Email Alerts
RSS
Volume 39 Issue 8
Aug.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Article Navigation >  CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS  > 2023  >  39(8): 738-745
Li Q,Ba T,Cao SJ,et al.Establishment and validation of a risk prediction model for disseminated intravascular coagulation patients with electrical burns[J].Chin J Burns Wounds,2023,39(8):738-745.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20230419-00132.
Citation: Li Q,Ba T,Cao SJ,et al.Establishment and validation of a risk prediction model for disseminated intravascular coagulation patients with electrical burns[J].Chin J Burns Wounds,2023,39(8):738-745.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20230419-00132.
shu

Establishment and validation of a risk prediction model for disseminated intravascular coagulation patients with electrical burns

doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20230419-00132

  • Department of Burn Surgery, Baogang Hospital of Inner Mongolia, Burn Medical Institute of Inner Mongolia, Baotou 014010, China

Funds:

Inner Mongolia Natural Science Foundation 2021MS08066, 2020MS03022

Major Disease Prevention and Control Technology Action Plan 2018-ZX-01S-001

Scientific and Research Project of Metallurgical Safety and Health Branch of the Chinese Society for Metals JKWS201832, JKWS202033

More Information
    Abstract
  •   Objective   To establish and validate a risk prediction model of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) by the screening independent risk factors for the occurrence of DIC in patients with electrical burns.   Methods   The retrospective case series study was conducted. The clinical data of 218 electrical burn patients admitted to Baogang Hospital of Inner Mongolia from January 2015 to January 2023 who met the inclusion criteria were collected, including 198 males and 20 females, with the age of (38±14) years. The patients were divided into DIC group and non DIC group based on whether they were diagnosed with DIC during the treatment period. The following data of patients of two groups were collected and compared, including age, gender, total burn area, full-thickness burn area, injury voltage, whether osteofascial compartment syndrome occurred within 1 day after injury, duration of stay in burn intensive care unit, total length of hospital stay, whether combined with inhalation injury and multiple injuries, whether shock occurred upon admission, the abbreviated burn severity index score, and the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ score. The laboratory examination data of the patients within 24 hours after admission were also collected, including blood routine indexes: white blood cell count (WBC), hemoglobin level, platelet count (PLT), and neutrophil count; coagulation indexes: activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), prothrombin time, thrombin time, and levels of D-dimer and fibrinogen (FIB); blood biochemistry indexes: aspartic transaminase, alanine transaminase, direct bilirubin, total bilirubin, total protein, albumin, blood glucose, creatinine, and urea nitrogen; blood gas analysis indexes: blood pH value, arterial partial pressure of oxygen, arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide, bicarbonate, and base excess; and cardiac zymogram indexes: levels of myoglobin, troponin, lactate dehydrogenase, creatine kinase (CK), and α-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase. Data were statistically analyzed with chi-square test, Fisher's exact probability test, independent sample t test, and Mann-Whitney U test. For the variables with statistically significant differences in single factor analysis, the least absolute value selection and shrinkage operator (LASSO) regression was used to reduce the dimension, and the predictive factors for DIC in 218 patients with electrical burns were screened. The above-mentioned predictors were included in multivariate logistic regression analysis to find out the independent risk factors for DIC in 218 patients with electrical burns, and to draw the prediction model nomograms. The performance of the prediction model was evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the area under the ROC curve, and the prediction model was validated by the calibration curve and clinical decision curve analysis (DCA).   Results   Compared with those in non DIC group, the total burn area, full-thickness burn area, total length of hospital stay, and the proportions of high voltage caused injury, occurrence of osteofascial compartment syndrome within 1 day after injury, combination of inhalation injury, and occurrence of shock upon admission of patients in DIC group were significantly increased/prolonged (with Z values of -2.53, -4.65, and -2.10, respectively, with χ 2 values of 11.46, 16.00, 7.98, and 18.93, respectively, P<0.05). Compared with those in non DIC group, the APTT, level of D-dimer, myoglobin, WBC, PLT, and levels of FIB, total bilirubin, and CK of patients within 24 hours after admission in DIC group were significantly prolonged/increased (with Z values of -2.02, -4.51, and -3.82, respectively, with t values of -3.84, -2.34, -2.77, -2.70, and -2.61, respectively), and the level of total protein and blood pH value were significantly reduced ( t=-2.85, Z=-2.03), P<0.05. LASSO regression analysis was carried out for the above 17 indicators with statistically significant differences. The results showed that injury voltage, the occurrence of shock upon admission, the occurrence of osteofascial compartment syndrome within 1 day after injury, and levels of D-dimer and total protein within 24 hours after admission were predictive factors for the occurrence of DIC in 218 patients with electrical burns (with regression coefficients of 0.24, 0.52, 0.35, 0.13, and -0.001, respectively). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that injury voltage, the occurrence of shock upon admission, the occurrence of osteofascial compartment syndrome within 1 day after injury, and D-dimer level within 24 hours after admission were independent risk factors for DIC in 218 patients with electrical burns (with odds ratios of 3.33, 4.24, 2.68, and 1.38, respectively, with 95% confidence intervals of 1.43-7.79, 1.78-10.07, 1.17-6.13, and 1.19-1.61, respectively, P<0.05). Based on the aforementioned four independent risk factors, the nomogram of prediction model for evaluating the probability of DIC in patients was drawn. The area under the ROC curve of prediction model was 0.88, and the 95% confidence interval was 0.82-0.95, indicating that the model had good predictive ability; the curve of prediction model tended to be near the ideal curve, indicating that the model had a high calibration degree; the clinical DCA of prediction model showed that the threshold probability of patients ranged from 4% to 97%, indicating that the model had good predictive ability.   Conclusions   The injury voltage, the occurrence of shock upon admission, the occurrence of osteofascial compartment syndrome within 1 day after injury, and D-dimer level within 24 hours after admission are independent risk factors for the occurrence of DIC in patients with electrical burns. The prediction model established based on the above indicators can provide early warning for the occurrence of DIC in these patients.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
  • loading
    • References(28)
  • [1]
    姚桂爱, 张晨美, 潜丽俊, 等. 血栓弹力图对脓毒性休克患儿发生弥散性血管内凝血早期的预测价值[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2022,31(12):1662-1665.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2022.12.016.
    [2]
    IbaT, LeviM, ThachilJ, et al. Disseminated intravascular coagulation: the past, present, and future considerations[J]. Semin Thromb Hemost, 2022,48(8):978-987. DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1756300.
    [3]
    张万福, 徐婧, 胡晓龙, 等. 背阔肌肌瓣在电烧伤后肩周肌力重建中的临床应用效果[J].中华烧伤杂志,2021,37(7):622-628. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210329-00107.
    [4]
    ScharfC, LiebchenU, PaalM, et al. Blood purification with a cytokine adsorber for the elimination of myoglobin in critically ill patients with severe rhabdomyolysis[J]. Crit Care, 2021,25(1):41. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-021-03468-x.
    [5]
    LiQ, BaT, WangLF, et al. Stratification of venous thromboembolism risk in burn patients by Caprini score[J]. Burns, 2019,45(1):140-145. DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2018.08.006.
    [6]
    ZhangTN, BaT, LiF, et al. Coagulation dysfunction of severe burn patients: a potential cause of death[J]. Burns, 2023,49(3):678-687. DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2022.05.003.
    [7]
    BartelsP, ThammOC, ElrodJ, et al. The ABSI is dead, long live the ABSI-reliable prediction of survival in burns with a modified Abbreviated Burn Severity Index[J]. Burns, 2020,46(6):1272-1279. DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2020.05.003.
    [8]
    马晓媛, 肖雅, 陈涛, 等. 解剖学评分联合生理学评分对严重创伤患者并发多器官功能障碍综合征的预测价值[J].中华烧伤杂志,2016,32(2):105-108. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2016.02.009.
    [9]
    中华医学会血液学分会血栓与止血学组. 弥散性血管内凝血诊断与治疗中国专家共识(2012年版)[J].中华血液学杂志,2012,33(11):978-979. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2012.11.022.
    [10]
    中华医学会血液学分会血栓与止血学组. 弥散性血管内凝血诊断中国专家共识(2017年版)[J].中华血液学杂志,2017,38(5):361-363. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2017.05.001.
    [11]
    魏在荣, 杨成兰, 蒋玲丽. 深度电烧伤创面的皮瓣修复[J/CD].中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版),2022,17(2):100-105. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2022.02.002.
    [12]
    中国老年医学学会烧创伤分会. 烧伤休克防治全国专家共识(2020版)[J].中华烧伤杂志,2020,36(9):786-792. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200623-00323.
    [13]
    中华医学会骨科学分会外固定与肢体重建学组, 中国医师协会创伤外科医师分会创伤感染专业委员会, 中国医师协会骨科医师分会创伤专家工作委员会. 中国急性骨筋膜室综合征早期诊断与治疗指南(2020版)[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2020,22(8):645-654. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115530-20200715-00467.
    [14]
    LiQ, WangLF, ChenQ, et al. Amputations in the burn unit: a retrospective analysis of 82 patients across 12 years[J]. Burns, 2017,43(7):1449-1454. DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2017.04.005.
    [15]
    任海涛, 陈华清, 韩春茂. 危重烧伤患者发生急性呼吸窘迫综合征预测模型的建立及其预测价值分析[J].中华烧伤杂志,2021,37(4):333-339. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200301-00109.
    [16]
    秦瑶, 韩红娟, 陈杜荣, 等. 基于LASSO logistic回归模型的轻度认知障碍逆转预测模型[J].中国卫生统计,2022,39(5):653-658. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-3674.2022.05.003.
    [17]
    奚丽婧, 郭昭艳, 杨雪珂, 等. LASSO及其拓展方法在回归分析变量筛选中的应用[J].中华预防医学杂志,2023,57(1):107-111. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20220117-00063.
    [18]
    GianolaD, FernandoRL. A multiple-trait Bayesian LASSO for genome-enabled analysis and prediction of complex traits[J]. Genetics, 2020,214(2):305-331. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.119.302934.
    [19]
    马琪敏, 刘晓彬, 伍国胜, 等. 特重度成年烧伤患者休克期凝血特征及其预警价值的回顾性队列研究[J].中华烧伤杂志,2021,37(2):150-156. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200907-00402.
    [20]
    GuilabertP, MartinN, UsúaG, et al. Coagulation alterations in major burn patients: a narrative review[J]. J Burn Care Res, 2023,44(2):280-292. DOI: 10.1093/jbcr/irac177.
    [21]
    吕广平, 陶白江, 曾丁, 等. 中大面积烧伤患者术后低体温的防治[J/CD].中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版),2020,15(4):308-311. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2020.04.015.
    [22]
    VaghardoostR, SaraeeA, GhavamiY, et al. Evaluation of electrical burn injuries in Iran: a 7-year retrospective study[J]. J Burn Care Res, 2022,43(1):104-108. DOI: 10.1093/jbcr/irab070.
    [23]
    StahlK, RastelliE, SchoserB. A systematic review on the definition of rhabdomyolysis[J]. J Neurol, 2020,267(4):877-882. DOI: 10.1007/s00415-019-09185-4.
    [24]
    LiQ, ZhangT, WangL, et al. Clinical significance of R-TEG in severe burn patients with coagulation dysfunction[J]. Injury, 2022,53(12):3993-3999. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.09.061.
    [25]
    MaegeleM, SchöchlH, MenovskyT, et al. Coagulopathy and haemorrhagic progression in traumatic brain injury: advances in mechanisms, diagnosis, and management[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2017,16(8):630-647. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30197-7.
    [26]
    Van HarenRM, ThorsonCM, ValleEJ, et al. Hypercoagulability after burn injury[J]. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2013,75(1):37-43; discussion 43. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182984911.
    [27]
    张伟, 刘宝辉, 夏成德, 等. D-二聚体对成年烧伤患者下肢深静脉血栓形成的预测价值[J].中华烧伤与创面修复杂志,2022,38(4):335-340. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20201021-00444.
    [28]
    汪文君, 程燕. D-二聚体联合血栓弹力图对重症肺炎患者弥散性血管内凝血前状态的诊断价值及临床意义[J].中国急救复苏与灾害医学杂志,2023,18(1):59-63. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-6966.2023.01.015.
    • Relative Articles
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(4)  / Tables(2)

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (799) PDF downloads(35) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    Copyright © Chinese Journal of Burns京ICP备07035254号-14

    E-mail：shaoshangzazhi@163.com

    Website：https://zhsszz.xml-journal.net/

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return