Email Alerts
RSS
Volume 37 Issue 11
Nov.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Supplements
Article Navigation >  CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS  > 2021  >  37(11): 1011-1023
Chen HL,Li MJ,Luo YM,et al.Application of a standard communication system-based continuous home remote visit mode in the management of visits to severely burned patients in the post-pandemic era of coronavirus disease 2019[J].Chin J Burns,2021,37(11):1070-1077.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210315-00088.
Citation: Zhang C,Li Z,Song W,et al.Preliminary investigation on the wound healing effect of three-dimensional bioprinting ink containing human adipose-derived protein complexes[J].Chin J Burns,2021,37(11):1011-1023.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210813-00282.
shu

Preliminary investigation on the wound healing effect of three-dimensional bioprinting ink containing human adipose-derived protein complexes

doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210813-00282
  • 1.

    Research Center for Wound Repair and Tissue Regeneration, Medical Innovation Research Department, the PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100048, China

  • 2.

    Department for Wound Repair and Plastic Surgery, PLA Strategic Support Force Characteristic Medical Center, Beijing 100005, China

Funds:

Science Fund for Creative Research Groups of National Natural Science Foundation of China 81721092

Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China 81830064

Youth Science Foundation Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China 32000969, 82002056

Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences 2019-I2M-5-059

Military Medical Innovation Research Project of PLA General Hospital CX19026

Wang Zhengguo Foundation for Traumatic Medicine Growth Factor Rejuvenation Plan SZYZ-TR-03

More Information
  • Corresponding author: Huang Sha, Email: stellarahuang@sina.com
  • Received Date: 2021-08-13
    Abstract
  •     Objective   To investigate the effects of human adipose-derived protein complex (ADPC) on the proliferation and migration ability of human skin fibroblasts (HSFs) and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs), and the repairing effects of ADPC-containing three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting ink (Bioink) in full-thickness skin defect wounds of nude mice.    Methods   The experimental research method was used. Discarded subcutaneous adipose tissue from 3 female patients with chronic wounds (aged 29-34 years) admitted to PLA General Hospital for abdominal flap transfer from October 2020 to March 2021 and discarded liposuction adipose tissue from 3 healthy female (aged 24-36 years) for abdominal liposuction during the same period were collected to prepare normal ADPC (nADPC) and liposuction-derived ADPC (lADPC), respectively. The protein concentration of the two kinds of ADPC was measured by bicinchoninic acid method, and the extraction efficiency of them was calculated. The sample numbers were 3. HSFs and HUVECs in logarithmic growth phase were taken for the subsequent experiments. HSFs and HUVECs were divided into phosphate buffered saline (PBS) control group, 4 μg/mL nADPC group, 20 μg/mL nADPC group, 100 μg/mL nADPC group, and 200 μg/mL nADPC group according to the random number table (the same grouping method below), with 5 wells in each group. Cells in PBS control group were cultured with PBS, and the cells in the 4 remaining groups were cultured with the corresponding final mass concentration of nADPC. After 24 h of conventional culture, the cell proliferation viability was detected by cell counting kit 8 method. HSFs and HUVECs were taken and divided into PBS control group, nADPC alone group, lADPC alone group, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) alone group, TNF-α+nADPC group, and TNF-α+lADPC group. Cells in PBS control group and TNF-α alone group were added with PBS. nADPC or lADPC was added to the cells in nADPC alone group, lADPC alone group, TNF-α+nADPC group, and TNF-α+lADPC group with a final mass concentration of 100 μg/mL, respectively. TNF-α with a final mass concentration of 20 ng/mL was added to the cells in TNF-α alone group, TNF-α+nADPC group, and TNF-α+lADPC group. The cell migration rate was calculated after the scratch test at 24 h after scratching (n=3), and the cell proliferation viability was detected after 24 h of culture as above (n=5). Gelatin-alginate composite Bioink (Bioink AG) was taken. Bioink AG containing 100 μg/mL lADPC (lADPC-Bioink AG) was prepared. The morphology of the two at room temperature and after condensation was observed. The morphology after 3D bioprinting and cross-linking was observed. The low-temperature gel formation time was recorded when detecting rheological properties using rheometer (n=3). Twenty BALB/c-NU female nude mice of 8-10 weeks old were taken to establish the full-thickness skin defect wounds on the back, and then they were divided into routine dressing change group, lADPC alone group, Bioink AG alone group, and lADPC-Bioink AG group, with 5 nude mice in each group. The wounds of nude mice in routine dressing change group were covered with hydrocolloid dressings and performed with routine dressing changes only, while the wounds of nude mice in the remaining 3 groups were treated with lADPC, Bioink AG, and lADPC-Bioink AG accordingly in addition. General observation was performed from treatment day (TD) 0, and the wound healing rate was calculated on TD 2, 6, and 10. On TD 10, histopathological observation of wounds was performed with hematoxylin eosin staining. Data were statistically analyzed with independent samples t test, one-way analysis of variance, analysis of variance for repeated measurement, Student-Newman-Keuls q test, and least significant difference t test.    Results   The protein concentration and extraction efficiency of lADPC were respectively (1.306±0.011) mg/mL and (11.1±1.5)%, which were significantly lower than (2.039±0.042) mg/mL and (22.2±2.0)% of nADPC (t=23.83, 6.38, P<0.05 or P<0.01). After 24 h of culture, compared with those in PBS control group, the proliferation viabilities of HSFs (q=6.943, 6.375, P<0.01) and HUVECs (q=6.301, 6.496, P<0.01) were significantly decreased in 100 μg/mL nADPC group and 200 μg/mL nADPC group; compared with those in 100 μg/mL nADPC group, the proliferation viabilities of HSFs and HUVECs in 200 μg/mL nADPC group did not change significantly (P>0.05). At 24 h after scratching, compared with those in PBS control group, the HSF and HUVEC migration rates were significantly lower in nADPC alone group, lADPC alone group, and TNF-α alone group (q=5.642, 6.645, 11.480, 4.772, 6.298, 10.420, P<0.05 or P<0.01); compared with those in nADPC alone group, there were no significant changes in the HSF and HUVEC migration rates in lADPC alone group (P>0.05); compared with those in TNF-α alone group, there were no significant changes in the HSF migration rates in TNF-α+nADPC group or TNF-α+lADPC group (P>0.05), the HUVEC migration rates were significantly higher in TNF-α+nADPC group and TNF-α+lADPC group (q=8.585, 7.253, P<0.01); compared with those in TNF-α+nADPC group, there were no significant changes in the HSF and HUVEC migration rates in TNF-α+lADPC group (P>0.05). After 24 h of culture, compared with those in PBS control group, the HSF and HUVEC proliferation viabilities were significantly lower in nADPC alone group, lADPC alone group, and TNF-α alone group (q=5.803, 5.371, 9.136, 11.580, 9.493, 13.510, P<0.05 or P<0.01); compared with those in nADPC alone group, the HSF and HUVEC proliferation viabilities in lADPC alone group did not change significantly (P>0.05); compared with those in TNF-α alone group, the HSF (q=14.990, 10.850, P<0.01) and HUVEC (q=7.066, 8.942, P<0.01) proliferation viabilities were significantly higher in TNF-α+nADPC group and TNF-α+lADPC group; compared with those in TNF-α+nADPC group, the HSF and HUVEC proliferation viabilities in TNF-α+lADPC group did not change significantly (P>0.05). At room temperature and in the condensed state, lADPC-Bioink AG had a more slightly turbid appearance than Bioink AG. lADPC-Bioink AG had a similar morphology to Bioink AG after 3D bioprinting and cross-linking. At 10 ℃, the coagulation time of lADPC-Bioink AG was (76.6±0.4) s, which was significantly slower than (74.4±0.6) s of Bioink AG (t=4.64, P<0.01). On TD 2, the nude mice in routine dressing change group had more wound exudation, while the nude mice in the remaining 3 groups had no significant exudation. On TD 8, the nude mice in lADPC-Bioink AG group had the smallest residual wound area and obvious epithelial coverage. On TD 2, the wound healing rate of nude mice in lADPC-Bioink AG group was significantly higher than that in lADPC alone group (t=3.59, P<0.05) and similar to the rates in routine dressing change group and Bioink AG alone group (P>0.05). On TD 6, the wound healing rate of nude mice in lADPC-Bioink AG group was significantly higher than the rates in routine dressing change group, lADPC alone group, and Bioink AG alone group (t=18.70, 15.70, 3.15, P<0.05 or P<0.01). On TD 10, the wound healing rate of nude mice in lADPC-Bioink AG group was significantly higher than the rates in routine dressing change group and lADPC alone group (t=12.51, 4.84, P<0.01) but similar to that in Bioink AG alone group (P>0.05). On TD 10, the wounds of nude mice in lADPC-Bioink AG group had moderate vascularization of the traumatic tissue, adequate epithelialization, and the best healing effect.    Conclusions   Liposuction-related operations have little effect on the characterization of ADPC protein concentration and extraction efficiency. LADPC and nADPC have the same biological effects, which can inhibit the proliferation and migration ability of HSFs and HUVECs in non-inflammatory environment and improve the proliferation viabilities of HSFs and HUVECs in inflammatory environment, while improving the migration ability of HUVECs. Adding lADPC to Bioink AG does not significantly affect the physical properties or printing performance of Bioink AG, but can enhance the wound repair effect of full-thickness skin defect wounds in nude mice.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(40)
  • [1]
    MascharakS, desJardins-ParkHE, DavittMF, et al. Preventing Engrailed-1 activation in fibroblasts yields wound regeneration without scarring[J].Science,2021,372(6540):eaba2374. DOI: 10.1126/science.aba2374.
    [2]
    ZhangJ, ZhengYJ, LeeJ, et al. A pulsatile release platform based on photo-induced imine-crosslinking hydrogel promotes scarless wound healing[J]. Nat Commun,2021,12(1):1670. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-21964-0.
    [3]
    GriffinDR, ArchangMM, KuanCH, et al. Activating an adaptive immune response from a hydrogel scaffold imparts regenerative wound healing[J]. Nat Mater,2021,20(4):560-569. DOI: 10.1038/s41563-020-00844-w.
    [4]
    GriffinDR,WeaverWM,ScumpiaPO, et al. Accelerated wound healing by injectable microporous gel scaffolds assembled from annealed building blocks[J].Nat Mater,2015,14(7):737-744. DOI: 10.1038/nmat4294.
    [5]
    NgWL, WangS, YeongWY, et al. Skin bioprinting: impending reality or fantasy?[J]. Trends Biotechnol,2016,34(9):689-699. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.04.006.
    [6]
    WonJY,LeeMH,KimMJ, et al. A potential dermal substitute using decellularized dermis extracellular matrix derived bio-ink[J].Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol,2019,47(1):644-649. DOI: 10.1080/21691401.2019.1575842.
    [7]
    ChimeneD, KaunasR, GaharwarAK. Hydrogel bioink reinforcement for additive manufacturing: a focused review of emerging strategies[J]. Adv Mater,2020,32(1):e1902026. DOI: 10.1002/adma.201902026.
    [8]
    ValotL,MartinezJ,MehdiA, et al. Chemical insights into bioinks for 3D printing[J].Chem Soc Rev,2019,48(15):4049-4086. DOI: 10.1039/c7cs00718c.
    [9]
    SomasekharanLT,RajuR,KumarS, et al. Biofabrication of skin tissue constructs using alginate, gelatin and diethylaminoethyl cellulose bioink[J].Int J Biol Macromol,2021,189:398-409. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.08.114.
    [10]
    ChenXF,YueZL,WinbergPC, et al. 3D bioprinting dermal-like structures using species-specific ulvan[J].Biomater Sci,2021,9(7):2424-2438. DOI: 10.1039/d0bm01784a.
    [11]
    ChoudhuryD, TunHW, WangTY, et al. Organ-derived decellularized extracellular matrix: a game changer for bioink manufacturing?[J]. Trends Biotechnol,2018,36(8):787-805. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.03.003.
    [12]
    ShookB, Rivera GonzalezG, EbmeierS, et al. The role of adipocytes in tissue regeneration and stem cell niches[J]. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol,2016,32:609-631. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-111315-125426.
    [13]
    Guerrero-JuarezCF,PlikusMV.Emerging nonmetabolic functions of skin fat[J].Nat Rev Endocrinol,2018,14(3):163-173. DOI: 10.1038/nrendo.2017.162.
    [14]
    ZwickRK, Guerrero-JuarezCF, HorsleyV, et al. Anatomical, physiological, and functional diversity of adipose tissue[J]. Cell Metab,2018,27(1):68-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.12.002.
    [15]
    ZhangZZ,ShaoML,HeplerC, et al. Dermal adipose tissue has high plasticity and undergoes reversible dedifferentiation in mice[J].J Clin Invest,2019,129(12):5327-5342. DOI: 10.1172/JCI130239.
    [16]
    SarkanenJR,RuusuvuoriP,KuokkanenH, et al. Bioactive acellular implant induces angiogenesis and adipogenesis and sustained soft tissue restoration in vivo[J].Tissue Eng Part A,2012,18(23/24):2568-2580. DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2011.0724.
    [17]
    HeYF,LinMH,WangXC, et al. Optimized adipose tissue engineering strategy based on a neo-mechanical processing method[J].Wound Repair Regen,2018,26(2):163-171. DOI: 10.1111/wrr.12640.
    [18]
    SarkanenJR,KailaV,MannerströmB, et al. Human adipose tissue extract induces angiogenesis and adipogenesis in vitro[J].Tissue Eng Part A,2012,18(1/2):17-25. DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2010.0712.
    [19]
    LiZ, HuangS, LiuYF, et al. Tuning alginate-gelatin bioink properties by varying solvent and their impact on stem cell behavior[J]. Sci Rep,2018,8(1):8020. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-26407-3.
    [20]
    LiuYF,LiJJ,YaoB, et al. The stiffness of hydrogel-based bioink impacts mesenchymal stem cells differentiation toward sweat glands in 3D-bioprinted matrix[J].Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl,2021,118:111387. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.111387.
    [21]
    WeiLC,LiZ,LiJJ, et al. An approach for mechanical property optimization of cell-laden alginate-gelatin composite bioink with bioactive glass nanoparticles[J].J Mater Sci Mater Med,2020,31(11):103. DOI: 10.1007/s10856-020-06440-3.
    [22]
    ChangM, NguyenTT. Strategy for treatment of infected fiabetic foot ulcers[J]. Acc Chem Res,2021,54(5):1080-1093. DOI: 10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00864.
    [23]
    NinanN,ThomasS,GrohensY.Wound healing in urology[J].Adv Drug Deliv Rev,2015(82/83):93-105. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2014.12.002.
    [24]
    WalkerJT,McLeodK,KimS, et al. Periostin as a multifunctional modulator of the wound healing response[J].Cell Tissue Res,2016,365(3):453-465. DOI: 10.1007/s00441-016-2426-6.
    [25]
    ChouhanD,DeyN,BhardwajN, et al. Emerging and innovative approaches for wound healing and skin regeneration: current status and advances[J].Biomaterials,2019,216:119267. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119267.
    [26]
    RodriguesM, KosaricN, BonhamCA, et al. Wound healing: a cellular perspective[J]. Physiol Rev,2019,99(1):665-706. DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00067.2017.
    [27]
    DongMW,LiM,ChenJ, et al. Activation of α7nAChR promotes diabetic wound healing by suppressing AGE-induced TNF-α production[J].Inflammation,2016,39(2):687-699. DOI: 10.1007/s10753-015-0295-x.
    [28]
    YenYH,PuCM,LiuCW, et al. Curcumin accelerates cutaneous wound healing via multiple biological actions: the involvement of TNF-α, MMP-9, α-SMA, and collagen[J].Int Wound J,2018,15(4):605-617. DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12904.
    [29]
    ZhouDJ, LiuTF, WangS, et al. Effects of IL-1β and TNF-α on the expression of P311 in vascular endothelial cells and wound healing in mice[J]. Front Physiol,2020,11:545008. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2020.545008.
    [30]
    GurtnerGC,WernerS,BarrandonY, et al. Wound repair and regeneration[J].Nature,2008,453(7193):314-321. DOI: 10.1038/nature07039.
    [31]
    SpiekmanM,PrzybytE,PlantingaJA, et al. Adipose tissue- derived stromal cells inhibit TGF-β1-induced differentiation of human dermal fibroblasts and keloid scar-derived fibroblasts in a paracrine fashion[J].Plast Reconstr Surg,2014,134(4):699-712. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000504.
    [32]
    KruglikovIL, SchererPE. Dermal adipocytes: from irrelevance to metabolic targets?[J]. Trends Endocrinol Metab,2016,27(1):1-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.tem.2015.11.002.
    [33]
    SpiekmanM,van DongenJA,WillemsenJC, et al. The power of fat and its adipose-derived stromal cells: emerging concepts for fibrotic scar treatment[J].J Tissue Eng Regen Med,2017,11(11):3220-3235. DOI: 10.1002/term.2213.
    [34]
    KoleskyDB,TrubyRL,GladmanAS, et al. 3D bioprinting of vascularized, heterogeneous cell-laden tissue constructs[J].Adv Mater,2014,26(19):3124-3130. DOI: 10.1002/adma.201305506.
    [35]
    NingLQ,GilCJ,HwangB, et al. Biomechanical factors in three-dimensional tissue bioprinting[J].Appl Phys Rev,2020,7(4):041319. DOI: 10.1063/5.0023206.
    [36]
    KimBS,KwonYW,KongJS, et al. 3D cell printing of in vitro stabilized skin model and in vivo pre-vascularized skin patch using tissue-specific extracellular matrix bioink: a step towards advanced skin tissue engineering[J].Biomaterials,2018,168:38-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.03.040.
    [37]
    YaoB,WangR,WangYH, et al. Biochemical and structural cues of 3D-printed matrix synergistically direct MSC differentiation for functional sweat gland regeneration[J].Sci Adv,2020,6(10):eaaz1094. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aaz1094.
    [38]
    WangSF, WangXH, NeufurthM, et al. Biomimetic alginate/gelatin cross-linked hydrogels supplemented with polyphosphate for wound healing applications[J]. Molecules, 2020, 25(21):5210. DOI: 10.3390/molecules25215210.
    [39]
    KaravasiliC,TsongasK,AndreadisII, et al. Physico-mechanical and finite element analysis evaluation of 3D printable alginate- methylcellulose inks for wound healing applications[J].Carbohydr Polym,2020,247:116666. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116666.
    [40]
    TurnerPR,MurrayE,McAdamCJ, et al. Peptide chitosan/dextran core/shell vascularized 3D constructs for wound healing[J].ACS Appl Mater Interfaces,2020,12(29):32328-32339. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c07212.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]Heng Xue, Li Changmin, Liu Wei, Li Ning, Yuan Zhiqiang, Peng Yizhi, Li Haisheng, Luo Gaoxing. Analysis of effects and influencing factors of continuous renal replacement therapy in severe burn patients complicated with acute kidney injury[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2024, 40(5): 468-475. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20240207-00052
    [2]Li Ning, Chen Hualing, Li Maojun, Luo Gaoxing, Yuan Zhiqiang. Application effects of bundle nursing of citric acid extracorporeal anticoagulation on continuous renal replacement therapy of severe burn patients[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2022, 38(1): 29-37. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20201201-00511
    [3]Jiang Bin, Shen Mingyan, Shen Tao. Nursing of one patient with extremely severe burn-blast combined injury complicated with acute kidney injury caused by dust explosion[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2020, 36(7): 603-605. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20190415-00188
    [4]Li Xiaoliang, Xiao Hongtao, Li Yancang, Li Yanguang, Zhang Jian, Feng Ke, Di Haiping, Tian Shemin, Lou Jihe, Xia Chengde. Effects of citric acid on patients with severe burn complicated with acute renal injury treated by continuous renal replacement therapy[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2019, 35(8): 568-573. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2019.08.003
    [5]Lyu Tao, Wang Lei, Liu Bing, Lou Jihe, Li Xiaoliang, Li Yancang, Li Shuren. Effect of continuous plasma filtration adsorption on treatment of severely burned patients with sepsis[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2018, 34(6): 370-373. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.06.011
    [6]Luo Xufang, Zhang Min, Zhao Dujuan, Lei Yan, Liu Juan, Bai Chen, Zhou Qin, Hu Xuehui. Influences of comprehensive nursing intervention on the caregivers of severely burned children[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2018, 34(9): 648-652. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.09.016
    [7]Liu Wei, Chai Jiake. Influences of ulinastatin on acute lung injury and time phase changes of coagulation parameters in rats with burn-blast combined injuries[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2018, 34(1): 32-39. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.01.007
    [8]Liu Feng, Huang Zhenggen, Peng Yizhi, Wu Jun, He Weifeng, Yuan Zhiqiang, Zhang Jiaping, Luo Qizhi, Yan Hong, Peng Daizhi, Dang Yongming, Luo Gaoxing. Clinical randomized controlled trial on the feasibility and validity of continuous blood purification during the early stage of severe burn[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2016, 32(3): 133-139. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2016.03.002
    [10]Jia Chiyu, Zou Xiaofang. Current status in rehabilitation of burn injury in China[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2015, 31(3): 161-163. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2015.03.001
    [11]Meng Aihua, He Lixin, Liu Qiang, . Clinical study on continuous plasma filtration absorption treatment for burn sepsis[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2014, 30(4): 310-314. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2014.04.005
    [12]Wang Yihe, Yang Hongming, Hu Quan, Hou Yusen, Luo Hongmin, Liu Lingying. Effects of sivelestat on acute lung injury in dogs with severe burn-blast combined injury Wang Yihe,[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2014, 30(2): 158-165. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2014.02.015
    [14]LI Lin, XU Le, WU Bo-yu, ZHENG You-jin. Investigation and analysis of factors influencing rehabilitation of burn patients[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2009, 25(6): 415-418. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2009.06.005
    [15]ZHU Pei-fang, WANG Zheng-guo. Burn-blast combined injury[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2008, 24(5): 384-386.
    [16]CHENG Tian-min, RAN Xin-ze. Studies on the treatment of combined radiation-burn injury[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2008, 24(5): 387-389.
    [17]YUE Li-qing, JIANG Dong-mei, HUANG Xiao-yuan. Investigation of life quality of severe burn patients at rehabilitation stage and analysis of the related influential factors[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2008, 24(3): 195-198.
    [19]LI Li. Influence of social support on the life quality of burn survivors[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2005, 21(4): 273-274.
    • Supplements(1)
  • 张超视频解读~1.mp4
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(6)

    1. 龚婷，陈思锋，莫春兰. 视频探视在重症监护病房中应用效果Meta分析. 实用临床医学. 2024(04): 100-106 .
    2. 朱婵，何林，张博文，梁英，赵海洋，齐宗师，梁敏，韩军涛，胡大海，刘佳琦. 儿童手烧伤后瘢痕挛缩家庭康复治疗模式的探索. 中华烧伤与创面修复杂志. 2023(01): 45-52 . 本站查看
    3. 周乾晓，冯灵，汪锐，涂双燕，徐丽莎，何凤鸣. 疫情背景下互联网视频技术在神经内科二级监护病区的应用现状. 中国社会医学杂志. 2023(02): 235-237 .
    4. 王雪敬，邓宝凤，罗昌春，赵玉荣，张爱军，刘海荣，赵艳梅. 新型冠状病毒感染期间远程探视系统在老年肿瘤住院病人中的应用. 实用老年医学. 2023(11): 1095-1098 .
    5. 刘园，邹琼，周灿，周爱梅. 云探视提高急诊重症监护室患者满意度研究调查分析. 中国当代医药. 2022(22): 161-164 .
    6. 李永亮，钟敏慧，朱芳，于婵，段霞. 慢性心力衰竭急性失代偿患者营养支持真实体验的质性研究. 中华现代护理杂志. 2022(35): 4870-4876 .

    Other cited types(0)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-04010203040
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 3.1 %FULLTEXT: 3.1 %META: 94.4 %META: 94.4 %PDF: 2.5 %PDF: 2.5 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 1.6 %其他: 1.6 %其他: 0.1 %其他: 0.1 %Central District: 0.1 %Central District: 0.1 %China: 0.2 %China: 0.2 %Kennedy Town: 0.0 %Kennedy Town: 0.0 %Solapur: 0.0 %Solapur: 0.0 %[]: 0.0 %[]: 0.0 %三明: 0.6 %三明: 0.6 %三门峡: 1.5 %三门峡: 1.5 %上海: 1.4 %上海: 1.4 %东莞: 0.0 %东莞: 0.0 %临汾: 0.2 %临汾: 0.2 %丽水: 0.9 %丽水: 0.9 %乐山: 0.6 %乐山: 0.6 %亳州: 0.0 %亳州: 0.0 %佛山: 0.3 %佛山: 0.3 %保定: 0.6 %保定: 0.6 %六安: 0.7 %六安: 0.7 %兰州: 0.1 %兰州: 0.1 %加特契纳: 0.1 %加特契纳: 0.1 %包头: 0.5 %包头: 0.5 %北京: 0.8 %北京: 0.8 %北方邦: 0.1 %北方邦: 0.1 %十堰: 0.0 %十堰: 0.0 %南京: 0.5 %南京: 0.5 %南宁: 0.1 %南宁: 0.1 %南平: 1.7 %南平: 1.7 %南通: 0.7 %南通: 0.7 %厦门: 0.2 %厦门: 0.2 %合肥: 0.8 %合肥: 0.8 %吉林: 0.8 %吉林: 0.8 %周口: 0.0 %周口: 0.0 %呼和浩特: 0.3 %呼和浩特: 0.3 %咸阳: 0.6 %咸阳: 0.6 %哈尔滨: 0.1 %哈尔滨: 0.1 %哥伦布: 0.1 %哥伦布: 0.1 %唐山: 0.3 %唐山: 0.3 %嘉兴: 1.1 %嘉兴: 1.1 %大连: 2.1 %大连: 2.1 %天津: 0.5 %天津: 0.5 %太原: 0.1 %太原: 0.1 %宁德: 1.8 %宁德: 1.8 %宁波: 1.2 %宁波: 1.2 %安庆: 0.1 %安庆: 0.1 %安康: 1.4 %安康: 1.4 %宜宾: 0.0 %宜宾: 0.0 %宿迁: 4.4 %宿迁: 4.4 %常州: 0.0 %常州: 0.0 %常德: 0.7 %常德: 0.7 %广元: 0.3 %广元: 0.3 %广安: 0.3 %广安: 0.3 %广州: 3.4 %广州: 3.4 %张家口: 0.6 %张家口: 0.6 %张家界: 0.0 %张家界: 0.0 %徐州: 0.8 %徐州: 0.8 %德阳: 0.1 %德阳: 0.1 %怀化: 0.2 %怀化: 0.2 %成都: 0.3 %成都: 0.3 %扬州: 0.8 %扬州: 0.8 %抚州: 1.2 %抚州: 1.2 %抚顺: 0.5 %抚顺: 0.5 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.1 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.1 %日照: 0.6 %日照: 0.6 %昆明: 0.2 %昆明: 0.2 %景德镇: 0.9 %景德镇: 0.9 %朝阳: 0.5 %朝阳: 0.5 %杭州: 1.6 %杭州: 1.6 %格兰特县: 0.0 %格兰特县: 0.0 %桂林: 0.0 %桂林: 0.0 %榆林: 0.1 %榆林: 0.1 %武汉: 0.2 %武汉: 0.2 %汉中: 0.8 %汉中: 0.8 %汕头: 0.4 %汕头: 0.4 %池州: 0.7 %池州: 0.7 %沈阳: 1.2 %沈阳: 1.2 %泉州: 1.9 %泉州: 1.9 %泰州: 1.6 %泰州: 1.6 %洛阳: 0.1 %洛阳: 0.1 %济南: 1.1 %济南: 1.1 %济宁: 0.0 %济宁: 0.0 %海东: 0.0 %海东: 0.0 %海得拉巴: 0.1 %海得拉巴: 0.1 %淮北: 0.2 %淮北: 0.2 %淮南: 0.1 %淮南: 0.1 %淮安: 0.7 %淮安: 0.7 %深圳: 0.1 %深圳: 0.1 %温州: 1.5 %温州: 1.5 %渭南: 0.4 %渭南: 0.4 %湖州: 1.4 %湖州: 1.4 %湘潭: 0.1 %湘潭: 0.1 %湘西: 0.7 %湘西: 0.7 %湛江: 0.1 %湛江: 0.1 %滨州: 0.0 %滨州: 0.0 %漯河: 0.1 %漯河: 0.1 %漳州: 0.9 %漳州: 0.9 %濮阳: 0.1 %濮阳: 0.1 %烟台: 0.6 %烟台: 0.6 %盐城: 0.6 %盐城: 0.6 %盘锦: 0.1 %盘锦: 0.1 %石家庄: 0.6 %石家庄: 0.6 %福州: 0.6 %福州: 0.6 %绍兴: 0.0 %绍兴: 0.0 %绵阳: 0.3 %绵阳: 0.3 %自贡: 0.2 %自贡: 0.2 %舟山: 1.1 %舟山: 1.1 %芒廷维尤: 8.6 %芒廷维尤: 8.6 %芜湖: 0.6 %芜湖: 0.6 %芝加哥: 0.1 %芝加哥: 0.1 %苏州: 1.0 %苏州: 1.0 %荆门: 0.4 %荆门: 0.4 %莆田: 2.4 %莆田: 2.4 %营口: 0.9 %营口: 0.9 %葫芦岛: 0.7 %葫芦岛: 0.7 %蚌埠: 0.2 %蚌埠: 0.2 %衡水: 0.4 %衡水: 0.4 %衡阳: 0.0 %衡阳: 0.0 %衢州: 2.4 %衢州: 2.4 %襄阳: 0.8 %襄阳: 0.8 %西宁: 0.9 %西宁: 0.9 %西安: 2.2 %西安: 2.2 %西雅图: 0.1 %西雅图: 0.1 %辽阳: 1.6 %辽阳: 1.6 %运城: 0.0 %运城: 0.0 %连云港: 0.6 %连云港: 0.6 %遵义: 0.3 %遵义: 0.3 %邵阳: 0.2 %邵阳: 0.2 %郑州: 0.3 %郑州: 0.3 %郴州: 1.1 %郴州: 1.1 %鄂木斯克: 0.2 %鄂木斯克: 0.2 %重庆: 3.2 %重庆: 3.2 %金华: 1.7 %金华: 1.7 %铁岭: 1.0 %铁岭: 1.0 %铜陵: 1.5 %铜陵: 1.5 %锦州: 1.1 %锦州: 1.1 %长春: 0.0 %长春: 0.0 %长沙: 0.5 %长沙: 0.5 %青岛: 0.1 %青岛: 0.1 %鞍山: 2.1 %鞍山: 2.1 %韶关: 0.0 %韶关: 0.0 %香港: 0.0 %香港: 0.0 %马鞍山: 0.0 %马鞍山: 0.0 %鹰潭: 0.5 %鹰潭: 0.5 %黄山: 0.1 %黄山: 0.1 %黄石: 0.1 %黄石: 0.1 %黔西南: 0.5 %黔西南: 0.5 %其他其他Central DistrictChinaKennedy TownSolapur[]三明三门峡上海东莞临汾丽水乐山亳州佛山保定六安兰州加特契纳包头北京北方邦十堰南京南宁南平南通厦门合肥吉林周口呼和浩特咸阳哈尔滨哥伦布唐山嘉兴大连天津太原宁德宁波安庆安康宜宾宿迁常州常德广元广安广州张家口张家界徐州德阳怀化成都扬州抚州抚顺拉贾斯坦邦日照昆明景德镇朝阳杭州格兰特县桂林榆林武汉汉中汕头池州沈阳泉州泰州洛阳济南济宁海东海得拉巴淮北淮南淮安深圳温州渭南湖州湘潭湘西湛江滨州漯河漳州濮阳烟台盐城盘锦石家庄福州绍兴绵阳自贡舟山芒廷维尤芜湖芝加哥苏州荆门莆田营口葫芦岛蚌埠衡水衡阳衢州襄阳西宁西安西雅图辽阳运城连云港遵义邵阳郑州郴州鄂木斯克重庆金华铁岭铜陵锦州长春长沙青岛鞍山韶关香港马鞍山鹰潭黄山黄石黔西南

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(5)  / Tables(4)

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (2694) PDF downloads(50) Cited by(6)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Copyright © Chinese Journal of Burns京ICP备07035254号-14

    E-mail：shaoshangzazhi@163.com

    Website：https://zhsszz.xml-journal.net/

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return