Articles in press have been peer-reviewed and accepted, which are not yet assigned to volumes /issues, but are citable by Digital Object Identifier (DOI).
Display Method:

MORE

Guideline and Consensus
Clinical practice guideline for pediatric scar prevention and treatment (2025 edition)
2025, 41(11): 1011-1028.   doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20250630-00285
Abstract [FullText HTML] PDF
Guideline and Consensus
Practical guideline on the prevention and management of diabetic foot in China (Ⅰ)
2025, 41(11): 1029-1049.   doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20250801-00345
Abstract [FullText HTML] PDF
Expert Forum
Multidisciplinary integration in the diagnosis and treatment in burns and wound repair surgery: current status, challenges, and future
Guan Hao, Zhang Dongliang
2025, 41(11): 1050-1056.   doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20250901-00379
Abstract [FullText HTML] PDF
Expert Forum
Analyzing the multidisciplinary strategies for diagnosis and treatment of patients with burns and trauma from a management perspective
Chen Hui
2025, 41(11): 1057-1063.   doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20250731-00341
Abstract [FullText HTML] PDF
Original Article·Multidisciplinary Integration in Burn Treatment and Diagnosis and Research
Clinical efficacy of multidisciplinary team collaboration in the treatment of deep sternal wound infection
Tong Lin, Lei Chenjia, Zhang Wanfu, Han Fei, Chen Yang, Zhang Hao, Guan Hao
2025, 41(11): 1064-1073.   doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20250402-00159
Abstract [FullText HTML] PDF

MORE

National expert consensus on early management of scars (2020 version)
Chinese Association of Plastics and Aesthetics Scar Medicine Branch
2021, 37(2): 113-125.   doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200609-00300
Abstract PDF
摘要:
2020, 36(8): E01-E52.   doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200217-01000
Abstract PDF
摘要:
Thoughts and principles of diagnosis and treatment of chronic refractory wounds in China
Dong Wei, Xiao Yurui, Wu Minjie, Jiang Duyin, Nie Lanjun, Liu Yingkai, Tang Jiajun, Tian Ming, Wang Chunlan, Huang Lifang, Dong Jiaoyun, Cao Xiaozan, Song Fei, Ji Xiaoyun, Ma Xian, Kang Yutian, Jin Shuwen, Qing Chun, Lu Shuliang
2018, 34(12): 868-873.   doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.12.010
Abstract PDF
摘要:
2017, 33(3): 129-135.   doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2017.03.001
Abstract PDF
摘要:
Theories and strategies of chronic wound treatment
Tan Qian, Xu Ye
2020, 36(9): 798-802.   doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200728-00361
Abstract PDF
摘要:
Clinical effects of autologous platelet rich plasma gel combined with vacuum sealing drainage techno-logy in repairing refractory wounds
Wang Ai, Ma Wenguo, Wang Chengde, Zhang Huanqi, Liu Fei
2021, 37(1): 42-48.   doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200105-00004
Abstract PDF
摘要:
2017, 33(1): 46-48.   doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2017.01.011
Abstract PDF
摘要:
Analysis of differential gene expressions of inflammatory and repair-related factors in chronic refractory wounds in clinic
Wang Lian, Guo Fei, Min Dinghong, Liao Xincheng, Yu Shaoqing, Long Xingxing, Ding xiang, Guo Guanghua
2019, 35(1): 18-24.   doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2019.01.005
Abstract PDF
摘要:
Clinical effects of application of antibiotic bone cement in wounds of diabetic foot ulcers
Huang Hongjun, Niu Xihua, Yang Guanlong, Wang Liying, Shi Fanchao, Xu Shaojun, Xu Lingang, Li Yonglin
2019, 35(6): 464-466.   doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2019.06.013
Abstract PDF
摘要:
New concept of chronic wound healing: advances in the research of wound management in palliative care
Yao Zexin, Fu Xiaobing, Cheng Biao
2020, 36(8): 754-757.   doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20190929-00388
Abstract PDF
摘要:
Effects of in situ cross-linked graphene oxide-containing gelatin methacrylate anhydride hydrogel on wound vascularization of full-thickness skin defect in mice
Liang Liting, Song Wei, Zhang Chao, Li Zhao, Yao Bin, Zhang Mengde, Yuan Xingyu, Enhejirigala, Fu Xiaobing, Huang Sha, Zhu Ping
2022, 38(7): 616-628.   doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20220314-00063
Abstract [FullText HTML] PDF(1403)
Abstract:
  Objective  To prepare graphene oxide (GO)-containing gelatin methacrylate anhydride (GelMA) hydrogel and to investigate the effects of in situ photopolymerized GO-GelMA composite hydrogel in wound vascularization of full-thickness skin defect in mice.  Methods  The experimental study method was used. The 50 μL of 0.2 mg/mL GO solution was evenly applied onto the conductive gel, and the structure and size of GO were observed under field emission scanning electron microscope after drying. Human skin fibroblasts (HSFs) were divided into 0 μg/mL GO (without GO solution, the same as below) group, 0.1 μg/mL GO group, 1.0 μg/mL GO group, 5.0 μg/mL GO group, and 10.0 μg/mL GO group treated with GO of the corresponding final mass concentration, and the absorbance value was detected using a microplate analyzer after 48 h of culture to reflect the proliferation activity of cells (n=6). HSFs and human umbilical vein vascular endothelial cells (HUVECs) were divided into 0 μg/mL GO group, 0.1 μg/mL GO group, 1.0 μg/mL GO group, and 5.0 μg/mL GO group treated with GO of the corresponding final mass concentration, and the migration rates of HSFs at 24 and 36 h after scratching (n=5) and HUVECs at 12 h after scratching (n=3) were detected by scratch test, and the level of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) secreted by HSFs after 4, 6, and 8 h of culture was detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method (n=3). The prepared GO-GelMA composite hydrogels containing GO of the corresponding final mass concentration were set as 0 μg/mL GO composite hydrogel group, 0.1 μg/mL GO composite hydrogel group, 1.0 μg/mL GO composite hydrogel group, and 5.0 μg/mL GO composite hydrogel group to observe their properties before and after cross-linking, and to detect the release of GO after soaking with phosphate buffer solution for 3 and 7 d (n=3). The full-thickness skin defect wounds were made on the back of 16 6-week-old female C57BL/6 mice. The mice treated with in situ cross-linked GO-GelMA composite hydrogel containing GO of the corresponding final mass concentration were divided into 0 μg/mL GO composite hydrogel group, 0.1 μg/mL GO composite hydrogel group, 1.0 μg/mL GO composite hydrogel group, and 5.0 μg/mL GO composite hydrogel group according to the random number table, with 4 mice in each group. The general condition of wound was observed and the wound healing rate was calculated on 3, 7, and 14 d of treatment, the wound blood perfusion was detected by laser Doppler flowmetry on 3, 7, and 14 d of treatment and the mean perfusion unit (MPU) ratio was calculated, and the wound vascularization on 7 d of treatment was observed after hematoxylin-eosin staining and the vascular density was calculated (n=3). The wound tissue of mice in 0 μg/mL GO composite hydrogel group and 0.1 μg/mL GO composite hydrogel group on 7 d of treatment was collected to observe the relationship between the distribution of GO and neovascularization by hematoxylin-eosin staining (n=3) and the expression of VEGF by immunohistochemical staining. Data were statistically analyzed with analysis of variance for repeated measurement, one-way analysis of variance, and Tukey's method.  Results  GO had a multilayered lamellar structure with the width of about 20 μm and the length of about 50 μm. The absorbance value of HSFs in 10.0 μg/mL GO group was significantly lower than that in 0 μg/mL GO group after 48 h of culture (q=7.64, P<0.01). At 24 h after scratching, the migration rates of HSFs were similar in the four groups (P>0.05); at 36 h after scratching, the migration rate of HSFs in 0.1 μg/mL GO group was significantly higher than that in 0 μg/mL GO group, 1.0 μg/mL GO group, and 5.0 μg/mL GO group (with q values of 7.48, 10.81, and 10.20, respectively, P<0.01). At 12 h after scratching, the migration rate of HUVECs in 0.1 μg/mL GO group was significantly higher than that in 0 μg/mL GO group, 1.0 μg/mL GO group, and 5.0 μg/mL GO group (with q values of 7.11, 8.99, and 14.92, respectively, P<0.01), and the migration rate of HUVECs in 5.0 μg/mL GO group was significantly lower than that in 0 μg/mL GO group and 1.0 μg/mL GO group (with q values of 7.81 and 5.33, respectively, P<0.05 or P<0.01 ). At 4 and 6 h of culture, the VEGF expressions of HSFs in the four groups were similar (P>0.05); at 8 h of culture, the VEGF expression of HSFs in 0.1 μg/mL GO group was significantly higher than that in 0 μg/mL GO group and 5.0 μg/mL GO group (with q values of 4.75 and 4.48, respectively, P<0.05). The GO-GelMA composite hydrogels in the four groups were all red liquid before cross-linking, which turned to light yellow gel after cross-linking, with no significant difference in fluidity. The GO in the GO-GelMA composite hydrogel of 0 μg/mL GO composite hydrogel group had no release of GO at all time points; the GO in the GO-GelMA composite hydrogels of the other 3 groups was partially released on 3 d of soaking, and all the GO was released on 7 d of soaking. From 3 to 14 d of treatment, the wounds of mice in the 4 groups were covered with hydrogel dressings, kept moist, and gradually healed. On 3, 7, and 14 d of treatment, the wound healing rates of mice in the four groups were similar (P>0.05). On 3 d of treatment, the MPU ratio of wound of mice in 0.1 μg/mL GO composite hydrogel group was significantly higher than that in 0 μg/mL GO composite hydrogel group, 1.0 μg/mL GO composite hydrogel group, and 5.0 μg/mL GO composite hydrogel group (with q values of 10.70, 11.83, and 10.65, respectively, P<0.05 or P<0.01). On 7 and 14 d of treatment, the MPU ratios of wound of mice in the four groups were similar (P>0.05). The MPU ratio of wound of mice in 0.1 μg/mL GO composite hydrogel group on 7 d of treatment was significantly lower than that on 3 d of treatment (q=14.38, P<0.05), and that on 14 d of treatment was significantly lower than that on 7 d of treatment (q=27.78, P<0.01). On 7 d of treatment, the neovascular density of wound of mice on 7 d of treatment was 120.7±4.1 per 200 times of visual field, which was significantly higher than 61.7±1.3, 77.7±10.2, and 99.0±7.9 per 200 times of visual field in 0 μg/mL GO composite hydrogel group, 1.0 μg/mL GO composite hydrogel group, and 5.0 μg/mL GO composite hydrogel group (with q values of 12.88, 7.79, and 6.70, respectively, P<0.01), and the neovascular density of wound of mice in 1.0 μg/mL GO composite hydrogel group and 5.0 μg/mL GO composite hydrogel group was significantly higher than that in 0 μg/mL GO composite hydrogel group (with q values of 5.10 and 6.19, respectively, P<0.05). On 7 d of treatment, cluster of new blood vessels in wound of mice in 0.1 μg/mL GO composite hydrogel group was significantly more than that in 0 μg/mL GO composite hydrogel group, and the new blood vessels were clustered near the GO; a large amount of VEGF was expressed in wound of mice in 0.1 μg/mL GO composite hydrogel group in the distribution area of GO and new blood vessels.  Conclusions  GO with mass concentration lower than 10.0 μg/mL had no adverse effect on proliferation activity of HSFs, and GO of 0.1 μg/mL can promote the migration of HSFs and HUVECs, and can promote the secretion of VEGF in HSFs. In situ photopolymerized of GO-GelMA composite hydrogel dressing can promote the wound neovascularization of full-thickness skin defect in mice and increase wound blood perfusion in the early stage, with GO showing an enrichment effect on angiogenesis, and the mechanism may be related to the role of GO in promoting the secretion of VEGF by wound cells.
Expert consensus on the treatment of second-degree burn wounds (2024 edition) Ⅱ: surgical treatment and infection prevention and treatment
2024, 40(2): 101-118.   doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20240112-00015
Abstract [FullText HTML] PDF(297)
Abstract:

Second-degree burns are the most common type of burns in clinical practice and hard to manage. The treatment needs not only to consider the possible different effects of dressing change or surgical treatment itself, but also requires the evaluation of many factors such as burn site, ages of patients, and burn area. At present, there are no unified standards or specifications for the surgical procedures of wound treatment, as well as infection diagnosis and grading of second-degree burn wounds, which seriously affects the formulation of clinical treatment plans. The consensus writing group developed the Expert consensus on the treatment of second-degree burn wounds ( 2024 edition) : surgical treatment and infection prevention and treatment based on evidence-based medical evidence and combined with expert opinion. This expert consensus put forward 29 specific recommendations from two aspects: surgical treatment and infection prevention and treatment of second-degree burn wounds, aiming to form a standardized clinical treatment plan for second-degree burns.

《CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS》

ISSN:2097-1109

CN:50-1225/R

Supervisor:China Association for Science and Technology(CAST)

Sponsor:Chinese Medical Association

Editor in chief:Luo Gaoxing

Executive Deputy Editor-in-Chief:Liang Guangping

Guidelines and Consensus>>

Notice>>

视频中心more