Email Alerts
RSS
Volume 38 Issue 3
Mar.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Article Navigation >  CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS  > 2022  >  38(3): 251-255
Meng YB,Lei J,Zhang HR,et al.Clinical effects of in situ perforation of preserved split scar matrix in combination with scalp transplantation and vacuum sealing drainage in the treatment of hypertrophic scar in non-functional sites after burns[J].Chin J Burns Wounds,2022,38(3):251-255.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20201201-00510.
Citation: Meng YB,Lei J,Zhang HR,et al.Clinical effects of in situ perforation of preserved split scar matrix in combination with scalp transplantation and vacuum sealing drainage in the treatment of hypertrophic scar in non-functional sites after burns[J].Chin J Burns Wounds,2022,38(3):251-255.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20201201-00510.
shu

Clinical effects of in situ perforation of preserved split scar matrix in combination with scalp transplantation and vacuum sealing drainage in the treatment of hypertrophic scar in non-functional sites after burns

doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20201201-00510

  • Institute of Burns, General Hospital of TISCO (the Sixth Hospital of Shanxi Medical University), Taiyuan 030009, China

More Information
  • Corresponding author: Duan Peng, Email: dp630613@163.com
  • Received Date: 2020-12-01
    Abstract
  •   Objective  To investigate the clinical effects of in situ perforation of preserved split scar matrix in combination with scalp transplantation and vacuum sealing drainage in the treatment of hypertrophic scar in non-functional sites after burns.  Methods  A retrospective observational study was used. From June 2017 to June 2019, 33 patients (24 males and 9 females, aged 8-50 years) who met the inclusion criteria with hypertrophic scars in non-functional sites outside the face after burns were treated in General Hospital of TISCO (the Sixth Hospital of Shanxi Medical University). All patients underwent scalp transplantation after perforation of retained split scar matrix in situ (with scar thinning area of 90-500 cm2), and then the vacuum sealing drainage was performed. The hematoma and infection of wounds were observed on the 7th day after operation. At the same time, the survival rate of skin grafting was observed and calculated. The flatness and thickness of the scar in the operative area were observed in 12 months after operation, and the itching and pain of the patients were recorded. Vancouver Scar Scale was used to score the scar of patients before operation and at 3, 6 and 12 months after operation. The healing time and hair growth of donor site were observed. Data were statistically analyzed with repeated analysis of variance, paired sample t test and bonferroni correction.  Results  On the 7th day after operation, local subcutaneous hematoma appeared in the wound of 2 patients, which healed after dressing change; no infection occurred. On the 7th day after operation, the survival rate of skin grafting of patients was 94.6%-99.0%(96.8±1.2)%. Scar flatness was well, the thickness of scar was not significantly higher than that of normal skin in 12 months after operation, and the symptoms of itching pain of patients disappeared or significantly relieved. Vancouver Scar Scale scores of patients before operation and at 3, 6, and 12 months after operation were 12.1±2.8, 8.5±1.5, 7.6±1.6, 6.7±1.3, respectively, and the scores of 3, 6, and 12 months after operation were all significantly lower than that before operation (with t values of 4.48, 4.06, and 3.97, respectively, P<0.01). All the donor sites of the head healed well in 4-7 days after operation. By 3-6 months after operation, all patients had good hair growth in the donor site and achieved no scar healing.  Conclusions  The treatment of hypertrophic scar in non-functional sites outside the face after burns by in situ perforation of preserved split scar matrix in combination with scalp transplantation and vacuum sealing drainage can effectively improve the appearance of hypertrophic scar in non-functional areas after burn and reduce its degree of hyperplasia, with scar-free donor site healing.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
  • loading
    • References(28)
  • [1]
    GauglitzGG,KortingHC,PavicicT,et al.Hypertrophic scarring and keloids: pathomechanisms and current and emerging treatment strategies[J].Mol Med,2011,17(1/2):113-125.DOI: 10.2119/molmed.2009.00153.
    [2]
    PratsinisH,MavrogonatouE,KletsasD.Scarless wound healing: from development to senescence[J].Adv Drug Deliv Rev,2019,146:325-343.DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2018.04.011.
    [3]
    LvKY, XiaZF. Chinese expert consensus on clinical prevention and treatment of scar [J/OL].Burns Trauma,2018,6:27 [2022-01-27]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30263894/. DOI: 10.1186/s41038-018-0129-9.
    [4]
    中国整形美容协会瘢痕医学分会.瘢痕早期治疗全国专家共识(2020版)[J].中华烧伤杂志,2021,37(2):113-125.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200609-00300.
    [5]
    SongT,KimKH,LeeKW.Randomised comparison of silicone gel and onion extract gel for post-surgical scars[J].J Obstet Gynaecol,2018,38(5):702-707.DOI: 10.1080/01443615.2017.1400524.
    [6]
    LiK, NicoliF, XiWJ, et al. The 1470 nm diode laser with an intralesional fiber device: a proposed solution for the treatment of inflamed and infected keloids[J/OL]. Burns Trauma,2019,7:5[2022-02-26]. https://pubmed. ncbi. nlm. nih. gov /30783604. DOI: 10.1186/s41038-019-0143-6.
    [7]
    KarmisholtKE, BanzhafCA, GludM, et al. Laser treatments in early wound healing improve scar appearance: a randomized split-wound trial with nonablative fractional laser exposures vs. untreated controls[J]. Br J Dermatol, 2018,179(6):1307-1314. DOI: 10.1111/bjd.17076.
    [8]
    ShirakamiE,YamakawaS,HayashidaK.Strategies to prevent hypertrophic scar formation: a review of therapeutic interventions based on molecular evidence[J].Burns Trauma, 2020.8:tkz003 [2022-03-15].https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33477421/.DOI: 10.1093/burnst/tkz003.
    [9]
    陈舜,郑林文,刘维,等.人工真皮联合负压封闭引流及自体刃厚皮整复大面积烧伤后瘢痕挛缩畸形的临床效果[J].中华烧伤杂志,2019,35(8):608-610.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2019.08.010.
    [10]
    韩军涛,谢松涛,陶克,等.自体瘢痕复合皮修复大面积深度烧伤后期畸形12例[J].中华烧伤杂志,2014,30(5):457-458.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2014.05.025.
    [11]
    KafkaM,CollinsV,KamolzLP,et al.Evidence of invasive and noninvasive treatment modalities for hypertrophic scars: a systematic review[J].Wound Repair Regen,2017,25(1):139-144.DOI: 10.1111/wrr.12507.
    [12]
    AtiyehBS.Nonsurgical management of hypertrophic scars: evidence-based therapies, standard practices, and emerging methods[J].Aesthetic Plast Surg,2020,44(4):1320-1344.DOI: 10.1007/s00266-020-01820-0.
    [13]
    CadetN,HardyI,DudekD,et al.Prospective case-control trial evaluating silicone gel for the treatment of direct brow lift scars[J].Can J Ophthalmol,2018,53(1):29-33.DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2017.07.017.
    [14]
    FangQQ,ChenCY,ZhangMX,et al.The effectiveness of topical anti-scarring agents and a novel combined process on cutaneous scar management[J].Curr Pharm Des,2017,23(15):2268-2275.DOI: 10.2174/1381612822666161025144434.
    [15]
    李廷,王晨,程大胜,等.人工真皮联合自体薄皮片治疗增生性瘢痕临床效果分析[J].中华烧伤杂志,2015,31(6):451-453.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2015.06.015.
    [16]
    胡克苏,祁俊,王磊,等.人工真皮支架联合负压封闭引流和自体刃厚皮片移植治疗难愈创面20例[J].中华烧伤杂志,2017,33(11):708-711.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2017.11.011.
    [17]
    TorkS,JeffersonRC,JanisJE.Acellular dermal matrices: applications in plastic surgery[J].Semin Plast Surg,2019,33(3):173-184.DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1693019.
    [18]
    OhSJ.Simultaneous two-layer harvesting of scalp split-thickness skin and dermal grafts for acute burns and postburn scar deformities[J].Arch Plast Surg,2019,46(6):558-565.DOI: 10.5999/aps.2018.00990.
    [19]
    KhansaI,HarrisonB,JanisJE.Evidence-based scar management: how to improve results with technique and technology[J].Plast Reconstr Surg,2016,138 (3 Suppl): S165-178.DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002647.
    [20]
    LeeKT,PyonJK,LimSY,et al.Negative-pressure wound dressings to secure split-thickness skin grafts in the perineum[J].Int Wound J,2014,11(2):223-227.DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2012.01078.x.
    [21]
    雷磊,高优,许建允,等.游离植皮联合负压创面治疗技术治疗Ⅲ/Ⅳ度烧伤创面效果分析[J].中国美容医学,2018,27(7):20-23.
    [22]
    WebsterJ,ScuffhamP,StankiewiczM,et al.Negative pressure wound therapy for skin grafts and surgical wounds healing by primary intention[J].Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2014(10):CD009261.DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009261.pub3.
    [23]
    KantakNA,MistryR,HalvorsonEG.A review of negative- pressure wound therapy in the management of burn wounds[J].Burns,2016,42(8):1623-1633.DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2016.06.011.
    [24]
    李志强, 吴文杰, 刘树江,等. 负压封闭引流技术在游离植皮中的应用[J]. 临床和实验医学杂志, 2017,16(10):1022-1025.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4695.2017.10.028.
    [25]
    SogorskiA,LehnhardtM,GoertzO,et al.Improvement of local microcirculation through intermittent Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT)[J].J Tissue Viability,2018,27(4):267-273.DOI: 10.1016/j.jtv.2018.08.004.
    [26]
    郭振荣，陆江阳.大面积烧伤植皮与供皮区的选择[J].人民军医,2001,44(1):21-22.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9736.2001.01.018.
    [27]
    ChongSJ,ChokeA,TanBK.Technical tips to enhance micrografting results in burn surgery[J].Burns,2017,43(5):983-986.DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2017.01.030.
    [28]
    申传安, 柴家科, 张琳,等. 自体头皮移植修复瘢痕皮肤中厚供皮区创面的效果观察[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2013, 93(12):921-923.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2013.12.010.
    • Relative Articles
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(1)

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (239) PDF downloads(35) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    Copyright © Chinese Journal of Burns京ICP备07035254号-14

    E-mail：shaoshangzazhi@163.com

    Website：https://zhsszz.xml-journal.net/

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return