Sun Dan, Zhao Peng, Ni Jiaying, et al. Effects of airway management team in the treatment of severely mass burn patients combined with inhalation injury[J]. Chin j Burns, 2018, 34(6): 354-359. Doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.06.008
Citation: Sun Dan, Zhao Peng, Ni Jiaying, et al. Effects of airway management team in the treatment of severely mass burn patients combined with inhalation injury[J]. Chin j Burns, 2018, 34(6): 354-359. Doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.06.008

Effects of airway management team in the treatment of severely mass burn patients combined with inhalation injury

doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.06.008
  • Received Date: 2018-03-26
    Available Online: 2021-10-28
  • Publish Date: 2018-06-20
  • Objective To explore and analyze the effects of airway management team (AMT) in the treatment of severely mass burn patients combined with inhalation injury. Methods The clinical data of 58 severely burned patients combined with inhalation injury hospitalized in our unit from January 2012 to August 2014, conforming to the inclusion criteria, were retrospectively analyzed. According to whether airway management was implemented by AMT or not, patients hospitalized from January 2012 to July 2014 were divided into control group (n=27), while patients in Kunshan factory aluminum dust explosion accident hospitalized on 2nd August 2014 were divided into observation group (n=31). Patients in control group received regular airway nursing carried out by nurses on duty, while patients in observation group received specialized airway concentration nursing implemented by AMT. The concrete implementation included overall assessment of patients′ airway, elaborate airway care, and controlled management of mechanical ventilation. Arterial blood gas indexes and oxygenation index of patients in the two groups on post injury day (PID) 1, 7, and 14 were compared. Sputum viscosity, ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) occurrence rate, and ventilation time of patients in the two groups in post injury week(s) 1, 2, and 3 after admission were monitored and recorded. Survival rates of patients in the two groups were compared. Data were processed with analysis of variance for repeated measurement, t test and Bonferroni correction, chi-square test, and Wilcoxon rank sum test. Results (1) There were no statistically significant differences in pH value, arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2), arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2), arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2), and oxygenation index of patients in the two groups on PID 1 (t=0.595, -0.166, 1.518, -0.828, 0.458, P>0.05). The pH values of patients in observation group on PID 7 and 14 were 7.327±0.050 and 7.367±0.043, respectively, significantly better than those in control group (7.304±0.021 and 7.390±0.029, respectively, t=-2.385, 2.391, P<0.05). The PaO2 values of patients in observation group on PID 7 and 14 were (95.1±6.7) and (106.3±7.8) mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa), respectively, significantly higher than those in control group [(91.6±5.7) and (102.0±8.3) mmHg, respectively, t=-2.109, -2.059, P<0.05]. The PaCO2 values of patients in observation group on PID 7 and 14 were (41±4) and (40±4) mmHg, respectively, significantly lower than those in control group [(43±5) and (43±4) mmHg, respectively, t=2.220, 2.304, P<0.05]. The SaO2 values of patients in observation group on PID 7 and 14 were 0.95±0.04 and 0.96±0.04, respectively, significantly higher than those in control group (0.93±0.05 and 0.94±0.05, respectively, t=-2.201, -2.016, P<0.05). The oxygenation indexes of patients in observation group on PID 7 and 14 were (286±18) and (329±20) mmHg, significantly higher than those in control group [(277±14) and (306±58) mmHg, respectively, t=-2.263, -2.022, P<0.05]. (2) Sputum viscosity of patients in observation group in post injury week(s) 1, 2, and 3 were superior to that in control group (Z=-2.096, -2.076, -2.033, P<0.05). (3) VAP occurrence rate of patients in observation group was lower than that in control group, and time of mechanical ventilation of patients in observation group was shorter than that in control group (χ2=4.244, t=2.425, P<0.05). (4) Survival rate of patients in observation group was higher than that in control group (χ2=4.244, P<0.05). Conclusions The special intensive care of airway management by AMT can effectively improve the oxygenation status of severely burned patients combined with inhalation injury, alleviate the sputum viscosity, reduce the occurrence of VAP, and shorten the time of mechanical ventilation, thus benefits the treatment of severely mass burn patients combined with inhalation injury.

     

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(27)

    1. 张连,江政英,郭光华. 烧伤合并吸入性损伤机械通气第24小时的氧合指数对患者预后的影响. 中国实用医药. 2024(05): 37-40 .
    2. 王园,冯苹,张寅,张伟英. 上海市护理学会《成人吸入性损伤患者的气道护理》团体标准解读. 上海护理. 2024(10): 1-5 .
    3. 李鑫,陆静静,秦媛. 护理专案改善模式对烧伤行皮肤软组织扩张术患者的影响. 齐鲁护理杂志. 2023(02): 5-7 .
    4. 冯苹,黎宁,王园,张寅. 吸入性损伤人工气道护理的专家共识. 海军医学杂志. 2023(01): 1-6 .
    5. 高娟. 合理情绪行为护理干预对烧伤整形术后患者美学效果及心理状态的影响. 中国美容医学. 2023(08): 182-186 .
    6. 王燕,郭蕊,王淑杰,周秀梅. 改良Beck口腔评分在机械通气烧伤患者口腔护理中的应用. 内蒙古医学杂志. 2023(09): 1129-1131 .
    7. 何幸红,俞超,王晓,周利. ICU多学科协作下1例水泥浆重度吸入性损伤患者的护理体会. 当代护士(下旬刊). 2023(11): 124-127 .
    8. 卢礼齐,萧丽,蒙振波. 气道管理小组在气道护理质量管理中的作用. 当代护士(上旬刊). 2022(03): 140-142 .
    9. 葛林林,高宇,李聪慧,刘莹,王庆芳. 气道管理小组对肺癌重症呼吸衰竭患者的干预效果. 癌症进展. 2022(09): 938-941+945 .
    10. 杜康,李晓棠,杨新蕾. 定时分步分段吸痰法在烧伤并吸入性损伤患者中的应用价值. 数理医药学杂志. 2022(08): 1248-1251 .
    11. 洪珊珊,庄端端,沈晓娜,金润女,韩延泽. 分级救护气道管理模式对烟雾吸入性损伤患者的应用价值研究. 现代医药卫生. 2022(18): 3095-3098+3104 .
    12. 邓颖飞,罗霞. 气道管理小组在重症呼吸衰竭患者护理中的应用. 中医药管理杂志. 2021(04): 70-72 .
    13. 田晓芳,夏红惠,张海英. 工作实录分析配合模拟应急演练应用于突发性群体事件中对救治效率及应急救护能力的影响. 护理实践与研究. 2021(05): 637-640 .
    14. 张笑雪,景福琴,冯可. 多学科团队协作护理在中重度烧伤伴吸入性气道损伤中的应用. 河南医学研究. 2021(12): 2291-2293 .
    15. 陈艳. 气道分级管理在ICU机械通气病人中的应用. 全科护理. 2021(23): 3225-3227 .
    16. 孟晓冰,陈云霞,陈梦琳. 气道管理小组在重型颅脑损伤患者护理中的应用. 齐鲁护理杂志. 2021(17): 51-53 .
    17. 王爱丽. 气道冲洗吸痰法在吸入性损伤气管切开术后的应用及临床护理干预. 中国全科医学. 2021(S2): 214-216 .
    18. 杨敏,魏娟. 重症肺炎患者机械通气期间气道分级管理的效果. 临床医学研究与实践. 2020(07): 175-176+190 .
    19. 丁丹卉,段前深,张治礼. 肺部CT灌注成像与MRI增强扫描在重度烧伤吸入性损伤中的诊断价值比较. 中国烧伤创疡杂志. 2020(02): 105-107 .
    20. 余惠,陈丽映,李孝建. 分阶段气道护理在重度吸入性损伤患者中的应用. 护士进修杂志. 2020(17): 1604-1606 .
    21. 蒋南红,王德运,席毛毛,栾夏刚,蒋梅君,李凤,谢卫国. 纤维支气管镜气道灌洗治疗特重度烧伤合并重度吸入性损伤患者的回顾性研究. 中华烧伤杂志. 2020(04): 252-259 .
    22. 陈丽英. 激励式护理对头面部烧伤并气道梗阻者负性情绪及生活质量的影响. 黑龙江医药. 2020(06): 1454-1455 .
    23. 华英,张怡,陈亚蓉. 气道管理小组在成批严重烧伤合并吸入性损伤患者救治中的应用. 护理实践与研究. 2019(16): 65-67 .
    24. 李洁玉. 重症烧伤患者创面感染的影响因素、菌群分布与防护措施. 护理实践与研究. 2019(19): 7-8 .
    25. 吴玉珊,梁建爱,罗丽秋. 治疗性沟通配合气道护理在有创机械通气患者中的应用. 齐鲁护理杂志. 2019(22): 66-68 .
    26. 魏秀超,雷蕾,欧阳晓丽. 气道管理小组在重症呼吸衰竭患者护理中的应用. 齐鲁护理杂志. 2019(23): 91-93 .
    27. 谭谦. 群体烧伤救治面临的挑战:从"八二"昆山工厂铝粉尘爆炸事故烧伤伤员救治谈起. 中华烧伤杂志. 2018(06): 329-331 .

    Other cited types(2)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-042024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-030510152025
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 21.8 %FULLTEXT: 21.8 %META: 72.7 %META: 72.7 %PDF: 5.5 %PDF: 5.5 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 6.6 %其他: 6.6 %其他: 0.3 %其他: 0.3 %China: 1.0 %China: 1.0 %Porto: 0.3 %Porto: 0.3 %[]: 1.0 %[]: 1.0 %北京: 0.3 %北京: 0.3 %北方邦: 0.3 %北方邦: 0.3 %南昌: 2.4 %南昌: 2.4 %张家口: 2.4 %张家口: 2.4 %恩施: 0.7 %恩施: 0.7 %惠州: 0.3 %惠州: 0.3 %无锡: 1.0 %无锡: 1.0 %普赖恩维尔: 1.0 %普赖恩维尔: 1.0 %朝阳: 0.7 %朝阳: 0.7 %武汉: 0.7 %武汉: 0.7 %沃思堡: 1.0 %沃思堡: 1.0 %深圳: 0.7 %深圳: 0.7 %漯河: 0.3 %漯河: 0.3 %芒廷维尤: 66.1 %芒廷维尤: 66.1 %芝加哥: 1.0 %芝加哥: 1.0 %西宁: 4.8 %西宁: 4.8 %运城: 0.3 %运城: 0.3 %邢台: 1.0 %邢台: 1.0 %重庆: 0.7 %重庆: 0.7 %雅加达: 4.2 %雅加达: 4.2 %黄冈: 0.3 %黄冈: 0.3 %其他其他ChinaPorto[]北京北方邦南昌张家口恩施惠州无锡普赖恩维尔朝阳武汉沃思堡深圳漯河芒廷维尤芝加哥西宁运城邢台重庆雅加达黄冈

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (209) PDF downloads(16) Cited by(29)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return