Management strategy of femoral artery pseudoaneurysm combined with infectious wounds
-
摘要:
目的 探讨股动脉假性动脉瘤合并感染创面的手术处理方式,并评价其临床效果。 方法 采用回顾性观察性研究方法。2014年10月—2022年9月,南京中医药大学无锡市中西医结合医院(江南大学附属医院)收治12例符合入选标准的股动脉假性动脉瘤合并感染创面患者,其中男6例、女6例,年龄46~78岁。Ⅰ期手术行清创、瘤体切除、动脉缝合/静脉移植修补动脉/动脉结扎,瘤体切除后创面面积4.0 cm×1.5 cm~12.0 cm×6.5 cm。对可缝合的创面行减张缝合及皮外持续负压封闭引流(VSD)治疗;较大无法缝合的创面予持续VSD治疗控制感染。Ⅱ期对可缝合的创面行减张缝合;较大创面采用邻近易位皮瓣(面积9.0 cm×5.0 cm~15.0 cm×7.0 cm)修复,对于裸露股动脉长度≥3.0 cm者,另切取股直肌肌瓣(长度15.0~18.0 cm)修复,供区均直接缝合;对动脉结扎的创面予邮票皮移植+持续VSD治疗。记录入院时创面分泌物标本细菌培养结果;记录Ⅰ期术中出血量、股动脉破口位置、动脉处理及创面修复方式,术后置管灌洗天数、置管引流天数、VSD治疗天数及引流量;Ⅱ期创面修复方式,术后置管引流天数、VSD治疗天数及引流量。观察术后皮瓣/肌瓣/邮票皮成活情况,记录创面愈合时间。出院后随访,评估创面愈合质量、行走功能、搏动性肿物是否消失;复查B超或CT血管造影(CTA),观察有无假性动脉瘤复发、股动脉血流是否通畅。 结果 入院时所有患者创面分泌物标本细菌培养结果均为阳性。Ⅰ期术中出血量150~750 mL;术中见动脉破口位于股动脉者8例、髂外动脉者2例、股动静脉瘘者2例;动脉经直接缝合者6例、自体大隐静脉修补者4例、自体大隐静脉桥接者1例、结扎者1例。4例患者创面Ⅰ期缝合,术后置管灌洗3~5 d,置管引流4~6 d,VSD治疗5~7 d,引流量80~450 mL。Ⅱ期手术:3例患者创面直接缝合,置管引流2~3 d;1例患者创面取头部邮票皮移植及VSD治疗5 d;2例患者创面采用邻近易位皮瓣修复,置管引流2~3 d;2例患者创面采用股直肌肌瓣加邻近易位皮瓣修复,置管引流3~5 d。Ⅱ期术后引流量为150~400 mL。术后皮瓣/肌瓣/邮票皮均成活,Ⅰ期手术后创面愈合时间为15~36 d。出院后随访2~8个月,所有患者创面愈合良好。1例股动脉结扎患者,足缺血坏死行小腿截肢,其余患者恢复正常行走功能。所有患者腹股沟区搏动性肿物消失。6例患者复查B超或CTA显示股动脉血流通畅,无假性动脉瘤复发。 结论 股动脉假性动脉瘤合并感染创面尽早行清创、瘤体切除、个体化动脉处理,并根据创面状况选择合适引流方式及个体化修复策略,可获得良好的修复效果。 Abstract:Objective To investigate the surgical treatment methods of femoral artery pseudoaneurysm combined with infectious wounds and to evaluate the clinical effects. Methods The retrospective observational research method was used. Twelve patients with femoral artery pseudoaneurysm combined with infectious wounds who met the inclusion criteria were admitted to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine Wuxi Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital (Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University) from October 2014 to September 2022, including 6 males and 6 females, aged from 46 to 78 years. In the primary operation, debridement, tumor resection, and artery suture/venous grafting to repair the artery/artery ligation were performed, and the wound area after tumor resection ranged from 4.0 cm×1.5 cm to 12.0 cm×6.5 cm. Wounds that could be sutured were treated with tension reduction suture and extracutaneous continuous vacuum sealing drainage (VSD), while large wounds that could not be sutured were treated with VSD to control infection. In the secondary operation, tension reduction suture was performed to repair the wounds that could be sutured; large wounds were repaired with adjacent translocated flaps with area of 9.0 cm×5.0 cm to 15.0 cm×7.0 cm. Additionally, when the length of the exposed femoral artery was equal to or over 3.0 cm, the wounds were repaired with additional rectus femoris muscle flap with length of 15.0 to 18.0 cm. The donor areas of the flaps were directly sutured. The wound with artery ligation was treated with stamp skin grafting and continuous VSD. The bacterial culture results of the wound exudate samples on admission were recorded. The intraoperative blood loss, the location of femoral artery rupture, the artery treatment method, and the wound repair method in the primary operation were recorded, and the durations of catheter lavage, catheter drainage, and VSD treatment, and the drainage volume after the operation were recorded. The repair method of wounds in the secondary operation, the durations of catheter drainage and VSD treatment, and the total drainage volume after the operation were recorded. The survivals of flap/muscle flap/stamp skin grafts were observed, and the wound healing time was recorded. Follow-up after discharge was performed to evaluate the quality of wound healing and the walking function and to check whether the pulsatile mass disappeared. B-ultrasound or computed tomography angiography (CTA) was performed again to observe potential pseudoaneurysm recurrence and evaluate the patency of blood flow of the femoral artery. Results The bacterial culture results of wound exudate samples of all the patients were positive on admission. The blood loss was 150 to 750 mL in the primary operation. The arterial ruptures were located in the femoral artery in 8 cases, in the external iliac artery in 2 cases, and in the femoral arteriovenous fistula in 2 cases. Six cases received direct artery suture, 4 cases received autologous great saphenous vein grafting to repair the artery, 1 case received autologous great saphenous vein bypass surgery, and 1 case received artery ligation. The primary wound suture was performed in 4 cases, along with catheter lavage for 3 to 5 days, catheter drainage for 4 to 6 days, VSD treatment for 5 to 7 days, and a total drainage volume of 80 to 450 mL after the surgery. In the secondary operation, the wounds were sutured directly in 3 cases along with catheter drainage for 2 to 3 days, the wound was repaired with scalp stamp skin graft and VSD treatment for 5 days in 1 case, the wounds were repaired with adjacent translocated flaps in 2 cases with catheter drainage for 2 to 3 days, and the wounds were repaired with rectus femoris muscle flaps+adjacent translocated flaps in 2 cases with catheter drainage for 3 to 5 days . The total drainage volume after the secondary operation ranged from 150 to 400 mL. All the skin flaps/muscle flaps/skin grafts survived after operation. The wound healing time ranged from 15 to 36 days after the primary operation. Follow-up of 2 to 8 months after discharge showed that the wounds of all patients healed well. One patient who underwent femoral artery ligation had calf amputation due to foot ischemic necrosis, and the rest of the patients regained normal walking ability. The pulsatile mass disappeared in inguinal region of all patients. B-ultrasound or CTA re-examination in 6 patients showed that the blood flow of femoral artery had good patency, and there was no pseudoaneurysm recurrence. Conclusions Early debridement, tumor resection, and individualized artery treatment should be performed in patients with femoral artery pseudoaneurysm combined with infected wounds. Besides, proper drainage and personalized repair strategy should be conducted according to the wound condition to achieve a good outcome. -
Key words:
- Aneurysm, false /
- Femoral artery /
- Infection /
- Vacuum sealing drainage /
- Wound repair
-
介绍了股动脉假性动脉瘤的个体化动脉处理策略(动脉缝合/静脉移植修补/动脉结扎等),以及合并不同感染创面的个体化引流方式(灌洗引流/置管引流/持续VSD)和个体化修复策略(减张缝合、皮瓣移植、皮瓣+肌瓣移植、皮片移植),获得了良好的修复效果。
随着介入治疗的日益增多,相关并发症相应增加,其中股动脉假性动脉瘤发生率明显上升。而如果股动脉假性动脉瘤处理不当,就会导致细菌入侵,动脉瘤发生感染,继而发生皮肤及皮下组织感染形成创面,增加动脉瘤破裂的风险,感染进展快,甚至会造成脓毒血症、感染性休克的发生。因此,股动脉假性动脉瘤合并感染创面成为临床十分棘手的问题,但鲜有报道。本文总结本团队治疗股动脉假性动脉瘤合并感染创面的临床经验。
1. 对象与方法
本回顾性观察性研究符合《赫尔辛基宣言》的基本原则。按照南京中医药大学无锡市中西医结合医院(江南大学附属医院)伦理委员会要求,可以在不泄露患者个人信息的前提下对其临床资料进行分析、使用。
1.1 入选标准
纳入标准:腹股沟区搏动性肿物合并皮肤红肿创面;B超或下肢CT血管造影(CTA)确诊为股动脉假性动脉瘤;入院时创面分泌物标本细菌培养呈阳性。排除标准:临床资料不完整者。
1.2 一般资料
2014年10月—2022年9月南京中医药大学无锡市中西医结合医院(江南大学附属医院)收治12例符合入选标准的股动脉假性动脉瘤合并感染创面的患者,其中男6例、女6例,年龄46~78岁。动脉瘤位于右侧腹股沟处者8例、左侧腹股沟处者4例。动脉瘤形成原因:股动脉穿刺者9例、股静脉穿刺者2例、股动脉外伤者1例。动脉瘤形成时间为5~45 d。B超或CTA检查明确股动脉假性动脉瘤伴周围软组织炎性改变。所有患者均有皮肤红肿热痛、搏动性肿物及创面渗出感染表现,其中7例患者出现SIRS,2例患者发展到脓毒血症。
1.3 治疗方法
1.3.1 术前治疗
所有患者入院时取创面分泌物标本行细菌培养。对于局限于创面感染的患者,予创面换药治疗;对于出现SIRS的患者,予静脉补液抗感染及创面引流换药治疗;对于发生脓毒血症的患者,予转入ICU行补液抗休克、抗感染、强心利尿、纠正酸中毒、补钾、控制血糖、营养支持等治疗,创面充分引流脓液、加强换药治疗。待患者病情稳定后,行手术治疗。
1.3.2 手术治疗
Ⅰ期手术:在假性动脉瘤区域行长纵向切口(超过瘤体近远端),沿创缘锐性切除感染坏死皮肤及皮下组织,清除血肿及脓液,用过氧化氢、碘伏及生理盐水冲洗创面。在瘤体近远端游离并显露正常股动脉,套带控制、阻断血流后,沿动脉外膜“会师法”切除瘤体,再次用生理盐水冲洗创面,显露股动脉破口。如破口较小,则直接缝合;如破口较大,则取自体大隐静脉进行修补;如股动脉破损严重,则视具体状况行短缩端端端缝合或自体大隐静脉桥接或局部结扎。瘤体切除后创面面积为4.0 cm×1.5 cm~12.0 cm×6.5 cm。创面能拉拢缝合者用深部环形褥式缝合技术(the looped broad and deep buried suturing technique,LBD减张缝合技术)缝合,并置灌洗引流管1根,每6小时使用500 mL生理盐水灌洗1次,同时皮外行持续VSD治疗(负压控制在-13.300~-9.975 kPa,下同)。创面不能拉拢缝合者,以人工真皮或邻近筋膜瓣临时覆盖裸露股动脉后,予VSD治疗,待感染控制后行Ⅱ期手术治疗。
Ⅱ期手术:创面较窄时予LBD减张缝合,置引流管1根;创面较大时,设计面积为9.0 cm×5.0 cm~15.0 cm×7.0 cm的邻近易位皮瓣,于阔筋膜深面切取,顺行转移修复创面,对于裸露股动脉长度≥3.0 cm者,另切取股直肌肌瓣(长度15.0~18.0 cm)修复,肌瓣下、皮瓣下及供区分别置1根引流管,供区直接缝合;动脉无法修补,结扎旷置者,予邮票皮移植修复创面后行VSD治疗。
1.3.3 术后治疗
根据药物敏感试验结果选择相抗生素;行皮瓣移植的患者术后静脉滴注巴曲酶注射液,首剂10 BU、后续均使用5 BU,隔天1次,疗程7 d。24 h引流量少于5 mL方可拔除引流管。
1.4 观察指标
记录入院时创面分泌物标本细菌培养结果。记录Ⅰ期术中出血量、股动脉破口位置、动脉处理及创面修复方式,术后置管灌洗天数、置管引流天数、VSD治疗天数及引流量。Ⅱ期创面修复方式,术后置管引流天数、VSD治疗天数及引流量。观察术后皮瓣/肌瓣/邮票皮成活情况,记录创面愈合时间。出院后随访,评估创面愈合质量、行走功能情况、搏动性肿物是否消失;复查B超或CTA,观察有无假性动脉瘤复发、股动脉血流是否通畅。
2. 结果
2.1 总体情况
入院时创面分泌物标本细菌培养结果:屎肠球菌者3例、粪肠球菌者3例、金黄色葡萄球菌者3例(其中2例患者为耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌)、大肠埃希菌者2例、铜绿假单胞菌者1例。Ⅰ期术中出血量150~750 mL;术中见动脉破口位于股动脉者8例、髂外动脉者2例、股动静脉瘘者2例;动脉采用直接缝合者6例、自体大隐静脉修补者4例、自体大隐静脉桥接者1例、结扎者1例(特大面积烧伤患者,无自体静脉移植条件)。4例患者创面Ⅰ期缝合,术后置管灌洗3~5 d,置管引流4~6 d,VSD治疗5~7 d,引流量80~450 mL。Ⅱ期手术:3例患者创面直接缝合,置管引流2~3 d;1例患者创面取头部邮票皮移植及VSD治疗5 d;2例患者创面采用邻近易位皮瓣修复,置管引流2~3 d;2例患者创面采用股直肌肌瓣加邻近易位皮瓣修复,置管引流3~5 d;引流量150~400 mL。术后皮瓣/肌瓣/邮票皮均成活,Ⅰ期手术后创面愈合(拆线)时间为15~36 d。
2.2 随访情况
出院后随访2~8个月,所有患者创面均愈合良好。1例股动脉结扎患者,足缺血坏死行小腿截肢后愈合,其余患者恢复正常行走功能。腹股沟区搏动性肿物消失,未发生皮肤感染或破溃。6例患者复查B超或CTA显示股动脉血流通畅,无假性动脉瘤复发。
2.3 典型病例
女,72岁,因左腹股沟区搏动性肿物1个月伴红肿热痛3 d入院。既往2型糖尿病史10年,入院前2个月因下肢动脉硬化闭塞行介入治疗,穿刺点位于左侧腹股沟处。创面情况:左侧腹股沟区搏动性肿物,皮肤红肿伴破溃,可见脓性分泌物。白细胞计数29.2×10 9/L,空腹血糖14.43 mmol/L。CTA显示左侧股动脉假性动脉瘤伴周围组织炎性改变。入院诊断:左侧股动脉假性动脉瘤合并感染创面,2型糖尿病伴血糖控制不佳。入院后积极抗感染、调整胰岛素控制血糖。入院时创面分泌物标本细菌培养结果为屎肠球菌。入院第3天,患者突发高热后出现胸闷心慌、大小便失禁。生命体征:体温39 ℃、心率136次/min、呼吸频率25次/min、血压84/47 mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa),急查血常规显示白细胞计数40.3×10 9/L,氧分压57.9 mmHg、pH值7.157、碳酸氢根12.7 mmol/L、血钾2.5 mmol/L、乳酸10.4 mmol/L,B型钠尿肽1 630 pg/mL,降钙素原0.54 ng/L。腹股沟区肿物破溃口裂开,伴有大量褐色渗出,考虑假性动脉瘤感染进展为脓毒血症、感染性休克、心力衰竭、代谢性酸中毒、低钾血症。转入ICU,予吸氧、补液抗休克、抗感染、强心利尿、纠正酸中毒、补钾、控制血糖、营养支持等治疗,并予左侧腹股沟区创面清创,充分引流积液、加强换药治疗,患者全身感染状况得到控制。遂进行Ⅰ期手术清创、切除假性动脉瘤,其动脉破口位于股动脉且破口较大,予移植自体大隐静脉修补,术中出血量200 mL。恢复血流后,局部翻转筋膜瓣覆盖裸露血管,创面面积9.5 cm×6.5 cm,行VSD治疗6 d,引流量280 mL。Ⅱ期再次行创面清创,去除血液循环不良的失活组织,可见裸露长度3.5 cm外膜灰暗(变性)的股动脉,于大腿外侧设计面积12.0 cm×7.0 cm的邻近易位皮瓣。切取易位皮瓣后,在同一供区切口内选择长度为16.0 cm的股直肌肌瓣,180°翻转覆盖裸露股动脉区域,不留无效腔;易位皮瓣90°旋转覆盖创面并缝合固定;供区直接拉拢逐层缝合,置引流管3根。术后予抗感染、巴曲酶降低纤维蛋白原浓度、控制血糖及营养支持治疗,引流4 d,引流量240 mL。术后皮瓣、肌瓣存活良好,Ⅰ期术后20 d拆线出院。出院后3个月随访,腹股沟处切口愈合良好,恢复正常行走功能,搏动性肿物消失;复查CTA显示股动脉血流通畅,假性动脉瘤无复发。见 图1。
3. 讨论
3.1 股动脉假性动脉瘤的病因与发病机制及手术时机
股动脉假性动脉瘤的病因包括医源性损伤(鞘管直径>2.3 mm)、多次穿刺、术后压迫方式不当、未充分制动、外伤、注射毒品等 [ 1, 2, 3] ,其中医源性损伤为最常见病因 [ 4] 。动脉破损后于破口周围形成血肿,因动脉的持续冲击力,使血管破口与血肿相通形成搏动性血肿 [ 5] 。血肿是细菌滋生的良好培养基,一旦处理不当、细菌入侵,则易发生动脉瘤感染 [ 6, 7] ,保守治疗会导致感染加重 [ 8] 。本组12例患者中有7例患者感染发展至SIRS,2例患者进展至脓毒血症,这会提高皮肤及软组织坏死并发症的发生率,同时也增加了手术难度。因此假性动脉瘤一旦出现局部红肿热痛感染征象,应尽早进行清创、瘤体切除、血管修补以及创面修复。
3.2 动脉修补方式
损伤变性的股动脉应姑息清创,尽可能予以保留。有学者报道因高压电烧伤致腹股沟处6 cm的股动脉烧伤变性,予以动脉保留、肌皮瓣转移覆盖创面;术后随访2年,股动脉通畅,创面愈合良好 [ 9] 。股动脉破裂口横径较小且局部血管壁完整时,可直接缝合破口;如破裂口较大,可取大隐静脉补片进行修补。对于血管糜烂、无法修补者,可在切除瘤体后行血管端端吻合。当血管壁缺损长度>2 cm时,自体静脉桥接仍为首选治疗方案 [ 10] 。但特殊情况下,如本组患者中的特大面积烧伤患者,腹股沟处股动脉长期多次穿刺置管,创面感染,股动脉长段破损,其下肢已经建立一定的侧支循环,亦无自体静脉移植条件,故选择股动脉结扎,随访足缺血坏死,行小腿截肢后创面愈合。
3.3 创面修复方式
本组患者的感染性创面因股动脉裸露,故以皮瓣或肌瓣+皮瓣修复为首选,既可以严密覆盖重要血管、神经,起到有效保护的作用,还可以促进微循环和组织修复 [ 11] 。对于可以拉拢缝合的创面,采用LBD减张缝合技术直接缝合创面 [ 12] ,该技术可提供更加稳定和持续的减张效果,尤其适用于张力较大的创面。本组患者中有4例患者创面较大,选择邻近顺行易位皮瓣修复,皮瓣包含阔筋膜,韧性好,既能够保护血管神经,又能够加强腹壁的强度;其中2例患者裸露血管长度≥3.0 cm,考虑裸露动脉长且管壁外膜变性,有发生破溃或血栓的致命风险,故选用抗感染能力强、血运丰富的肌瓣覆盖血管。在手术中,易位皮瓣切取后,股直肌肌瓣恰好位于皮瓣供区切口内,不增加手术切口,且股直肌肌瓣血管蒂位置高、恒定、便于旋转,可调整覆盖创面深腔。该术式操作简便、出血少,且切取股直肌肌瓣后对下肢功能影响不大。而对于特大面积烧伤患者,因皮源及可用的组织量少,一般取头部邮票皮移植修复。
3.4 引流方式及材料的选择
VSD具有控制感染、改善创基、固定皮片、促进组织愈合的作用 [ 13] 。本组病例均选择VSD及深部置管引流治疗。对于创面Ⅰ期缝合者,置灌洗引流管既有利于避免含有细菌的渗液在深部积聚,又利于避免皮肤下无效腔形成。辅以皮外VSD治疗,既利于引流经引流管口渗漏的灌洗液,又利于外固定并适度压迫皮肤,避免对切口的牵扯。而对于创面Ⅱ期缝合者,Ⅰ期VSD治疗主要用于控制感染、改善创基,Ⅱ期皮下置引流管引流积液。对于创面行皮片移植的患者,VSD治疗则用于外固定皮片,提高皮片成活率。对于Ⅱ期行皮瓣或肌瓣+皮瓣修复的患者,Ⅰ期VSD治疗用于改善创基,Ⅱ期则分别于肌瓣下、皮瓣下及供区留置引流管,引流积液,消除无效腔。VSD材料优选聚乙烯醇材料,该材料亲水保湿性、生物相容性较好,不易与创面粘连,可减少拆除材料损伤血管的风险。且聚乙烯醇材料孔径较致密,负压吸引后回缩率较小,可减少外固定皮片或皮瓣的移动 [ 14] 。但需要注意的是,如修复的股动脉裸露于创面,则需以人工真皮或者邻近组织瓣转移覆盖,避免聚乙烯醇材料直接接触动脉。
3.5 术后巴曲酶的应用
巴曲酶具有降低纤维蛋白原浓度,抑制血管炎症反应和血栓形成,促进血栓溶解和血管内皮修复,以及加快组织修复的作用 [ 15, 16] 。有学者报道其可有效地促进随意型皮瓣的成活 [ 17] ,还可加快创面愈合、改善愈合质量 [ 18] 。本组病例因手术创伤、局部血肿、动脉瘤发生后卧床制动等原因,处于高凝状态,其血浆纤维蛋白原水平显著高于正常水平。故动脉修补、创面修复后,应用巴曲酶促进血管内皮细胞爬行、改善皮瓣微循环,最终皮瓣无坏死,创面愈合良好。
3.6 股动脉假性动脉瘤的预防和早期处理
假性动脉瘤一旦形成,一般不能自愈,可能会产生诸多并发症,如感染、皮肤破裂、神经受压、肢体缺血,严重者需截肢 [ 19] 。因此,动脉穿刺点及穿刺角度要精准,最佳的穿刺点应位于腹股沟韧带以下、皮纹以上的区域,此区域股动脉相对固定,后方有股骨头骨性支撑便于压迫止血。以45~60°的角度进针,皮肤进针点与血管进针点相对移位少,更容易定位及压迫,穿刺并发症发生率也更低 [ 20] 。在条件允许的情况下,应优选超声引导,明确动静脉位置下,行精准穿刺动静脉,可减少60%左右的穿刺并发症 [ 21] 。术后压迫位置要准,时间要长(15~20 min),包扎固定要牢靠持久(6 h以上),术后绝对卧床24 h,换药消毒要无菌操作。一旦出现局部异常疼痛,应及时行超声检查,尽早积极处理病因。常规处理方法包括手法压迫、介入治疗及手术修补,可根据患者个体情况选择合适方案 [ 22] 。一旦出现感染症状,尽早手术是关键。
综上,对股动脉假性动脉瘤合并感染创面尽早行清创、瘤体切除、个体化动脉处理(动脉缝合/静脉移植修补动脉/动脉结扎),并根据创面状况选择合适引流方式(灌洗引流/置管引流/持续VSD治疗)及个体化修复策略(减张缝合、皮瓣移植、皮瓣+肌瓣移植、皮片移植),可获得良好的修复效果。
储国平:手术设计、管理患者、实施手术、撰写文章;蒋朝龙、宣天梵:收集数据、处理图片、文献收集、摘要翻译;周滇、丁羚涛、杨敏烈、朱宇刚:实施手术;赵朋、吕国忠:指导手术的设计与实施过程、指导文章撰写所有作者均声明不存在利益冲突 -
参考文献
(22) [1] ChaeSY,ParkC,KimJK,et al.Ultrasound-guided percutaneous thrombin injection of femoral artery pseudoaneurysms caused by vascular access[J].Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi,2021,82(3):589-599.DOI: 10.3348/jksr.2020.0113. [2] de Oliveira LeiteTF,BortoliniE,LinardB,et al.Evaluation of morphological and clinical factors related to failure of percutaneous treatment with thrombin injection of femoral pseudoaneurysms from cardiac catheterization[J].Ann Vasc Surg,2019,59:173-183.DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.01.013. [3] 何瑶,汪海洋,罗海龙,等.毒品注射致股动脉假性动脉瘤的诊疗进展[J].中华血管外科杂志,2019,4(1):62-65.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2096-1863.2019.01.016. [4] 陈丽娅,万跃,施思,等.超声引导下经皮瘤腔内注射凝血酶治疗医源性股动脉假性动脉瘤的疗效分析[J].中国实用神经疾病杂志,2018,21(11):1196-1201.DOI: 10.12083/SYSJ.2018.11.292. [5] IshikawaE,MiyazakiS,MukaiM,et al.Femoral vascular complications after catheter ablation in the current era: the utility of computed tomography imaging[J].J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol,2020,31(6):1385-1393.DOI: 10.1111/jce.14468. [6] StoltM,Braun-DullaeusR,HeroldJ.Do not underestimate the femoral pseudoaneurysm[J].Vasa,2018,47(3):177-185.DOI: 10.1024/0301-1526/a000691. [7] 许玉春, 黄建华, 李介秋, 等. 注射毒品所致的股动脉假性动脉瘤的治疗: 附45例报告[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2013, 22(12):1614-1617. DOI: 10.7659/j.issn.1005-6947.2013.12.018. [8] 贺致宾,张学民,焦洋,等.感染性股动脉假性动脉瘤手术治疗及伤口处理:附16例分析[J].中国普通外科杂志,2018,27(12):1546-1550.DOI: 10.7659/j.issn.1005-6947.2018.12.008. [9] 梁鹏飞,张丕红,张明华,等.腹股沟区及会阴部深度皮肤软组织缺损的皮瓣修复[J].中华烧伤杂志,2015,31(5):378-380.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2015.05.014. [10] McCreadyRA,BryantMA,DivelbissJL,et al.Arterial infections in the new millenium: an old problem revisited[J].Ann Vasc Surg,2006,20(5):590-595.DOI: 10.1007/s10016-006-9107-y. [11] 赵鹏亮,郭振,屠海霞,等.腹直肌肌皮瓣应用于腹股沟区深度损伤创面的修复[J].感染、炎症、修复,2018,19(4):240-241,封2.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-8521.2018.04.010. [12] 柴琳琳,汤绪文,李曾显,等.LBD减张缝合技术在瘢痕切除术中的应用探讨[J].中国美容医学,2019,28(8):16-19. [13] 中华医学会烧伤外科学分会,《中华烧伤杂志》编辑委员会.负压封闭引流技术在烧伤外科应用的全国专家共识(2017版)[J].中华烧伤杂志,2017,33(3):129-135.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2017.03.001. [14] 黄振,王朋,潘珍乙,等.聚乙烯醇和聚氨酯负压材料在Ⅲ度烧伤切痂创面应用的前瞻性随机对照试验[J].中华烧伤杂志,2020,36(9):813-820.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20191225-00472. [15] MasudaH,SatoA,ShizunoT,et al.Batroxobin accelerated tissue repair via neutrophil extracellular trap regulation and defibrinogenation in a murine ischemic hindlimb model[J].PLoS One,2019,14(8):e0220898.DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220898. [16] 李贇蓉.巴曲酶对血管内皮细胞影响的研究进展[J].医学理论与实践,2019,32(10):1478-1480.DOI: 10.19381/j.issn.1001-7585.2019.10.009. [17] FangMJ,QiCY,ChenXY,et al.Effects of batroxobin treatment on the survival of random skin flaps in rats[J].Int Immunopharmacol,2019,72:235-242.DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2019.04.011. [18] 胡骁骅,孙永华,陈忠.巴曲酶对深Ⅱ度烫伤创面微循环血流变化及愈合的影响[J].中华烧伤杂志,2000,16(4):241.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2000.04.014. [19] MugliaR,MarraP,DulcettaL,et al.US-guided percutaneous thrombin injection to treat non-femoral artery pseudoaneurysms: preliminary experience and review of the literature[J].Radiol Med,2023,128(1):125-131.DOI: 10.1007/s11547-022-01576-4. [20] 张永保,李涵,房杰,等.股静脉穿刺导致医源性股动脉假性动脉瘤合并股动静脉瘘的处理策略——附12例报导[J].中国循环杂志,2022,37(9):946-949.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3614.2022.09.013. [21] KupóP,PapR,SághyL,et al.Ultrasound guidance for femoral venous access in electrophysiology procedures-systematic review and meta-analysis[J].J Interv Card Electrophysiol,2020,59(2):407-414.DOI: 10.1007/s10840-019-00683-z. [22] 李孝成,陈俞宏,张麟,等.球囊阻断在股动脉假性动脉瘤手术中的应用[J/CD].中国血管外科杂志(电子版),2021,13(2):140-142.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7429.2021.02.010. -