Email Alerts
RSS
Volume 39 Issue 3
Mar.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Article Navigation >  CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS  > 2023  >  39(3): 248-255
Fan TT,Han M,Liang Y,et al.Application effects of nitrous oxide and oxygen mixed inhalation technology on analgesia and sedation during debridement and dressing change in children with moderate or severe burns[J].Chin J Burns Wounds,2023,39(3):248-255.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20220308-00051.
Citation: Fan TT,Han M,Liang Y,et al.Application effects of nitrous oxide and oxygen mixed inhalation technology on analgesia and sedation during debridement and dressing change in children with moderate or severe burns[J].Chin J Burns Wounds,2023,39(3):248-255.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20220308-00051.
shu

Application effects of nitrous oxide and oxygen mixed inhalation technology on analgesia and sedation during debridement and dressing change in children with moderate or severe burns

doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20220308-00051
  • 1.

    Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China

  • 2.

    Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery, Central Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University (Jinan Central Hospital), Jinan 250013, China

Funds:

Jinan Clinical Medical Research Center for Burn/Trauma and Chronic Wounds 201912010

Jinan Science and Technology Innovation Project on Medicine and Health 201907080

More Information
  • Corresponding author: Song Guodong, Email: sgd.zxyy@163.com
  • Received Date: 2022-03-08
    Abstract
  •   Objective   To investigate the application effects of nitrous oxide and oxygen mixed inhalation technology on analgesia and sedation during debridement and dressing change in children with moderate or severe burns.   Methods   A retrospective non-randomized contemporary controlled study was conducted. From December 2019 to November 2021, 140 burn children with moderate or severe burns, aged 1 to 3 years, who met the inclusion criteria were admitted to Central Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University. During debridement and dressing change 3 to 14 days after injury, 42 children, including 23 males and 19 females, who received nurse-centered pain management mode and analgesia and sedation with nitrous oxide and oxygen mixed inhalation technology were included in nitrous oxide group (the dressing change process using the above-mentioned technology for the first time was selected for the follow-up study). Another 42 children, including 24 males and 18 females, were included in non-nitrous oxide group from 98 children who did not apply analgesia or sedation treatment during dressing change with stratified random sampling (one dressing change process was randomly selected for the follow-up study). The face, legs, activity, cry, and consolability scale and Ramsay sedation scale were used to evaluate the pain intensity and degree of sedation, respectively, at 30 minutes before dressing change (hereinafter referred to as before dressing change), immediately after debridement, and at 30 minutes after finishing dressing change (hereinafter referred to as after dressing change). After dressing change, the self-made satisfaction scale was used to evaluate the satisfaction degree of dressing change surgeons and guardians of children for analgesic effects during dressing change. The duration of dressing change and the healing time of deep partial-thickness burn wounds were recorded. The heart rate and percutaneous arterial oxygen saturation (SpO 2) before, during, and after dressing change and the occurrence of adverse events such as nausea and vomiting during dressing change were recorded. Data were statistically analyzed with Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test, analysis of variance for repeated measurement, independent sample t test, and Bonferroni correction.   Results   There were no significant differences in the score of pain intensity and score of sedation degree between children in two groups before and after dressing change ( P>0.05). Immediately after debridement, the score of pain intensity of children in nitrous oxide group was 2.5±0.7, which was significantly lower than 7.6±1.0 in non-nitrous oxide group ( t=-26.69, P<0.05); the score of sedation degree of children in nitrous oxide group was 1.83±0.38, which was significantly higher than 1.21±0.42 in non-nitrous oxide group ( t=7.15, P<0.05). After dressing change, the satisfaction degree scores of dressing change surgeons and guardians of children for analgesic effects during dressing change of children in nitrous oxide group were significantly higher than those in non-nitrous oxide group (with tvalues of 10.53 and 2.24, respectively, P<0.05). The dressing change duration of children in nitrous oxide group was significantly shorter than that in non-nitrous oxide group ( t=-5.33, P<0.05). The healing time of deep partial-thickness burn wounds in children between the two groups had no significant difference ( P>0.05). The heart rate of children in nitrous oxide group was significantly lower than that in non-nitrous oxide group during dressing change ( t=-12.40, P<0.05), while the SpO 2 was significantly higher than that in non-nitrous oxide group ( t=5.98, P<0.05). During dressing change, 2 children had nausea and 1 child had euphoria in nitrous oxide group, while heart rate of all children in non-nitrous oxide group continued to be higher than the normal range.   Conclusions   In the process of debridement and dressing change in children with moderate or severe burns, the use of nurse-centered pain management mode and the standardized use of nitrous oxide and oxygen mixed inhalation technology can safely and effectively control pain and sedation.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
  • loading
    • References(37)
  • [1]
    TegtmeyerLC, HerrnstadtGR, MaierSL, et al. Retrospective analysis on thermal injuries in children-demographic, etiological and clinical data of German and Austrian pediatric hospitals 2006-2015-approaching the new German burn registry[J]. Burns, 2018, 44(1):150-157. DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2017.05.013.
    [2]
    何珊,左泽兰.1 946例住院烧伤患儿流行病学调查[J].中华烧伤杂志,2018,34(10):696-700.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.10.009.
    [3]
    张成,彭源,罗小强,等.3 067例住院烧伤患儿流行病学调查及其感染的病原学特征分析[J].中华烧伤杂志,2021,37(6):538-545.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210201-00044.
    [4]
    《中华烧伤杂志》编辑委员会.成人烧伤疼痛管理指南(2013版)[J].中华烧伤杂志,2013,29(3):225-231.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2013.03.002.
    [5]
    杨晓瑞,钟坤根,胡清刚,等.手术室外床旁烧伤患者清创换药的疼痛治疗研究进展[J].医学综述,2019,25(10):2039-2043,2048.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2084.2019.10.032.
    [6]
    ISBI Practice Guidelines Committee, SubcommitteeAdvisory, SubcommitteeSteering. ISBI practice guidelines for burn care, part 2[J]. Burns, 2018, 44(7):1617-1706. DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2018.09.012.
    [7]
    FaginA, PalmieriTL. Considerations for pediatric burn sedation and analgesia[J/OL]. Burns Trauma, 2017, 5(1):28[2022-03-08]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33709001/.DOI: 10.1186/s41038-017-0094-8.
    [8]
    VossJK, LozenskiJ, HansenJK, et al. Sedation and analgesia for adult outpatient burn dressing change: a survey of American Burn Association Centers[J]. J Burn Care Res, 2020, 41(2):322-327. DOI: 10.1093/jbcr/irz164.
    [9]
    HansenJK, VossJ, GanatraH, et al. Sedation and analgesia during pediatric burn dressing change: a survey of American Burn Association Centers[J]. J Burn Care Res, 2019, 40(3):287-293. DOI: 10.1093/jbcr/irz023.
    [10]
    RetrouveyH, ShahrokhiS. Pain and the thermally injured patient-a review of current therapies[J]. J Burn Care Res, 2015, 36(2):315-323. DOI: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000073.
    [11]
    MyersR, LozenskiJ, WyattM, et al. Sedation and analgesia for dressing change: a survey of American Burn Association Burn Centers[J]. J Burn Care Res, 2017, 38(1): e48-e54. DOI: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000423.
    [12]
    姚则名,冷敏,汪虹.烧伤患儿辅助镇痛镇静治疗的研究进展[J].中华烧伤杂志,2020,36(10):979-982.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20190731-00327.
    [13]
    吴巍巍,路英慧,程丹,等.烧伤患儿的疼痛评估及非药物干预研究进展[J].中华烧伤杂志,2020,36(1):76-80.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2020.01.015.
    [14]
    海峡两岸医药卫生交流协会烧创伤暨组织修复专委会.氧化亚氮与氧气混合吸入镇静镇痛技术在烧伤外科应用的专家共识(2021版)[J].中华烧伤杂志,2021,37(3):201-206.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200523-00284.
    [15]
    OsmanBM, ShapiroFE. Office-based anesthesia: a comprehensive review and 2019 update[J]. Anesthesiol Clin, 2019, 37(2):317-331. DOI: 10.1016/j.anclin.2019.01.004.
    [16]
    RamsayMA, SavegeTM, SimpsonBR, et al. Controlled sedation with alphaxalone-alphadolone[J]. Br Med J, 1974, 2(5920):656-659. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.2.5920.656.
    [17]
    中华医学会儿科学分会急救学组,中华医学会急诊医学分会儿科学组,中国医师协会儿童重症医师分会.中国儿童重症监护病房镇痛和镇静治疗专家共识(2018版)[J].中华儿科杂志,2019,57(5):324-330.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1310.2019.05.002.
    [18]
    MerkelSI, Voepel-LewisT, ShayevitzJR, et al. The FLACC: a behavioral scale for scoring postoperative pain in young children[J]. Pediatr Nurs, 1997, 23(3):293-297.
    [19]
    Voepel-LewisT, MerkelS, TaitAR, et al. The reliability and validity of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability observational tool as a measure of pain in children with cognitive impairment[J]. Anesth Analg, 2002, 95(5):1224-1229. DOI: 10.1097/00000539-200211000-00020.
    [20]
    StoddardFJJr, LuthraR, SorrentinoEA, et al. A randomized controlled trial of sertraline to prevent posttraumatic stress disorder in burned children[J]. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol, 2011, 21(5):469-477. DOI: 10.1089/cap.2010.0133.
    [21]
    LegrandM, BarraudD, ConstantI, et al. Management of severe thermal burns in the acute phase in adults and children[J]. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med, 2020, 39(2):253-267. DOI: 10.1016/j.accpm.2020.03.006.
    [22]
    WeinertCR, ChlanL, GrossC. Sedating critically ill patients: factors affecting nurses' delivery of sedative therapy[J]. Am J Crit Care, 2001, 10(3):156-165; quiz 166-167.
    [23]
    BarrJ, FraserGJ, PuntilloK, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of pain, agitation, and delirium in adult patients in the intensive care unit[J]. Crit Care Med, 2013, 41(1):263-306. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182783b72.
    [24]
    HinkelbeinJ, LampertiM, AkesonJ, et al. European Society of Anaesthesiology and European Board of Anaesthesiology guidelines for procedural sedation and analgesia in adults[J]. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2018, 35(1):6-24. DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000683.
    [25]
    朱峰,夏照帆.成人重症烧伤镇痛镇静管理[J].中华烧伤杂志,2018,34(6):407-411.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.06.022.
    [26]
    McgrathPJ, WalcoGA, TurkDC, et al. Core outcome domains and measures for pediatric acute and chronic/recurrent pain clinical trials: PedIMMPACT recommendations[J]. J Pain, 2008, 9(9):771-783. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2008.04.007.
    [27]
    ZielińskiJ, Morawska-KochmanM, ZatońskiT. Pain assessment and management in children in the postoperative period: a review of the most commonly used postoperative pain assessment tools, new diagnostic methods and the latest guidelines for postoperative pain therapy in children[J]. Adv Clin Exp Med, 2020, 29(3):365-374. DOI: 10.17219/acem/112600.
    [28]
    CrellinDJ, HarrisonD, SantamariaN, et al. The psychometric properties of the FLACC scale used to assess procedural pain[J]. J Pain, 2018, 19(8):862-872. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2018.02.013.
    [29]
    MellonRD, SimoneAF, RappaportBA. Use of anesthetic agents in neonates and young children[J]. Anesth Analg, 2007, 104(3):509-520. DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000255729.96438.b0.
    [30]
    QuachDF, de LeonVC, ConwayCR. Nitrous oxide: an emerging novel treatment for treatment-resistant depression[J]. J Neurol Sci, 2022, 434:120092. DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2021.120092.
    [31]
    GriggsC, GovermanJ, BittnerEA, et al. Sedation and pain management in burn patients[J]. Clin Plast Surg, 2017, 44(3):535-540. DOI: 10.1016/j.cps.2017.02.026.
    [32]
    BrownNJ, KimbleRM, GramotnevG, et al. Predictors of re-epithelialization in pediatric burn[J]. Burns, 2014, 40(4):751-758. DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2013.09.027.
    [33]
    PardesiO, FuzaylovG. Pain management in pediatric burn patients: review of recent literature and future directions[J]. J Burn Care Res, 2017, 38(6):335-347. DOI: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000470.
    [34]
    吴新民,薛张纲,马虹,等.右美托咪定临床应用专家共识(2018)[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2018,34(8):820-823.DOI: 10.12089/jca.2018.08.024.
    [35]
    杨智斌,沈江涌,米克德,等.右美托咪定复合瑞芬太尼在烧伤重症监护病房中清醒非插管患者换药时的应用研究[J].中华烧伤杂志,2018,34(10):707-713.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.10.011.
    [36]
    谢军明,金慧,王媛媛,等.不同剂量右美托咪定滴鼻用于后路腰椎管减压内固定术患者术前镇静效果的比较[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2020,36(1):30-34.DOI: 10.12089/jca.2020.01.007.
    [37]
    LiA, YuenVM, Goulay-DufaÿS, et al. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of intranasal and intravenous dexmedetomidine[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2018, 120(5): 960-968. DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.11.100.
    • Relative Articles
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(2)  / Tables(4)

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (2388) PDF downloads(26) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    Copyright © Chinese Journal of Burns京ICP备07035254号-14

    E-mail：shaoshangzazhi@163.com

    Website：https://zhsszz.xml-journal.net/

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return