-
摘要:
目的 探讨头皮缺损伴颅骨外露创面的组织瓣修复策略。 方法 该研究为回顾性观察性研究。2019年1月—2023年12月,暨南大学附属广州红十字会医院收治18例符合入选标准的不同头皮缺损伴颅骨外露创面面积(以下简称头皮缺损面积)的患者,其中男13例、女5例,年龄17~59岁。清创后,头皮缺损面积为1 cm×1 cm~25 cm×25 cm。针对头皮缺损面积<9 cm2且周围头皮局部条件较好的患者,采用局部皮瓣(面积为2 cm×2 cm~5 cm×5 cm)进行创面修复;将皮瓣供区创面拉拢缝合,若缝合张力较大则取头部皮片进行创面修复。对于头皮缺损面积>9 cm2且≤1/4头皮总面积的患者,采用扩张皮瓣(面积为5 cm×3 cm~12 cm×12 cm)进行创面修复;将皮瓣供区创面直接拉拢缝合。对于头皮缺损面积>1/4头皮总面积且≤1/2头皮总面积的患者,采用游离股前外侧皮瓣(面积为9 cm×7 cm~29 cm×14 cm)进行创面修复;将皮瓣供区创面分层缝合,若张力较大则移植同侧大腿皮片进行修复。对于头皮缺损面积>1/2头皮总面积的患者,采用游离大网膜瓣(面积为28 cm×23 cm~29 cm×26 cm)+大腿皮片进行创面修复,并直接缝合切取大网膜瓣造成的腹部切口。记录术中移植的组织瓣类型。术后,观察组织瓣及受区移植皮片成活情况、皮瓣供区创面/切取大网膜瓣造成的腹部切口愈合情况。随访时,观察组织瓣成活情况、皮瓣供区创面/切取大网膜瓣造成的腹部切口瘢痕增生情况。末次随访时,复查头部CT评估颅骨有无坏死。 结果 针对本组病例头皮缺损伴颅骨外露创面,4例患者采用局部皮瓣修复,其中2例患者采用局部V-Y推进皮瓣修复,2例患者采用局部双蒂拱顶石皮瓣修复,术后皮瓣均完全成活。5例患者采用扩张皮瓣修复,其中1例患者埋置2个皮肤软组织扩张器,4例患者埋置1个皮肤软组织扩张器,术后扩张皮瓣均完全成活。7例患者采用游离股前外侧皮瓣移植修复,术后6例患者皮瓣完全成活,1例患者皮瓣远端坏死,经清创拉拢缝合后愈合良好。2例患者采用游离移植大网膜瓣+大腿皮片修复,术后大网膜瓣和受区移植皮片均存活良好。术后,皮瓣供区创面/切取大网膜瓣造成的腹部切口均愈合良好。术后随访6~24个月,组织瓣均存活良好,无颅骨外露;皮瓣供区创面/切取大网膜瓣造成的腹部切口瘢痕增生不明显。末次随访时,复查CT显示所有患者颅骨均无坏死。 结论 根据头皮缺损面积从小至大依次选择局部皮瓣、扩张皮瓣、游离股前外侧皮瓣、游离大网膜瓣+皮片修复创面,效果良好,值得临床推广。 Abstract:Objective To investigate the strategy of using tissue flaps for repairing scalp defects with exposed skull wounds. Methods This study was a retrospective observational study. From January 2019 to December 2023, 18 patients (13 males and 5 females, aged 17-59 years) with different scalp defect combined with skull exposure area (hereafter referred to as scalp defect area) who met the inclusion criteria were admitted to Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital of Jinan University. After debridement, the scalp defect area was 1 cm×1 cm to 25 cm×25 cm. For patients with scalp defect area < 9 cm2 and good local conditions of the surrounding scalp, local flaps with area of 2 cm×2 cm-5 cm×5 cm were used for wound repair. The wound in the donor site of the flap was pulled together and sutured. If the suture tension was large, the skin graft from the head was taken and transplanted for wound repair. For patients with scalp defect area > 9 cm2 and ≤1/4 of the total scalp area, expanded flaps with area of 5 cm×3 cm-12 cm×12 cm were used for wound repair. The wound in the donor site of the flap was pulled together and sutured directly. For patients with scalp defect area >1/4 and ≤1/2 of the total scalp area, free transplantation of anterolateral thigh flaps with area of 9 cm×7 cm-29 cm×14 cm were used for wound repair. The wound in the donor site of the flap was sutured in layers, and the skin graft from the ipsilateral thigh was transplanted for repair if the tension was large. For patients with scalp defect area >1/2 of the total scalp area, free greater omental flap (28 cm×23 cm-29 cm×26 cm in area) transplantation and thigh skin graft were used for wound repair. The abdominal incision caused by cutting the greater omental flap was sutured directly. The types of tissue flaps were recorded during operation. After operation, the survival of tissue flaps and skin graft in the recipient sites was observed, and the wound healing of flap donor sites/abdominal incision caused by cutting the greater omental flap was observed. During follow up, the survival of tissue flaps and the scar hyperplasia of flap donor site/abdominal incision caused by cutting the greater omental flap were observed. At the last follow-up, the skull necrosis was evaluated by computed tomography scan. Results For the scalp defect with exposed skull wounds in this group of cases, 4 cases were repaired with local flaps, of which 2 cases were repaired with V-Y advancement flaps, and 2 cases were repaired with local double-pedicle vault stone flaps. The flaps survived completely after operation. Five cases were repaired with expanded flaps, of which 1 patient was implanted with 2 skin and soft tissue expanders, and 4 patients were implanted with 1 skin and soft tissue expander. The expanded flaps survived completely after operation. Seven cases were repaired with free transplantation of anterolateral thigh flaps. After operation, the flap in 6 cases survived, and the distal end of the flap was necrotic in 1 case, and the wound healed well after debridement and suture. Two cases were repaired with free transplantation of greater omental flaps and thigh skin graft, and the greater omental flap and skin graft in the recipient site survived well after operation. After operation, the wound of flap donor site/abdominal incision caused by cutting the greater omental flap healed well. During follow-up, all tissue flaps survived well without skull exposure; the scar hyperplasia of flap donor site/abdominal incision caused by cutting the greater omental flap was not obvious. At the last follow-up, computed tomography scan showed that all patients had no skull necrosis. Conclusions According to the size of scalp defect, local flap, expanded flap, free anterolateral thigh flap, and free greater omental flap+skin graft are selected successively from small to large to repair the wounds, and the effect is good, which is worthy of clinical promotion. -
Key words:
- Surgical flaps /
- Wound healing /
- Scalp defect /
- Exposed skull
-
参考文献
(22) [1] 马杰, 沈尊理, 沈华, 等. 头皮缺损修复方法的选择[J].组织工程与重建外科杂志,2016,12(1):25-26,30. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-0364.2016.01.006. [2] 田甜, 陈传俊, 李罗珠, 等. 颅骨密集钻孔结合负压封闭引流治疗大面积头皮缺损并颅骨外露[J].中华整形外科杂志,2017,33(4):304-305. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-4598.2017.04.017. [3] 胡涛涛, 常树森, 魏在荣, 等. 改良三纵五横法在股前外侧穿支皮瓣修复术前穿支定位中的应用研究[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2021,35(8):1027-1032. DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.202103074. [4] Sandoval-ClavijoA, PigemR, Sieira-GilR, et al. Coverage of large bone-exposed scalp defect with bone burring followed by dermal regeneration template and split-thickness grafting[J]. Dermatol Surg, 2022,48(6):685-686. DOI: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000003419. [5] RanjanK, VenkataramuV, AchantiHP, et al. The role of pedicled latissimus dorsi flap in scalp defect reconstruction following tumour excision[J]. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2021,73(1):129-132. DOI: 10.1007/s12070-020-02071-w. [6] HowerterSS, LearW. Preservation of hair density and orientation in a large scalp defect of a female patient using a novel intraoperative skin relaxation device[J]. Int J Womens Dermatol, 2020,6(4):338-339. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijwd.2020.05.003. [7] ShenH, DaiX, ChenJ, et al. Modified unilateral pedicled V-Y advancement flap for scalp defect repair[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2018,29(3):608-613. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004330. [8] YamamuraK, EndoY, KabashimaK. Occipital artery island V-Y flap for the reconstruction of temporal scalp defect[J]. Int J Dermatol, 2020,59(8):e296-e298. DOI: 10.1111/ijd.14865. [9] LiuY, XiaoB, ZhangC, et al. Occipital pressure sores in two neonates[J/OL]. Burns Trauma, 2015,3:22[2024-05-15]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27574668/. DOI: 10.1186/s41038-015-0021-9. [10] 葛礼正, 刘安军, 郭利刚, 等. 颞浅动脉及其吻合支为蒂的头皮瓣在修复头皮缺损颅骨外露中的临床应用[J].中华整形外科杂志,2014,30(6):466-468. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-4598.2014.06.020. [11] NeumannCG. The expansion of an area of skin by progressive distention of a subcutaneous balloon; use of the method for securing skin for subtotal reconstruction of the ear[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg (1946), 1957,19(2):124-130. DOI: 10.1097/00006534-195702000-00004. [12] XieF, QinJ, FangB, et al. Novel strategies in scalp expansion: improvements and applications of tissue expanders[J/OL]. Burns Trauma, 2024,12:tkae002[2024-05-15]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38596624/. DOI: 10.1093/burnst/tkae002. [13] GosainAK, TurinSY, ChimH, et al. Salvaging the unavoidable: a review of complications in pediatric tissue expansion[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2018,142(3):759-768. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004650. [14] 计鹏, 胡大海, 韩夫, 等. 扩张皮瓣修复钛网颅骨成形术后钛网外露创面的临床效果[J].中华烧伤杂志,2021,37(8):752-757. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200613-00306. [15] 何永强, 张岩. 扩张器Ⅰ期植入扩张头皮瓣修复电烧伤致大面积颅骨外露创面的临床效果[J].中华医学美学美容杂志,2016,22(5):309-310. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0290.2016.05.016. [16] DongL, DongY, LiuC, et al. Latissimus dorsi-myocutaneous flap in the repair of titanium mesh exposure and scalp defect after cranioplasty[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2020,31(2):351-354. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006016. [17] 梁尊鸿, 潘云川, 林志琥, 等. 游离股前外侧皮瓣及头皮扩张术序贯治疗头皮大面积缺损并颅骨外露感染创面[J].中华显微外科杂志,2018,41(2):186-189. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-2036.2018.02.024. [18] 唐鑫成, 邹永根, 欧昌良, 等. 游离股前外侧皮瓣修复电击伤后头部大面积软组织缺损[J].中华显微外科杂志,2021,44(2):178-180. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441206-20200730-00307. [19] LeeABJr, SchimertG, ShaktinS, et al. Total excision of the sternum and thoracic pedicle transposition of the greater omentum; useful strategems in managing severe mediastinal infection following open heart surgery[J]. Surgery, 1976,80(4):433-436. [20] 张旭东, 赵启明, 陈丽梅, 等. 犬肢体爆炸伤后游离移植大网膜的抗感染能力[J].中华烧伤杂志,2014,30(4):360-362. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2014.04.018. [21] LiuJ, HanJ, JiG, et al. Laparoscopic harvest and free transplantation of great omentum flap for extensive tissue defects in complex wounds[J]. JPRAS Open, 2023,39:1-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpra.2023.10.012. [22] van WingerdenJJ, CoretME, van NieuwenhovenCA, et al. The laparoscopically harvested omental flap for deep sternal wound infection[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2010,37(1):87-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.06.020. -