Abstract: Objective To investigate the effects of application of citrate anticoagulation in bedside continuous blood purification (CBP) of severe burn patients with sepsis, so as to provide reference for choosing anticoagulants in CBP of these patients. Methods Thirty severe burn patients with sepsis, conforming to the study criteria, were admitted to our burn intensive care unit from January 2014 to July 2017. Patients were divided into heparin group and citrate group according to computer randomization method, with 15 cases in each group. Patients in two groups all received bedside CBP treatment. Patients in heparin group used local heparin anticoagulation, while patients in citrate group used local citrate anticoagulation. Time of predicted single-time CBP treatment, time of single-time CBP treatment, time of accumulative CBP treatment, and rate of reaching the standard of CBP treatment time were counted. Changes of prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), international normalized ratio (INR), fibrinogen, serum procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein (CRP) of patients before and after treatment were monitored. Hemorrhage in wounds, incision on trachea, and arteriovenous intubation point, and other complications during and after CBP treatment were observed. Data were processed with independent sample t test and chi-square test. Results (1) Time of predicted single-time CBP treatment of patients in the two groups was equal. Time of single-time CBP treatment and time of accumulative CBP treatment of patients in citrate group were longer than those in heparin group. Rate of reaching the standard of CBP treatment time of patients in citrate group was significantly higher than that in heparin group (χ²=16.655, P<0.01). (2) There was no statistically significant difference in PT, APTT, INR, fibrinogen, serum procalcitonin, and CRP of patients in the two groups before CBP treatment (t=0.203, -1.006, 0.203, 0.039, -1.591, -0.824, P>0.05). PT and APTT of patients in citrate group after CBP treatment were (14.2±1.6) and (45±7) s, respectively, significantly shorter than (15.5±1.4) and (53±6) s in heparin group (t=2.395, 3.321, P<0.05 or P<0.01). INR of patients in citrate group after CBP treatment was 1.13±0.12, significantly lower than 1.24±0.12 in heparin group (t=2.395, P<0.05). Fibrinogen of patients in citrate group after CBP treatment was (3.5±0.6) g/L, significantly higher than (3.0±0.6) g/L in heparin group (t=-2.427, P<0.05). Serum procalcitonin and CRP of patients in citrate group after CBP treatment were significantly lower than those in heparin group (t=2.520, 2.710, P<0.05). Decreased degree of serum procalcitonin and CRP of patients in citrate group after CBP treatment were (1.8±0.6) ng/mL and (143±69) mg/L, respectively, significantly higher than (0.9±0.6) ng/mL and (95±50) mg/L in heparin group (t=-4.033, -2.170, P<0.05 or P<0.01). (3) During CBP treatment, patients in heparin group experienced 21 times of exacerbation of wound hemorrhage and 10 times of new hemorrhage, including 2 times of hemorrhage at incision on trachea and 8 times of hemorrhage at arteriovenous intubation point. No exacerbation of hemorrhage or new hemorrhage happened in patients of citrate group. After CBP treatment, no electrolyte disturbance happened in patients of heparin group, but 1 patient in citrate group experienced hypocalcemia. Conclusions Application of citrate anticoagulation in bedside CBP of severe burn patients with sepsis shows light impact on systematic coagulation status, and can effectively decrease inflammation reaction of burn sepsis with low rate of hemorrhage.