Effect of venous anastomosis of the pedicled digital artery dorsal branch island flap in repairing fingertip or pulp defects of the same finger

Objective To explore the effect of venous anastomosis of the pedicled digital artery dorsal branch island flap in repairing fingertip or pulp defects of the same finger. Methods From February 2016 to September 2018, a total of 56 emergency cases (67 fingers) with fingertip or pulp defects in 2-5 fingers were admitted to the Second Hospital of Tangshan (hereinafter referred to as the author′s affiliation), and the prospective research was conducted. The patients were divided into venous anastomosis group of 29 cases (35 fingers) and non-venous anastomosis group of 27 cases (32 fingers) by drawing lots. There were 18 males and 11 females in venous anastomosis group, aged 17 to 62 years, with wound area of 1.6 cm×1.3 cm-3.1 cm×2.4 cm after debridement. There were 17 males and 10 females in non-venous anastomosis group, aged 20 to 59 years, with wound area of 1.7 cm×1.2 cm-3.0 cm×2.4 cm after debridement. According to the location and size of the fingertip or pulp defect of patients in the two groups, the flap was designed on the dorsum of the middle or proximal phalanx of the injured finger. During the operation, the epineurium of dorsal branch of the proper digital nerve or the dorsal digital nerve carried by the flap was anastomosed end-to-end with the stump of proper digital nerve in the wound. One or two superficial vein (s) carried by the flap was/were interrupted end-to-end anastomosed with the superficial veins on the dorsum or palm of the wound surface in venous anastomosis group, and the venous anastomosis was not performed in non-venous anastomosis group. The flap size resected ranged from 1.8 cm×1.5 cm to 3.4 cm×2.6 cm in venous anastomosis group, and that ranged from 1.9 cm×1.4 cm to 3.3 cm×2.6 cm in non-venous anastomosis group. The donor site wounds in the two groups were resurfaced by free full-thickness skin graft harvested from the proximal forearm or the medial side of the upper arm. The blood circulation of the flap of patients in 2 groups was observed after operation. During follow-up after operation, the patients′ satisfaction for the appearance of the flap was evaluated by Michigan Hand Function Questionnaire, the flap color was observed by the chief physician of the Department of Hand Surgery in the author′s affiliation, and the incidence of flap pigmentation was calculated. Data were statistically analyzed with t test and chi-square test. Results All the flaps of patients survived without tension blister in venous anastomosis group after operation. Tension blisters occurred in 6 cases (6 fingers) in non-venous anastomosis group due to venous reflux obstruction, and the flaps survived after removing some sutures of the pedicle and changing dressing. During follow-up of 8-20 months, with an average of 15 months, the patients′ satisfaction score for flap appearance in venous anastomosis group was (4.6±0.5) points, which was obviously higher than (4.3±0.6) points of non-venous anastomosis group (t=2.482, P<0.05). The incidence of flap pigmentation in venous anastomosis group was 9% (3/35), which was significantly lower than 31% (10/32) of non-venous anastomosis group (χ²=5.498, P<0.05). Conclusions The pedicled digital artery dorsal branch island flap with venous anastomosis repairs the same fingertip or pulp defects, resulting in unobstructed venous reflux, low incidence of flap pigmentation, good appearance and high patient satisfaction.