He T,Liu W,Shen CA.Research advances on application of pancreatic stone protein in the early diagnosis of sepsis[J].Chin J Burns Wounds,2023,39(10):985-988.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20221120-00498.
Citation: Luo GX,Zhan RX,Yuan ZQ,et al.Discussion on classification and diagnostic nomenclature of burn infection[J].Chin J Burns Wounds,2023,39(4):301-304.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20221206-00528.

Discussion on classification and diagnostic nomenclature of burn infection

doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20221206-00528
More Information
  • Infection is the most common complication after burn injury and one of the leading causes of death in burn patients. Thus, how to effectively prevent the occurrence and development of infection is an important task in treating burns. Till now, there are still many controversies in the clinical definition, diagnosis, and treatment of infection, especially burn infection. The authors of this article put forward their opinions and views on this subject, hoping to deepen the readers' understanding of burn infection.

     

  • [1]
    BoehmD, MenkeH. Sepsis in burns-lessons learnt from developments in the management of septic shock[J]. Medicina (Kaunas), 2021, 58(1):26. DOI: 10.3390/medicina58010026.
    [2]
    LadhaniHA, YowlerCJ, ClaridgeJA. Burn wound colonization, infection, and sepsis[J]. Surg Infect (Larchmt), 2021,22(1):44-48. DOI: 10.1089/sur.2020.346.
    [3]
    TorresM, PetersonJM, WolfSE. Detection of infection and sepsis in burns[J]. Surg Infect (Larchmt), 2021,22(1):20-27. DOI: 10.1089/sur.2020.348.
    [4]
    KhalediM, AfkhamiH, MatouriRN, et al. Effective strategies to deal with infection in burn patient[J]. J Burn Care Res, 2022,43(4):931-935. DOI: 10.1093/jbcr/irab226.
    [5]
    BurgessM, ValderaF, VaronD, et al. The immune and regenerative response to burn injury[J]. Cells, 2022, 11(19):3073. DOI: 10.3390/cells11193073.
    [6]
    LeypoldT, SchäferB, BeierJP. Measures for preventing infection in burn surgery[J]. Surg Technol Int, 2022, 41:sti41/1604. DOI: 10.52198/22.STI.41.WH1604.
    [7]
    KumarV. Sepsis roadmap: what we know, what we learned, and where we are going[J]. Clin Immunol, 2020,210:108264. DOI: 10.1016/j.clim.2019.108264.
    [8]
    EvansL, RhodesA, AlhazzaniW, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2021,47(11):1181-1247. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y.
    [9]
    SingerM, DeutschamnCS, SeymourCW, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3)[J]. JAMA, 2016, 315(8):801-810. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
    [10]
    EgiM, OguraH, YatabeT, et al. The Japanese clinical practice guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2020 (J-SSCG 2020)[J]. Acute Med Surg, 2021, 8(1):e659. DOI: 10.1002/ams2.659.
    [11]
    郑瑞强, 张艺芬, 荣子琪, 等. 《拯救脓毒症运动:脓毒症与感染性休克治疗国际指南2021版》解读与展望[J].中华危重病急救医学,2021,33(10):1159-1164. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20211009-01442.
    [12]
    钱建丹, 李俊, 霍娜, 等. 《拯救脓毒症运动:2021年脓毒症和脓毒症休克管理国际指南》感染管理更新要点解读[J].中华传染病杂志,2022,40(7):385-391. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn311365-20211216-00445.
    [13]
    黎鳌. 脓毒症(sepsis)一词目前不宜更改[J]. 科技术语研究, 1999(3):11.
    [14]
    中华医学会重症医学分会. 成人严重感染与感染性休克血流动力学监测与支持指南[J].中华内科杂志,2007,46(4):344-349. DOI: 10.3760/j.issn:0578-1426.2007.04.035.
    [15]
    余追, 周青山. 脓毒症诊疗热点与争议[J].临床外科杂志,2011,19(3):155-157. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2011.03.006.
    [16]
    于湘友, 杜欣欣. 脓毒症:争议中前行[J].中华危重病急救医学,2019,31(10):1204-1207. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2019.10.005.
    [17]
    YanJ, HillWF, RehouS, et al. Sepsis criteria versus clinical diagnosis of sepsis in burn patients: a validation of current sepsis scores[J]. Surgery, 2018,164(6):1241-1245. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.05.053.
    [18]
    ISBI Practice Guidelines Committee, SubcommitteeSteering, SubcommitteeAdvisory. ISBI practice guidelines for burn care[J]. Burns, 2016,42(5):953-1021. DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2016.05.013.
    [19]
    GreenhalghDG, SaffleJR, 4thHolmes JH, et al. American Burn Association consensus conference to define sepsis and infection in burns[J]. J Burn Care Res, 2007,28(6):776-790. DOI: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3181599bc9.
    [20]
    彭毅志, 袁志强. 烧伤感染术语及诊断标准的商榷[J]. 中华烧伤杂志,2007,23(6): 404-405. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2007.06.002.
    [21]
    NorburyW, HerndonDN, TanksleyJ, et al. Infection in burns[J]. Surg Infect (Larchmt), 2016,17(2):250-255. DOI: 10.1089/sur.2013.134.
    [22]
    GongY, PengY, LuoX, et al. Different infection profiles and antimicrobial resistance patterns between burn ICU and common wards[J]. Front Cell Infect Microbiol, 2021,11:681731. DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.681731.
    [23]
    TuY, LineaweaverWC, BrelandA, et al. Fungal infection in burn patents: a review of 36 case reports[J]. Ann Plast Surg, 2021,86(4S Suppl 4):S463-467. DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002865.
    [24]
    LittlehalesE, TeagueR, AndrewD, et al. Mucormycosis in burns: a review[J]. J Burn Care Res, 2022,43(2):353-360. DOI: 10.1093/jbcr/irab236.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]Shi Jijing, Zhao Liang, Li Xiaoliang, Zhang Qun, Xia Chengde, Ma Chao. Analysis of the characteristics of infectious pathogens in burn patients with sepsis based on metagenomic next-generation sequencing technology[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2024, 40(10): 940-947. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20240418-00137
    [2]Huan Jingning, Zhang Lijun. Inspiration from the research advances in microcirculatory dysfunction to the treatment of burn shock and burn septic shock[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2022, 38(5): 401-407. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20220323-00082
    [3]Yao Yongming, Luan Yingyi. New understanding on the immunity for severe infections and complications in burns and trauma[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2021, 37(6): 519-523. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210118-00025
    [4]Jiang Bin, Shen Mingyan, Shen Tao. Nursing of one patient with extremely severe burn-blast combined injury complicated with acute kidney injury caused by dust explosion[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2020, 36(7): 603-605. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20190415-00188
    [5]Yao Yongming, Luan Yingyi. Precision evaluation of immune status and its significance in sepsis after burns or trauma[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2018, 34(11): 786-789. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.11.013
    [6]Liu Wei, Chai Jiake. Influences of ulinastatin on acute lung injury and time phase changes of coagulation parameters in rats with burn-blast combined injuries[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2018, 34(1): 32-39. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.01.007
    [9]Wang Yihe, Yang Hongming, Hu Quan, Hou Yusen, Luo Hongmin, Liu Lingying. Effects of sivelestat on acute lung injury in dogs with severe burn-blast combined injury Wang Yihe,[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2014, 30(2): 158-165. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2014.02.015
    [14]ZHU Pei-fang, WANG Zheng-guo. Burn-blast combined injury[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2008, 24(5): 384-386.
    [15]CHENG Tian-min, RAN Xin-ze. Studies on the treatment of combined radiation-burn injury[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2008, 24(5): 387-389.
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-042024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-03051015202530
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 8.6 %FULLTEXT: 8.6 %META: 73.4 %META: 73.4 %PDF: 18.0 %PDF: 18.0 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 6.0 %其他: 6.0 %其他: 0.4 %其他: 0.4 %Central District: 0.1 %Central District: 0.1 %上海: 3.9 %上海: 3.9 %东莞: 0.3 %东莞: 0.3 %临沂: 0.1 %临沂: 0.1 %丽水: 0.4 %丽水: 0.4 %乌鲁木齐: 0.1 %乌鲁木齐: 0.1 %佛山: 0.6 %佛山: 0.6 %俄亥俄州: 0.1 %俄亥俄州: 0.1 %兰州: 1.0 %兰州: 1.0 %凉山: 0.3 %凉山: 0.3 %包头: 0.1 %包头: 0.1 %北京: 2.9 %北京: 2.9 %十堰: 0.1 %十堰: 0.1 %南京: 1.2 %南京: 1.2 %南宁: 0.1 %南宁: 0.1 %南昌: 1.3 %南昌: 1.3 %南阳: 0.4 %南阳: 0.4 %台州: 0.3 %台州: 0.3 %合肥: 0.3 %合肥: 0.3 %呼和浩特: 0.7 %呼和浩特: 0.7 %咸阳: 0.1 %咸阳: 0.1 %哈尔滨: 1.2 %哈尔滨: 1.2 %哥伦布: 0.1 %哥伦布: 0.1 %嘉兴: 0.1 %嘉兴: 0.1 %太原: 0.9 %太原: 0.9 %宁波: 1.0 %宁波: 1.0 %宿州: 0.3 %宿州: 0.3 %广州: 2.0 %广州: 2.0 %张家口: 0.4 %张家口: 0.4 %成都: 1.3 %成都: 1.3 %扬州: 0.9 %扬州: 0.9 %新乡: 0.1 %新乡: 0.1 %昆明: 7.9 %昆明: 7.9 %普赖恩维尔: 0.4 %普赖恩维尔: 0.4 %朝阳: 0.1 %朝阳: 0.1 %杭州: 1.6 %杭州: 1.6 %枣庄: 0.3 %枣庄: 0.3 %柳州: 1.2 %柳州: 1.2 %梧州: 0.3 %梧州: 0.3 %武汉: 1.6 %武汉: 1.6 %沃思堡: 0.9 %沃思堡: 0.9 %泉州: 0.1 %泉州: 0.1 %泰州: 0.3 %泰州: 0.3 %济南: 0.9 %济南: 0.9 %济源: 0.1 %济源: 0.1 %海得拉巴: 0.4 %海得拉巴: 0.4 %深圳: 0.3 %深圳: 0.3 %温州: 0.3 %温州: 0.3 %漯河: 1.3 %漯河: 1.3 %潍坊: 0.1 %潍坊: 0.1 %烟台: 0.1 %烟台: 0.1 %珠海: 0.1 %珠海: 0.1 %石家庄: 2.5 %石家庄: 2.5 %自贡: 0.1 %自贡: 0.1 %芒廷维尤: 12.4 %芒廷维尤: 12.4 %芝加哥: 0.6 %芝加哥: 0.6 %苏州: 1.2 %苏州: 1.2 %荆州: 0.1 %荆州: 0.1 %莆田: 0.3 %莆田: 0.3 %菏泽: 0.1 %菏泽: 0.1 %葫芦岛: 0.7 %葫芦岛: 0.7 %衡水: 1.0 %衡水: 1.0 %衡阳: 0.4 %衡阳: 0.4 %襄阳: 0.6 %襄阳: 0.6 %西宁: 5.5 %西宁: 5.5 %西安: 1.5 %西安: 1.5 %贵阳: 0.3 %贵阳: 0.3 %运城: 0.4 %运城: 0.4 %通辽: 0.3 %通辽: 0.3 %邯郸: 0.3 %邯郸: 0.3 %邵阳: 0.3 %邵阳: 0.3 %郑州: 1.5 %郑州: 1.5 %重庆: 15.3 %重庆: 15.3 %铁岭: 0.3 %铁岭: 0.3 %银川: 0.1 %银川: 0.1 %长春: 0.1 %长春: 0.1 %长沙: 2.0 %长沙: 2.0 %长治: 0.3 %长治: 0.3 %阿克苏: 0.1 %阿克苏: 0.1 %随州: 0.4 %随州: 0.4 %青岛: 1.2 %青岛: 1.2 %香港: 0.4 %香港: 0.4 %驻马店: 0.6 %驻马店: 0.6 %鹤壁: 0.3 %鹤壁: 0.3 %黄冈: 0.1 %黄冈: 0.1 %其他其他Central District上海东莞临沂丽水乌鲁木齐佛山俄亥俄州兰州凉山包头北京十堰南京南宁南昌南阳台州合肥呼和浩特咸阳哈尔滨哥伦布嘉兴太原宁波宿州广州张家口成都扬州新乡昆明普赖恩维尔朝阳杭州枣庄柳州梧州武汉沃思堡泉州泰州济南济源海得拉巴深圳温州漯河潍坊烟台珠海石家庄自贡芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州荆州莆田菏泽葫芦岛衡水衡阳襄阳西宁西安贵阳运城通辽邯郸邵阳郑州重庆铁岭银川长春长沙长治阿克苏随州青岛香港驻马店鹤壁黄冈

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(1)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (502) PDF downloads(123) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return