10.1007/s12055-020-00944-x.
    [29]
    AkoumianakiE,JonkmanA,SklarMC,et al.A rational approach on the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in severe hypoxemia: advanced technology is not a panacea[J].Ann Intensive Care,2021,11(1):107.DOI: 10.1186/s13613-021-00897-3.
    [30]
    OstermannM,LumlertgulN.Acute kidney injury in ECMO patients[J].Crit Care,2021,25(1):313.DOI: 10.1186/s13054-021-03676-5.
    [31]
    ZeidmanAD.Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and con- tinuous kidney replacement therapy: technology and outcomes—a narrative review[J].Adv Chronic Kidney Dis,2021,28(1):29-36.DOI: 10.1053/j.ackd.2021.04.004.
    [32]
    O'HoroJC, CawcuttKA, De MoraesAG,et al.The evidence base for prophylactic antibiotics in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation[J].ASAIO J,2016,62(1):6-10.DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000287.
    [33]
    GongY,PengY,LuoX,et al.Different infection profiles and antimicrobial resistance patterns between burn ICU and common wards[J].Front Cell Infect Microbiol,2021,11:681731.DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.681731.
    [34]
    Abdul-AzizMH,RobertsJA.Antibiotic dosing during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: does the system matter?[J].Curr Opin Anaesthesiol,2020,33(1):71-82.DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000810.
    [35]
    HahnJ,ChoiJH,ChangMJ.Pharmacokinetic changes of antibiotic, antiviral, antituberculosis and antifungal agents during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in critically ill adult patients[J].J Clin Pharm Ther,2017,42(6):661-671.DOI: 10.1111/jcpt.12636.
    [36]
    JamalJA,EconomouCJ,LipmanJ,et al.Improving antibiotic dosing in special situations in the ICU: burns, renal replacement therapy and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation[J].Curr Opin Crit Care,2012,18(5):460-471.DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e32835685ad.
    [37]
    CottaMO,RobertsJA,LipmanJ.Antibiotic dose optimization in critically ill patients[J].Med Intensiva,2015,39(9):563-572.DOI: 10.1016/j.medin.2015.07.009.
    [38]
    SzymanskiMW,HafzalahM.Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation anticoagulation[M/OL].Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls,2021[2021-09-21]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34033395. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34033395
    [39]
    DavisRC,DurhamLA,KiralyL,et al.Safety, tolerability, and outcomes of enteral nutrition in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation[J].Nutr Clin Pract,2021,36(1):98-104.DOI: 10.1002/ncp.10591.
    [40]
    KaramO,NellisME.Transfusion management for children supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation[J].Transfusion,2021,61(3):660-664.DOI: 10.1111/trf.16272.
    [41]
    CallaghanS,CaiT,McCaffertyC,et al.Adsorption of blood components to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) surfaces in humans: a systematic review[J].J Clin Med,2020, 9(10):3272.DOI: 10.3390/jcm9103272.
    [42]
    LiuC,ChenY,ChenY,et al.Effects of prone positioning during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory respiratory failure: a systematic review[J].SN Compr Clin Med,2021,15:1-7.DOI: 10.1007/s42399-021-01008-w.
    [43]
    YuX,GuS,LiM,et al.Awake extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute respiratory distress syndrome: which clinical issues should be taken into consideration[J].Front Med (Lausanne),2021,8:682526.DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.682526.
    • Relative Articles
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(1)  / Tables(6)

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (579) PDF downloads(56) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    Copyright © Chinese Journal of Burns京ICP备07035254号-14

    E-mail：shaoshangzazhi@163.com

    Website：https://zhsszz.xml-journal.net/

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return