Volume 39 Issue 10
Oct.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Wu L,Ding YZ,Hao MR,et al.Abdominal function and appearance of patients after repairing the extensive skin and soft tissue defects in the limbs with two types of lower abdominal tissue flaps[J].Chin J Burns Wounds,2023,39(10):959-967.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20230428-00145.
Citation: Wu L,Ding YZ,Hao MR,et al.Abdominal function and appearance of patients after repairing the extensive skin and soft tissue defects in the limbs with two types of lower abdominal tissue flaps[J].Chin J Burns Wounds,2023,39(10):959-967.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20230428-00145.

Abdominal function and appearance of patients after repairing the extensive skin and soft tissue defects in the limbs with two types of lower abdominal tissue flaps

doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20230428-00145
More Information
  • Corresponding author: Gao Xiang, Email: 776454551@qq.com
  • Received Date: 2023-04-28
  •   Objective   To study the abdominal function and appearance of patients after repairing the extensive skin and soft tissue defects in the limbs with two types of lower abdominal tissue flaps.   Methods   A retrospective clinical controlled study was conducted. From June 2016 to October 2022, 17 patients with extensive skin and soft tissue defects in the limbs who met the inclusion criteria were admitted to the Department of Bone Hand Microsurgery of Shandong Wendeng Orthopedic Hospital, including 2 males and 15 females, aged 21-60 years, with a defect ranging from 15.0 cm×10.0 cm to 23.0 cm×15.0 cm. According to the applied repair method, the patients were divided into deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap group (9 cases) with the defect wound being repaired by the DIEP flap and muscle sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (MS-TRAM) flap group (8 cases) with the defect wound being repaired by the MS-TRAM flap. On post surgery day (PSD) 1, 3, 5, 7, and 14, the blood supply of the tissue flaps was evaluated using a self-made tissue flap blood supply evaluation scale. At 12 months after surgery, the patients' satisfaction with the efficacy of tissue flap repair was evaluated using the satisfaction score standard for flap efficacy. Before surgery and at 3 and 12 months after surgery, a self-made abdominal wall strength evaluation scale was used to evaluate the strength of abdominal wall. At 12 months after surgery, a self-made abdominal appearance evaluation scale was used to evaluate the condition of abdominal scars, degree of abdominal symmetry, the appearance and restoration of umbilicus, abdominal protrusion during dressing, and formation of folds on both sides of the abdomen. Data were statistically analyzed with analysis of variance for repeated measurement, independent sample t test, paired sample t test, and Fisher's exact probability test.   Results   On PSD 1, 3, 5, 7, and 14, there was no significant change in the blood supply score of tissue flaps of patients in the two groups, and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups ( P>0.05). At 12 months after surgery, the satisfaction ratio of patients in DIEP flap group with tissue flap repair efficacy was 8/9, which was close to 7/8 in MS-TRAM flap group ( P>0.05). The preoperative abdominal wall strength of patients between the two groups was similar ( P>0.05), while the abdominal wall strength of patients in DIEP flap group was significantly stronger than that in MS-TRAM flap group at 3 and 12 months after surgery (with t values of 3.09 and 3.02, respectively, P<0.05). Compared with the preoperative strength within each group, the abdominal wall strength of patients in DIEP flap group at 3 months after surgery and in MS-TRAM flap group at 3 and 12 months after surgery decreased significantly (with t values of 6.04, 9.71, and 2.91, respectively, P<0.05), which did not change significantly in DIEP flap group at 12 months after surgery ( P>0.05). At 12 months after surgery, the scores of abdominal scars, degree of abdominal symmetry, the appearance and restoration of umbilicus, abdominal protrusion during dressing, and formation of folds on both sides of the abdomen of patients were similar between the two groups ( P>0.05).   Conclusions   Free transplantation of DIEP flap and MS-TRAM flap to repair the extensive skin and soft tissue defects in the limbs can achieve good repair results, including good blood supply of tissue flap and abdominal shape, and the patients' high degree of satisfaction with the efficacy of tissue flap repair. However, DIEP flap is superior to MS-TRAM flap in terms of long-term postoperative abdominal wall strength recovery, showing a broader prospect of application.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    刘胜哲,巨积辉,柳志锦,等.串并联双侧股前外侧超长穿支皮瓣修复四肢大面积创面的临床效果[J].中华烧伤杂志,2021,37(3):250-256.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200226-00096.
    [2]
    覃凤均,沈余明,杜伟力,等.带腹壁下血管的脐旁穿支皮瓣在毁损性创面修复中的应用策略及临床效果[J].中华烧伤杂志,2021,37(7):606-613.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210310-00082.
    [3]
    陈斓,张伟,谢卫国,等.扩张髂腹股沟皮瓣游离移植整复大面积烧伤后严重瘢痕挛缩畸形的临床效果[J].中华烧伤与创面修复杂志,2022,38(4):321-327.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20220210-00021.
    [4]
    RutherfordCL,TanBK,LimSZ,et al.Shaping of the abdominal flap in breast reconstruction: the coning technique in muscle sparing TRAM[J].JPRAS Open,2020,25:93-98.DOI: 10.1016/j.jpra.2020.07.003.
    [5]
    KimJH,KimNR,KimYS,et al.Dual-pedicled conjoined abdominal flap for breast reconstruction in a patient with previous radiation therapy[J]. Arch Aesthetic Plast Surg,2021,27(1):31-34.DOI: 10.14730/aaps.2020.02306.
    [6]
    DI SummaPG,WatfaW,CampisiC,et al.Free versus pedicled anterolateral thigh flap for abdominal wall reconstruction[J].Anticancer Res,2019,39(12):6759-6768.DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.13891.
    [7]
    何晓清,杨曦,段家章,等.基于CTA精准皮瓣外科的理念与初步实践[J].中华骨科杂志,2022,42(6):365-373.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121113-20211119-00669.
    [8]
    徐伯扬,付苏,辛敏强,等.双血管蒂腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣在乳房再造中的临床应用[J].中华整形外科杂志,2021,37(7):712-718.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn114453-20200525-00320.
    [9]
    KagayaY,ArikawaM,HigashinoT,et al.Autologous abdominal wall reconstruction using anterolateral thigh and iliotibial tract flap after extensive tumor resection: a case series study of 50 consecutive cases[J].J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg,2020,73(4):638-650.DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2019.11.017.
    [10]
    ZolperEG,BekenyJC,FanKL,et al.Incidence of complications in delayed abdominal-based flap breast reconstruction using a drainless recipient site: a case series[J].Ann Plast Surg,2020,85(S1 Suppl 1):S37-40.DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002328.
    [11]
    ZhangW,HuJ,HuangY,et al.Urine-derived stem cells: applications in skin, bone and articular cartilage repair[J/OL].Burns Trauma,2021,9:tkab039[2023-04-28].https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34859109/.DOI: 10.1093/burnst/tkab039.
    [12]
    AhujaRB,ChatterjeeP.Comparative efficacy of intralesional verapamil hydrochloride and triamcinolone acetonide in hypertrophic scars and keloids[J].Burns,2014,40(4):583-588.DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2013.09.029.
    [13]
    张浩,张晓东,庾东春,等.应用带蒂皮瓣修复皮肤软组织缺损[J].中华骨科杂志,2012,32(3):260-264.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2352.2012.03.013.
    [14]
    CorreiaR,AlvesG,BentoR,et al.Dissection flap fenestration with a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt needle: an adjuvant technique in endovascular treatment of post-dissection thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms[J].EJVES Vasc Forum,2021,52:38-40.DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvsvf.2021.07.001.
    [15]
    ScomacaoI,VijayasekaranA,FahradyanV,et al.The anatomic feasibility of a functional chimeric flap in complex abdominal wall reconstruction[J].Ann Plast Surg,2021,86(5):557-561.DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002490.
    [16]
    MolinoJA,García MartínezL,Guillén BurriezaG,et al.Outcomes after split abdominal wall muscle flap repair for large congenital diaphragmatic hernias[J].Eur J Pediatr Surg,2020,30(2):210-214.DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1687867.
    [17]
    ZhangQ,XiaoQ,GuoR,et al.Applications of rib sparing technique in internal mammary vessels exposure of abdominal free flap breast reconstructions: a 12-year single-center experience of 215 cases[J].Gland Surg,2019,8(5):477-485.DOI: 10.21037/gs.2019.08.08.
    [18]
    Di PaceB,KhanF,PatelM,et al.A multicentre study of the relationship between abdominal flap and mastectomy weights in immediate unilateral free flap breast reconstruction and the effect of adjuvant radiotherapy[J].J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg,2022,75(1):61-68.DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.06.010.
    [19]
    TakedaS,MitsuyaS,YamamotoM,et al.Advantages of the external fixator for stabilizing pedicled abdominal or groin flap[J].J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg,2020,73(4):783-808.DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2019.11.058.
    [20]
    BroylesJM,SmithJM,PhillipsBT,et al.The effect of sarcopenia on perioperative complications in abdominally based free-flap breast reconstruction[J].J Surg Oncol,2020,122(6):1240-1246.DOI: 10.1002/jso.26120.
    [21]
    KhoongYM,HuangX,GuS,et al.Imaging for thinned perforator flap harvest: current status and future perspectives[J/OL].Burns Trauma,2021,9:tkab042[2023-04-28].https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34926708/.DOI: 10.1093/burnst/tkab042.
    [22]
    LeeHC,LeeJ,ParkSH,et al.The hybrid latissimus dorsi flap in immediate breast reconstruction: a comparative study with the abdominal-based flap[J].Ann Plast Surg,2021,86(4):394-399.DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002565.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(3)  / Tables(4)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1044) PDF downloads(14) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return