Email Alerts
RSS
Volume 38 Issue 10
Oct.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Article Navigation >  CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS  > 2022  >  38(10): 944-951
Wang P,Chen ZH,Jiang LY,et al.Screening, functional analysis and clinical validation of differentially expressed genes in diabetic foot ulcers[J].Chin J Burns Wounds,2022,38(10):944-951.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20220731-00328.
Citation: Wang P,Chen ZH,Jiang LY,et al.Screening, functional analysis and clinical validation of differentially expressed genes in diabetic foot ulcers[J].Chin J Burns Wounds,2022,38(10):944-951.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20220731-00328.
shu

Screening, functional analysis and clinical validation of differentially expressed genes in diabetic foot ulcers

doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20220731-00328
  • 1.

    Department of Burns and Plastic and Cosmetic Surgery, Xi'an Ninth Hospital, Xi'an 710054, China

  • 2.

    Department of Burns and Wound Repair, Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Burn Research Institute, Fujian Burn Medical Center, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Burn and Trauma, Fuzhou 350001, China

  • 3.

    Department of Burns and Plastic and Wound Repair Surgery, Xiang'an Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, China

Funds:

Key Research and Development Plan of Shaanxi Province of China S2021-YF-YBSF-0936

Xi'an Health Commission Fund Project 2020yb21, 2022yb03, 2022yb04, 2022yb05

2020 Provincial Key Laboratory Open Project of Fujian Medical University Affiliated Union Hospital XHZDSYS202004

More Information
  • Corresponding author: Xiao Hou'an, Email: xiaohouan@163.com
  • Received Date: 2022-07-31
    Abstract
  •   Objective  To screen the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), and to perform functional analysis and clinical validation of them, intending to lay a theoretical foundation for epigenetic therapy of chronic refractory wounds.  Methods  An observational study was conducted. The gene expression profile dataset GSE80178 of DFU patients in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) was selected, and the DEG between three normal skin tissue samples and six DFU tissue samples in the dataset was analyzed and screened using the GEO2R tool. For the screened DEG, ClusterProfiler, org.Hs.eg.db, GOplot, and ggplot2 in the R language packages were used for Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis of biological processes, molecular functions, and cellular components, and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis, respectively. Protein-protein interaction (PPI) analysis was performed using STRING database to screen key genes in the DEG, and GO enrichment analysis of key genes was performed using Cytohubba plug-in in Cytoscape 3.9.1 software. DFU tissue and normal skin tissue discarded after surgery were collected respectively from 15 DFU patients (7 males and 8 females, aged 55-87 years) and 15 acute wound patients (6 males and 9 females, aged 8-52 years) who were admitted to Xiang'an Hospital of Xiamen University from September 2018 to March 2021. The mRNA and protein expressions of small proline-rich repeat protein 1A (SPRR1A) and late cornified envelope protein 3C (LCE3C) were detected by real-time fluorescent quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry, respectively. Data were statistically analyzed with independent sample t test.  Results  Compared with normal skin tissue, 492 statistically differentially expressed DEGs were screened from DFU tissue of DFU patients (corrected P<0.05 or corrected P<0.01), including 363 up-regulated DEGs and 129 down-regulated DEGs. GO terminology analysis showed that DEGs were significantly enriched in the aspects of skin development, keratinocyte (KC) differentiation, keratinization, epidermal development, and epidermal cell differentiation, etc. (corrected P values all <0.01). KEGG pathway analysis showed that DEGs were significantly enriched in the aspects of tumor-associated microRNA, Ras related protein 1 signaling pathway, and pluripotent stem cell regulatory signaling pathway, etc. (corrected P values all <0.01). PPI analysis showed that endophial protein, SPRR1A, SPRR1B, SPRR2B, SPRR2E, SPRR2F, LCE3C, LCE3E, keratin 16 (all down-regulated DEGs), and filoprotein (up-regulated DEG) were key genes of DEGs screened from DFU tissue of DFU patients, which were significantly enriched in GO terms of keratinization, KC differentiation, epidermal cell differentiation, skin development, epidermis development, and peptide cross-linking, etc. (corrected P values all <0.01). The mRNA expressions of SPRR1A and LCE3C in DFU tissue of DFU patients were 0.588±0.082 and 0.659±0.098, respectively, and the protein expressions were 0.22±0.05 and 0.24±0.04, respectively, which were significantly lower than 1.069±0.025 and 1.053±0.044 (with t values of 20.91 and 13.66, respectively, P values all <0.01) and 0.38±0.04 and 0.45±0.05 (with t values of 9.69 and 12.46, respectively, P values all <0.01) in normal skin tissue of acute wound patients.  Conclusions  Compared with normal skin tissue, there is DEG profile in DFU tissue of DFU patients, with DEGs being significantly enriched in the aspects of KC differentiation and keratin function. Key DEGs are related to the biological function of KC, and their low expressions in DFU tissue of DFU patients may impede ulcer healing.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
  • loading
    • References(38)
  • [1]
    《多学科合作下糖尿病足防治专家共识(2020版)》编写组.多学科合作下糖尿病足防治专家共识(2020版)精华版(Ⅱ)[J].中华烧伤杂志,2020,36(9):767-785.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200217-00062.
    [2]
    ArmstrongDG,BoultonAJM,BusSA.Diabetic foot ulcers and their recurrence[J].N Engl J Med,2017,376(24):2367-2375.DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra1615439.
    [3]
    JiangY,WangX,XiaL,et al.A cohort study of diabetic patients and diabetic foot ulceration patients in China[J].Wound Repair Regen,2015,23(2):222-230.DOI: 10.1111/wrr.12263.
    [4]
    陈泓邑.生物医学大数据共享中的“信任”与“配享信任”[J].医学与哲学,2021,42(2):23-27.DOI: 10.12014/j.issn.1002-0772.2021.02.05.
    [5]
    姜林宏,张鹤达,钟山亮,等.基于GEO数据库分析circRNAs在胃癌组织中的表达[J].中国肿瘤外科杂志,2020,12(6):529-533.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4136.2020.06.008.
    [6]
    张钧栋,杨波,刘霖,等.严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒感染肺损伤机制与干预药物的生物信息学分析[J].中华实验和临床病毒学杂志,2020,34(4):367-373.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112866-20200318-00074.
    [7]
    赵倩倩,尤红俊,肖丹,等.基于基因表达综合数据库芯片的类风湿关节炎生物标志物的筛选与生物信息学分析[J].西安交通大学学报(医学版),2020,41(4):544-552.DOI: 10.7652/jdyxb202004014.
    [8]
    王欣凯,王硕.探究生物信息学的研究进展[J].科技资讯,2020,18(14):228-229.DOI: 10.16661/j.cnki.1672-3791.2020.14.228.
    [9]
    闫小妮,田国祥,郭晓娟,等.GEO数据库架构、申请及数据提取方法与流程[J].中国循证心血管医学杂志,2019,11(2):134-137.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4055.2019.02.02.
    [10]
    胡建雄,陈思齐,刘涛,等.R语言在公共卫生领域的应用:基本数据处理[J].华南预防医学,2020,46(2):183-184,188.DOI: 10.12183/j.scjpm.2020.0183.
    [11]
    CrosaraKTB,MoffaEB,XiaoY,et al.Merging in-silico and in vitro salivary protein complex partners using the STRING database: a tutorial[J].J Proteomics,2018,171:87-94.DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2017.08.002.
    [12]
    江珊,蒋勃,徐桂珍,等.使用Cytoscape对生物网络数据的建模和分析[J].农业网络信息,2017(6):32-37.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6251.2017.06.009.
    [13]
    郭光华,朱峰,闵定宏,等.糖尿病足合并难愈性创面外科治疗全国专家共识(2020版)[J/CD].中华损伤与修复杂志:电子版,2020,15(4):256-263.DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2020.04.005.
    [14]
    申金付,蒋瑞妹,王卓群,等.2型糖尿病患者糖尿病足溃疡复发情况及影响因素[J].中华烧伤杂志,2020,36(10):947-952.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20190726-00315.
    [15]
    DingX,TangQ,XuZ,et al.Challenges and innovations in treating chronic and acute wound infections: from basic science to clinical practice[J/OL].Burns Trauma,2022,10:tkac014[2022-07-31]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35611318/.DOI: 10.1093/burnst/tkac014.
    [16]
    RaghuramAC,YuRP,LoAY,et al.Role of stem cell therapies in treating chronic wounds: a systematic review[J].World J Stem Cells,2020,12(7):659-675.DOI: 10.4252/wjsc.v12.i7.659.
    [17]
    WangA,LvG,ChengX,et al.Guidelines on multidisciplinary approaches for the prevention and management of diabetic foot disease (2020 edition)[J/OL].Burns Trauma,2020,8:tkaa017[2022-07-31].https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32685563/.DOI: 10.1093/burnst/tkaa017.
    [18]
    马俊,吴霞,宫伟,等.生物信息学相关数据库在肿瘤研究中的应用[J].中国医药生物技术,2019,14(1):69-71.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-713X.2019.01.014.
    [19]
    林志琥,王君,梁尊鸿,等.干细胞治疗糖尿病足创面的研究进展[J].中华烧伤与创面修复杂志,2022,38(3):281-286.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210828-00292.
    [20]
    王雪欣,余鹏,张明谏,等.糖尿病足患者下肢动脉病变和伤口细菌学分析[J].中华烧伤杂志,2018,34(6):386-388.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.06.014.
    [21]
    薛春利,胡志成,杨祖贤,等.异体脱细胞真皮基质治疗糖尿病足溃疡临床效果荟萃分析[J].中华烧伤杂志,2016,32(12):725-729.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2016.12.005.
    [22]
    徐进,殷嫦嫦,宋伟,等.间充质干细胞治疗糖尿病足溃疡的Meta分析[J].中国糖尿病杂志,2019,27(6):417-423.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6187.2019.06.004.
    [23]
    VerdiJ,ShirianS,SalehM,et al.Mesenchymal stem cells regenerate diabetic foot ulcers: a review article[J].World J Plast Surg,2022,11(1):12-22.DOI: 10.52547/wjps.11.1.12.
    [24]
    Álvaro-AfonsoFJ,Sanz-CorbalánI,Lázaro-MartínezJL,et al.Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a review of preclinical and clinical studies[J].Angiology,2020,71(9):853-863.DOI: 10.1177/0003319720939467.
    [25]
    任慧雯,王秋月.Epac-Rap1与糖尿病肾病[J].国际内分泌代谢杂志,2015,35(3):170-172.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4157.2015.03.007.
    [26]
    陆树良,谢挺,牛轶雯.创面难愈机制研究——糖尿病皮肤的“微环境污染”[J].中华烧伤杂志,2008,24(1):3-5.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2008.01.002.
    [27]
    李校堃.坚持梦想 不负韶华:生长因子与创面修复三十年自主创新之路[J].中华烧伤杂志,2020,36(3):161-165.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200305-00125.
    [28]
    董叫云,弓家弘,嵇晓芸,等.异体糖尿病大鼠来源脂肪干细胞移植治疗糖尿病大鼠创面的初步评价及其机制探讨[J].中华烧伤杂志,2019,35(9):645-654.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2019.09.002.
    [29]
    KuritaM,AraokaT,HishidaT,et al.In vivo reprogramming of wound-resident cells generates skin epithelial tissue[J].Nature,2018,561(7722):243-247.DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0477-4.
    [30]
    RoshanA,MuraiK,FowlerJ,et al.Human keratinocytes have two interconvertible modes of proliferation[J].Nat Cell Biol,2016,18(2):145-156.DOI: 10.1038/ncb3282.
    [31]
    PiipponenM,LiD,LandénNX.The immune functions of keratinocytes in skin wound healing[J].Int J Mol Sci,2020,21(22):8790.DOI: 10.3390/ijms21228790.
    [32]
    RiouxG,RidhaZ,SimardM,et al.Transcriptome profiling analyses in psoriasis: a dynamic contribution of keratinocytes to the pathogenesis[J].Genes (Basel),2020,11(10):1155.DOI: 10.3390/genes11101155.
    [33]
    VermeijWP,BackendorfC.Skin cornification proteins provide global link between ROS detoxification and cell migration during wound healing[J].PLoS One,2010,5(8):e11957.DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011957.
    [34]
    MizuguchiY,SpechtS,LunzJG3rd,et al.SPRR2A enhances p53 deacetylation through HDAC1 and down regulates p21 promoter activity[J].BMC Mol Biol,2012,13:20.DOI: 10.1186/1471-2199-13-20.
    [35]
    ZhangC,HuZ,LoneAG,et al.Small proline-rich proteins (SPRRs) are epidermally produced antimicrobial proteins that defend the cutaneous barrier by direct bacterial membrane disruption[J].Elife,2022,11:e76729.DOI: 10.7554/eLife.76729.
    [36]
    NiehuesH,van der KriekenDA,EderveenTHA,et al.Antimicrobial late cornified envelope proteins: the psoriasis risk factor deletion of LCE3B/C genes affects microbiota composition[J].J Invest Dermatol,2022,142(7):1947-1955.e6.DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2021.11.036.
    [37]
    ZhangX,YinM,ZhangLJ.Keratin 6, 16 and 17-critical barrier alarmin molecules in skin wounds and psoriasis[J].Cells,2019,8(8):807.DOI: 10.3390/cells8080807.
    [38]
    尹丽芬,柳志文,吴昊,等.丝聚蛋白在口腔黏膜下纤维性变中的表达[J].口腔疾病防治,2019,27(9):557-560.DOI: 10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2019.09.003.
    • Relative Articles
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(6)

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (2818) PDF downloads(50) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    Copyright © Chinese Journal of Burns京ICP备07035254号-14

    E-mail：shaoshangzazhi@163.com

    Website：https://zhsszz.xml-journal.net/

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return