Visual analysis of the current research status and hotspots of electric burns at home and abroad
-
摘要:
目的 分析国内外发表的电烧伤相关文献，探讨电烧伤研究的热点与前沿。 方法 采用文献计量学方法。分别检索中国知网、万方数据库、维普数据库及Web of Science数据库核心合集中2013年1月1日—2022年12月31日发表的与电烧伤相关的中英文文献，采用CiteSpace6.2.R2软件进行分析。分别统计中英文文献的发文量、发文作者、国家与机构，对关键词进行共现分析并在此基础上进行突现情况分析和聚类分析，将关键词按时间排序得到聚类时间线图，探讨电烧伤领域研究现状和热点的演变过程。 结果 在Web of Science数据库核心合集中检索出398篇英文文献；在中国知网、万方数据库、维普数据库检索并查重后得到523篇中文文献。2013—2022年，电烧伤领域英文文献发文量呈稳步上升趋势，中文文献发文量呈下降并趋于平稳趋势。中文文献中共302位作者以第1作者发表电烧伤相关文章，发文量≥3篇的核心作者共有17位；英文文献中共320位作者以第1作者发表电烧伤相关文章。共有65个国家进行电烧伤相关研究，美国是与其他国家合作最多、发文量最多的国家。国内外共512家机构发表电烧伤相关文章，发表中文和英文文章数量最多的机构分别是上海电力医院（14篇）和韩国翰林大学（11篇）。共纳入1 176个中文关键词、1 068个英文关键词进行共现分析，排除与检索词相关的关键词后，中文文献中出现频次排前3的关键词为外科皮瓣、创面修复、护理，英文文献中出现频次排前3的关键词是management、epidemiology、children。中文文献关键词分析得到10个聚类，最大的聚类是创面愈合，其次是临床效果、外科皮瓣；英文文献关键词分析得到7个聚类，最大的聚类是reconstructive surgical procedures，其次是chronic pain、shock。中文文献中持续存在的聚类为创面愈合、临床效果等，近2年出现的突现节点为手术时机、四肢电烧伤、增生性瘢痕等；英文文献中持续存在的聚类为reconstructive surgical procedures、chronic pain等，近2年出现的突现节点为predictors、burn management等。中文文献中突现持续时间最长（2017—2021年）的关键词是腕部电烧伤，突现强度最高的关键词是皮瓣修复；英文文献中突现持续时间最长（2019—2022年）的关键词是voltage，突现强度最高的关键词是prevention。 结论 国内外电烧伤研究方向与热点存在相似性和差异性。外科皮瓣修复是国内外电烧伤领域的共同研究热点，目前国内研究侧重于创面愈合、腕部电烧伤等方面，国外研究则聚焦在治疗管理、流行病学、重建等方面。 Abstract:Objective To analyze the literature on electric burns published at home and abroad, and to explore the research hotspots and frontiers of electric burns. Methods The bibliometric method was used. The Chinese and English literature related to electric burns published in China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang database, VIP database and the core collection of Web of Science database from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2022 were searched respectively, and the CiteSpace 6.2.R2 software was used for analysis. The number of papers, authors, countries, and institutions of Chinese and English literature were counted respectively, and the co-occurrence analysis of keywords and mutation analysis and cluster analysis on the basis of the co-occurrence analysis were conducted, besides, the clustering time line figure was obtained after the keywords were sorted by time to explore the current research status and the evolution process of hotspots in the field of electric burns. Results A total of 398 English papers were retrieved from the core collection of Web of Science database, and a total of 523 Chinese papers were retrieved from China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang database, and VIP database after duplicate check. From 2013 to 2022, the number of English literature published in the field of electric burns showed a steadily upward trend, and the number of published Chinese literature showed a downward trend and tended to be stable. In Chinese literature, a total of 302 authors as the first author published papers related to electric burns, with 17 core authors published ≥3 papers; in English literature, a total of 320 authors as the first author published papers related to electric burns. Researches on electric burns were carried out in 65 countries, with United States having the most cooperation with other countries and the largest number of papers published. A total of 512 institutions at home and abroad published papers related to electric burns, and the institutions with the largest number of Chinese and English papers were Shanghai Electric Power Hospital in China ( n=14) and Hallym University in Korea ( n=11), respectively. A total of 1 176 Chinese keywords and 1 068 English keywords were included for co-occurrence analysis after excluding keywords related to the searching words. The top three keywords in frequency in Chinese literature were surgical flap, wound repair, and nursing, and the top three keywords in frequency in English literature were management, epidemiology, and children. Ten clusters were obtained by keyword analysis in Chinese literature, and the largest cluster was wound healing, followed by clinical effects and surgical flaps. Seven clusters were obtained by keyword analysis in English literature, and the largest cluster was reconstructive surgical procedures, followed by chronic pain and shock. The persistent clusters in Chinese literature were wound healing and clinical outcomes, etc., and the prominent nodes in the recent two years were surgical timing, limb electric burns, and hypertrophic scars; the persistent clusters in English literature were reconstructive surgical procedures and chronic pain, etc., and the prominent nodes in the recent two years were predictors and burn management, etc. In Chinese literature, the keyword with the longest duration of mutation (2017—2021) was wrist electric burns, and the keyword with the highest intensity of mutation was flap repair; in English literature, the keyword with the longest duration of the mutation (2019—2022) was voltage, and the keyword with the highest intensity of mutation was prevention. Conclusions There are similarities and differences in the research directions and hotspots of electric burns at home and abroad. Surgical flap repair is a common research hotspot at home and abroad. At present, domestic research focuses on wound healing, wrist electric burns, and other aspects, while international research focuses on treatment management, epidemiology, reconstruction, and other aspects. -
Key words:
- Burns, electric /
- Bibliometrics /
- Research status /
- Research hotspots /
- Visual analysis
-
参考文献
(33) [1] 谢卫国.电烧伤防治:百尺竿头仍需努力[J].中华烧伤杂志,2017,33(12):728-731.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2017.12.002. [2] KhorD,AlQasasT,GaletC,et al. Electrical injuries and outcomes: a retrospective review[J/OL]. Burns,2023,23:S0305-4179(23)00061-X(2023-03-23)[2023-09-28]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37005139/.DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2023.03.015. [published online ahead of print]. [3] GandhiG,ParasharA,SharmaRK.Epidemiology of electrical burns and its impact on quality of life - the developing world scenario[J].World J Crit Care Med,2022,11(1):58-69.DOI: 10.5492/wjccm.v11.i1.58. [4] StylianouN,BuchanI,DunnKW.A review of the international Burn Injury Database (iBID) for England and Wales: descriptive analysis of burn injuries 2003-2011[J].BMJ Open,2015,5(2):e006184.DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006184. [5] KeshavarziA,RahgozarZ,MortazaviM,et al.Epidemiology, geographical distribution, and outcome analysis of patients with electrical burns referred to Shiraz Burn Center, Shiraz, Iran during 2008-2019[J].World J Plast Surg,2022,11(2):102-109.DOI: 10.52547/wjps.11.2.102. [6] 蒋梅君, 李泽, 谢卫国. 2 133例电烧伤住院患者流行病学调查[J]. 中华烧伤杂志,2017,33 (12): 732-737. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2017.12.003. [7] KasanaRA,BabaPU,WaniAH.Pattern of high voltage electrical injuries in the Kashmir valley: a 10-year single centre experience[J].Ann Burns Fire Disasters,2016,29(4):259-263. [8] 邱均平,王明芝.1999～2008年国内数字图书馆研究论文的计量分析[J].情报杂志,2010,29(2):1-5.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1965.2010.02.001. [9] 宋永辉,马廷灿,岳名亮,等.基于文献计量的负责任研究与创新领域国际研究现状、演化路径及关键内容分析[J].科技管理研究,2023,43(8):82-92.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7695.2023.8.010. [10] 陈悦,陈超美,刘则渊,等.CiteSpace知识图谱的方法论功能[J].科学学研究,2015,33(2):242-253.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2053.2015.02.009. [11] PriceK,LeeKC,WoolleyKE,et al.Burn injury prevention in low- and middle- income countries: scoping systematic review[J/OL].Burns Trauma,2021,9:tkab037[2023-07-01].https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34729373/.DOI: 10.1093/burnst/tkab037. [12] GurbuzK,DemirM.Patterns and outcomes of high-voltage vs low-voltage pediatric electrical injuries: an 8-year retrospective analysis of a tertiary-level burn center[J].J Burn Care Res,2022,43(3):704-709.DOI: 10.1093/jbcr/irab178. [13] HanD,WeiY,LiY,et al.Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 5,569 pediatric burns in central China from 2013 to 2019[J].Front Public Health,2022,10:751615.DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.751615. [14] SabriD,OrnekDT,AhmetE,et al.Electrical injuries in children: a 10-years experience at a tertiary pediatric burn center[J].J Burn Care Res,2021,42(4):801-809. DOI: 10.1093/jbcr/irab012. [15] SalehiSH,Sadat AzadY,BagheriT,et al.Epidemiology of occupational electrical injuries[J].J Burn Care Res,2022,43(2):399-402.DOI: 10.1093/jbcr/irab171. [16] StocklyOR,WolfeAE,EspinozaLF,et al.The impact of electrical injuries on long-term outcomes: a burn model system national database study[J].Burns,2020,46(2):352-359.DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2019.07.030. [17] 李泽,席毛毛,谢卫国.3108例特殊原因烧伤临床流行病学分析[J].感染、炎症、修复,2018,19(1):3-8.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-8521.2018.01.001. [18] 赵黎君,周琴,邹小梅.鼠神经生长因子联合腹部超薄皮瓣修复手部深度电烧伤创面[J].中国美容医学,2022,31(10):31-34. [19] 吴宏志,李晓,杨蒙,等. 自体富血小板血浆凝胶对中老年电烧伤患者创面愈合的影响[J]. 中国老年学杂志,2015(5):1182-1184. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2015.05.014. [20] BaşaranA,GürbüzK,ÖzlüÖ,et al.Electrical burns and complications: data of a tertiary burn center intensive care unit[J].Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg,2020,26(2):222-226.DOI: 10.14744/tjtes.2019.65780. [21] ShihJG,ShahrokhiS,JeschkeMG.Review of adult electrical burn injury outcomes worldwide: an analysis of low-voltage vs high-voltage electrical injury[J].J Burn Care Res,2017,38(1):e293-e298.DOI: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000373. [22] 何小龙,张兵,李峥,等.富氢盐水对严重高电压烧伤大鼠肾功能及肾组织病理变化的影响[J].中国临床研究,2019,32(7):874-878.DOI: 10.13429/j.cnki.cjcr.2019.07.003. [23] 贾伟,刘建龙,覃凤均,等.高压电烧伤合并肢体血管损伤治疗10年回顾性分析[J].中国普通外科杂志,2022,31(6):760-766.DOI: 10.7659/j.issn.1005-6947.2022.06.008. [24] 富文达,李娜,魏华,等.自体富血小板血浆联合负压封闭引流技术治疗慢性难愈性创面疗效的Meta分析[J].中国输血杂志,2023,36(2):155-160.DOI: 10.13303/j.cjbt.issn.1004-549x.2023.02.015. [25] PedrazziN,KleinH,GentzschT,et al.Predictors for limb amputation and reconstructive management in electrical injuries[J].Burns,2023,49(5):1103-1112.DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2022.08.007. [26] AlipourJ,MehdipourY,KarimiA.Epidemiology and outcome analysis of 3030 burn patients with an ICD-10 approach[J].Ann Burns Fire Disasters,2020,33(1):3-13. [27] NisarS,KeylounJW,KolachanaS,et al.Institutional experience using a treatment algorithm for electrical injury[J].J Burn Care Res,2021,42(3):351-356.DOI: 10.1093/jbcr/irab020. [28] SaputroI,RiestianoB,HoekstraLT,et al.The effect of oral N-acetylcystein on prevention of extensive tissue destruction in electrical burn injury[J].Burns,2018,44(8):2059-2063.DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2018.08.025. [29] ChoYS,SeoCH,JooSY,et al.The association between vitamin D levels and burn factors in different burn types[J/OL].Burns Trauma,2020,8:tkaa018[2023-07-01]. https://pubmed.ncbi,nlm.nih.dov/32607374/.DOI: 10.1093/burnst/tkaa018. [30] AaseDM,FinkJW,LeeRC,et al.Mood and cognition after electrical injury: a follow-up study[J].Arch Clin Neuropsychol,2014,29(2):125-130.DOI: 10.1093/arclin/act117. [31] 张庆富.关注电烧伤所致精神障碍[J].中华烧伤杂志,2020,36(6):415-418.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200412-00221. [32] ShahidF,GondalMF,Us SabahN,et al.Psychosocial impact of electrical burn in children: a follow-up study conducted at a tertiary care hospital[J].Cureus,2022,14(12):e32816.DOI: 10.7759/cureus.32816. [33] 王凌峰,李全,曹胜军,等.我国大面积烧伤救治工作的回顾与展望[J/CD].中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版),2022,17(5):369-378.DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2022.05.001. -
2 2013—2022年中国知网、万方数据库、维普数据库中共523篇电烧伤相关中文文献和Web of Science数据库核心合集中398篇英文文献的关键词共现图。2A.中文文献；2B.英文文献
注：排除与检索词相关的关键词电烧伤、电击伤、烧伤及electrical injury、injury、electrical burn、burn injury，确定主要高频关键词；节点大小代表关键词的出现频次，节点越大，表示该关键词出现的频次越高；图2B中electrical injury为电烧伤，injury为损伤，electrical burn为电烧伤，management为管理，epidemiology为流行病学，children为儿童，electrocution为触电，reconstruction为重建
3 2013—2022年中国知网、万方数据库、维普数据库共523篇电烧伤相关中文文献和Web of Science数据库核心合集中398篇英文文献的关键词聚类图。3A.中文文献；3B.英文文献
注：聚类标签数值越小表示聚类规模越大、所包含关键词节点越多；图3B中reconstructive surgical procedures为重建外科手术，chronic pain为慢性疼痛，shock为电击，electrical injury为电烧伤，risk factor为风险因素，health为健康，electrical burn为电烧伤
4 2013—2022年中国知网、万方数据库、维普数据库共523篇电烧伤相关中文文献和Web of Science数据库核心合集中398篇英文文献的关键词聚类时间线图。4A.中文文献；4B.英文文献
注：每个节点代表关键词，节点越大表示出现频次越高；内部红圈代表高突现强度，紫色的圆环代表高中心性，节点间的连线表示相连的2个或多个关键词同时出现在同一篇或多篇文献中；图4B中reconstructive surgical procedures为重建外科手术，chronic pain为慢性疼痛，shock为电击，electrical injury为电烧伤，risk factor为风险因素，health为健康，electrical burn为电烧伤
表1 2013—2022年中国知网、万方数据库、维普数据库共523篇电烧伤相关文献突现强度排前10的关键词的突现情况
表1. Mutations of the top 10 keywords in terms of mutation intensity in a total of 523 electric burns-related literature in China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang database, and VIP database from 2013 to 2022
关键词 突现强度 出现年份 结束年份 皮瓣修复 2.96 2015 2016 病理学 2.36 2018 2019 深度电烧伤 2.33 2018 2021 并发症 2.21 2021 2022 手部电烧伤 2.21 2021 2022 流行病学 2.02 2017 2019 小儿 1.93 2015 2016 烧伤患者 1.87 2019 2021 腕部电烧伤 1.67 2017 2021 院前急救 1.67 2014 2015 截肢 1.67 2014 2015 
下载: 导出CSV
表2 2013—2022年Web of Science数据库核心合集中398篇电烧伤相关文献突现强度排前10的关键词的突现情况
表2. Mutations of the top 10 keywords in terms of mutation intensity in a total of 398 electric burns-related literature in the core collection of Web of Science database from 2013 to 2022
关键词 突现强度 出现年份 结束年份 prevention（预防） 4.19 2013 2015 risk factors（风险因素） 3.09 2015 2017 long term sequelae（长期后遗症） 2.86 2014 2016 mechanisms（机制） 2.14 2021 2022 voltage（电压） 2.01 2019 2022 management（管理） 1.95 2021 2022 morbidity（发病率） 1.79 2018 2019 safety（安全） 1.79 2018 2019 electrical shock（触电） 1.79 2020 2021 case report（病例报告） 1.74 2020 2022
下载: 导出CSV
-
图(6) / 表(2)
计量
- 文章访问数: 241
- HTML全文浏览量: 157
- PDF下载量: 45
- 被引次数: 0
