Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Lu Bo,Ma Xiaohong,Fu Qingqing,et al.Effect of the hand function assessment and training system on hand function rehabilitation in patients with burns[J].Chin J Burns Wounds,2026,42(11):1-9.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20250715-00306.
Citation: Lu Bo,Ma Xiaohong,Fu Qingqing,et al.Effect of the hand function assessment and training system on hand function rehabilitation in patients with burns[J].Chin J Burns Wounds,2026,42(11):1-9.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20250715-00306.

Effect of the hand function assessment and training system on hand function rehabilitation in patients with burns

doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20250715-00306
Funds:

General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China 82072188

Chongqing Science and Technology Communication and Popularization Project CSTB2025KJCBPJKPHDYB10X0054

More Information
  • Corresponding author: Tan Jianglin, Email: tanjl@tmmu.edu.cn
  • Received Date: 2025-07-15
    Available Online: 2026-11-02
  •   Objective  To investigate the effect of the hand function assessment and training system on hand function rehabilitation in patients with burns.  Methods  This was a retrospective cohort study. From January 2021 to December 2024, 32 patients with hand burns who met the inclusion criteria were admitted to the Institute of Burn Research, the First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University). According to the rehabilitation method, patients were divided into routine rehabilitation group (13 males and 3 females, aged (43±14) years) receiving routine rehabilitation training and system rehabilitation group (15 males and 1 female, aged (38±12) years) receiving additional training with the hand function assessment and training system on the basis of routine rehabilitation training, with 30 affected hands in each group. The total active motion (TAM) method was used to assess the range of motion of finger joints of affected hands before treatment and at 4 weeks after treatment, and the improvement degree of affected hands was recorded at 4 weeks after treatment. Before treatment and at 4 weeks after treatment, grip strength and pinch strength of affected hands were recorded; the severity of pain and pruritus of affected hands was scored using the Visual Analogue Scale; activities of daily living were assessed using the modified Barthel Index (MBI) and the Functional Independence Measure (FIM); and the scores of each dimension of the self-care subscale of FIM (eating, grooming, bathing, dressing upper body, dressing lower body, and toileting) were further recorded to reflect upper limb function.  Results  Within-group comparison showed that the total TAM of affected hands in routine rehabilitation group and system rehabilitation group at 4 weeks after treatment was (726±192)° and (709±242)°, respectively, both significantly higher than (633±208)° and (564±244)° before treatment (with t values of -7.25 and -7.65, respectively, P<0.05). At 4 weeks after treatment, the improvement degree of affected hands in system rehabilitation group was significantly better than that in routine rehabilitation group (RR=4.50, with a 95%CI value of 1.06–19.11, Z=-1.99, P<0.05). Within-group comparison showed that grip strength and pinch strength of affected hands in routine rehabilitation group at 4 weeks after treatment were significantly higher than those before treatment (with t values of -6.90 and -6.61, respectively, P<0.05), and grip strength and pinch strength of affected hands in system rehabilitation group at 4 weeks after treatment were significantly higher than those before treatment (with t values of -11.89 and -14.98, respectively, P<0.05); between-group comparison showed that grip strength and pinch strength of affected hands in system rehabilitation group at 4 weeks after treatment were significantly higher than those in routine rehabilitation group (with t values of 3.07 and 2.97, respectively, P<0.05). Within-group comparison showed that compared with before treatment, the pruritus score of affected hands in routine rehabilitation group and the pain score of affected hands in system rehabilitation group were significantly increased at 4 weeks after treatment (with Z values of -2.31 and -2.17, respectively, P<0.05); between-group comparison showed that the pain score of affected hands in system rehabilitation group at 4 weeks after treatment was significantly higher than that in routine rehabilitation group (Z=-2.53, P<0.05). Within-group comparison showed that the MBI score and FIM score of affected hands in routine rehabilitation group at 4 weeks after treatment were significantly higher than those before treatment (with t values of -3.62 and -3.72, respectively, P<0.05), and the MBI score and FIM score of affected hands in system rehabilitation group at 4 weeks after treatment were significantly higher than those before treatment (with t values of -3.83 and -4.29, respectively, P< 0.05); between-group comparison showed that the FIM score of affected hands in system rehabilitation group at 4 weeks after treatment was significantly higher than that in routine rehabilitation group (t=-1.02, P<0.05). Within-group comparison showed that the scores of eating, grooming, bathing, dressing upper body, dressing lower body, and toileting dimensions of the self-care subscale of FIM of affected hands in routine rehabilitation group at 4 weeks after treatment were significantly higher than those before treatment (with t values of -5.57, -5.67, -5.44, -4.56, -3.71, and -4.03, respectively, P<0.05), and the scores of eating, grooming, bathing, dressing upper body, dressing lower body, and toileting dimensions of the self-care subscale of FIM of affected hands in system rehabilitation group at 4 weeks after treatment were significantly higher than those before treatment (with t values of -6.96, -9.52, -12.48, -4.68, -7.07, and -7.11, respectively, P<0.05); between-group comparison showed that the scores of bathing, dressing upper body, dressing lower body, and toileting dimensions of the self-care subscale of FIM of affected hands in system rehabilitation group at 4 weeks after treatment were significantly higher than those in routine rehabilitation group (with t values of -3.90, -2.89, -3.38, and -4.19, respectively, P<0.05).  Conclusions  The hand function assessment and training system can improve the range of motion of affected hand joints, increase grip strength and pinch strength, enhance activities of daily living, and improve upper limb function in patients with burns, thus providing assistance for hand function recovery in burn patients.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    KaraS, SeyhanN, ÖksüzS. Effectiveness of early rehabilitation in hand burns[J]. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg, 2023,29(6):691-697. DOI: 10.14744/tjtes.2023.22780.
    [2]
    赵海洋, 韩军涛, 刘佳琦, 等. 手持续被动运动系统联合功能训练与压力手套治疗手背部烧伤后早期瘢痕挛缩的效果[J].中华烧伤杂志,2021,37(4):319-326. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20201020-00443.
    [3]
    许静,蔡志雨,徐振雷.Maslow理论指导下护理干预对手部烧伤后瘢痕整形患者自护能力及术后康复的影响[J].中国美容医学,2024,33(5):168-171.
    [4]
    LiuM, ZhuH, YanR, et al. Epidemiology and outcome analysis of 470 patients with hand burns: a five-year retrospective study in a major burn center in southwest China[J]. Med Sci Monit, 2020,26:e918881. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.918881.
    [5]
    KnightA, WasiakJ, SalwayJ, et al. Factors predicting health status and recovery of hand function after hand burns in the second year after hospital discharge[J]. Burns, 2017,43(1):100-106. DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2016.07.025.
    [6]
    严雪芹,曹松梅,周芳芳,等.手部烧伤患者手功能早期康复管理的最佳证据总结[J].中华护理杂志,2025,60(8):998-1004. DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2025.08.017.
    [7]
    BashaMA, Abdel-AalNM, KamelF. Effects of Wii fit rehabilitation on lower extremity functional status in adults with severe burns: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2022,103(2):289-296. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.08.020.
    [8]
    李秀丽,李珊,冯梦晨,等.采用上肢运动游戏治疗卒中后轻度认知障碍并结合功能性近红外光谱技术进行疗效评估的研究[J].中国康复,2023,38(7):412-416.
    [9]
    刘美凤, 赵黎明, 孙红日, 等. 任务导向性训练对脑卒中偏瘫者骨骼肌含量及肌力的影响[J]. 重庆医科大学学报, 2017,42(10):1270-1273. DOI: 10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.001013.
    [10]
    HeM, HuangL, TangD, et al. Intervention effect of lower limb rehabilitation robot with task-oriented training on stroke patients and its influence on KFAROM score[J]. J Biosci Med, 2024, 12(9): 62-72. DOI: 10.4236/jbm.2024.129007.
    [11]
    AlsubiheenAM, ChoiW, YuW, et al. The Effect of task-oriented activities training on upper-limb function, daily activities, and quality of life in chronic stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2022,19(21):14125. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192114125.
    [12]
    MalikAN, MasoodT. Task-oriented training and exer-gaming for improving mobility after stroke: a randomized trial[J]. J Pak Med Assoc, 2021,71(1(B)):186-190. DOI: 10.47391/JPMA.560.
    [13]
    蔡俊燕, 肖王静, 孙子荔, 等. 康复训练联合阶段式压力治疗对手部深度烧伤后瘢痕增生及运动功能的影响[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志,2025,47(6):524-529. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn421666-20250224-00091.
    [14]
    史娜,金晓燕,赵凯平,等.基于家庭远程康复平台的延续性康复改善手烧伤患者抗瘢痕治疗的疗效[J].中国医科大学学报,2023,52(9):810-814. DOI: 10.12007/j.issn.0258-4646.2023.09.007.
    [15]
    ZhouYQ, ZhouJY, LuoGX, et al. Effects of early rehabilitation in improvement of paediatric burnt hands function[J]. World J Clin Cases, 2021,9(32):9741-9751. DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i32.9741.
    [16]
    黎宁, 付青青, 罗月, 等. 基于个案管理模式的康复护理决策方案在严重烧伤患者中的应用效果[J].中华烧伤与创面修复杂志,2024,40(1):78-86. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20230905-00078.
    [17]
    谭江琳, 罗高兴. 重视烧伤康复评定[J].中华烧伤与创面修复杂志,2023,39(12):1109-1114. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20230831-00070.
    [18]
    费才莲, 谢娟, 顾盈盈, 等. 多元化手功能锻炼在脑梗死手部功能障碍患者中的应用效果研究[J].重庆医科大学学报,2022,47(7):828-833. DOI: 10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.003065.
    [19]
    朱婵, 何林, 何亭, 等. 手背皮肤软组织缺损伴伸肌腱损伤修复术后早期康复治疗的临床效果[J].中华烧伤与创面修复杂志,2024,40(4):365-372. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20230820-00057.
    [20]
    朱婵,何林,张博文,等.儿童手烧伤后瘢痕挛缩家庭康复治疗模式的探索[J].中华烧伤与创面修复杂志,2023,39(1):45-52. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20220622-00253.
    [21]
    KennedyDL, Chism-BalangueT, FurnissD. Reporting of scar outcomes in the hand and wrist; a state-of-the-art literature review[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2023,24(1):249. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06296-y.
    [22]
    倪少俊, 徐秋月. 不同年龄手部烧伤瘢痕挛缩畸形患者修复后功能恢复水平比较[J].中国美容医学,2021,30(4):89-91.
    [23]
    SamhanAF, AbdelhalimNM, ElnaggarRK. Effects of interactive robot-enhanced hand rehabilitation in treatment of paediatric hand-burns: a randomized, controlled trial with 3-months follow-up[J]. Burns, 2020,46(6):1347-1355. DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2020.01.015.
    [24]
    YuJ, SongJ, ShenQ. Effects of fully immersive virtual reality training on cognitive function in patients with mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Front Hum Neurosci, 2024,18:1467697. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1467697.
    [25]
    RahimkhaniM, MohammadabadiA, AskariM, et al. Investigating the impact of patient-centered peer counseling on anxiety and pain among burn patients: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Burns, 2024,50(8):2091-2102. DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2024.07.034.
    [26]
    RehanM, TariqR, IqbalT, et al. Impact of burns on anxiety, depression and selfesteem among patients with burn injuries: a cross-sectional study[J]. Ann Burns Fire Disasters, 2024,37(2):134-139.
    [27]
    KhameesKM, DeldarK, YazarluO, et al. Effect of augmented reality-based rehabilitation of hand burns on hand function in children: A randomized controlled trial[J]. J Hand Ther, 2025,38(2):235-245. DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2023.10.009.
    [28]
    BaY, LiF, WuY, et al. A clinical study on the evaluation of rehabilitation outcomes in patients with deep hand burns using hand strength monitoring[J]. Burns, 2025,51(4):107415. DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2025.107415.
    [29]
    MagniNE, McNairPJ, RiceDA. Impairments in grip and pinch force accuracy and steadiness in people with osteoarthritis of the hand: a case-control comparison[J]. Musculoskelet Sci Pract, 2021,55:102432. DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2021.102432.
    [30]
    ChenB, JiaQ, HuangJ, et al. Clinical symptoms of postburn hypertrophic scars and analysis of risk factors for itching and pain requiring pharmacological intervention[J]. Dermatol Surg, 2025,51(4):396-402. DOI: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000004516.
    [31]
    SantuzziCH, Gonçalves LiberatoFM, Fachini de OliveiraNF, et al. Massage, laser and shockwave therapy improve pain and scar pruritus after burns: a systematic review[J]. J Physiother, 2024,70(1):8-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.jphys.2023.10.010.
    [32]
    安东, 刘阳, 杨通江. 体外冲击波疗法在烧伤创面修复和烧伤后瘢痕治疗中的应用[J].中国组织工程研究,2022,26(20):3265-3272.
    [33]
    金亚新, 廖雨萍, 刘韦辰, 等. 疼痛综合管理护理质量评价指标体系的构建[J].中国疼痛医学杂志,2024,30(8):630-634. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9852.2024.08.012.
    [34]
    宋春红, 黎景波, 蓝蔚, 等. 压力治疗对大面积烧伤继发增生性瘢痕患者血流动力学的影响及其机制[J].中华烧伤与创面修复杂志,2022,38(12):1126-1132. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20220616-00235.
    [35]
    DahmS, LeeG, ClelandH, et al. The use of carbon dioxide and intense pulsed light laser for the treatment of hypertrophic burn scars: A case series[J]. Scars Burn Heal, 2023,9:20595131231202103. DOI: 10.1177/20595131231202103.
    [36]
    BetarN, DonovanM, TyackZ, et al. Recovery in patients undergoing ablative fractional carbon dioxide laser for adult hypertrophic burn scars: a longitudinal cohort study[J]. Burns, 2025,51(1):107300. DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2024.107300.
    [37]
    冯伟华, 何宛玥, 唐忠一, 等. 甲状腺术后瘢痕防治的研究进展[J].中华内分泌外科杂志,2023,17(4):504-507. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.115807-20221212-00369.
    [38]
    周青青,施加加,倪波业.扩展Barthel指数与功能独立性量表在评定脑卒中患者日常生活活动功能等级中的对比分析[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志,2021,43(7):602-606. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-1424.2021.07.005.
    [39]
    ChruscielJ ,NdoyeR ,NdiongueM B , et al.Predictive value of a self-administered frailty screening questionnaire for the effectiveness of functional rehabilitation evaluated with the locomotor functional independence measure in a geriatric rehabilitation unit: a multicentre cohort study[J].BMC Geriatrics,2024,24(1):1013-1013.DOI: 10.1186/S12877-024-05605-X.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(1)  / Tables(5)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (23) PDF downloads(3) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return