Volume 38 Issue 1
Jan.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Herrero DLE, Sanchez-Sanchez M, Cachafeiro FL, et al. Lactate and lactate clearance in critically burned patients: usefulness and limitations as a resuscitation guide and as a prognostic factor[J]. Burns, 2020, 46(8):1839-1847. DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2020.06.003.
Citation: Herrero DLE, Sanchez-Sanchez M, Cachafeiro FL, et al. Lactate and lactate clearance in critically burned patients: usefulness and limitations as a resuscitation guide and as a prognostic factor[J]. Burns, 2020, 46(8):1839-1847. DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2020.06.003.

Differences of water barrier function between keloid and its surrounding normal skin in patients with keloids and its related mechanism

doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210427-00156
Funds:

General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China 81671921

More Information
  •   Objective   To compare the differences of water barrier function between keloids and its surrounding normal skin in patients with keloids, and to explore the primary mechanism.   Methods   A cross-sectional observational study was conducted. From October 2020 to March 2021, 30 patients with keloids who met the inclusion criteria visited Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, including 18 females and 12 males, aged 20-48 years. The transepidermal water loss (TEWL) of their keloids and the surrounding normal skin of the 30 patients were measured by multi probe adapter on the reception day. The keloid tissues and normal skin of 5 patients after keloid repair surgery were processed for hematoxylin-eosin staining to measure the thickness of epidermis. Immunohistochemistry was performed on samples from 3 of those 5 patients to detect the expressions of cytokeratin-10, involucrin, and filaggrin in keloids and normal skin. Data were statistically analyzed with paired sample ttest and independent sample t test.   Results   On the reception day, the TEWL of keloids of 30 patients was 9.0 (6.9, 13.4) g·m -2·h -1 and the TEWL of the normal skin was 8.1 (6.4, 18.1) g·m -2·h -1, between which the difference was not statistically significant ( t=0.44, P>0.05). After keloid repair surgery, the thickness of epidermis in the keloids of 5 patients was (194±44) μm, which was significantly thicker than that of the normal skin (44±11) μm, ( t=6.88, P<0.01). Furthermore, increased keratinocytes, lack of normal epidermal ridge structures, and thickened stratum corneum were observed in the keloid area. After keloid repair surgery, the expression level of cytokeratin-10 in keloids was significantly lower than that in normal skin of 3 patients ( t=8.50, P<0.01), but there were no statistically significant differences in the expression levels of involucrin or filaggrin between keloids and normal skin (with t values of 0.07 and 0.96, respectively, P>0.05).   Conclusions   Keloid tissue from patients with keloids displays increased number of keratinocytes and thickened epidermis. But the water barrier function in keloid area is similar to the surrounding normal skin, suggesting that TEWL may not be the main mechanism lead to the persistent development of keloids.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    TanS, KhumaloN, BayatA. Understanding keloid pathobiology from a quasi-neoplastic perspective: less of a scar and more of a chronic inflammatory disease with cancer-like tendencies[J]. Front Immunol,2019, 10:1810.DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01810.
    [2]
    AndrewsJP, MarttalaJ, MacarakE, et al. Keloids: the paradigm of skin fibrosis-pathomechanisms and treatment[J]. Matrix Biol,2016,51:37-46.DOI: 10.1016/j.matbio.2016.01.013.
    [3]
    OgawaR. Keloid and hypertrophic scars: are the result of chronic inflammation in the reticular dermis[J]. Int J Mol Sci,2017,18(3):606.DOI: 10.3390/ijms18030606.
    [4]
    LimandjajaGC, NiessenFB, ScheperRJ, et al. The keloid disorder: heterogeneity, histopathology, mechanisms and models[J]. Front Cell Dev Biol,2020,8:360.DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00360.
    [5]
    TsaiCH, OgawaR. Keloid research: current status and future directions[J]. Scars Burn Heal, 2019,5:2059513119868659.DOI: 10.1177/2059513119868659.
    [6]
    UehaS, ShandFHW, MatsushimaK. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of chronic inflammation-associated organ fibrosis[J]. Front Immunol,2012,3:71.DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00071.
    [7]
    WangZC, ZhaoWY, CaoYY, et al. The roles of inflammation in keloid and hypertrophic scars[J]. Front Immunol,2020,11:603187.DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.603187.
    [8]
    TandaraAA, MustoeTA. The role of the epidermis in the control of scarring:evidence for mechanism of action for silicone gel[J]. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg,2008,61(10):1219-1225.DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2008.03.022.
    [9]
    MustoeTA. Evolution of silicone therapy and mechanism of action in scar management[J]. Aesthetic Plast Surg,2008,32(1):82-92.DOI: 10.1007/s00266-007-9030-9.
    [10]
    OgawaR, DohiT, TosaM, et al. The latest strategy for keloid and hypertrophic scar prevention and treatment: the Nippon Medical School (NMS) protocol[J]. J Nippon Med Sch,2021,88(1):2-9.DOI: 10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2021_88-106.
    [11]
    O'BrienL, JonesDJ. Silicone gel sheeting for preventing and treating hypertrophic and keloid scars[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2013,2013(9):CD003826.DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003826.pub3.
    [12]
    AlexanderH, BrownS, DanbyS, et al. Research techniques made simple: transepidermal water loss measurement as a research tool[J]. J Invest Dermatol,2018,138(11):2295-2300.e1.DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2018.09.001.
    [13]
    DiniV, BarbaneraS, RomanelliM. Quantitative evaluation of maceration in venous leg ulcers by transepidermal water loss(TEWL) measurement[J]. Int J Low Extrem Wounds,2014,13(2):116-119.DOI: 10.1177/1534734614536035.
    [14]
    GardienKLM, BaasDC, de VetHCW, et al. Transepidermal water loss measured with the Tewameter TM300 in burn scars[J]. Burns,2016,42(7):1455-1462.DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2016.04.018.
    [15]
    KuniiT, HiraoT, KikuchiK, et al. Stratum corneum lipid profile and maturation pattern of corneocytes in the outermost layer of fresh scars: the presence of immature corneocytes plays a much more important role in the barrier dysfunction than do changes in intercellular lipids[J]. Br J Dermatol,2003, 149(4):749-756.DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2003.05545.x.
    [16]
    EhrlichHP, DesmoulièreA, DiegelmannRF, et al. Morphological and immunochemical differences between keloid and hypertrophic scar[J]. Am J Pathol,1994,145(1):105-113.
    [17]
    BetarbetU, BlalockTW. Keloids: a review of etiology, prevention, and treatment[J]. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol,2020,13(2):33-43.
    [18]
    BaroniA, BuomminoE, De GregorioV, et al. Structure and function of the epidermis related to barrier properties[J]. Clin Dermatol,2012,30(3):257-262.DOI: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.211.08.007.
    [19]
    MenonGK, ClearyGW, LaneME. The structure and function of the stratum corneum[J]. Int J Pharm, 2012,435(1):3-9.DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2012.06.005.
    [20]
    RawlingsAV, HardingCR. Moisturization and skin barrier function[J]. Dermatol Ther,2004,17 (Suppl 1):S43-48.DOI: 10.1111/j.1396-0296.2004.04s1005.x.
    [21]
    SuetakeT, SasaiS, ZhenYX, et al. Functional analyses of the stratum corneum in scars. Sequential studies after injury and comparison among keloids, hypertrophic scars, and atrophic scars[J]. Arch Dermatol,1996,132(12):1453-1458.
    [22]
    LimandjajaGC, van den BroekLJ, WaaijmanT, et al. Increased epidermal thickness and abnormal epidermal differentiation in keloid scars[J]. Br J Dermatol,2017,176(1):116-126. DOI: 10.1111/bjd.14844.
    [23]
    OuseyK, CuttingKF, RogersAA, et al. The importance of hydration in wound healing: reinvigorating the clinical perspective[J]. J Wound Care,2016,25(3):122,124-130.DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2016.25.3.122.
    [24]
    SawadaY, SoneK. Hydration and occlusion treatment for hypertrophic scars and keloids[J]. Br J Plast Surg,1992,45(8):599-603.DOI: 10.1016/0007-1226(92)90027-u.
    [25]
    SuetakT, SasaiS, ZhenYX, et al. Effects of silicone gel sheet on the stratum corneum hydration[J]. Br J Plast Surg,2000,53(6):503-507.DOI: 10.1054/bjps.2000.3388.
    [26]
    KumarAS, KamalasananK. Drug delivery to optimize angiogenesis imbalance in keloid: a review[J]. J Control Release,2021,329:1066-1076.DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.10.035.
    [27]
    MariW, AlsabriSG, TabalN, et al. Novel insights on understanding of keloid scar: article review[J]. J Am Coll Clin Wound Spec,2016,7(1/2/3):1-7.DOI: 10.1016/j.jccw.2016.10.001.
    [28]
    LeeHJ, JangYJ. Recent understandings of biology, prophylaxis and treatment strategies for hypertrophic scars and keloids[J]. Int J Mol Sci,2018,19(3):711.DOI: 10.3390/ijms19030711.
    [29]
    SogabeY, AkimotoS, AbeM, et al. Functions of the stratum corneum in systemic sclerosis as distinct from hypertrophic scar and keloid functions[J]. J Dermatol Sci,2002,29(1):49-53.DOI: 10.1016/s0923-1811(02)00006-3.
    [30]
    SandlandsA, SutherlandC, IrvineAD, et al. Filaggrin in the frontline: role in skin barrier function and disease[J]. J Cell Sci,2009,122(Pt 9):1285-1294.DOI: 10.1242/jcs.033969.
    [31]
    BrettmannEA, de Guzman StrongC. Recent evolution of the human skin barrier[J]. Exp Dermatol, 2018,27(8):859-866.DOI: 10.1111/exd.13689.
    [32]
    AnS, ChaHJ, KoJM, et al. Kinetin improves barrier function of the skin by modulating keratinocyte differentiation markers[J]. Ann Dermatol,2017,29(1):6-12.DOI: 10.5021/ad.2017.29.1.6.
    [33]
    VisscherMO, SaidD, WickettR. Stratum corneum cytokines, structural proteins, and transepidermal water loss: effect of hand hygiene[J]. Skin Res Technol,2010,16(2):229-236.DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0846.2009.00411.x.
    [34]
    MollR, DivoM, LangbeinL. The human keratins: biology and pathology[J]. Histochem Cell Biol, 2008,129(6):705-733.DOI: 10.1007/s00418-008-0435-6.
    [35]
    JumperN, PausR, BayatA. Functional histopathology of keloid disease[J]. Histol Histopathol,2015, 30(9):1033-1057. DOI: 10.14670/HH-11-624.
    [36]
    LeeJYY, YangCC, ChaoSC, et al. Histopathological differential diagnosis of keloid and hypertrophic scar[J]. Am J Dermatopathol,2004,26(5): 379-384.DOI: 10.1097/00000372-200410000-00006.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(2)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (403) PDF downloads(47) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return