Effects and mechanism of age on the stiffness and the fibrotic phenotype of fibroblasts of human hypertrophic scar

Zhu Dongzhen; Yao Bin; Cui Xiaoli; Huang Sha; Fu Xiaobing

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200810-00374

Volume 37 Issue 10

Oct. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS > 2021 > 37(10): 937-945

Zhu DZ,Yao B,Cui XL,et al.Effects and mechanism of age on the stiffness and the fibrotic phenotype of fibroblasts of human hypertrophic scar[J].Chin J Burns,2021,37(10):937-945.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200810-00374.

Citation:

PDF( 21935 KB)

Effects and mechanism of age on the stiffness and the fibrotic phenotype of fibroblasts of human hypertrophic scar

doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200810-00374

1.
Research Center for Wound Repair and Regeneration, Medical Innovation Research Department, the PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100048, China
2.
Key Laboratory of Tissue Repair and Regeneration of PLA, Beijing Key Research Laboratory of Skin Injury, Repair and Regeneration, the Fourth Medical Center, the PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100048, China

Funds:

General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China 32000969, 82002056

Military Medicine Innovation Research program of Chinese PLA General Program CX19026

Wang Zhengguo Foundation for Traumatic Medicine Growth Factor Rejuvenation Plan SZYZ-TR-03

More Information

Corresponding author: Huang Sha, Email: stellarahuang@sina.com
Received Date: 2020-08-10

Abstract

Abstract

Objective To explore the effects and potential molecular mechanism of age on the stiffness and the fibrotic phenotype of fibroblasts (Fbs) of human hypertrophic scar. Methods The experimental research method was used. From January to June 2020, the surgically removed hypertrophic scar tissue of 10 scar patients (4 males and 6 females) and residual full-thickness normal skin tissue of 10 cases (5 males and 5 females, aged 7-41 years) were collected after operation in Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery of the Fourth Medical Center of the PLA General Hospital. The hypertrophic scar tissue of 6 patients aged (10.7±1.6) years was included into the young group and the hypertrophic scar tissue of 4 patients aged (40.0±2.2) years was included into the elderly group according to the age of patients. For the normal skin tissue and scar tissue in the two groups, hematoxylin eosin (HE) staining was performed to observe the tissue morphology, Masson staining was performed to observe the morphology and arrangement of collagen and quantify the content of collagen, and scanning electron microscope was used to observe the microscopic difference of dermal collagen fibers after the samples were freeze-dried and metal coated. The stiffness of scar tissue in the two groups was measured by atomic force microscope under the liquid phase. The scar tissue in the two groups was collected and the Fbs were isolated and cultured. The morphological differences of the Fbs were observed under the inverted phase contrast microscope, and the protein expression of paxillin was detected with cellular immunofluorescence to reflect the morphology of the Fbs. Cellular immunofluorescence was used to detect the expressions of pro-fibrosis protein α-smooth actin (α-SMA), transforming growth factor-β₁ (TGF-β₁), and type Ⅰ collagen, mechanotransduction-related protein Yes-associated protein (YAP), and the proliferation-related protein Ki67. Real-time fluorescent quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction was used to detect the mRNA expressions of pro-fibrosis genes of TGF-β₁, α-SMA, and type Ⅰ collagen, fibrosis inhibiting gene of TGF-β₃, and mechanotransduction-related genes of Rho-associated protein 1 (ROCK1) and YAP. Data were statistically analyzed with one-way analysis of variance and least significant difference t test. Results HE staining showed that the epidermal layer of normal skin was uneven, and blood vessels and sweat glands could be seen in the dermal layer; the epidermal layer of the scar tissue in the two groups was relatively flat, and blood vessels and sweat glands were rare. Masson staining and scanning electron microscopy showed that the collagen fibers in normal skin arranged loosely and disorderly, while the collagen fibers in scar tissue of the two groups arranged densely and orderly, and the collagen fibers in scar tissue of the young group were denser than those of the elderly group. The collagen content in scar tissue of the young group and the elderly group was significantly higher than that of the normal skin tissue (t=8.02, 3.15, P<0.05 or P<0.01), and the collagen content in scar tissue of the elderly group was significantly lower than that of the young group (t=4.84, P<0.05). The dermal stiffness of scar tissue in the elderly group was (50.3±1.1) kPa, significantly higher than (35.2±0.8) kPa in the young group (t=11.43, P<0.05). There were no obvious differences in the morphology of scar Fbs in the two groups observed under inverted phase contrast microscope and by cellular immunofluorescence. The expressions of type Ⅰ collagen and TGF-β₁ in scar Fbs cytoplasm of the elderly group were significantly higher than those in the young group, while the expressions of α-SMA in scar Fbs cytoplasm were close in the two groups. The expressions of YAP in cytoplasm and nucleus of scar Fbs in the elderly group were significantly higher than those in the young group, while the expressions of Ki67 in scar Fbs nucleus of the two groups were close. The mRNA expressions of TGF-β₁and type Ⅰ collagen in scar Fbs of the elderly group were significantly higher than those in the young group (t=2.87, 4.85, P<0.05 or P<0.01), the mRNA expression of TGF-β₃ in scar Fbs of the elderly group was significantly lower than that in the young group (t=3.36, P<0.05), and the mRNA expressions of α-SMA in scar Fbs of the two groups were close (t=1.14, P>0.05). The mRNA expressions of ROCK1 and YAP in scar Fbs of the elderly group were significantly higher than those in the young group (t=2.98, 7.60, P<0.05 or P<0.01). Conclusions The elderly are prone to scar healing after skin injury. The molecular mechanism may be attributed to the production of extracellular matrix components with higher stiffness, which increases tissue stiffness and thereby activates the expressions of ROCK and YAP/transcriptional co-activator with PDZ-binding motif genes, promoting pro-fibrosis gene and protein expression.
- Cicatrix,
- Hardness,
- Fibroblast,
- Age,
- Gene and protein of fibrosis,
- Gene and protein of mechanotransduction

FullText(HTML)

References(36)

References

[1]	KirkwoodTB. Understanding the odd science of aging[J]. Cell, 2005,120(4):437-447.DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.01.027.
[2]	BakerDJ, PetersenRC. Cellular senescence in brain aging and neurodegenerative diseases: evidence and perspectives[J]. J Clin Invest, 2018,128(4):1208-1216. DOI: 10.1172/JCI95145.
[3]	RamirezT, LiYM, YinS, et al. Aging aggravates alcoholic liver injury and fibrosis in mice by downregulating sirtuin 1 expression[J]. J Hepatol, 2017,66(3):601-609. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.11.004.
[4]	ShusterS, BlackMM, Mc VitieE. The influence of age and sex on skin thickness, skin collagen and density[J]. Br J Dermatol, 1975,93(6):639-643. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1975.tb05113.x.
[5]	MooreAL, MarshallCD, BarnesLA, et al. Scarless wound healing: transitioning from fetal research to regenerative healing[J]. Wiley interdiscip Rev Dev Biol, 2018,7(2): 10.1002/wdev.309. DOI: 10.1002/wdev.309.
[6]	WillyardC. Unlocking the secrets of scar-free skin healing[J]. Nature, 2018,563(7732):S86-88. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-018-07430-w.
[7]	SolonJ, LeventalI, SenguptaK, et al. Fibroblast adaptation and stiffness matching to soft elastic substrates[J]. Biophys J, 2007,93(12):4453-4461. DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.106.101386.
[8]	WellsRG. Tissue mechanics and fibrosis[J]. Biochim Biophys Acta, 2013,1832(7):884-890. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2013.02.007.
[9]	DasguptaI, McCollumD. Control of cellular responses to mechanical cues through YAP/TAZ regulation[J]. J Biol Chem, 2019,294(46):17693-17706. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.REV119.007963.
[10]	DupontS. Role of YAP/TAZ in cell-matrix adhesion-mediated signalling and mechanotransduction[J]. Exp Cell Res, 2016,343(1):42-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2015.10.034.
[11]	LichtmanMK, Otero-VinasM, FalangaV. Transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) isoforms in wound healing and fibrosis[J]. Wound Repair Regen, 2016,24(2):215-222. DOI: 10.1111/wrr.12398.
[12]	LiuF, LagaresD, ChoiKM, et al. Mechanosignaling through YAP and TAZ drives fibroblast activation and fibrosis[J]. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, 2015,308(4):L344-357. DOI: 10.1152/ajplung.00300.2014.
[13]	SzetoSG, NarimatsuM, LuM, et al. YAP/TAZ are mechano- regulators of TGF-β-Smad signaling and renal fibrogenesis[J]. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2016,27(10):3117-3128.DOI: 10.1681/asn.2015050499.
[14]	AbramczykH, ImielaA, Brozek-PluskaB, et al. Advances in Raman imaging combined with AFM and fluorescence microscopy are beneficial for oncology and cancer research[J]. Nanomedicine (Lond), 2019,14(14):1873-1888. DOI: 10.2217/nnm-2018-0335.
[15]	BhushanB. Nanotribological and nanomechanical properties of skin with and without cream treatment using atomic force microscopy and nanoindentation[J]. J Colloid Interface Sci, 2012,367(1):1-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2011.10.019.
[16]	StylianouA, LekkaM, StylianopoulosT. AFM assessing of nanomechanical fingerprints for cancer early diagnosis and classification: from single cell to tissue level[J]. Nanoscale, 2018,10(45):20930-20945. DOI: 10.1039/c8nr06146g.
[17]	GauglitzGG, KortingHC, PavicicT, et al. Hypertrophic scarring and keloids: pathomechanisms and current and emerging treatment strategies[J]. Mol Med, 2011,17(1/2):113-125. DOI: 10.2119/molmed.2009.00153.
[18]	PuglieseE, CoentroJQ, RaghunathM, et al. Wound healing and scar wars[J]. Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 2018,129:1-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2018.05.010.
[19]	张波, 王正国, 朱佩芳. 皮肤无瘢痕愈合机制的研究进展[J]. 中华烧伤杂志, 2002,18(5):318-320.
[20]	KöseO, WaseemA. Keloids and hypertrophic scars: are they two different sides of the same coin?[J]. Dermatol Surg, 2008,34(3):336-346. DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2007.34067.x.
[21]	RittiéL, FisherGJ. Natural and sun-induced aging of human skin[J]. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med, 2015,5(1):a015370. DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a015370.
[22]	GeorgesPC, HuiJJ, GombosZ, et al. Increased stiffness of the rat liver precedes matrix deposition: implications for fibrosis[J]. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, 2007,293(6):G1147-1154. DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00032.2007.
[23]	Viji BabuPK, RiannaC, BelgeG, et al. Mechanical and migratory properties of normal, scar, and Dupuytren's fibroblasts[J]. J Mol Recognit, 2018,31(9):e2719. DOI: 10.1002/jmr.2719.
[24]	TschumperlinDJ, LagaresD. Mechano-therapeutics: targeting mechanical signaling in fibrosis and tumor stroma[J]. Pharmacol Ther, 2020,212:107575. DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2020.107575.
[25]	TschumperlinDJ, LigrestiG, HilscherMB, et al. Mechanosensing and fibrosis[J]. J Clin Invest, 2018,128(1):74-84. DOI: 10.1172/JCI93561.
[26]	WuH, YuY, HuangH, et al. Progressive pulmonary fibrosis is caused by elevated mechanical tension on alveolar stem cells[J]. Cell, 2020,180(1):107-121.e17. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.11.027.
[27]	YaoB, ZhuDZ, CuiXL, et al. Modeling human hypertrophic scars with 3D preformed cellular aggregates bioprinting[J]. Bioactive Materials, 2021,In press. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.09.004.
[28]	HinzB. Myofibroblasts[J]. Exp Eye Res, 2016,142:56-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2015.07.009.
[29]	HinzB, McCullochCA, CoelhoNM. Mechanical regulation of myofibroblast phenoconversion and collagen contraction[J]. Exp Cell Res, 2019,379(1):119-128.DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2019.03.027.
[30]	KnipeRS, ProbstCK, LagaresD, et al. The Rho kinaseis oforms ROCK1 and ROCK2 each contribute to the development of experimental pulmonary fibrosis[J]. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol, 2018,58(4):471-481. DOI: 10.1165/rcmb.2017-0075OC.
[31]	ShiJ, SurmaM, YangY, et al. Disruption of both ROCK1 and ROCK2 genes in cardiomyocytes promotes autophagy and reduces cardiac fibrosis during aging[J]. FASEB J, 2019,33(6):7348-7362. DOI: 10.1096/fj.201802510R.
[32]	ZhouY, HuangX, HeckerL, et al. Inhibition of mechanosensitive signaling in myofibroblasts ameliorates experimental pulmonary fibrosis[J]. J Clin Invest, 2013,123(3):1096-1108. DOI: 10.1172/JCI66700.
[33]	NoguchiS, SaitoA, NagaseT. YAP/TAZ signaling as a molecular link between fibrosis and cancer[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2018,19(11):3674. DOI: 10.3390/ijms19113674.
[34]	Picollet-D'hahanN, DolegaME, LiguoriL, et al. A 3D toolbox to enhance physiological relevance of human tissue models[J]. Trends Biotechnol, 2016,34(9):757-769.DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.06.012.
[35]	YanWC, DavoodiP, VijayavenkataramanS, et al. 3D bioprinting of skin tissue: from pre-processing to final product evaluation[J]. Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 2018,132:270-295.DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2018.07.016.
[36]	朱冬振, 王一惠, 王睿, 等. 外源性肿瘤坏死因子α对三维环境下小鼠间充质干细胞向汗腺细胞分化的影响及机制[J]. 中华烧伤杂志, 2020,36(3):187-194. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200105-00005.