Research advances on burn blister fluid

Dong Hongfei; Huang Xi; You Shuang; Li Xianhui

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20211109-00380

Volume 38 Issue 10

Oct. 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS > 2022 > 38(10): 994-998

Dong HF,Huang X,You S,et al.Research advances on burn blister fluid[J].Chin J Burns Wounds,2022,38(10):994-998.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20211109-00380.

Citation:

Dong HF,Huang X,You S,et al.Research advances on burn blister fluid[J].Chin J Burns Wounds,2022,38(10):994-998.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20211109-00380.

Citation:

Dong HF,Huang X,You S,et al.Research advances on burn blister fluid[J].Chin J Burns Wounds,2022,38(10):994-998.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20211109-00380.

PDF( 438 KB)

Research advances on burn blister fluid

doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20211109-00380

Department of Burn Plastic Surgery, General Hospital of Western Theater Command, Chengdu 610083, China

More Information

Corresponding author: Li Xianhui, Email: tommy517@126.com
Received Date: 2021-11-09
Available Online: 2022-10-24

Abstract

Abstract

Burns often cause the damaged tissue to produce a large amount of exudate and the formation of blisters on the wound. The burn blister fluid contains a large number of molecules related to wound healing, which can reflect the state of local tissue microenvironment of the burn wound. Analyzing relevant information such as cellular components, signal mediators, and protein molecules in burn blister fluid is helpful to understand the local reaction and tissue microenvironment of burn wounds, and then help clinical burn treatment. In this article, by understanding the production mechanism of burn blister fluid, discussing its role in wound evaluation, and integrating the research progress of burn blister fluid in proteomics, metabolomics, cellular components, and pharmacokinetics, we propose our thoughts and prospects on the research of burn blister fluid, in order to provide assistance for clinical evaluation and treatment of burn wounds, and also provide idea for the follow-up study of burn blister fluid.
- Burns,
- Cellular microenvironment,
- Proteomics,
- Pharmacokinetics,
- Blister fluid,
- Wound evaluation

FullText(HTML)

References(43)

References

[1]	LeppäpuskaIM, RannikkoEH, LaukkaM, et al. Low TGF-β1 in wound exudate predicts surgical site infection after axillary lymph node dissection[J]. J Surg Res, 2021,267:302-308. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.05.039.
[2]	GotoT, SaliganLN. Wound pain and wound healing biomarkers from wound exudate: a scoping review[J]. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs, 2020,47(6):559-568. DOI: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000703.
[3]	ZangT, BroszczakDA, BroadbentJA, et al. The biochemistry of blister fluid from pediatric burn injuries: proteomics and metabolomics aspects[J]. Expert Rev Proteomics, 2016,13(1):35-53. DOI: 10.1586/14789450.2016.1122528.
[4]	ZhaoR, LangTC, KimA, et al. Early protein C activation is reflective of burn injury severity and plays a critical role in inflammatory burden and patient outcomes[J]. Burns, 2022,48(1):91-103. DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2021.03.004.
[5]	TanJ, LiN, GongY, et al. Procalcitonin kinetics early after severe burn injury and its value in diagnosis of sepsis[J]. Burns, 2021,47(8):1802-1809. DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2021.02.024.
[6]	PerssonC. Humoral first-line mucosal innate defence in vivo[J]. J Innate Immun, 2020,12(5):373-386. DOI: 10.1159/000506515.
[7]	WheelerES, MillerTA. The blister and the second degree burn in guinea pigs: the effect of exposure[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 1976,57(1):74-83. DOI: 10.1097/00006534-197601000-00015.
[8]	DespaF, OrgillDP, NeuwalderJ, et al. The relative thermal stability of tissue macromolecules and cellular structure in burn injury[J]. Burns, 2005,31(5):568-577. DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2005.01.015.
[9]	Vigiola CruzM, CarneyBC, LukerJN, et al. Plasma ameliorates endothelial dysfunction in burn injury[J]. J Surg Res, 2019,233:459-466. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.08.027.
[10]	MeierTO, GuggenheimM, VetterST, et al. Microvascular regeneration in meshed skin transplants after severe burns[J]. Burns, 2011,37(6):1010-1014. DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2011.01.001.
[11]	ZangT, BroszczakDA, CuttleL, et al. Mass spectrometry based data of the blister fluid proteome of paediatric burn patients[J]. Data Brief, 2016,8:1099-1110. DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2016.07.033.
[12]	ZangT, BroszczakDA, CuttleL, et al. The blister fluid proteome of paediatric burns[J]. J Proteomics, 2016,146:122-132. DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2016.06.026.
[13]	LintnerAC, BrennanP, MilesM, et al. Oral administration of injectable ketamine during burn wound dressing changes[J]. J Pharm Pract, 2021,34(3):423-427. DOI: 10.1177/0897190019876497.
[14]	UllahS, MansoorS, AyubA, et al. An update on stem cells applications in burn wound healing[J]. Tissue Cell, 2021,72:101527. DOI: 10.1016/j.tice.2021.101527.
[15]	MaZ, MoR, ChenC, et al. Surgical treatment of joint burn scar contracture: a 10-year single-center experience with long-term outcome evaluation[J]. Ann Transl Med, 2021,9(4):303. DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-4947.
[16]	WiśniewskaJ, SłyszewskaM, KopcewiczM, et al. Comparative studies on the effect of pig adipose-derived stem cells (pASCs) preconditioned with hypoxia or normoxia on skin wound healing in mice[J]. Exp Cell Res, 2022,418(1):113263. DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2022.113263.
[17]	LeeSZ, HalimAS. Superior long term functional and scar outcome of Meek micrografting compared to conventional split thickness skin grafting in the management of burns[J]. Burns, 2019,45(6):1386-1400. DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2019.04.011.
[18]	GündüzM, SekmenliT, UğurluoğluC, et al. The effects of nitroglycerin in the zone of stasis in a rat burn model[J]. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg, 2020,26(2):171-177. DOI: 10.14744/tjtes.2019.00005.
[19]	WangHD, WeiZJ, LiJJ, et al. Application value of biofluid-based biomarkers for the diagnosis and treatment of spinal cord injury[J]. Neural Regen Res, 2022,17(5):963-971. DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.324823.
[20]	FerreiraMB, FonsecaT, CostaR, et al. Prevalence, risk factors and proteomic bioprofiles associated with heart failure in rheumatoid arthritis: the RA-HF study[J]. Eur J Intern Med, 2021,85:41-49. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2020.11.002.
[21]	WongCH, SongC, HengKS, et al. Plasma free hemoglobin: a novel diagnostic test for assessment of the depth of burn injury[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2006,117(4):1206-1213. DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000200070.66604.1e.
[22]	TanzerC, SampsonDL, BroadbentJA, et al. Evaluation of haemoglobin in blister fluid as an indicator of paediatric burn wound depth[J]. Burns, 2015,41(5):1114-1121. DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2014.12.017.
[23]	PanSC, WuLW, ChenCL, et al. Deep partial thickness burn blister fluid promotes neovascularization in the early stage of burn wound healing[J]. Wound Repair Regen, 2010,18(3):311-318. DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2010.00586.x.
[24]	PanSC, WuLW, ChenCL, et al. Angiogenin expression in burn blister fluid: implications for its role in burn wound neovascularization[J]. Wound Repair Regen, 2012,20(5):731-739. DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2012.00819.x.
[25]	PanSC, TsaiYH, ChuangCC, et al. Preliminary assessment of burn depth by paper-based ELISA for the detection of angiogenin in burn blister fluid-a proof of concept[J]. Diagnostics (Basel), 2020,10(3):127. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics10030127.
[26]	ZangT, CuttleL, BroszczakDA, et al. Characterization of the blister fluid proteome for pediatric burn classification[J]. J Proteome Res, 2019,18(1):69-85. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.8b00355.
[27]	FinnertyCC, JeschkeMG, QianWJ, et al. Determination of burn patient outcome by large-scale quantitative discovery proteomics[J]. Crit Care Med, 2013,41(6):1421-1434. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827c072e.
[28]	FrearCC, ZangT, GriffinBR, et al. The modulation of the burn wound environment by negative pressure wound therapy: insights from the proteome[J]. Wound Repair Regen, 2021,29(2):288-297. DOI: 10.1111/wrr.12887.
[29]	ZhengJ, JohnsonM, MandalR, et al. A comprehensive targeted metabolomics assay for crop plant sample analysis[J]. Metabolites, 2021,11(5):303.DOI: 10.3390/metabo11050303.
[30]	AderemiAV, AyelesoAO, OyedapoOO, et al. Metabolomics: a scoping review of its role as a tool for disease biomarker discovery in selected non-communicable diseases[J]. Metabolites, 2021,11(7) :418.DOI: 10.3390/metabo11070418.
[31]	HendricksonC, LindenK, KreyerS, et al. 1H-NMR metabolomics identifies significant changes in metabolism over time in a porcine model of severe burn and smoke inhalation[J]. Metabolites, 2019,9(7):142.DOI: 10.3390/metabo9070142.
[32]	YangG, ZhangY, WuD, et al. 1H-NMR metabolomics identifies significant changes in hypermetabolism after glutamine administration in burned rats[J]. Am J Transl Res, 2019,11(12):7286-7299.
[33]	WalejkoJM, ChristopherBA, CrownSB, et al. Branched-chain α-ketoacids are preferentially reaminated and activate protein synthesis in the heart[J]. Nat Commun, 2021,12(1):1680. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-21962-2.
[34]	PotenzaF, CufaroMC, Di BiaseL, et al. Proteomic analysis of marinesco-sjogren syndrome fibroblasts indicates pro-survival metabolic adaptation to SIL1 loss[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2021,22(22):12449. DOI: 10.3390/ijms222212449.
[35]	VillaniAP, RozieresA, BensaidB, et al. Massive clonal expansion of polycytotoxic skin and blood CD8+ T cells in patients with toxic epidermal necrolysis[J]. Sci Adv, 2021,7(12):eabe0013. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abe0013.
[36]	MargaroliC, BradleyB, ThompsonC, et al. Distinct compartmentalization of immune cells and mediators characterizes bullous pemphigoid disease[J]. Exp Dermatol, 2020,29(12):1191-1198. DOI: 10.1111/exd.14209.
[37]	ChenSH, WongTW, LeeCH, et al. Predominance of CD14+ cells in burn blister fluids[J]. Ann Plast Surg, 2018,80(2S Suppl 1):S70-74. DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001305.
[38]	ZhangM, MalikAB, RehmanJ. Endothelial progenitor cells and vascular repair[J]. Curr Opin Hematol, 2014,21(3):224-228. DOI: 10.1097/MOH.0000000000000041.
[39]	GholobovaD, TerrieL, MackovaK, et al. Functional evaluation of prevascularization in one-stage versus two-stage tissue engineering approach of human bio-artificial muscle[J]. Biofabrication, 2020,12(3):035021. DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/ab8f36.
[40]	姚咏明, 栾樱译. 严重烧创伤感染及其并发症的免疫新认识[J].中华烧伤杂志,2021,37(6):519-523. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210118-00025.
[41]	华荣, 荣新洲, 张涛, 等. 严重烧伤患者早期应用阿米卡星的药代动力学研究[J].中华烧伤杂志,2008,24(1):33-35. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2008.01.010.
[42]	覃凤均, 卞婧, 田彭, 等. 大面积烧伤患者早期应用万古霉素的药代动力学研究[J].中国医刊,2020,55(3):287-290. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-1070.2020.03.016.
[43]	杨建辉,孟园园.万古霉素血药浓度检测对烧伤总面积>50%体表总面积患者药物剂量调整的影响[J].医药论坛杂志,2021,42(6):39-41,45.

Relative Articles

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Proportional views

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article Metrics

Article views (316) PDF downloads(81)

Research advances on burn blister fluid

doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20211109-00380

Abstract

References

Proportional views

Catalog

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Article Metrics

Proportional views

Related

Research advances on burn blister fluid

doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20211109-00380

Abstract

References

Proportional views

Catalog

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Article Metrics

Proportional views

Related

Export File

Citation

Format

Content