Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Hou Xinwei,Dong Shuai,Zhu Bo,et al.Establishment and preliminary validation of an artificial intelligence-assisted model for identification of perforators of anterolateral thigh perforator flaps based on preoperative indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) videos[J].Chin J Burns Wounds,2026,42(9):1-10.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20260531-00222.
Citation: Hou Xinwei,Dong Shuai,Zhu Bo,et al.Establishment and preliminary validation of an artificial intelligence-assisted model for identification of perforators of anterolateral thigh perforator flaps based on preoperative indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) videos[J].Chin J Burns Wounds,2026,42(9):1-10.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20260531-00222.

Establishment and preliminary validation of an artificial intelligence-assisted model for identification of perforators of anterolateral thigh perforator flaps based on preoperative indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) videos

doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20260531-00222
Funds:

Suzhou Municipal Key Medical Discipline SZXK202532

Suzhou Municipal Science and Technology Research Program SYWD2025069

2026 Jiangsu Province Graduate Research and Practice Innovation Program 26CXJH5988

More Information
  • Corresponding author: Wang Kai, Email: 15962200201@163.com
  • Received Date: 2026-05-31
    Available Online: 2026-08-31
  •   Objective  To establish and preliminarily validate an artificial intelligence-assisted model for identification of perforators of anterolateral thigh perforator flaps based on preoperative indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) videos.  Methods  This study was a cross-sectional study. From January to July 2024, 70 patients who met the inclusion criteria and underwent anterolateral thigh perforator flap repair surgery were admitted to Suzhou Ruihua Orthopedic Hospital of Soochow University. All patients received preoperative color Doppler ultrasound (CDU) and ICGA examinations. Fifty patients were selected as the training set for model parameter training using the random function in Python 3.13, and the remaining 20 patients were assigned as the validation set for independent validation. With the intraoperative exploration result as the gold standard, 4 perforator sites were preset in the anterolateral thigh perforator flap area of each patient. In the training set and the validation set of patients, cases where the distance between the perforator localization points of CDU, ICGA-manual interpretation, and ICGA-based artificial intelligence (ICGA-AI) and the actual intraoperative cutaneous perforator entry point was ≤1.0 cm (defined as true positive) were calculated, and the positive rate was calculate. In the training set and validation set of patients, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy, and balanced accuracy of the three methods for perforator localization were calculated, the consistency of the perforator localization results between the three methods and the intraoperative exploration; the distance between the perforator localization points determined by the three methods and the corresponding actual intraoperative cutaneous perforator entry point (error distance) was measured; the consistency between the dominant perforator localization by ICGA-AI and that determined intraoperatively was recorded, and the localization accuracy of the dominant perforator was calculated.  Results  There were no statistically significant differences in the positive rates of perforator localization among the three methods in both the training set and the validation set of patients (P>0.05). In the training set of patients, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy, and balanced accuracy of CDU, ICGA-manual interpretation, and ICGA-AI were 88.70%, 85.88%, 89.47%, 84.88%, 87.50%, and 87.29%, 93.91%, 89.41%, 92.31%, 91.57%, 92.00%, and 91.66%, and 82.61%, 83.53%, 87.16%, 78.02%, 83.00%, and 83.07%, respectively; the consistency of the perforator localization results between the three methods and the intraoperative exploration was strong or almost perfect (with κ of 0.74, 0.84, and 0.66, respectively, P<0.05). In the validation set of patients, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy, and balanced accuracy of CDU, ICGA-manual interpretation, and ICGA-AI were 95.24%, 78.95%, 83.33%, 93.75%, 87.50%, and 87.09%, 95.24%, 92.11%, 93.02%, 94.59%, 93.75%, and 93.67%, 95.24%, 94.74%, 95.24%, 94.74%, 95.00%, and 94.99%, respectively; the consistency of the perforator localization results between the three methods and the intraoperative exploration was strong or almost perfect (with κ of 0.75, 0.88, and 0.90, respectively, P<0.05). In the training set of patients, the error distance of perforator localization of ICGA-AI was 0.84 (0.70, 0.98) cm, which was significantly shorter than 1.41 (0.80, 2.00) cm of CDU (Z=-2.56, P<0.05) and 1.50 (1.03, 1.80) cm of ICGA-manual interpretation (Z=-5.88, P<0.05). In the validation set of patients, the error distance of perforator localization of ICGA-AI was 0.52 (0.35, 0.71) cm, which was significantly shorter than 1.50 (1.00, 2.25) cm of CDU (Z=-3.23, P<0.05) and 1.56 (1.41, 2.00) cm of ICGA-manual interpretation (Z=-3.52, P<0.05). In the training set and the validation set of patients, the accuracy of ICGA-AI for dominant perforator localization was 82.00% (41/50) and 90.00% (18/20), respectively.  Conclusions  This study preliminarily establishes an artificial intelligence-assisted method for identification of perforators of anterolateral thigh perforator flaps based on ICGA videos. In the validation set of patients, this method showed smaller localization errors and higher accuracy of dominant perforator localization, which can assist in preoperative perforator localization.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    徐永清,唐举玉,刘元波,等.股前外侧皮瓣穿支解剖学特征与定位方法的专家共识(2024版)[J].中国临床解剖学杂志,2024,42(5):489-499.DOI: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2024.5.01.
    [2]
    SongYG,ChenGZ,SongYL.The free thigh flap: a new free flap concept based on the septocutaneous artery[J].Br J Plast Surg,1984,37(2):149-159.DOI: 10.1016/0007-1226(84)90002-x.
    [3]
    WeiFC,JainV,CelikN,et al.Have we found an ideal soft-tissue flap? An experience with 672 anterolateral thigh flaps[J].Plast Reconstr Surg,2002,109(7):2219-2226; discussion 2227-2230.DOI: 10.1097/00006534-200206000-00007.
    [4]
    KimataY,UchiyamaK,EbiharaS,et al.Anatomic variations and technical problems of the anterolateral thigh flap: a report of 74 cases[J].Plast Reconstr Surg,1998,102(5):1517-1523.DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199810000-00026.
    [5]
    WongCH,WeiFC.Anterolateral thigh flap[J].Head Neck,2010,32(4):529-540.DOI: 10.1002/hed.21204.
    [6]
    LakhianiC,LeeMR,Saint-CyrM.Vascular anatomy of the anterolateral thigh flap: a systematic review[J].Plast Reconstr Surg,2012,130(6):1254-1268.DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31826d1662.
    [7]
    LeeYC,ChenWC,ChouTM,et al.Anatomical variability of the anterolateral thigh flap perforators: vascular anatomy and its clinical implications[J].Plast Reconstr Surg,2015,135(4):1097-1107.DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001103.
    [8]
    SmithRK,WykesJ,MartinDT,et al.Perforator variability in the anterolateral thigh free flap: a systematic review[J].Surg Radiol Anat,2017,39(7):779-789.DOI: 10.1007/s00276-016-1802-y.
    [9]
    董帅,王石,滕志成,等.吲哚菁绿血管造影联合彩色多普勒超声在股前外侧穿支皮瓣穿支定位中的临床应用效果[J].中华烧伤与创面修复杂志,2025,41(11):10.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20240629-00254.
    [10]
    王石,董帅,曹阳,等.高选择性动脉吲哚菁绿造影在游离股前外侧皮瓣设计中的应用[J].中华烧伤与创面修复杂志,2024,40(10):948-954.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20240513-00174.
    [11]
    ThomasB,FalknerF,DidzunO,et al.Optimizing ALT flap harvest: the role of combined preoperative duplex ultrasound and intraoperative ICG angiography for perforator selection[J].Life (Basel),2025,15(4):620.DOI: 10.3390/life15040620.
    [12]
    ChungMJ,ChenWH,LuYC,et al.Artificial intelligence-assisted indocyanine green angiography for perforators identification in the anterolateral thigh flap[J].Ann Plast Surg,2026,96(2 Suppl 2):S25-S30.DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000004545.
    [13]
    JiangZ,LeiY,ZhangL,et al.Automated quantitative analysis of blood flow in extracranial-intracranial arterial bypass based on indocyanine green angiography[J].Front Surg,2021,8:649719.DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.649719.
    [14]
    ShadidO,SethI,CuomoR,et al.Artificial intelligence in microsurgical planning: a five-year leap in clinical translation[J].J Clin Med,2025,14(13):4574.DOI: 10.3390/jcm14134574.
    [15]
    LinTC,YangHA,HuangRW,et al.Artificial intelligence and machine learning in reconstructive microsurgery[J].Semin Plast Surg,2025,39(3):190-198.DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1810062.
    [16]
    LandisJR,KochGG.The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data[J].Biometrics,1977,33(1):159-174.
    [17]
    MiyamotoS,FujisawaK,KuritaD,et al.New anatomic landmark for perforator of anterolateral thigh flap in preoperative ultrasonography[J].Laryngoscope,2025,135(10):3623-3629.DOI: 10.1002/lary.32223.
    [18]
    YuL,JiangY,ZhangJ,et al.Three dimensional-CTA versus Doppler ultrasound for anterolateral thigh flap reconstruction in limb defects: a retrospective study[J].Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open,2025,13(11):e7308.DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000007308.
    [19]
    WeiB,LuG,LiQ,et al.Finder-I for locating anterolateral thigh perforators in head and neck reconstruction: a diagnostic study[J].Head Neck,2025,47(11):3019-3027.DOI: 10.1002/hed.28227.
    [20]
    张丕红.浅谈薄型穿支皮瓣切取与穿支血管探测和皮瓣血运评估[J].中华烧伤与创面修复杂志,2023,39(10):911-918.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20230812-00047.
    [21]
    邓呈亮,简喜超.浅谈显微外科技术和游离穿支皮瓣修复创面[J].中华烧伤与创面修复杂志,2026,42(5):421-427.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20260224-00085.
    [22]
    YuP,YoussefA.Efficacy of the handheld Doppler in preoperative identification of the cutaneous perforators in the anterolateral thigh flap[J].Plast Reconstr Surg,2006,118(4):928-933.DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000232216.34854.63.
    [23]
    TsukinoA,KurachiK,InamiyaT,et al.Preoperative color Doppler assessment in planning of anterolateral thigh flaps[J].Plast Reconstr Surg,2004,113(1):241-246.DOI: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000095949.41413.88.
    [24]
    ChengHT,LinFY,ChangSC.Diagnostic efficacy of color Doppler ultrasonography in preoperative assessment of anterolateral thigh flap cutaneous perforators: an evidence-based review[J].Plast Reconstr Surg,2013,131(3):471e-473e.DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31827c733e.
    [25]
    王晓冰,纪旭,马春燕.彩色多普勒超声在股前外侧穿支皮瓣移植术前穿支动脉评估中的作用[J].中国医科大学学报,2022,51(6):513-517.DOI: 10.12007/j.issn.0258-4646.2022.06.007.
    [26]
    MooreR,MullnerD,NicholsG,et al.Color Doppler ultrasound versus computed tomography angiography for preoperative anterolateral thigh flap perforator imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].J Reconstr Microsurg,2022,38(7):563-570.DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1740958.
    [27]
    KimTH, ChaoJS, KwonJG, et al. Refining surgical precision: the impact of color doppler ultrasound-guided perforator mapping on anterolateral thigh flap for oncologic patients[J/OL]. J Reconstr Microsurg,2025[2026-05-31]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41360097/. DOI:10.1055/a-2751-8691. [published online ahead of print December 8, 2025].
    [28]
    TangY,GuoQ,LiX,et al.Augmented reality-assisted systematic mapping of anterolateral thigh perforators[J].BMC Musculoskelet Disord,2022,23(1):1047.DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-06013-1.
    [29]
    YuXX,YangSF,JiCS,et al.A novel computed tomography angiography technique: guided preoperative localization and design of anterolateral thigh perforator flap[J].Insights Imaging,2022,13(1):190.DOI: 10.1186/s13244-022-01318-0.
    [30]
    ZhangA,DongY,YuanS,et al.Preoperative perforator mapping of anterolateral thigh flaps using computed tomographic angiography and visual coordinate system for the reconstruction of head and neck defects[J].Ear Nose Throat J,2025,104(4):NP195-NP202.DOI: 10.1177/01455613221108367.
    [31]
    KimH,ChaIH,KimHJ,et al.Perforators detected in computed tomography angiography for anterolateral thigh free flap: am I the only one who feels inaccurate?[J].J Clin Med,2023,12(12):4139.DOI: 10.3390/jcm12124139.
    [32]
    张月恒,崔文举,宋坤修,等.改良CT血管造影术辅助基于浅筋膜穿支的股前外侧皮瓣穿支评估与偏心设计的前瞻性研究[J].中华烧伤与创面修复杂志,2023,39(2):141-149.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20220902-00376.
    [33]
    尹其翔,糜菁熠,蔡华忠,等.基于多层CT血管成像的穿支皮瓣设计和切取的三维导航流程的建立及其临床应用效果[J].中华烧伤与创面修复杂志,2025,41(2):171-179.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20240407-00123.
    [34]
    SingaraveluA,DalliJ,PotterS,et al.Artificial intelligence for optimum tissue excision with indocyanine green fluorescence angiography for flap reconstructions: proof of concept[J].JPRAS Open,2024,41:389-393.DOI: 10.1016/j.jpra.2024.07.014.
    [35]
    赖子森,吕嘉晖,刘广文,等.超声引导下经皮经肝门静脉穿刺注射吲哚菁绿在腹腔镜解剖性肝切除术中的应用价值[J].中华消化外科杂志,2024,23(12):1544-1549.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115610-20241120-00500.
    [36]
    DidzunO,ThomasB,PanayiAC,et al.Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography as a predictor of distal flap necrosis in latissimus dorsi free flaps[J].Microsurgery,2025,45(2):e70019.DOI: 10.1002/micr.70019.
    [37]
    刘一秀,汤喜,吴剑,等.基于混合现实与人工智能算法在股前外穿支血管定位中的前瞻性研究[J].华西口腔医学杂志,2024,(6):9.DOI: 10.7518/hxkq.2024.2024129.
    [38]
    LiuY,FanW,YuM,et al.Comparison between mixed reality with artificial algorithms and ultrasound in localization of anterior thigh flap perforators: a prospective randomized controlled study[J].BMC Med,2025,23(1):374.DOI: 10.1186/s12916-025-04181-0.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(2)  / Tables(2)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (28) PDF downloads(8) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return