Shi Chenshuo, Wang Dali, Sun Jin, et al. Influence of human amniotic mesenchymal stem cells on macrophage phenotypes and inflammatory factors in full-thickness skin wounds of mice[J]. Chin j Burns, 2020, 36(4): 288-296. Doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20191120-00438
Citation: Li N,Chen HL,Li MJ,et al.Prospective study on application of mind mapping combined with scenario simulation training on the ability training of junior nurses in hospital transfer of patients with critical burns and trauma[J].Chin J Burns Wounds,2023,39(5):465-471.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20220524-00200.

Prospective study on application of mind mapping combined with scenario simulation training on the ability training of junior nurses in hospital transfer of patients with critical burns and trauma

doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20220524-00200
Funds:

Graduate Education Teaching Reform Research Project of Chongqing of China yjg172013

More Information
  • Corresponding author: Li Haisheng, Email: lee58427@163.com
  • Received Date: 2022-05-24
  •   Objective   To explore the application effects of mind mapping combined with scenario simulation training on the ability training of junior nurses in hospital transfer of patients with critical burns and trauma.   Methods   A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted. From December 2019 to December 2020, 55 female junior nurses from the Institute of Burn Research of the First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University (the Third Military Medical University) who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled in this study and divided into routine group (27 nurses, aged (24.0±0.9) years) and combined group (28 nurses, aged (24.2±0.8) years), according to the random number table. The nurses in routine group were trained with hospital transfer of patients with critical burns and trauma by theory combined with operational skill, and the nurses in combined group were trained with hospital transfer of patients with critical burns and trauma by mind mapping combined with scenario simulation training. Before and after the training, the self-made theoretical examination papers and skill assessment items were used for the examination and assessment to nurses, and their scores were calculated and compared. The self-made emergency ability scoring system was used to evaluate the emergency disposal ability of nurses from five dimensions, including team cooperation ability, emergency response ability, operative technique ability, specialized business ability, and nurse-patient communication ability, and their scores were calculated and compared. The non-standard implementation rates of transfer nursing measures, such as incomplete preparation of goods, poor communication effect of patients, inadequate pipeline nursing, unclear handover, and inadequate final treatment, were calculated and compared in the process of transporting highly simulated human (hereinafter referred to as simulated human) by nurses before and after training; and the rate of disease change and successful rate of transport of simulated human were calculated and compared after training. After assessment, self-made satisfaction questionnaire was used to compare nurses' satisfaction with the training mode, content, and effects. Data were statistically analyzed with independent sample t test, Pearson chi-square test, or Yates corrected chi-square test.   Results   Fifty-five enrolled nurses were fully involved in the training, examination, assessment, and questionnaire filling. Before training, there were no statistically significant differences in theoretical examination and skill assessment scores between the 2 groups ( P>0.05); After training, the theoretical examination and skill assessment scores of nurses in combined group were significantly higher than those in routine group (with t values of -3.89 and -4.24, respectively, P<0.05). Before training, there were no statistically significant differences in the scores of each item of emergency disposal ability between the 2 groups ( P>0.05); after training, the scores in terms of team cooperation ability, emergency response ability, operative technique ability, specialized business ability, and nurse-patient communication ability of nurses in combined group were significantly higher than those in routine group (with t values of -6.49, -6.44, -2.21, -2.85, and -2.34, respectively, P<0.05). Before training, there were no statistically significant differences in the non-standard implementation rates of transfer nursing measures of nurses between the 2 groups ( P>0.05); after training, the non-standard rates of incomplete preparation of goods, unclear handover, and inadequate final treatment of nurses in combined group were significantly lower than those in routine group (with t values of 3.87, 5.89, and 5.28, respectively, P<0.05). After training, the rate of disease change of simulated human of nurses in combined group was 7.14% (2/28), which was significantly lower than 33.33% (9/27) in routine group ( χ 2=5.89, P<0.05); the successful rate of transport was 96.43% (27/28), which was significantly higher than 74.07% (20/27) in routine group ( χ 2=3.87, P<0.05). After assessment, the total score of training satisfaction and scores of satisfaction with training mode and training effect of nurses in combined group were significantly higher than those in routine group (with t values of 5.22, 4.67, and 10.71, respectively, P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the satisfaction score on training content between the two groups ( P>0.05).   Conclusions   Evidence-based mind mapping combined with scenario simulation training significantly improves the nursing skills and emergency handling capabilities of junior nurses in transferring patients with critical burns and trauma.

     

  • [1]
    刘云松. 陆地远程转运危重病人的经验[J].中国急救医学,2004,24(7):封三. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1949.2004.07.046.
    [2]
    马莉, 王志稳, 葛宝兰,等. 急诊科危重病人院内转运过程中不良事件及风险因素分析[J]. 护理研究, 2019, 33(21):3676-3680. DOI: 10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2019.21.008.
    [3]
    WarnerP, BaileyJK, BowersL, et al. Aeromedical pediatric burn transportation: a six-year review[J]. J Burn Care Res, 2016,37(2):e181-e187. DOI: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000198.
    [4]
    FanaraB, ManzonC, BarbotO, et al. Recommendations for the intra-hospital transport of critically ill patients[J]. Crit Care, 2010,14(3):R87. DOI: 10.1186/cc9018.
    [5]
    JonesHM, ZychowiczME, ChampagneM, et al. Intrahospital transport of the critically ill adult: a standardized evaluation plan[J]. Dimens Crit Care Nurs, 2016,35(3):133-146. DOI: 10.1097/DCC.0000000000000176.
    [6]
    陆琴, 倪桂珍, 王宋超. 心内科电子护理病历书写思维导图的设计及应用[J].护理学报,2018,25(24):17-20. DOI: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2018.24.017.
    [7]
    许月萍,于恩光,张小红.思维导图在新护士培训中的应用[J].护理学报,2014(11):4-6.
    [8]
    东尼·博赞. 大脑使用说明书[M]. 张鼎昆, 徐克茹, 译. 北京:外语教学与研究出版社, 2005.
    [9]
    RanaS, HughesLA, RanaS, et al. The effects of ICU crisis reorganization on outcomes in patients not infected with coronavirus disease 2019 during the initial surge of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic[J]. Crit Care Explor, 2021,3(1):e0333. DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000333.
    [10]
    YangSH, JerngJS, ChenLC, et al. Incidence of patient safety events and process-related human failures during intra-hospital transportation of patients: retrospective exploration from the institutional incident reporting system[J]. BMJ Open, 2017,7(11):e017932. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017932.
    [11]
    中国医师协会烧伤科医师分会, 中华医学会烧伤外科学分会. 成批严重烧伤伤员的转运方案(2016版)[J].中华烧伤杂志,2016,32(8):449-451. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2016.08.001.
    [12]
    急诊危重症患者院内转运共识专家组. 急诊危重症患者院内转运共识——标准化分级转运方案[J].中国急救医学,2017,37(6):481-485. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1949.2017.06.001.
    [13]
    Australasian College for Emergency Medicine, Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists, Joint Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine. Minimum standards for intrahospital transport of critically ill patients[J]. Emerg Med (Fremantle), 2003,15(2):202-204.
    [14]
    StonebrakerK. Intra-hospital transport: university of Michigan SWAT team takes the ICU to the patient[J]. Mich Nurse, 2011,84(3):10-12.
    [15]
    WarrenJ, FrommREJr, OrrRA, et al. Guidelines for the inter- and intrahospital transport of critically ill patients[J]. Crit Care Med, 2004,32(1):256-262. DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000104917.39204.0A.
    [16]
    颜红波, 于红静, 关玉仙, 等. 反思日记联合案例法在神经外科低年资护士培训中的应用[J].护理学杂志,2019,34(3):93-95. DOI: 10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2019.03.093.
    [17]
    李慧, 邓晰明, 张飞鹏, 等. 集束化干预措施在急诊外科急危重症患者院内转运中的效果研究[J].中华全科医学,2020,18(8):1414-1416,1424. DOI: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001520.
    [18]
    王青, 周琴, 罗旭芳, 等. 情景浸润联合交互式培训模式在低年资护士预防及处理压疮培训中的应用效果[J].中华烧伤杂志,2020,36(4):312-316. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20190108-00001.
    [19]
    张春华. 合作式情景模拟培训在手术室低年资护士培训中的应用[J].中华医学教育杂志,2019,39(9):677-680. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2019.09.008.
    [20]
    仲丽芸, 段熠, 何川. 情景模拟教学在神经外科低年资护士规范化培训中的应用[J].中华现代护理杂志,2019,25(24):3063-3065. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2019.24.007.
    [21]
    LottTF. Moving forward: creating a new nursing services orientation program[J]. J Nurses Staff Dev, 2006,22(5):214-221. DOI: 10.1097/00124645-200609000-00002.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]Luo Wei, Luo Jia, Huang Yuqun, Chen Yu, Li Ning. Application effects of scenario simulation combined with checklist-based teaching in clinical decision-making ability training of nursing interns in burn department[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2024, 40(9): 876-884. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20240425-00152
    [2]Guo Qingjiao, Gu Ying, Ouyang Jing, Yu Lihong, Zhang Yizhi, Rao Jiaqin, Luo Shasha, Xu Wanying. Summary of the best evidence on exercise for the prevention and treatment of diabetic foot[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2023, 39(7): 671-678. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20220822-00354
    [3]Li Maojun, Chen Hualing, Ju Yangyang, Zeng Lijin, Li Ning. A cross-sectional survey and influencing factors analysis of knowledge, attitude, and behavior of enteral nutrition implemented by nurses in burn intensive care unit[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2023, 39(9): 874-881. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20220522-00198
    [4]Chen Hanxi, Liu Wenji, Liu Bing, Huang Zhifeng, Zhang Qiuping, Xiao Xiling, Lai Wen, Zheng Shaoyi. Influence of work engagement and self-efficacy of nurses on clinical practice ability in burn intensive care unit[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2023, 39(8): 779-786. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20220905-00379
    [5]Jiang Qiqi, Zhang Yin, Qiao Liang, Zha Qinghua, Xie Lin, Luo Zhizhen. A cross-sectional survey and analysis of influencing factors of humanistic of the current status of humanistic care ability of burn specialist nurses[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2022, 38(11): 1073-1078. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210318-00092
    [6]Xie Lin, Zhang Yin, Wang Jiayu, Yang Dingting, Teng Peimin, Wang Wenliang, Huang Yi. A prospective before-after self-control study of the scenario simulation teaching of junior nurses in a burns department on the fluid resuscitation care of massive burn patients during shock stage[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2021, 37(8): 781-787. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20201105-00456
    [7]Jiang Bin, Shen Mingyan, Shen Tao. Nursing of one patient with extremely severe burn-blast combined injury complicated with acute kidney injury caused by dust explosion[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2020, 36(7): 603-605. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20190415-00188
    [8]Wang Qing, Zhou Qin, Luo Xufang, Ma Ningxia, Tong Cuifang, Xue Jiao. Effect of using scenario infiltration joint interactive training mode for junior nurse training in the prevention and treatment of pressure sore[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2020, 36(4): 312-316. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20190108-00001
    [9]Ding Hongfan, Zheng Xingfeng, Xia Zhaofan. Advances in the research of application of metabonomics in the treatment of severe burn or trauma[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2019, 35(6): 467-471. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2019.06.014
    [10]Lu Ying, Zhou Qin, Wang Lina, Wang Dongjuan, Wang Ni, Hou Jiao, Wang Qing, Xue Jiao. Application of Plato analysis combined with plan-do-check-act cycle in scientific research management of nurses with primary position title[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2019, 35(10): 752-756. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2019.10.009
    [11]Liu Wei, Chai Jiake. Influences of ulinastatin on acute lung injury and time phase changes of coagulation parameters in rats with burn-blast combined injuries[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2018, 34(1): 32-39. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.01.007
    [12]Jiang Xiaosheng, Xu Le, Li Lin, Zhang Lingqian. Investigation and analysis of the difference between the nursing needs of adult burn patients and nurses′ cognition[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2018, 34(10): 731-735. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.10.016
    [16]Wang Yihe, Yang Hongming, Hu Quan, Hou Yusen, Luo Hongmin, Liu Lingying. Effects of sivelestat on acute lung injury in dogs with severe burn-blast combined injury Wang Yihe,[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2014, 30(2): 158-165. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2014.02.015
    [18]ZHU Pei-fang, WANG Zheng-guo. Burn-blast combined injury[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2008, 24(5): 384-386.
    [19]CHENG Tian-min, RAN Xin-ze. Studies on the treatment of combined radiation-burn injury[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2008, 24(5): 387-389.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(5)

    1. 金静洁,王徐赢,胡珍珍. 基于ICU应急救治团队主导体外膜肺氧合支持下的院内安全转运的应用效果. 中国医药导报. 2024(16): 52-55 .
    2. 杨骄,林锦淑,陈翠娟,张育淑. 重症烧伤患者护理中应用临床护理路径的效果分析. 中华灾害救援医学. 2024(01): 109-112 .
    3. 罗维,罗佳,黄玉群,陈羽,黎宁. 情景模拟联合清单式教学在烧伤科护理实习生临床决策能力培训中的应用效果. 中华烧伤与创面修复杂志. 2024(09): 876-884 . 本站查看
    4. 杨妙芬. 中医药传统文化融入规范化培训管理对低年资护士综合素质的影响. 中医药管理杂志. 2024(21): 46-48 .
    5. 范敏娟,田梓蓉,李秀雅,李飞,任晓波. 思维导图式健康教育对喉切除患者出院准备度的影响. 中华现代护理杂志. 2024(34): 4728-4734 .

    Other cited types(0)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-04010203040
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 20.4 %FULLTEXT: 20.4 %META: 71.6 %META: 71.6 %PDF: 8.0 %PDF: 8.0 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 10.1 %其他: 10.1 %其他: 0.5 %其他: 0.5 %Moorveld: 0.9 %Moorveld: 0.9 %上海: 0.5 %上海: 0.5 %兰州: 0.2 %兰州: 0.2 %北京: 0.7 %北京: 0.7 %十堰: 0.2 %十堰: 0.2 %南京: 0.9 %南京: 0.9 %南宁: 1.4 %南宁: 1.4 %南昌: 0.9 %南昌: 0.9 %咸阳: 0.5 %咸阳: 0.5 %哥伦布: 0.5 %哥伦布: 0.5 %嘉兴: 0.7 %嘉兴: 0.7 %圣约翰斯: 0.2 %圣约翰斯: 0.2 %大连: 0.2 %大连: 0.2 %天津: 0.7 %天津: 0.7 %安康: 0.2 %安康: 0.2 %宣城: 0.2 %宣城: 0.2 %平顶山: 0.2 %平顶山: 0.2 %广州: 1.2 %广州: 1.2 %张家口: 4.5 %张家口: 4.5 %成都: 0.2 %成都: 0.2 %日照: 0.2 %日照: 0.2 %昆明: 2.6 %昆明: 2.6 %普赖恩维尔: 4.7 %普赖恩维尔: 4.7 %杭州: 0.7 %杭州: 0.7 %格兰特县: 0.2 %格兰特县: 0.2 %梧州: 0.5 %梧州: 0.5 %武汉: 0.5 %武汉: 0.5 %沃思堡: 1.4 %沃思堡: 1.4 %沈阳: 0.2 %沈阳: 0.2 %济南: 0.5 %济南: 0.5 %海得拉巴: 0.7 %海得拉巴: 0.7 %温州: 0.9 %温州: 0.9 %漯河: 0.9 %漯河: 0.9 %濮阳: 0.2 %濮阳: 0.2 %石家庄: 0.7 %石家庄: 0.7 %福州: 0.5 %福州: 0.5 %芒廷维尤: 32.9 %芒廷维尤: 32.9 %芝加哥: 1.9 %芝加哥: 1.9 %苏州: 0.2 %苏州: 0.2 %衡水: 0.2 %衡水: 0.2 %西宁: 1.9 %西宁: 1.9 %西安: 1.2 %西安: 1.2 %贵阳: 0.5 %贵阳: 0.5 %邯郸: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.2 %郑州: 1.2 %郑州: 1.2 %鄂州: 0.7 %鄂州: 0.7 %重庆: 15.0 %重庆: 15.0 %长春: 0.5 %长春: 0.5 %长沙: 1.2 %长沙: 1.2 %青岛: 0.2 %青岛: 0.2 %马德里: 0.7 %马德里: 0.7 %黄冈: 0.2 %黄冈: 0.2 %其他其他Moorveld上海兰州北京十堰南京南宁南昌咸阳哥伦布嘉兴圣约翰斯大连天津安康宣城平顶山广州张家口成都日照昆明普赖恩维尔杭州格兰特县梧州武汉沃思堡沈阳济南海得拉巴温州漯河濮阳石家庄福州芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州衡水西宁西安贵阳邯郸郑州鄂州重庆长春长沙青岛马德里黄冈

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(1)  / Tables(4)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (304) PDF downloads(34) Cited by(5)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return