Cheng Lin, Du Weili, Zhang Ying, et al. Staged repair strategy for chronic sacrococcygeal radiation ulcer[J]. Chin j Burns, 2021, 37(3): 225-231. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210104-00003
Citation: Zhang MS,Huang L,Zhu H,et al.Prospective randomized controlled trial on the application of sevoflurane inhalation sedation and analgesia during dressing changes in children with extensive burns[J].Chin J Burns Wounds,2023,39(11):1014-1020.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20230731-00027.

Prospective randomized controlled trial on the application of sevoflurane inhalation sedation and analgesia during dressing changes in children with extensive burns

doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20230731-00027
Funds:

Health Research Fund of Kunming Municipal Health Commission 2022-04-03-001

More Information
  • Corresponding author: Fu Jinfeng, Email: fujinfeng@etyy.cn
  • Received Date: 2023-07-31
  •   Objective   To explore the safety and effectiveness of the application of sevoflurane inhalation sedation and analgesia during dressing changes in children with extensive burns.   Methods   A prospective randomized controlled research was conducted. From March 2020 to January 2023, 216 children with extensive burns who met the inclusion criteria were admitted to the Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery of Kunming Children's Hospital. According to the random number table, the children were divided into sevoflurane group and ibuprofen group, with 103 cases left in sevoflurane group (67 males and 36 females, aged 1 (1, 2) years), and 98 cases left in ibuprofen group (67 males and 31 females, aged 1 (1, 2) years) after the exclusion of several dropped-out children. Children in sevoflurane group received sevoflurane inhalation for sedation and analgesia during dressing changes, while those in ibuprofen group took oral ibuprofen for analgesia before dressing changes. The heart rate, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and percutaneous arterial oxygen saturation (SpO 2) of the children were monitored and recorded at 30 minutes before the start of dressing changes, immediately after debridement, and at 30 minutes after the completion of dressing changes. The face, legs, activity, cry, and consolability scale and Ramsay sedation scale were used to evaluate the pain intensity and degree of sedation, respectively, at 30 minutes before the start of dressing changes, immediately after debridement, and at 30 minutes after the completion of dressing changes. The duration of dressing changes and the total number of dressing changes during hospitalization were recorded. The Houston Pain Outcome Instrument questionnaire was used to assess the satisfaction of the dressing-changing surgeons and a family member of the child with the analgesic effects during the process of dressing change when the children were discharged from the hospital. The occurrence of adverse reactions such as respiratory depression and hypoxemia that occurred during the process of dressing change were monitored and recorded. Data were statistically analyzed with independent sample t test, analysis of variance for repeated measurement, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, chi-square test, and Fisher's exact probability test.   Results   At 30 minutes before the start of dressing changes and 30 minutes after the completion of dressing changes, there were no statistically significant differences in heart rate, MAP, and SpO 2 between children in the two groups ( P>0.05). Immediately after debridement, compared with those in ibuprofen group, the heart rate and MAP of children in sevoflurane group were significantly decreased (with t values of 8.10 and 4.37, respectively, P<0.05), while the SpO 2 was significantly increased ( t=21.77, P<0.05). At 30 minutes before the start of dressing changes and 30 minutes after the completion of dressing changes, there were no statistically significant differences in the score of pain intensity and score of sedation degree between children in the two groups ( P>0.05). Immediately after debridement, compared with that in ibuprofen group, the score of pain intensity of children in sevoflurane group was significantly decreased, while the score of sedation degree was significantly increased (with t values of 42.87 and 72.45, respectively, P<0.05). The duration of dressing changes and the total number of dressing changes during hospitalization of patients in sevoflurane group were (18±3) min and (4.1±1.0) times, respectively, which were both significantly shorter than (26±7) min and less than (6.6±1.4) times in ibuprofen group, respectively (with t values of -4.44 and 14.17, respectively, P<0.05). Upon discharge, the satisfaction scores of dressing-changing surgeons and the family members of children with the analgesic effects during the process of dressing change in sevoflurane group were significantly higher than those in ibuprofen group (with t values of 44.23 and 36.55, respectively, P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of respiratory depression, hypoxemia, hypotension, coughing, nausea, and vomiting during the process of dressing change between children in the two groups ( P>0.05).   Conclusions   Application of sevoflurane inhalation during dressing changes in children with extensive burns can safely and effectively control pain and sedation, shorten the time for dressing change, with fewer adverse reactions. This method can be used for routine dressing change in pediatric burn wards.

     

  • [1]
    张成,彭源,罗小强,等.3 067例住院烧伤患儿流行病学调查及其感染的病原学特征分析[J].中华烧伤杂志,2021,37(6):538-545.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210201-00044.
    [2]
    吴巍巍,路英慧,程丹,等.烧伤患儿的疼痛评估及非药物干预研究进展[J].中华烧伤杂志,2020,36(1):76-80.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2020.01.015.
    [3]
    方艳丽,赵敏,潘桂芹.七氟醚潮气量法吸入用于小儿全身麻醉诱导的效果观察[J].中国实用医刊,2021,48(14):53-56.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115689-20210331-01230.
    [4]
    冯华丽,王莎,项芹,等.烧伤患儿创面换药时中深度镇静的研究进展[J].中华烧伤与创面修复杂志,2023,39(1):96-100.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20220421-00153.
    [5]
    De Sanctis BriggsV. Magnetic resonance imaging under sedation in newborns and infants: a study of 640 cases using sevoflurane[J]. Paediatr Anaesth, 2005, 15(1): 9-15.DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2005.01360.x.
    [6]
    中华医学会儿科学分会急救学组,中华医学会急诊医学分会儿科学组,中国医师协会儿童重症医师分会.中国儿童重症监护病房镇痛和镇静治疗专家共识(2018版)[J].中华儿科杂志,2019,57(5):324-330.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1310.2019.05.002.
    [7]
    何冠凤,何珊,左泽兰.重症监护室儿童镇静评估的研究进展[J].中国小儿急救医学,2022,29(1):60-64.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4912.2022.01.012.
    [8]
    黄志华,邵海军,陶国荣,等.舒芬太尼联合地佐辛应用于胰腺肿瘤手术后患者自控静脉镇痛的效果评价[J].上海医学,2023,46(5):291-296.DOI: 10.19842/j.cnki.issn.0253-9934.2023.05.007.
    [9]
    黄娅娟,高国燕,刘训华,等.丙泊酚复合瑞芬太尼自控镇静镇痛在烧伤换药中的应用观察[J].中华烧伤杂志,2014,30(6):525-529.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2014.06.014.
    [10]
    AnwarK.Pathophysiology of pain[J].Dis Mon,2016,62(9):324-329.DOI: 10.1016/j.disamonth.2016.05.015.
    [11]
    吴巍巍,刘淑梅,贺婷婷,等.虚拟现实技术在烧伤疼痛干预中的研究进展[J].中华烧伤杂志,2020,36(7):620-622.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20190402-00159.
    [12]
    ISBI Practice Guidelines Committee, SubcommitteeAdvisory, SubcommitteeSteering. ISBI practice guidelines for burn care, part 2[J]. Burns, 2018, 44(7): 1617-1706. DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2018.09.012.
    [13]
    刘配配,郑吉建,白洁,等.采用灌注指数监测小儿全身麻醉期间伤害性刺激反应的临床观察[J].上海交通大学学报(医学版),2018,38(1):67-70.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2018.01.012.
    [14]
    方静.七氟烷在新生儿麻醉诱导和中深度镇静中应用研究进展[J].现代医药卫生,2022,38(20):3512-3516.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5519.2022.20.021.
    [15]
    张广源, 索生红, 杨森林.布洛芬用于儿童和青少年骨折镇痛的效果和安全性:系统评价和Meta分析[J].国际麻醉学与复苏杂志, 2018,39(7): 650-657.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4378.2018.07.009.
    [16]
    ShuklaA,ChowdharyV.Neurodevelopmental outcome at 5 years of age after general anaesthesia or awake-regional anaesthesia in infancy (GAS): an international, multicentre, randomised, controlled equivalence trial[J].Acta Paediatr,2019,108(11):2115-2116.DOI: 10.1111/apa.14943.
    [17]
    WarnerDO, ZaccarielloMJ, KatusicSK, et al. Neuropsychological and behavioral outcomes after exposure of young children to procedures requiring general anesthesia: the Mayo Anesthesia Safety in Kids (MASK) study[J]. Anesthesiology, 2018, 129(1): 89-105. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002232.
    [18]
    MillerTL, ParkR, SunLS. Report on the Fifth PANDA Symposium on "Anesthesia and Neurodevelopment in Children"[J]. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol, 2016, 28(4): 350-355. DOI: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000346.
    [19]
    强婷婷,张丽,胡宪文.七氟醚对发育期大脑认知功能的影响及其机制研究进展[J].国际麻醉学与复苏杂志,2022,43(6):664-668.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn321761-20210531-00577.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]Li Jun, Liu Mengdong, Zhu Liang, Luo Yuming, Yang Qiying, Gao Xiaowen, Han Juntao. Clinical effect of unilateral superior gluteal artery perforator propeller flap combined with contralateral centripetal advancement flap in repairing huge pressure ulcers in the sacrococcygeal region[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2024, 40(6): 551-556. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20231031-00158
    [2]Qi Jianwu, Chen Shao, Sun Binhong, Chai Yitong, Huang Jian, Li Yi, Yang Keyue, Sun Heyang, Chen Hong. Clinical effects of free latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap combined with artificial dermis and split-thickness skin graft in the treatment of degloving injury in lower extremity[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2022, 38(4): 347-353. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210421-00145
    [3]Li Gang, Zhang Zhi, Li Yeyang, Wang Jinlun. Clinical effects of flaps with cervical cutaneous branch of transverse cervical artery in repairing neck radiation ulcers[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2021, 37(12): 1116-1121. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200807-00371
    [4]Chen Liming, Xu Liwei, Liu Yi, Wang Gang. Effects of free perforator propeller flap from buttock in repairing deep wound of buttock[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2020, 36(2): 106-109. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2020.02.005
    [5]Ma Chao, Tao Ran, Shu Jun, Lei Yonghong, Han Yan. Methods of repairing large soft tissue defect with latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap and management of secondary wound in donor site[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2020, 36(12): 1199-1203. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20191121-00439
    [6]Sun Jialin, Guo Pengfei, Cui Zhengjun, Meng Qingnan, Wei Aizhou, Zhou Jian. Clinical effects of superior gluteal artery perforator " buddy flap" in repairing pressure ulcer in sacrococcygeal region[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2020, 36(8): 726-729. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20190607-00265
    [7]Shi Chenshuo, Tang Xiujun, Wang Dali, Wei Zairong, Wang Bo, Wu Bihua, Liu Zhiyuan. Clinical effects of superior gluteal artery perforator island flap in repair of sacral pressure ulcer[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2019, 35(5): 367-370. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2019.05.008
    [10]Ning Fanggang, Qin Fengjun, Chen Xin, Zhang Guoan. Repair of cervical postradiation ulcer following radical mastectomy with lower trapezius myocutaneous flap[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2015, 31(6): 421-423. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2015.06.006
    [14]LI Yong-lin, XIAO Hai-tao, QI Qiang, ZHOU Zhao-ping, OKA Hiroaki, MORIGUCHI Takahaki. Clinical efficacy of artery pedorator-based flap in the repair of gluteal-sacral pressure sores[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2007, 23(1): 32-35.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(11)

    1. 李莉莉,于文昌,李波,吴德勇,王进勇,邹晓辉,汪明柱,徐向荣. 脊柱内固定术后患者难愈性创面的修复方法及其效果. 中华烧伤与创面修复杂志. 2024(06): 529-535 . 本站查看
    2. 沈余明,胡云刚. 慢性放射性溃疡的诊疗策略. 中华烧伤与创面修复杂志. 2024(06): 501-506 . 本站查看
    3. 杜伟力,沈余明,程琳,代强,车可心. 乳腺癌根治术后胸部放射性溃疡的修复策略及其临床效果. 中华烧伤与创面修复杂志. 2024(06): 521-528 . 本站查看
    4. 中国老年医学学会烧创伤分会,中华医学会组织修复与再生分会,中国康复医学会再生医学与康复专业委员会,中国抗癌协会肿瘤整形外科专业委员会,《中华烧伤与创面修复杂志》编辑委员会. 放射性皮肤损伤的诊断和治疗专家共识(2024版). 中华烧伤与创面修复杂志. 2024(08): 701-712 . 本站查看
    5. 官世水,沈佳祚,张力,林建聪. 臀下动脉股后复合组织瓣修复骶尾部巨大压力性创面. 局解手术学杂志. 2024(09): 800-804 .
    6. 王思思,肖逵,李罡,陈宾,张志,李孝建. Flexi-Seal粪便管理系统联合负压封闭引流技术辅助皮瓣修复会阴部放射性溃疡一例. 中国临床新医学. 2023(07): 739-741 .
    7. 牧晶,宋增丽,代红雨,王志敏,叶建州. 中药内外合治子宫内膜癌术后放射性窦道一例. 环球中医药. 2022(10): 1714-1716 .
    8. 吴德金,赵遵江,张保德,章荣涛,王修坤,刘勇. 封闭负压引流联合脱细胞真皮和自体刃厚皮移植治疗足踝部创面30例. 感染、炎症、修复. 2022(03): 145-147+193 .
    9. 刘毅. 重视医源性创面的防治. 中华烧伤杂志. 2021(03): 213-215 .
    10. 肖敏,朱媛,张伟旭. 游离股前外侧皮瓣修复头部严重放射性溃疡1例. 山东大学学报(医学版). 2021(08): 122-124 .
    11. 郑梁,杨帆,徐风瑞,李江华,赵坤,吴桐,杨银辉. 4T原则在修复难愈性压疮中的临床应用. 中国美容整形外科杂志. 2021(10): 610-612+616 .

    Other cited types(1)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0305101520
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 16.0 %FULLTEXT: 16.0 %META: 76.5 %META: 76.5 %PDF: 7.5 %PDF: 7.5 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 0.9 %其他: 0.9 %Sandy Hook: 1.4 %Sandy Hook: 1.4 %五指山: 1.9 %五指山: 1.9 %伦敦: 1.9 %伦敦: 1.9 %儋州: 0.9 %儋州: 0.9 %北京: 1.4 %北京: 1.4 %北方邦: 0.5 %北方邦: 0.5 %哥伦布: 0.9 %哥伦布: 0.9 %唐山: 0.9 %唐山: 0.9 %商丘: 0.5 %商丘: 0.5 %天津: 0.9 %天津: 0.9 %常州: 1.9 %常州: 1.9 %张家口: 7.5 %张家口: 7.5 %昆明: 1.4 %昆明: 1.4 %法尔肯施泰因: 2.8 %法尔肯施泰因: 2.8 %洛阳: 0.5 %洛阳: 0.5 %湖州: 1.9 %湖州: 1.9 %芒廷维尤: 60.6 %芒廷维尤: 60.6 %荆州: 0.5 %荆州: 0.5 %西宁: 8.0 %西宁: 8.0 %运城: 0.5 %运城: 0.5 %重庆: 0.9 %重庆: 0.9 %长沙: 0.5 %长沙: 0.5 %青岛: 0.5 %青岛: 0.5 %黄冈: 0.5 %黄冈: 0.5 %其他Sandy Hook五指山伦敦儋州北京北方邦哥伦布唐山商丘天津常州张家口昆明法尔肯施泰因洛阳湖州芒廷维尤荆州西宁运城重庆长沙青岛黄冈

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(1)  / Tables(5)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (605) PDF downloads(30) Cited by(12)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return