He Zhiyou, Wang Yuan, Zhang Pihong, et al. Establishment and test results of an artificial intelligence burn depth recognition model based on convolutional neural network[J]. Chin j Burns, 2020, 36(11): 1070-1074. Doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20190926-00385
Citation: He Zhiyou, Wang Yuan, Zhang Pihong, et al. Establishment and test results of an artificial intelligence burn depth recognition model based on convolutional neural network[J]. Chin j Burns, 2020, 36(11): 1070-1074. Doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20190926-00385

Establishment and test results of an artificial intelligence burn depth recognition model based on convolutional neural network

doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20190926-00385
  • Received Date: 2019-09-26
    Available Online: 2021-10-28
  • Publish Date: 2020-11-20
  • Objective To establish an artificial intelligence burn depth recognition model based on convolutional neural network, and to test its effectiveness. Methods In this evaluation study on diagnostic test, 484 wound photos of 221 burn patients in Xiangya Hospital of Central South University (hereinafter referred to as the author′s unit) from January 2010 to December 2019 taken within 48 hours after injury which met the inclusion criteria were collected and numbered randomly. The target wounds were delineated by image viewing software, and the burn depth was judged by 3 attending doctors with more than 5-year professional experience in Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery of the author′s unit. After marking the superficial partial-thickness burn, deep partial-thickness burn, or full-thickness burn in different colors, the burn wounds were cut according to 224×224 pixels to obtain 5 637 complete wound images. The image data generator was used to expand images of each burn depth to 10 000 images, after which, images of each burn depth were divided into training set, verification set, and test set according to the ratio of 7.0∶1.5∶1.5. Under Keras 2.2.4 Python 2.8.0 version, the residual network ResNet-50 of convolutional neural network was used to establish the artificial intelligence burn depth recognition model. The training set was input for training, and the verification set was used to adjust and optimize the model. The judging accuracy rate of various burn depths by the established model was tested by the test set, and precision, recall, and F1_score were calculated. The test results were visualized to generate two-dimensional tSNE cloud chart through the dimensionality reduction tool tSNE, and the distribution of various burn depths was observed. According to the sensitivity and specificity of the model for the recognition of 3 kinds of burn depths, the corresponding receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curve was drawn, and the area under the ROC curve was calculated. Results (1) After the testing of the test set, the precisions of the artificial intelligence burn depth recognition model for the recognition of superficial partial-thickness burn, deep partial-thickness burn, or full-thickness burn were 84% (1 095/1 301), 81% (1 215/1 499) and 82% (1 395/1 700) respectively, the recall were 73% (1 095/1 500), 81% (1 215/1 500) and 93% (1 395/1 500) respectively, and the F1_scores were 0.78, 0.81, and 0.87 respectively. (2) tSNE cloud chart showed that there was small overlapping among different burn depths in the test results for the test set of artificial intelligence burn depth recognition model, among which the overlapping between superficial partial-thickness burn and deep partial-thickness burn and that between deep partial-thickness burn and full-thickness burn were relatively more, while the overlapping between superficial partial-thickness burn and full-thickness burn was relatively less. (3) The area under the ROC curve for 3 kinds of burn depths recognized by the artificial intelligence burn depth recognition model was ≥0.94. Conclusions The artificial intelligence burn depth recognition model established by ResNet-50 network can rather accurately identify the burn depth in the early wound photos of burn patients, especially superficial partial-thickness burn and full-thickness burn. It is expected to be used clinically to assist the diagnosis of burn depth and improve the diagnostic accuracy.

     

  • Relative Articles

    [1]Wang Yaolun, Hu Hongyang, Wu Qing, Wei Huiyan. Research advances on application of sub-epidermal moisture scanner in monitoring tissue viability of early pressure injuries[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2024, 40(1): 96-100. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20231101-00169
    [2]Liu Yijia, Wu Peng, An Gang, Fang Qiu, Zheng Jia, Wang Yibing. Research advances on the techniques for diagnosing burn wound depth[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2022, 38(5): 481-485. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210518-00195
    [3]Li Xiaoliang, Ye Xiangyang, Li Yanguang, Xiao Hongtao, Zhao Xiaokai, Zhang Jian, Feng Ke, Tian Shemin, Lou Jihe, Xia Chengde. Value of renal injury marker protein in early diagnosis of acute kidney injury in burn patients with delayed resuscitation[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2021, 37(2): 143-149. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200915-00411
    [4]Jiang Bin, Shen Mingyan, Shen Tao. Nursing of one patient with extremely severe burn-blast combined injury complicated with acute kidney injury caused by dust explosion[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2020, 36(7): 603-605. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20190415-00188
    [5]Ben Chi, Li Haihang, Liu Tong, Wang Zejing, Cheng Dasheng, Zhu Shihui. Advances in the research of artificial intelligence technology assisting the diagnosis of burn depth[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2020, 36(3): 244-246. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20190403-00162
    [6]Lou Jihe, Zhao Xiaokai, Li Shuren, Liu Bing, Li Yancang, Zhang Jian, Wang Lei, Yang Gaoyuan, Xiao Hongtao, Xie Jiangfan, Lyu Tao, Li Xiaoliang, Xia Chengde. Early diagnosis and treatment for burn complicated with severe paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2019, 35(8): 599-603. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2019.08.008
    [7]Tang Chenqi, Li Junqiang, Xu Dayuan, Liu Xiaobin, Hou Wenjia, Lyu Kaiyang, Xiao Shichu, Xia Zhaofan. Comparison of machine learning method and logistic regression model in prediction of acute kidney injury in severely burned patients[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2018, 34(6): 343-348. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.06.006
    [8]Liu Wei, Chai Jiake. Influences of ulinastatin on acute lung injury and time phase changes of coagulation parameters in rats with burn-blast combined injuries[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2018, 34(1): 32-39. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.01.007
    [9]Li Haihang, Bao Zhenxing, Liu Xiaobin, Zhu Shihui. Advances in the research of application of artificial intelligence in burn field[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2018, 34(4): 246-248. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.04.011
    [12]Wang Yihe, Yang Hongming, Hu Quan, Hou Yusen, Luo Hongmin, Liu Lingying. Effects of sivelestat on acute lung injury in dogs with severe burn-blast combined injury Wang Yihe,[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2014, 30(2): 158-165. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2014.02.015
    [15]ZHU Pei-fang, WANG Zheng-guo. Burn-blast combined injury[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2008, 24(5): 384-386.
    [16]CHENG Tian-min, RAN Xin-ze. Studies on the treatment of combined radiation-burn injury[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2008, 24(5): 387-389.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(12)

    1. 杨陆涛,曹青. 自体浓缩生长因子联合牛碱性成纤维细胞生长因子外用凝胶在创面修复中的应用. 中国当代医药. 2024(11): 25-28 .
    2. 李雪琪,周飞,张腾,董晨明. 近10年人工智能技术应用于创伤领域的可视化分析. 中国医药导报. 2024(24): 21-28 .
    3. 张小丽,张元智,宋志红,朱小军. 基于卷积神经网络评估伤口愈合模型的建立. 内蒙古医科大学学报. 2024(S1): 44-46 .
    4. 李研. 中西医结合护理在烧伤患者中的应用效果观察. 中国城乡企业卫生. 2022(02): 211-212 .
    5. 刘红燕,李谨,唐振,赖哲. 基于卷积神经网络的烟火智能识别算法应用研究. 中国新技术新产品. 2022(01): 146-148 .
    6. 龙忠恒,徐培,张红玲,曾静,高虎,唐诚,张祥明. 矩形瘢痕瓣联合移植自体刃厚皮片修复大面积烧伤后Ⅳ型腋窝瘢痕挛缩畸形. 中华整形外科杂志. 2022(02): 191-195 .
    7. 赵侠,贺轲. 智能医生助理关键技术及应用研究. 中国卫生标准管理. 2022(04): 49-52 .
    8. 刘一嘉,吴鹏,安纲,方秋,郑佳,王一兵. 烧伤创面深度诊断技术的研究进展. 中华烧伤与创面修复杂志. 2022(05): 481-485 . 本站查看
    9. 舒帆,安阳. 人工智能和大数据在整形外科中的应用进展. 中华整形外科杂志. 2022(10): 1169-1175 .
    10. 郑志荣,左浩. 人工智能在计算机网络技术中的应用探讨. 电脑知识与技术. 2021(20): 101-102+126 .
    11. 宋晓焕,梁金伟,刘晓连. 基于改进GLR算法的英语翻译智能识别模型设计. 电子设计工程. 2021(19): 64-68 .
    12. 胡淑娟. 基于卷积神经网络的电子音乐辨识模型. 微型电脑应用. 2021(11): 150-153 .

    Other cited types(4)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-03051015202530
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 16.8 %FULLTEXT: 16.8 %META: 72.8 %META: 72.8 %PDF: 10.5 %PDF: 10.5 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 3.5 %其他: 3.5 %其他: 2.0 %其他: 2.0 %China: 0.3 %China: 0.3 %France: 1.0 %France: 1.0 %United States: 0.5 %United States: 0.5 %[]: 0.3 %[]: 0.3 %上海: 0.5 %上海: 0.5 %东莞: 0.5 %东莞: 0.5 %东营: 0.8 %东营: 0.8 %兰州: 0.3 %兰州: 0.3 %北京: 2.3 %北京: 2.3 %北方邦: 0.3 %北方邦: 0.3 %南京: 0.5 %南京: 0.5 %南平: 0.3 %南平: 0.3 %南昌: 1.0 %南昌: 1.0 %厦门: 1.0 %厦门: 1.0 %台中: 1.0 %台中: 1.0 %台北: 1.0 %台北: 1.0 %咸阳: 1.3 %咸阳: 1.3 %哥伦布: 0.3 %哥伦布: 0.3 %宁德: 0.3 %宁德: 0.3 %广州: 1.5 %广州: 1.5 %张家口: 2.3 %张家口: 2.3 %成都: 1.5 %成都: 1.5 %扬州: 0.3 %扬州: 0.3 %无锡: 3.8 %无锡: 3.8 %杭州: 1.3 %杭州: 1.3 %株洲: 0.3 %株洲: 0.3 %格兰特县: 0.3 %格兰特县: 0.3 %沈阳: 0.3 %沈阳: 0.3 %法兰克福: 1.0 %法兰克福: 1.0 %洛杉矶: 0.3 %洛杉矶: 0.3 %济南: 0.5 %济南: 0.5 %温州: 0.8 %温州: 0.8 %漯河: 0.5 %漯河: 0.5 %烟台: 0.5 %烟台: 0.5 %石家庄: 0.8 %石家庄: 0.8 %福州: 0.3 %福州: 0.3 %纽约: 0.5 %纽约: 0.5 %芒廷维尤: 47.8 %芒廷维尤: 47.8 %芝加哥: 1.0 %芝加哥: 1.0 %苏州: 1.5 %苏州: 1.5 %西宁: 2.0 %西宁: 2.0 %西安: 0.5 %西安: 0.5 %西雅图: 0.3 %西雅图: 0.3 %贵阳: 1.5 %贵阳: 1.5 %运城: 1.3 %运城: 1.3 %郑州: 2.8 %郑州: 2.8 %重庆: 2.0 %重庆: 2.0 %长春: 0.8 %长春: 0.8 %长沙: 2.5 %长沙: 2.5 %雅加达: 1.0 %雅加达: 1.0 %青岛: 0.5 %青岛: 0.5 %其他其他ChinaFranceUnited States[]上海东莞东营兰州北京北方邦南京南平南昌厦门台中台北咸阳哥伦布宁德广州张家口成都扬州无锡杭州株洲格兰特县沈阳法兰克福洛杉矶济南温州漯河烟台石家庄福州纽约芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州西宁西安西雅图贵阳运城郑州重庆长春长沙雅加达青岛

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (290) PDF downloads(42) Cited by(16)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return