Clinical effects of different types of chimeric perforator flap transplantation in the treatment of lower extremity wounds with bone exposure
-
摘要:
目的 探讨不同类型嵌合穿支皮瓣移植治疗下肢骨外露创面的临床效果。 方法 该研究为回顾性病例系列研究。2019年1月—2024年8月,陆军军医大学(第三军医大学)第二附属医院整形外科收治15例符合入选标准的下肢骨外露创面患者,其中12例患者合并骨髓炎。15例患者中男8例、女7例,年龄27~66岁,末次清创后创面面积为3.0 cm×2.0 cm~22.0 cm×4.5 cm。根据创面面积、深度、缺损组织成分、解剖部位及患肢血管条件等,应用嵌合肌瓣、肌瓣与髂骨瓣、肌瓣与筋膜瓣的穿支皮瓣,包括旋髂动脉嵌合穿支皮瓣、旋髂浅动脉联合腹壁浅动脉嵌合穿支皮瓣、旋股外侧动脉嵌合穿支皮瓣、胸背动脉嵌合穿支皮瓣,进行下肢骨外露创面修复,嵌合穿支皮瓣面积为4.0 cm×3.0 cm~25.0 cm×5.0 cm。对嵌合穿支皮瓣供区创面进行直接拉拢缝合、游离皮片移植或局部皮瓣转移修复。观察术后早期移植嵌合穿支皮瓣成活情况。随访观察所有患者移植嵌合穿支皮瓣存活情况与外观、供受区创面愈合情况与并发症发生情况、供区瘢痕形成情况、负重活动情况,合并骨髓炎患者骨髓炎有无复发迹象。 结果 1例行嵌合肌瓣与筋膜瓣的旋股外侧动脉降支穿支皮瓣移植患者,在术后24 h内出现皮瓣静脉血管危象,皮瓣淤紫,行急诊血管探查+静脉二次吻合再通后皮瓣成活;1例行嵌合肌瓣的旋股外侧动脉斜支穿支皮瓣移植患者术后10 d皮瓣远端部分坏死,经换药+游离皮片移植修复后皮瓣成活;其余13例患者移植嵌合穿支皮瓣均顺利成活。术后随访3~6个月显示,15例患者移植嵌合穿支皮瓣均存活良好,其中7例患者皮瓣臃肿;15例患者供受区创面愈合良好,未发生感染及窦道形成、持续性疼痛等并发症,且供区仅遗留线性瘢痕,但有3例患者供区遗留皮肤感觉异常;15例患者均能负重活动;12例合并骨髓炎患者均未见骨髓炎复发迹象。 结论 采用不同类型嵌合穿支皮瓣修复下肢骨外露创面,具有并发症少、皮瓣存活率高、骨髓炎治愈率高、下肢功能恢复佳等优点,是下肢骨外露损伤时修复创面、重建下肢功能的可靠临床方案。 Abstract:Objective To investigate the clinical effects of different types of chimeric perforator flap transplantation in the treatment of lower extremity wounds with bone exposure. Methods This study was a retrospective case series study. From January 2019 to August 2024, 15 patients with lower extremity wounds with bone exposure who met the inclusion criteria were admitted to the Department of Plastic Surgery of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University (the Third Military Medical University), among whom 12 patients were combined with osteomyelitis. Among the 15 patients, there were 8 males and 7 females, aged 27-66 years, and the wound area after the last debridement ranged from 3.0 cm×2.0 cm to 22.0 cm×4.5 cm. According to the wound area, depth, composition of defective tissue, anatomical site, and vascular conditions of the affected limb, chimeric perforator flaps containing muscle flaps, muscle flaps and iliac bone flaps, or muscle flaps and fascial flaps were used, including circumflex iliac artery chimeric perforator flaps, superficial circumflex iliac artery combined with superficial inferior epigastric artery chimeric perforator flaps, lateral circumflex femoral artery chimeric perforator flaps, and thoracodorsal artery chimeric perforator flaps, to repair lower extremity wounds with bone exposure. The area of the chimeric perforator flaps ranged from 4.0 cm×3.0 cm to 25.0 cm×5.0 cm. The donor site wounds of the chimeric perforator flaps were repaired by direct suture, free skin grafting, or local flap transfer. The survival of the transplanted chimeric perforator flaps in the early postoperative period was observed. Follow-up was conducted to observe the survival and appearance of the transplanted chimeric perforator flaps, wound healing and complications in both donor and recipient sites, scar formation in the donor site, and weight-bearing activity of all patients, and signs of osteomyelitis recurrence in patients combined with osteomyelitis. Results One patient who underwent transplantation of a chimeric perforator flap based on the descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery containing a muscle flap and a fascial flap developed venous vascular crisis within 24 hours after surgery, with the flap becoming dark purple; the flap survived after emergency vascular exploration and secondary venous anastomosis and recanalization. One patient who underwent transplantation of a chimeric perforator flap based on the oblique branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery containing a muscle flap developed partial necrosis of the distal end of the flap 10 days after surgery, and the flap survived after dressing changes and free skin grafting. The transplanted chimeric perforator flaps in the remaining 13 patients survived smoothly. Postoperative follow-up of 3-6 months showed that the transplanted chimeric perforator flaps in 15 patients all survived well, among whom 7 patients had bulky flaps; all the wounds in both donor and recipient sites healed well in 15 patients, with no complications such as infection, sinus tract formation, or persistent pain, and only linear scars remained in the donor sites, but 3 patients had abnormal skin sensation in the donor sites; all 15 patients were able to perform weight-bearing activities; no signs of osteomyelitis recurrence were observed in the 12 patients combined with osteomyelitis. Conclusions The use of different types of chimeric perforator flap to repair lower extremity wounds with bone exposure has the advantages of fewer complications, high flap survival rate, high cure rate of osteomyelitis, and good recovery of lower extremity function, and is a reliable clinical regimen for repairing wounds and reconstructing lower extremity function in lower extremity injuries with bone exposure. -
Key words:
- Lower extremity /
- Perforator flap /
- Microsurgery /
- Osteomyelitis /
- Bone exposure /
- Chimeric flap /
- Wound repair
-
参考文献
(37) [1] 唐举玉.掌握嵌合穿支皮瓣技术进一步提升复合组织缺损重建水平[J].中华烧伤与创面修复杂志,2025,41(1):5-10.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20241106-00435. [2] DongKX,ZhouY,ChengYY,et al.Clinical application of digital technology in the use of anterolateral thigh lobulated perforator flaps to repair complex soft tissue defects of the limbs[J/OL].Burns Trauma,2024,12:tkae011[2025-05-27].https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38737342/.DOI: 10.1093/burnst/tkae011. [3] 唐举玉.特殊形式穿支皮瓣及其衍生术式的分型与命名[J].中华显微外科杂志,2021,44(3):245-254.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441206-20210530-00193. [4] SuiX,QingL,YuF,et al.The versatile thoracodorsal artery perforator flap for extremity reconstruction: from simple to five types of advanced applications and clinical outcomes[J].J Orthop Surg Res,2023,18(1):973.DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-04480-3. [5] 吴泽东,郑和平.嵌合穿支皮瓣的发展与现状[J].临床外科杂志,2015,23(5):330-333. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2015.05.003. [6] LeeYJ,KimJ,LeeCR,et al.Anterolateral thigh chimeric flap: an alternative reconstructive option to free flaps for large soft tissue defects[J].J Clin Med,2023,12(21):6723.DOI: 10.3390/jcm12216723. [7] 李海,邓呈亮,肖顺娥,等.旋股外侧动脉嵌合穿支皮瓣修复足踝部复合组织缺损的效果[J].中华烧伤与创面修复杂志,2025,41(4):370-377.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20240202-00045. [8] 汤玉泉,唐举玉,吴攀峰,等.旋股外侧动脉降支嵌合穿支皮瓣游离移植治疗胫骨创伤后骨髓炎[J].中国现代医学杂志,2017,27(8):76-79.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-8982.2017.08.016. [9] 程琳,刘先奇,杜伟力,等.嵌合穿支皮瓣修复骨或内固定外露创面及骨髓炎创面的临床效果[J].中华烧伤与创面修复杂志,2024,40(7):643-649.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20231120-00198. [10] 吴攀峰,唐举玉,李康华,等.旋髂深动脉嵌合穿支皮瓣修复四肢骨和软组织缺损[J].中华显微外科杂志,2014,37(6):524-527.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-2036.2014.06.002. [11] WilkinsonHN,HardmanMJ.Wound healing: cellular mechanisms and pathological outcomes[J].Open Biol,2020,10(9):200223.DOI: 10.1098/rsob.200223. [12] MarquesR,LopesM,RamosP,et al.Prognostic factors for delayed healing of complex wounds in adults: a scoping review[J].Int Wound J,2023,20(7):2869-2886.DOI: 10.1111/iwj.14128. [13] 覃凤均,胡骁骅,黎明,等.腓肠神经营养血管远端蒂皮瓣联合腓骨短肌肌瓣治疗跟骨骨髓炎及跟骨缺损[J].骨科临床与研究杂志,2017,3(6):364-368.DOI: 10.19548/j.2096-269x.2017.06.009. [14] 郭晓峰,薛明宇,邓鑫鑫,等.自制抗生素骨水泥棒在胫骨钉道骨髓炎中的应用[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2023,37(2):153-156.DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.202207133. [15] BovillJD,SayyedAA,HuffmanSS,et al.A comparative analysis of fasciocutaneous versus muscle free flaps in peripheral vascular disease patients[J].Microsurgery,2023,43(3):253-260.DOI: 10.1002/micr.31008. [16] 王剑利,刘兴龙,赵刚,等.传统皮瓣与穿支皮瓣的临床回顾对比研究[J].中国骨与关节杂志,2015,4(2):128-132.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-252X.2015.02.18. [17] 赵建文,史卫东,何红英,等.穿支皮瓣的现状与发展[J].中国骨伤,2023,36(8):697-700.DOI: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2023.08.001. [18] HongJP,KwonJG,SuhHP,et al.The evolution of perforator flaps and the future of microsurgery[J].JPRAS Open,2025,47:33-42.DOI: 10.1016/j.jpra.2025.09.016. [19] 霍磊,谭琪,高加智,等.穿支皮瓣中Choke vessels的相关研究与展望[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2024,32(14):1309-1313.DOI: 10.20184/j.cnki.Issn1005-8478.11016A. [20] 金文虎,张子阳,吴祥奎,等.旋股外侧动脉嵌合皮瓣在足踝部复杂创面中的应用[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2021,35(7):891-895.DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.202102039. [21] SzczerbaN,WaleszczyńskaJ,JerkaD,et al.Fascia lata and tensor fasciae latae in lower-limb reconstruction[J].J Clin Med,2026,15(14):5547.DOI: 10.3390/jcm15145547. [22] 唐怀龙,谢久虎,吴信举,等.股前外侧嵌合穿支肌皮瓣在修复下肢软组织缺损合并深部死腔创面中的应用[J].实用手外科杂志,2025,39(3):275-279.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2722.2025.03.001. [23] 钟宇惠,崔旭,周思拓,等.抗生素骨水泥与VSD联合游离股前外侧穿支嵌合肌皮瓣序贯治疗糖尿病性跟骨骨髓炎创面的临床效果[J].中华烧伤与创面修复杂志,2026,42(3):225-233.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20251129-00493. [24] 黄巾帼,茹能.骨膜瓣治疗创伤性骨外露创面的研究进展[J].中外医学研究,2024,22(4):177-180.DOI: 10.14033/j.cnki.cfmr.2024.04.044. [25] 毛璐,张伯松,董迪,等.载万古霉素和美罗培南骨水泥人体局部释放研究[J].中国医院药学杂志,2022,42(20):2101-2104.DOI: 10.13286/j.1001-5213.2022.20.04. [26] 庞哲栋,肖连根,樊光亚,等.抗生素骨水泥治疗慢性创面的研究进展[J].中国现代医生,2023,61(11):120-124. [27] 邓智明,祝伟,缪玉龙,等.抗生素骨水泥在老年患者肌腱外露、骨外露创面中的临床应用[J].实用手外科杂志,2025,39(2):143-146.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2722.2025.02.002. [28] 魏富达,汪小华,谢肇.PMMA骨水泥与磷酸钙骨水泥诱导成膜及其对成骨活性的差异[J].第三军医大学学报,2015,37(10):973-977.DOI: 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201502031. [29] 王文凯,曾昕,左睿,等.小鼠股骨骨缺损诱导膜模型的构建与评估[J].第三军医大学学报,2018,40(9):805-809.DOI: 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201712163. [30] XieZ,CaoZM,YangY,et al.Clinical effect of free chimeric anterolateral thigh flap and chimeric thoracodorsal artery perforator flap in chronic osteomyelitis[J].J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg,2024,98:272-280.DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.09.007. [31] AbdelfattahU,AbdelwahabN,EmaraYO,et al.The efficacy of chimeric superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator (SCIP) flap in treatment of posttraumatic chronic osteomyelitis[J/OL].J Reconstr Microsurg,2025(2025-10-28)[2026-05-27],https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41151748/.DOI:10.1055/a-2717-4713.[published online ahead of print]. [32] GaoY,YangE,LuoS,et al.Pre-expanded muscle-sparing latissimus dorsi flap in defect reconstruction and its application strategy[J/OL].Burns Trauma,2024,12:tkae014[2025-05-27].https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38898890/.DOI: 10.1093/burnst/tkae014. [33] GravvanisA,TsoutsosD,KarakitsosD,et al.Blood perfusion of the free anterolateral thigh perforator flap: its beneficial effect in the reconstruction of infected wounds in the lower extremity[J].World J Surg,2007,31(1):11-18.DOI: 10.1007/s00268-006-0298-8. [34] 王欣,潘佳栋.功能性穿支皮(组织)瓣在组织缺损重建中的应用与创新[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2025,39(9):1071-1075.DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.202508001. [35] LiRG,ZengCJ,YuanS,et al.Reconstruction of large area of deep wound in the foot and ankle with chimeric anterolateral thigh perforator flap[J].Orthop Surg,2021,13(5):1609-1617.DOI: 10.1111/os.13046. [36] PotocnikP,LotterL,ToepferA,et al.Orthoplastic tarsal reconstruction using a chimeric vascularized bone graft in a heavy smoker: a case report[J].J Surg Case Rep,2025,2025(9):rjaf715.DOI: 10.1093/jscr/rjaf715. [37] 唐举玉,贺继强,吴攀峰,等.旋股外侧动脉降支嵌合穿支皮瓣立体修复合并深部死腔的下肢软组织缺损[J].中华显微外科杂志,2018,41(5):424-427.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-2036.2018.05.003. -
图 1 嵌合肌瓣的旋股外侧动脉降支穿支分叶皮瓣游离移植联合抗生素骨水泥填充修复例1患者左下肢骨外露创面的效果。1A.骨科予以左侧胫骨及外踝切开复位内固定+骨水泥置入术后第2天CT三维重建(左图)及X线片(右图)表现;1B、1C.分别为入整形外科(后续均为该科室处理)第1次清创术前外踝、胫前区创面,外踝骨质、肌腱、肌肉及内固定钢板外露,胫骨、肌肉、肌腱及内固定钢板外露;1D.第1次清创术中留取骨髓腔内组织行病理检查,可见大量中性粒细胞、淋巴细胞及浆细胞浸润,伴纤维组织增生 苏木精-伊红 ×100;1E.皮瓣移植术前胫前及外踝骨水泥外露创面;1F.皮瓣移植术前左内侧踝骨外露创面;1G.皮瓣移植术前左侧胫前区创面;1H.嵌合肌瓣的旋股外侧动脉降支穿支分叶皮瓣设计;1I.切取皮瓣并离断血管蒂后即刻;1J、1K.分别为皮瓣游离移植+抗生素骨水泥填充术后即刻侧面观、正面观,皮瓣血运良好;1L.供区创面直接拉拢缝合后即刻;1M、1N.分别为皮瓣修复术后6个月胫前、外踝皮瓣,均存活良好,轻度臃肿;1O.皮瓣修复术后6个月,X线检查显示骨髓腔内无明显感染征象(右侧图为左侧图放大1.6倍后图像)
图 2 嵌合肌瓣的胸背动脉穿支皮瓣游离移植联合抗生素骨水泥填充修复例2患者右下肢骨外露创面的效果。2A.入院时右小腿中段前内侧填塞骨水泥并部分外露;2B.入院时X线片显示,右侧胫骨内固定术后改变,右小腿软组织肿胀;2C.第2次清创术前创面,右侧胫骨外露;2D.第2次清创术中留取骨髓腔内组织行病理检查,大量中性粒细胞、淋巴细胞及浆细胞浸润,伴纤维组织增生 苏木精-伊红 ×100;2E.背部嵌合肌瓣的胸背动脉穿支皮瓣设计;2F.胸背动脉穿支血管走行;2G.皮瓣移植手术前创面情况;2H.切取嵌合肌瓣的胸背动脉穿支皮瓣并离断血管蒂后即刻;2I.皮瓣游离移植+抗生素骨水泥填充术后即刻,皮瓣血运良好;2J.皮瓣修复术后3个月,皮瓣成活良好,轻度臃肿;2K.皮瓣修复术后3个月,供区遗留线性瘢痕;2L.皮瓣修复术后3个月,CT检查显示骨髓腔未见明显感染征象
-



下载: