Establishment of an early risk prediction model for bloodstream infection and analysis of its predictive value in patients with extremely severe burns
-
摘要:
目的 筛选特重度烧伤患者发生血流感染的独立危险因素,以此构建该类患者发生血流感染的早期预测模型并分析其预测价值。 方法 采用回顾性病例对照研究方法。2010年1月1日—2019年12月31日,上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院灼伤整形科收治307例符合入选标准的特重度烧伤患者,其中男251例、女56例,年龄33~55岁。根据是否发生血流感染,将患者分为未血流感染组(221例)和血流感染组(86例),比较2组患者性别、年龄、身体质量指数、转归、住院天数,统计血流感染组患者血微生物培养中细菌检出情况。将纳入的307例患者按照大约7∶3的比例采用随机数字表法分成建模组(219例)和验证组(88例),比较2组患者性别、年龄、身体质量指数、烧伤总面积、Ⅲ度烧伤面积、是否合并吸入性损伤、是否行机械通气、机械通气天数、住重症监护病房(ICU)天数、转归、住院天数、是否并发血流感染。根据是否发生血流感染,将建模组患者分为血流感染亚组(154例)和未血流感染亚组(165例),比较2个亚组患者烧伤总面积、Ⅲ度烧伤面积、是否合并吸入性损伤、是否行机械通气、机械通气天数、住ICU天数。对前述2组间数据比较行独立样本t检验、χ2检验、Mann-Whitney U检验等单因素分析,筛选出建模组的亚组单因素分析中差异有统计学意义的因素,以其作为自变量进行二分类多因素logistic回归分析,筛选影响特重度烧伤患者发生血流感染的独立危险因素,并以此构建建模组特重度烧伤患者发生血流感染的预测模型。绘制预测模型对建模组患者血流感染风险预测的受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线,计算ROC曲线下面积,根据约登指数计算敏感度、特异度、最佳预测概率。根据是否发生血流感染,将验证组患者分为血流感染亚组(21例)和未血流感染亚组(67例),以预测概率>模型最佳预测概率为血流感染判定标准,采用预测模型预测验证组中2个亚组患者血流感染发生情况,计算预测血流感染发生率及特异度与敏感度,另绘制预测模型对验证组患者血流感染风险预测的ROC曲线,计算ROC曲线下面积。 结果 与未血流感染组比较,血流感染组患者病死率明显增高(χ2=8.485,P<0.01),住院天数明显增加(Z=-3.003,P<0.01),性别、年龄、身体质量指数无明显变化(P>0.05)。血流感染组患者血微生物培养中检出110株细菌,其中菌株数排前3位的细菌为肺炎克雷伯菌、铜绿假单胞菌、鲍曼不动杆菌,分别占35.45%(39/110)、26.36%(29/110)、13.64%(15/110)。建模组与验证组患者性别、年龄、身体质量指数、烧伤总面积、Ⅲ度烧伤面积、合并吸入性损伤比例、行机械通气比例、机械通气天数、住ICU天数、转归、住院天数、并发血流感染比例相近(P>0.05)。与建模组中的未血流感染亚组比较,血流感染亚组患者烧伤总面积、Ⅲ度烧伤面积、合并吸入性损伤比例与行机械通气比例明显增大(Z=-4.429,t=-4.045,χ2=7.845、8.845,P<0.01),机械通气天数与住ICU天数明显增加(Z=-3.904、-4.134,P<0.01)。二分类多因素logistic回归分析显示,烧伤总面积、住ICU天数、合并吸入性损伤是建模组患者发生血流感染的独立危险因素(比值比=1.031、1.018、2.871,95%置信区间=1.004~1.059、1.006~1.030、1.345~6.128,P<0.05或P<0.01)。建模组ROC曲线下面积为0.773(95%置信区间=0.708~0.838);当约登指数为0.425时,该预测模型的敏感度为64.6%,特异度为77.9%,最佳预测概率为0.335。预测模型预测验证组患者血流感染发生率为27.27%(24/88),特异度为82.09%(55/67),敏感度为57.14%(12/21);验证组ROC曲线下面积为0.759(95%置信区间=0.637~0.882)。 结论 烧伤总面积、住ICU天数、合并吸入性损伤是特重度烧伤患者发生血流感染的危险因素,基于这些因素构建的特重度烧伤患者血流感染风险早期预测模型对于治疗方法和细菌流行病学相对稳定的烧伤中心而言具有一定预测价值。
Abstract:Objective To establish an early prediction model for bloodstream infection in patients with extremely severe burns based on the screened independent risk factors of the infection, and to analyze its predictive value. Methods A retrospective case-control study was conducted. From January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2019, 307 patients with extremely severe burns were admitted to the Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery of Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medcine, including 251 males and 56 females, aged from 33 to 55 years. According to the occurrence of bloodstream infection, the patients were divided into non-bloodstream infection group (221 cases) and bloodstream infection group (86 cases). The gender, age, body mass index, outcome, length of hospital stay of patients were compared between the two groups, and the detection of bacteria in blood microbial culture of patients was analyzed in bloodstream infection group. The included 307 patients were divided into modeling group (219 cases) and validation group (88 cases) according to the random number table with a ratio of about 7∶3. The gender, age, body mass index, total burn area, full-thickness burn area, combination of inhalation injury, implementation of mechanical ventilation, days of mechanical ventilation, days of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, outcome, length of hospital stay, complication of bloodstream infection of patients were compared between the two groups. According to the occurrence of bloodstream infection, the patients in modeling group were divided into bloodstream infection subgroup (154 cases) and non-bloodstream infection subgroup (165 cases). The total burn area, full-thickness burn area, combination of inhalation injury, implementation of mechanical ventilation, days of mechanical ventilation, and days of ICU stay of patients were compared between the two subgroups. The above-mentioned data between two groups were statistically analyzed with one-way analysis of independent sample t test, chi-square test, and Mann-Whitney U test to screen out the factors with statistically significant differences in the subgroup univariate analysis of modeling group. The factors were used as variables, and binary multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to screen out the independent risk factors of bloodstream infection in patients with extremely severe burns, based on which the prediction model for bloodstream infection in patients with extremely severe burns of modeling group was established. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the prediction model predicting the risk of bloodstream infection of patients in modeling group was drawn, and the area under the ROC curve was calculated. The sensitivity, specificity, and the best prediction probability were calculated according to the Youden index. According to the occurrence of bloodstream infection, the patients in validation group were divided into bloodstream infection subgroup (21 cases) and non-bloodstream infection subgroup (67 cases). The prediction probability >the best prediction probability of model was used as the judgment standard of bloodstream infection. The prediction model was used to predict the occurrence of bloodstream infection of patients in the two subgroups of validation group, and the incidence, specificity, and sensitivity for predicting bloodstream infection were calculated. In addition, the ROC curve of the prediction model predicting the risk of bloodstream infection of patients in validation group was drawn, and the area under the ROC curve was calculated. Results Compared with those of non-bloodstream infection group, the mortality of patients in bloodstream infection group was significantly higher (χ2=8.485, P<0.01), the length of hospital stay was significantly increased (Z=-3.003, P<0.01), but there was no significant change in gender, age, or body mass index (P>0.05). In patients of bloodstream infection group, 110 strains of bacteria were detected in blood microbial culture, among which Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii were the top three bacteria, accounting for 35.45% (39/110), 26.36% (29/110), and 13.64% (15/110), respectively. Gender, age, body mass index, total burn area, full-thickness burn area, proportion of combination of inhalation injury, proportion of implementation of mechanical ventilation, days of mechanical ventilation, days of ICU stay, outcome, length of hospital stay, and proportion of complication of bloodstream infection of patients were similar between modeling group and validation group (P>0.05). Compared with those of non-bloodstream infection subgroup in modeling group, the total burn area, full-thickness burn area, proportion of combination of inhalation injury, proportion of implementation of mechanical ventilation, days of mechanical ventilation, and days of ICU stay of patients in bloodstream infection subgroup were significantly increased (Z=-4.429, t=-4.045, χ2=7.845, 8.845, Z=-3.904, -4.134, P<0.01). Binary multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that total burn area, days of ICU stay, and combination of inhalation injury were the independent risk factors for bloodstream infection of patients in modeling group (odds ratio=1.031, 1.018, 2.871, 95% confidence interval=1.004-1.059, 1.006-1.030, 1.345-6.128, P<0.05 or P<0.01). In modeling group, the area under the ROC curve was 0.773 (95% confidence interval=0.708-0.838); the sensitivity was 64.6%, the specificity was 77.9%, and the best prediction probability was 0.335 when the Youden index was 0.425. The bloodstream infection incidence of patients predicted by the prediction model in validation group was 27.27% (24/88), with specificity of 82.09% (55/67) and sensitivity of 57.14% (12/21). The area under the ROC curve in validation group was 0.759 (95% confidence interval=0.637-0.882). Conclusions The total burn area, days of ICU stay, and combination of inhalation injury are the risk factors of bloodstream infection in patients with extremely severe burns. The early prediction model for bloodstream infection risk in patients with extremely severe burns based on these factors has certain predictive value for burn centers with relatively stable treatment methods and bacterial epidemiology.
-
Key words:
- Burns /
- Infection /
- Risk factors /
- Early prediction model
-
参考文献
(37)
计量
- 文章访问数: 321
- HTML全文浏览量: 43
- PDF下载量: 71
- 被引次数: 0