The consensus writing panel of the expert consensus on the clinical application of narrow-band intense pulsed light (2024 edition).Expert consensus on the clinical application of narrow-band intense pulsed light (2024 edition)[J].Chin J Burns Wounds,2024,40(1):19-25.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20230918-00085.
Citation: The consensus writing panel of the expert consensus on the clinical application of narrow-band intense pulsed light (2024 edition).Expert consensus on the clinical application of narrow-band intense pulsed light (2024 edition)[J].Chin J Burns Wounds,2024,40(1):19-25.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20230918-00085.

Expert consensus on the clinical application of narrow-band intense pulsed light (2024 edition)

doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20230918-00085
  • Received Date: 2023-09-18
  • The continuous innovation of medical cosmetology technology promotes the rapid development of aesthetic medicine. Narrow-band intense pulsed light (NB-IPL), which is developed based on conventional intense pulsed light, is a more accurate, efficient, and safer technique on clinical application. In order to promote more professionalization and standardization of the clinical application of NB-IPL, a panel of clinical experts in plastic surgery, dermatology and other fields developed the consensus based on the evidence-based medicine, clinical practice, and authoritative guidelines of other disciplines. The consensus panel discussed the indications, treatment parameters, contraindications, and precautions for the clinical application of NB-IPL and would serve as a reference for clinicians, nurses, teaching and research personnels engaged in plastic and cosmetics related work.

     

  • Yao Min, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China, Email: my058@vip.sina.com
  • [1]
    SalesA, PandolfoIL, de Almeida CruzM, et al. Intense Pulsed Light on skin rejuvenation: a systematic review[J]. Arch Dermatol Res, 2022,314(9):823-838. DOI: 10.1007/s00403-021-02283-2.
    [2]
    中国医师协会皮肤科医师分会皮肤激光与理疗亚专业委员会. 强脉冲光临床应用专家共识(2017)[J].中华皮肤科杂志,2017,50(10):701-705. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4030.2017.10.001.
    [3]
    杨翠霞, 侯文婕, 杨帅, 等. 窄谱强脉冲光治疗面部毛细血管扩张症疗效评价[J].中国美容医学,2014,23(9):745-747.
    [4]
    王岚, 迟国庆, 李承新, 等. 短波理疗仪联合精准强脉冲光修复面部敏感性皮肤的疗效观察[J].实用皮肤病学杂志,2019,12(2):71-74. DOI: 10.11786/sypfbxzz.1674-1293.20190203.
    [5]
    蒋亚楠, 赵德梅, 高宇, 等. 窄谱强脉冲光治疗早期颜面部创伤性瘢痕的疗效评价[J].中国美容医学,2021,30(5):35-37.
    [6]
    张亚茹.窄谱强脉冲光超光子滑动模式在面部浅表色素性疾病治疗中的临床应用[J].中国激光医学杂志,2021,30(1):39.
    [7]
    张嘉文, 刘子菁, 王小燕, 等. 玫瑰痤疮的光电治疗研究进展[J].中国美容医学,2019,28(5):159-162.
    [8]
    MoyWJ, YakelJD, OsorioOC, et al. Targeted narrowband intense pulsed light on cutaneous vasculature[J]. Lasers Surg Med, 2015,47(8):651-657. DOI: 10.1002/lsm.22393.
    [9]
    KnightJM. Combined 400-600nm and 800-1200nm intense pulsed phototherapy of facial acne vulgaris[J]. J Drugs Dermatol, 2019,18(11):1116-1122.
    [10]
    LeeY, JangJH, NamS, et al. Investigation of prognostic factors for intense pulsed light treatment with a vascular filter in patients with moderate or severe meibomian gland dysfunction[J]. J Clin Med, 2022,11(16):4724. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11164724.
    [11]
    SeagoM, ShumakerPR, SpringLK, et al. Laser treatment of traumatic scars and contractures: 2020 international consensus recommendations[J]. Lasers Surg Med, 2020, 52(2):96-116. DOI: 10.1002/lsm.23201.
    [12]
    BitterP.Intense pulsed light: where we are now?[J].Dermatological Reviews, 2021, 2:60-68.DOI: 10.1002/der2.63.
    [13]
    RaulinC, HellwigS, SchönermarkMP. Treatment of a nonresponding port-wine stain with a new pulsed light source (PhotoDerm VL)[J]. Lasers Surg Med, 1997,21(2):203-208. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9101(1997)21:2<203::aid-lsm13>3.0.co;2-f.
    [14]
    FodorL, RamonY, FodorA, et al. A side-by-side prospective study of intense pulsed light and Nd:YAG laser treatment for vascular lesions[J]. Ann Plast Surg, 2006,56(2):164-170. DOI: 10.1097/01.sap.0000196579.14954.d6.
    [15]
    TanghettiEA. Split-face randomized treatment of facial telangiectasia comparing pulsed dye laser and an intense pulsed light handpiece[J]. Lasers Surg Med, 2012,44(2):97-102. DOI: 10.1002/lsm.21151.
    [16]
    PetersonJD, FriedmannDP, AbdoK, et al. Efficacy and safety of intense pulsed light with a KTP/PDLlike filter for the treatment of facial telangiectasias[J]. J Drugs Dermatol, 2020,19(9):844-850. DOI: 10.36849/JDD.2020.10.36849/JDD.2020.4834.
    [17]
    GardenBC, GardenJM, GoldbergDJ. Light-based devices in the treatment of cutaneous vascular lesions: an updated review[J]. J Cosmet Dermatol, 2017,16(3):296-302. DOI: 10.1111/jocd.12370.
    [18]
    BennardoL, PatrunoC, ZappiaE, et al. Combination of specific vascular lasers and vascular intense pulsed light improves facial telangiectasias and redness[J]. Medicina (Kaunas), 2022, 58(5):651.DOI: 10.3390/medicina58050651.
    [19]
    GanH, YueB, WangY, et al. Treatment of facial telangiectasia with narrow-band intense pulsed light in Chinese patients[J]. J Cosmet Laser Ther, 2018,20(7/8):442-446. DOI: 10.1080/14764172.2018.1427871.
    [20]
    段鳕芸, 周舟, 刘太华, 等. 宽谱与窄谱强脉冲光治疗红斑毛细血管扩张型玫瑰痤疮疗效比较[J].中国美容医学,2021,30(12):75-78.
    [21]
    ZhaoL, YouC, ChenH, et al. Retrospective study of factors affecting efficacy of therapy with dye pulsed light for erythematotelangiectatic rosacea[J]. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb), 2020,10(6):1273-1283. DOI: 10.1007/s13555-020-00440-5.
    [22]
    贾婕, 张荣, 鲁东平, 等. 精准脉冲光联合长脉冲1064 nm Nd:YAG激光治疗玫瑰痤疮的疗效观察[J].中国皮肤性病学杂志,2021,35(12):1359-1364. DOI: 10.13735/j.cjdv.1001-7089.202106057.
    [23]
    FuX, DongJ, WangS, et al. Advances in the treatment of traumatic scars with laser, intense pulsed light, radiofrequency, and ultrasound[J/OL]. Burns Trauma, 2019,7:1[2023-09-18]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30723753/. DOI: 10.1186/s41038-018-0141-0.
    [24]
    KligmanDE, ZhenY. Intense pulsed light treatment of photoaged facial skin[J]. Dermatol Surg, 2004,30(8):1085-1090. DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2004.30332.x.
    [25]
    DiBernardoBE, PoznerJN. Intense pulsed light therapy for skin rejuvenation[J]. Clin Plast Surg, 2016,43(3):535-540. DOI: 10.1016/j.cps.2016.03.008.
    [26]
    ChanCS, SaediN, MickleC, et al. Combined treatment for facial rejuvenation using an optimized pulsed light source followed by a fractional non-ablative laser[J]. Lasers Surg Med, 2013,45(7):405-409. DOI: 10.1002/lsm.22162.
    [27]
    VarugheseN, KellerL, GoldbergDJ. Split-face comparison between single-band and dual-band pulsed light technology for treatment of photodamage[J]. J Cosmet Laser Ther, 2016,18(4):213-216. DOI: 10.1080/14764172.2016.1177188.
    [28]
    潘永正. 激光与强脉冲光对皮肤光老化作用机制研究进展[J].中国美容医学,2013,22(1):220-222. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-6455.2013.01.090.
    [29]
    雷德军, 丁欣强, 朱自荣. 窄谱强脉冲光联合调Q激光治疗痤疮后红斑、色素沉着的临床效果及对患者生活质量的影响[J].陕西医学杂志,2018,47(7):839-842. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2018.07.007.
    [30]
    秦高平, 孙要文, 韩峰, 等. 中药涂擦联合窄谱强脉冲光治疗烧伤后皮肤色素异常临床疗效分析[J].中国美容医学,2021,30(9):129-131.
    [31]
    向芳, 张祥月, 丁媛, 等. DPL联合果酸治疗面颈部毛囊性红斑黑变病疗效观察[J].中国皮肤性病学杂志,2021,35(6):4. DOI: 10.13735/j.cjdv.1001-7089.202007193.
    [32]
    田怡, 张文红, 金岚. Starlux晶钻光LuxG对面部雀斑的临床疗效分析[J].激光杂志,2012,33(4):53-54. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-2743.2012.04.025.
    [33]
    莫金雪, 方锐华, 罗佩瑜, 等. DPL精准光治疗雀斑疗效分析[J].皮肤性病诊疗学杂志,2020,27(2):104-107. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8468.2020.02.009.
    [34]
    KligmanDE, ZhenY. Intense pulsed light treatment of photoaged facial skin[J]. Dermatol Surg, 2004,30(8):1085-1090. DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2004.30332.x.
    [35]
    ButlerEG2nd, McClellanSD, RossEV. Split treatment of photodamaged skin with KTP 532 nm laser with 10 mm handpiece versus IPL: a cheek-to-cheek comparison[J]. Lasers Surg Med, 2006,38(2):124-128. DOI: 10.1002/lsm.20222.
    [36]
    VarugheseN, KellerL, GoldbergDJ. Split-face comparison between single-band and dual-band pulsed light technology for treatment of photodamage[J]. J Cosmet Laser Ther, 2016,18(4):213-216. DOI: 10.1080/14764172.2016.1177188.
    [37]
    KimJ, LeeJ, ChoiH. Intense pulsed light attenuates UV-induced hyperimmune response and pigmentation in human skin cells[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2021, 22(6):3173. DOI: 10.3390/ijms22063173.
    [38]
    BraunM. Intense pulsed light versus advanced fluorescent technology pulsed light for photodamaged skin: a split-face pilot comparison[J]. J Drugs Dermatol, 2007,6(10):1024-1028.
    [39]
    李牧桑, 祁薇, 周沁, 等. AOPT强脉冲光在轻度面部皮肤松弛中的应用[J].中国医疗美容,2022,12(1):40-44. DOI: 10.19593/j.issn.2095-0721.2022.01.011.
    [40]
    陈媛, 刘建, 李孝建. DPL在防治儿童烧伤后早期增生性瘢痕中应用的研究进展[J].组织工程与重建外科杂志,2021,17(6):497-502. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-0364.2021.06.010.
    [41]
    王棽, 金锐, 米晶, 等. 窄谱强脉冲光治疗烧伤瘢痕的疗效评价[J].组织工程与重建外科杂志,2015,11(3):196-198. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-0364.2015.03.022.
    [42]
    刘勇, 孙苗, 杜迎, 等. 超光子强脉冲光400~600nm联合800~1200nm治疗痤疮的疗效观察[J].中国现代药物应用,2022,16(8):41-43. DOI: 10.14164/j.cnki.cn11-5581/r.2022.08.014.
    [43]
    ChenS, WangY, RenJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of intense pulsed light in the treatment of inflammatory acne vulgaris with a novel filter[J]. J Cosmet Laser Ther, 2019,21(6):323-327. DOI: 10.1080/14764172.2019.1605450.
    [44]
    GaoL, QuH, GaoN, et al. A retrospective analysis for facial telangiectasia treatment using pulsed dye laser and intense pulsed light configured with different wavelength bands[J]. J Cosmet Dermatol, 2020,19(1):88-92. DOI: 10.1111/jocd.13179.
    [45]
    缪嘉颖 窄谱强脉冲光联合二氧化碳点阵激光改善增生性瘢痕颜色的临床评估 上海 上海交通大学 2019 DOI: 10.27307/d.cnki.gsjtu.2019.000261

    缪嘉颖. 窄谱强脉冲光联合二氧化碳点阵激光改善增生性瘢痕颜色的临床评估[D].上海:上海交通大学, 2019. DOI: 10.27307/d.cnki.gsjtu.2019.000261.

    [46]
    AdamičM, PavlovićMD, Troilius RubinA, et al. Guidelines of care for vascular lasers and intense pulse light sources from the European Society for Laser Dermatology[J]. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, 2015,29(9):1661-1678. DOI: 10.1111/jdv.13177.
    [47]
    ZelicksonZ, SchramS, ZelicksonB. Complications in cosmetic laser surgery: a review of 494 Food and Drug Administration Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Reports[J]. Dermatol Surg, 2014,40(4):378-382. DOI: 10.1111/dsu.12461.
    [48]
    WannerM, SakamotoFH, AvramMM, et al. Immediate skin responses to laser and light treatments: therapeutic endpoints: how to obtain efficacy[J]. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2016,74(5):821-833; quiz 834, 833. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.06.026.
    [49]
    SuQ, WangF, ChaiY, et al. A prospective study on the treatment of immediate post-operative scar with narrowband intense pulsed light under polarized dermoscopy[J]. J Cosmet Laser Ther, 2021,23(5/6):137-141. DOI: 10.1080/14764172.2021.2016844.
    [50]
    WatH, WuDC, RaoJ, et al. Application of intense pulsed light in the treatment of dermatologic disease: a systematic review[J]. Dermatol Surg, 2014,40(4):359-377. DOI: 10.1111/dsu.12424.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]Expert consensus on the treatment of second-degree burn wounds (2024 edition)Ⅰ: pre-hospital first aid and non-surgical treatment[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2024, 40(1): 1-18. doi: 10.3760/cmaj.cn501225-20231019-00120
    [2]Expert consensus on enteral nutrition care for adult patients with severe burns (2024 edition)[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2024, 40(9): 801-811. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20240229-00078
    [3]Yao Min, Zhang Yiqiu. Clinical application of photobiomodulation in trauma repair and medical aesthetics[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2024, 40(4): 307-313. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20240203-00048
    [4]National expert consensus on clinical diagnosis and treatment of hot crush injury wound (2023 version)[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2023, 39(3): 201-208. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20220608-00227
    [5]Expert consensus on the clinical treatment of burn patients complicated with Coronavirus infection (2023 version)[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2023, 39(8): 701-712. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20230519-00176
    [6]The Burn and Trauma Branch of Chinese Geriatrics Society, Critical Care Group of Chinese Burn Association. National expert consensus on prone position therapy in adult burn patients (2022 version)[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2022, 38(7): 601-609. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20211208-00407
    [7]Liu Yan. National expert consensus on the aeromedical trans- portation of burn patients (2022 version)[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2022, 38(2): 101-108. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20211025-00366
    [8]Chinese Association of Plastics and Aesthetics Scar Medicine Branch. National expert consensus on early management of scars (2020 version)[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2021, 37(2): 113-125. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200609-00300
    [9]Committee on Burn Injury and Tissue Repair of Association of Medical Exchanges Across the Taiwan Straits. Expert consensus on the application of nitrous oxide and oxygen mixed inhalation for sedation and analgesia technology in burn surgery (2021 version)[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2021, 37(3): 201-206. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200523-00284
    [13]Writing group of experts consensus on clinical application of bilayer artificial dermis (2019 version). Experts consensus on clinical application of bilayer artificial dermis (2019 version)[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2019, 35(10): 705-711. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2019.10.001
    [14]The Burn and Trauma Branch of Chinese Geriatrics Society, Lyu Guozhong. National experts consensus on clinical application of collagen-based wound biomaterials (2018 version)[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2018, 34(11): 766-769. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.11.009
    [15]The Burn and Trauma Branch of Chinese Geriatrics Society, Guo Guanghua, Zhu Feng, Huang Yuesheng, Wu Jun, Sun Yonghua, Xia Zhaofan, Fu Xiaobing. National experts consensus on clinical diagnosis and treatment of inhalation injury (2018 version)[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2018, 34(11): 770-775. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.11.010
    [16]The Burn and Trauma Branch of Chinese Geriatrics Society, Ming Zhiguo, Lei Jin, Duan Peng, Tan Jianglin, Lou Jihe, Di Haiping, Wang Deyun. National experts consensus on tracheotomy and intubation for burn patients (2018 version)[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2018, 34(11): 782-785. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.11.012
    [17]The Burn and Trauma Branch of Chinese Geriatrics Society, Zhang Jiaping, Wang Weiyi. National experts consensus on application of pulse contour cardiac output monitoring technique in severe burn treatment (2018 version)[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2018, 34(11): 776-781. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.11.011
    [18]Zhang Yiqiu, Dong Jiying, Wang Shen, Yan Min, Yao Min. Clinical effects of a combination treatment with narrow-spectrum intense pulsed light and fractional carbon dioxide laser on hypertrophic scar pruritus[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2018, 34(9): 608-614. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.09.010
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-042024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-030255075100125
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 8.6 %FULLTEXT: 8.6 %META: 73.8 %META: 73.8 %PDF: 17.5 %PDF: 17.5 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 6.0 %其他: 6.0 %其他: 2.2 %其他: 2.2 %Central District: 0.6 %Central District: 0.6 %China: 0.1 %China: 0.1 %Falls Church: 0.3 %Falls Church: 0.3 %Fremont: 0.1 %Fremont: 0.1 %Gunsan: 0.0 %Gunsan: 0.0 %Rochester: 0.1 %Rochester: 0.1 %San Jose: 0.0 %San Jose: 0.0 %Seattle: 0.1 %Seattle: 0.1 %United States: 0.1 %United States: 0.1 %[]: 0.1 %[]: 0.1 %三亚: 0.2 %三亚: 0.2 %三门峡: 0.0 %三门峡: 0.0 %上海: 6.8 %上海: 6.8 %东莞: 0.4 %东莞: 0.4 %中山: 0.1 %中山: 0.1 %临沂: 0.3 %临沂: 0.3 %九江: 0.0 %九江: 0.0 %佛山: 1.1 %佛山: 1.1 %兰州: 0.2 %兰州: 0.2 %北京: 8.7 %北京: 8.7 %华盛顿: 0.0 %华盛顿: 0.0 %南京: 2.0 %南京: 2.0 %南充: 0.0 %南充: 0.0 %南宁: 0.4 %南宁: 0.4 %南昌: 1.1 %南昌: 1.1 %南通: 0.2 %南通: 0.2 %厦门: 0.5 %厦门: 0.5 %台北: 0.1 %台北: 0.1 %台州: 0.3 %台州: 0.3 %合肥: 0.8 %合肥: 0.8 %吉林: 0.2 %吉林: 0.2 %周口: 0.1 %周口: 0.1 %呼和浩特: 0.1 %呼和浩特: 0.1 %咸阳: 0.2 %咸阳: 0.2 %哈尔滨: 0.3 %哈尔滨: 0.3 %哥伦布: 0.0 %哥伦布: 0.0 %商洛: 0.0 %商洛: 0.0 %喀什: 0.0 %喀什: 0.0 %嘉兴: 0.1 %嘉兴: 0.1 %圣地亚哥: 0.0 %圣地亚哥: 0.0 %圣安东尼奥: 0.0 %圣安东尼奥: 0.0 %夏延: 0.1 %夏延: 0.1 %大理: 0.0 %大理: 0.0 %大连: 0.0 %大连: 0.0 %大阪: 0.0 %大阪: 0.0 %天津: 0.9 %天津: 0.9 %太原: 0.6 %太原: 0.6 %安康: 0.2 %安康: 0.2 %安阳: 0.1 %安阳: 0.1 %安顺: 0.0 %安顺: 0.0 %宜宾: 0.1 %宜宾: 0.1 %宜昌: 0.0 %宜昌: 0.0 %宣城: 0.3 %宣城: 0.3 %宿迁: 0.1 %宿迁: 0.1 %巴音郭楞: 0.1 %巴音郭楞: 0.1 %常州: 0.1 %常州: 0.1 %常德: 0.1 %常德: 0.1 %平顶山: 0.1 %平顶山: 0.1 %广元: 0.1 %广元: 0.1 %广州: 3.8 %广州: 3.8 %庆阳: 0.0 %庆阳: 0.0 %廊坊: 0.1 %廊坊: 0.1 %张家口: 1.1 %张家口: 1.1 %徐州: 0.1 %徐州: 0.1 %德州: 0.0 %德州: 0.0 %恩施: 0.1 %恩施: 0.1 %意法半: 0.0 %意法半: 0.0 %成都: 1.2 %成都: 1.2 %新乡: 0.1 %新乡: 0.1 %新南威尔士: 0.1 %新南威尔士: 0.1 %无锡: 0.2 %无锡: 0.2 %日喀则: 0.1 %日喀则: 0.1 %日照: 0.0 %日照: 0.0 %昆明: 3.1 %昆明: 3.1 %朝阳: 0.1 %朝阳: 0.1 %杭州: 2.2 %杭州: 2.2 %柳州: 0.0 %柳州: 0.0 %株洲: 0.0 %株洲: 0.0 %格兰特县: 0.1 %格兰特县: 0.1 %桂林: 0.0 %桂林: 0.0 %梅克伦堡县: 0.0 %梅克伦堡县: 0.0 %梅州: 0.2 %梅州: 0.2 %梧州: 0.2 %梧州: 0.2 %榆林: 0.1 %榆林: 0.1 %武汉: 1.1 %武汉: 1.1 %汕头: 0.5 %汕头: 0.5 %汕尾: 0.1 %汕尾: 0.1 %江门: 0.0 %江门: 0.0 %沈阳: 0.5 %沈阳: 0.5 %沧州: 0.1 %沧州: 0.1 %泉州: 0.1 %泉州: 0.1 %法尔肯施泰因: 0.1 %法尔肯施泰因: 0.1 %波恩: 0.1 %波恩: 0.1 %泰安: 0.2 %泰安: 0.2 %泸州: 0.1 %泸州: 0.1 %洛杉矶: 0.1 %洛杉矶: 0.1 %洛阳: 0.5 %洛阳: 0.5 %济南: 1.3 %济南: 1.3 %海东: 0.0 %海东: 0.0 %海口: 0.3 %海口: 0.3 %海得拉巴: 0.1 %海得拉巴: 0.1 %淄博: 0.1 %淄博: 0.1 %淮北: 0.0 %淮北: 0.0 %淮南: 0.1 %淮南: 0.1 %淮安: 0.1 %淮安: 0.1 %深圳: 2.4 %深圳: 2.4 %温州: 0.5 %温州: 0.5 %湖州: 0.3 %湖州: 0.3 %湛江: 0.1 %湛江: 0.1 %滨州: 0.0 %滨州: 0.0 %漯河: 0.3 %漯河: 0.3 %潍坊: 0.5 %潍坊: 0.5 %澄迈: 0.3 %澄迈: 0.3 %濮阳: 0.0 %濮阳: 0.0 %烟台: 0.1 %烟台: 0.1 %玉溪: 0.0 %玉溪: 0.0 %珀斯: 0.1 %珀斯: 0.1 %珠海: 0.4 %珠海: 0.4 %眉山: 0.1 %眉山: 0.1 %石嘴山: 0.1 %石嘴山: 0.1 %石家庄: 0.4 %石家庄: 0.4 %福州: 0.1 %福州: 0.1 %红河: 0.0 %红河: 0.0 %绍兴: 0.2 %绍兴: 0.2 %绥化: 0.0 %绥化: 0.0 %绵阳: 0.0 %绵阳: 0.0 %聊城: 0.0 %聊城: 0.0 %舟山: 0.0 %舟山: 0.0 %芒廷维尤: 16.4 %芒廷维尤: 16.4 %芜湖: 0.1 %芜湖: 0.1 %芝加哥: 0.3 %芝加哥: 0.3 %苏州: 1.6 %苏州: 1.6 %荆州: 0.0 %荆州: 0.0 %莆田: 0.1 %莆田: 0.1 %菏泽: 0.1 %菏泽: 0.1 %萨那: 0.2 %萨那: 0.2 %葫芦岛: 0.0 %葫芦岛: 0.0 %葵涌: 0.0 %葵涌: 0.0 %蚌埠: 0.1 %蚌埠: 0.1 %衡水: 0.5 %衡水: 0.5 %衡阳: 0.0 %衡阳: 0.0 %西宁: 1.2 %西宁: 1.2 %西安: 1.3 %西安: 1.3 %许昌: 0.0 %许昌: 0.0 %贵阳: 0.7 %贵阳: 0.7 %赣州: 0.1 %赣州: 0.1 %辽源: 0.0 %辽源: 0.0 %运城: 0.2 %运城: 0.2 %连云港: 0.2 %连云港: 0.2 %遵义: 0.1 %遵义: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.2 %郑州: 0.9 %郑州: 0.9 %鄂尔多斯: 0.0 %鄂尔多斯: 0.0 %重庆: 4.2 %重庆: 4.2 %银川: 0.2 %银川: 0.2 %锦州: 0.1 %锦州: 0.1 %长春: 0.2 %长春: 0.2 %长沙: 3.2 %长沙: 3.2 %阜新: 0.1 %阜新: 0.1 %阜阳: 0.0 %阜阳: 0.0 %阿什本: 0.2 %阿什本: 0.2 %阿姆斯特丹: 0.0 %阿姆斯特丹: 0.0 %阿里: 0.1 %阿里: 0.1 %陇南: 0.0 %陇南: 0.0 %青岛: 1.0 %青岛: 1.0 %韶关: 0.1 %韶关: 0.1 %香港: 0.2 %香港: 0.2 %驻马店: 0.0 %驻马店: 0.0 %魁北克: 0.0 %魁北克: 0.0 %黄冈: 0.2 %黄冈: 0.2 %黄石: 0.1 %黄石: 0.1 %黔东南: 0.0 %黔东南: 0.0 %其他其他Central DistrictChinaFalls ChurchFremontGunsanRochesterSan JoseSeattleUnited States[]三亚三门峡上海东莞中山临沂九江佛山兰州北京华盛顿南京南充南宁南昌南通厦门台北台州合肥吉林周口呼和浩特咸阳哈尔滨哥伦布商洛喀什嘉兴圣地亚哥圣安东尼奥夏延大理大连大阪天津太原安康安阳安顺宜宾宜昌宣城宿迁巴音郭楞常州常德平顶山广元广州庆阳廊坊张家口徐州德州恩施意法半成都新乡新南威尔士无锡日喀则日照昆明朝阳杭州柳州株洲格兰特县桂林梅克伦堡县梅州梧州榆林武汉汕头汕尾江门沈阳沧州泉州法尔肯施泰因波恩泰安泸州洛杉矶洛阳济南海东海口海得拉巴淄博淮北淮南淮安深圳温州湖州湛江滨州漯河潍坊澄迈濮阳烟台玉溪珀斯珠海眉山石嘴山石家庄福州红河绍兴绥化绵阳聊城舟山芒廷维尤芜湖芝加哥苏州荆州莆田菏泽萨那葫芦岛葵涌蚌埠衡水衡阳西宁西安许昌贵阳赣州辽源运城连云港遵义邯郸郑州鄂尔多斯重庆银川锦州长春长沙阜新阜阳阿什本阿姆斯特丹阿里陇南青岛韶关香港驻马店魁北克黄冈黄石黔东南

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(1)  / Tables(1)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1479) PDF downloads(352) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return