Deng RF,Fan BW,Song SH,et al.Application strategies and clinical effects of superior gluteal artery perforator tissue flaps in repairing stage Ⅳ pressure ulcers in the sacrococcygeal region[J].Chin J Burns Wounds,2025,41(3):232-241.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20240804-00294.
Citation: Deng RF,Fan BW,Song SH,et al.Application strategies and clinical effects of superior gluteal artery perforator tissue flaps in repairing stage Ⅳ pressure ulcers in the sacrococcygeal region[J].Chin J Burns Wounds,2025,41(3):232-241.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20240804-00294.

Application strategies and clinical effects of superior gluteal artery perforator tissue flaps in repairing stage Ⅳ pressure ulcers in the sacrococcygeal region

doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20240804-00294
Funds:

Regional Science Foundation Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China 81760343

General Program of Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province of China 20202BABL206072

More Information
  •   Objective  To explore the application strategies and clinical effects of superior gluteal artery perforator tissue flaps in repairing stage Ⅳ pressure ulcers in the sacrococcygeal region.  Methods  This study was a retrospective observational study. From July 2019 to April 2024, 89 patients with stage Ⅳ pressure ulcers in the sacrococcygeal region who met the inclusion criteria were admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, including 59 males and 30 females, aged 21 to 84 years. There were 89 sacrococcygeal pressure ulcers, with an area of 5.0 cm×4.0 cm-21.0 cm×21.0 cm after debridement. According to the shape, size, and depth of the wounds after debridement, combined with the elasticity and texture of the skin around the wounds, and the principle of minimizing damage to the donor area, the appropriate forms of superior gluteal artery perforator tissue flaps were cut for wound repair in the following three conditions. (1) For wounds with a round shape, an area of 5.0 cm×5.0 cm-21.0 cm×21.0 cm, and a depth of 1.0-3.5 cm, the superior gluteal artery perforator propeller flap or myocutaneous flap, bilobed superior gluteal artery perforator relay flap, and bilateral superior gluteal artery perforator rotational flap were used. (2) For wounds with an oval shape, an area of 5.0 cm×4.0 cm-18.5 cm×10.5 cm, and a depth of 1.0-3.0 cm, the superior gluteal artery perforator propeller flap or myocutaneous flap, unilateral superior gluteal artery perforator propeller flap combined with contralateral superior gluteal artery perforator V-Y advanced flap or keystone flap were used. (3) For wounds with a fusiformis shape, an area of 7.0 cm×4.0 cm-17.5 cm×6.0 cm, and a depth of 1.5-5.0 cm, the unilateral or bilateral superior gluteal artery perforator V-Y advanced flap, superior gluteal artery perforator keystone flap, or superior gluteal artery perforator keystone flap combined with gluteus maximus muscle flap were used. In this group of patients, a total of 40 superior gluteal artery perforator propeller flaps (with an resection area of 11.0 cm×6.0 cm-17.0 cm×11.0 cm), 22 superior gluteal artery perforator propeller myocutaneous flaps (with an resection area of 10.0 cm×5.0 cm-14.0 cm×8.0 cm), 7 bilobed superior gluteal artery perforator relay flaps (with a main flap resection area of 5.5 cm×5.5 cm-18.0 cm×11.5 cm and a side flap resection area of 4.5 cm×3.0 cm-11.0 cm×6.5 cm), 5 bilateral superior gluteal artery perforator rotational flaps (with a total resection area of 20.0 cm×16.0 cm-26.0 cm×21.0 cm on both sides), 14 superior gluteal artery perforator V-Y advanced flaps (with an resection area of 12.0 cm×10.0 cm-18.0 cm×18.0 cm), 13 superior gluteal artery perforator keystone flaps (with an resection area of 13.0 cm×6.5 cm-19.0 cm×18.0 cm), and 3 gluteus maximus muscle flaps (with an resection area of 8.0 cm×3.0 cm-15.0 cm×4.5 cm). The donor area wounds were all directly sutured. The survival of tissue flaps was observed and the incidence rate of delayed wound healing in the reception area was calculated, and wound healing in the donor area was observed. The appearance and texture of tissue flaps and recurrence of pressure ulcers were followed up.  Results  After surgery, all bilateral superior gluteal artery perforator rotational flaps, superior gluteal artery perforator V-Y advanced flaps, superior gluteal artery perforator keystone flaps, and gluteus maximus muscle flaps survived well. There were 6 cases of delayed wound healing in the reception area after surgery, with an incidence rate of 6.7% (6/89). Two patients had incision dehiscence in the donor area wounds due to postoperative bleeding, the wounds healed after debridement, vacuum sealing drainage, and dressing change. The wounds in the donor area of the remaining patients healed well. Six patients were lost to follow-up. Eighty-three patients were followed up for 3-48 months, of whom 4 patients died. Among the remaining 79 patients, 3 cases had pressure ulcers recur due to improper nursing, while the rest of the patients had tissue flaps with good appearance and soft texture and no recurrence of pressure ulcers.  Conclusions  Based on the characteristics of wound shape, size, and depth after debridement of stage Ⅳ pressure ulcers in the sacrococcygeal region, individualized selection of flap, myocutaneous flap, or a combination of flap and gluteus maximus muscle flap based on the perforating branch of the superior gluteal artery perforator can achieve good clinical repair results. The postoperative tissue flap survived well, with a good appearance, soft texture, and less recurrence of pressure ulcers.

     

  • [1]
    史宸硕,唐修俊,王达利,等. 臀上动脉穿支岛状皮瓣修复骶尾部压疮的临床效果[J]. 中华烧伤杂志,2019,35(5):367-370. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2019.05.008.
    [2]
    DjedovicG,MetzlerJ,MorandiEM,et al.Comparison of fasciocutaneous V-Y and rotational flaps for defect coverage of sacral pressure sores: a critical single-centre appraisal[J].Int Wound J,2017,14(6):945-949.DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12736.
    [3]
    ChengTW,LinYN,LeeSS,et al.The niche of dermal graft to reconstruct a complex pressure injury wound in sacral region: a case report[J].Medicine (Baltimore),2023,102(51):e36617.DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036617.
    [4]
    孙佳琳,郭鹏飞,崔正军,等. 臀上动脉穿支接力皮瓣修复骶尾部压疮的临床效果[J]. 中华烧伤杂志,2020,36(8):726-729. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20190607-00265.
    [5]
    SinghK,AggarwalK.Freestyle SGAP flaps for sacral ulcers[J/OL].Trop Doct,2024:494755241282715(2024-09-09)[2025-02-23]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39248219/.DOI:10.1177/00494755241282715.[published online ahead of print].
    [6]
    TsukuuraR,YamamotoT.Sensate superior gluteal artery perforator flap for reconstruction of sacrococcygeal large wound dehiscence: a case report and literature review[J].Microsurgery,2022,42(3):271-276.DOI: 10.1002/micr.30825.
    [7]
    AcartürkTO, SeyhanT, BengürFB, et al. A single superior gluteal artery perforator flap in reconstruction of large midline sacral defects: a method for practical harvest and safe closure[J]. Ann Plast Surg, 2022, 88(3): 313-318.DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002935.
    [8]
    岳超,王涛,段梦莹,等.臀部双侧V-Y推进岛状皮瓣修复肛周Paget病术后缺损的应用[J].中华皮肤科杂志,2024,57(1):58-61.DOI: 10.35541/cjd.20220143.
    [9]
    RubensteinLZ,HarkerJO,SalvàA,et al.Screening for undernutrition in geriatric practice: developing the short-form mini-nutritional assessment (MNA-SF)[J].J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci,2001,56(6):M366-372.DOI: 10.1093/gerona/56.6.m366.
    [10]
    潘海燕,顾则娟,李方,等.基于老年综合评估分析卒中恢复期老年患者认知衰弱发生及影响因素[J].医学研究与战创伤救治,2024,37(4):406-410.DOI: 10.16571/j.cnki.2097-2768.2024.04.013.
    [11]
    邓如非,龙露瑶,陈燕微,等.基于窦道情况及皮肤软组织缺损范围的坐骨结节压疮临床修复策略[J].中华烧伤与创面修复杂志,2024,40(1):64-71.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20231114-00194.
    [12]
    曹世坤,余道江,安璐,等.自由式穿支皮瓣在臀部压疮修复中的应用[J].中华解剖与临床杂志,2020,25(4):365-370.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn101202-20200130-00023.
    [13]
    陈黎明,徐立炜,刘毅,等.臀部自由穿支螺旋桨皮瓣修复臀部深度创面的效果[J].中华烧伤杂志,2020,36(2):106-109.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2020.02.005.
    [14]
    陈黎明,王刚,刘宏,等.臀部自由穿支螺旋桨肌皮瓣修复合并深部死腔的臀部复杂性创面的临床效果[J].中华烧伤与创面修复杂志,2023,39(8):753-757.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20221115-00488.
    [15]
    栗颖利,唐炜雅,邢新,等. 船形改良拱顶石穿支岛状皮瓣修复跨关节部位软组织缺损[J]. 中国美容整形外科杂志,2017,28(1):23-25. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-7040.2017.01.007.
    [16]
    BehanFC.The Keystone Design Perforator Island Flap in reconstructive surgery[J].ANZ J Surg,2003,73(3):112-120.DOI: 10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.02638.x.
    [17]
    RiniIS,GunardiAJ,MarsaulinaRP,et al.A systematic review of the keystone design perforator island flap in the reconstruction of trunk defects[J].Arch Plast Surg,2020,47(6):535-541.DOI: 10.5999/aps.2020.00094.
    [18]
    刘本全,董德升,史明艳,等.En bloc切除清创联合臀大肌肌瓣治疗坐骨结节压疮合并慢性骨髓炎的临床效果[J].中华烧伤与创面修复杂志,2022,38(4):363-368.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210122-00032.
    [19]
    杨力,朱小平,黄巧洪,等.臀大肌肌皮瓣修复骶尾部Ⅳ度压疮13例[J].中华烧伤杂志,2014,30(2):146-147.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2014.02.012.
    [20]
    刘江涛,王一勇,陈蓝,等.皮瓣联合流体悬浮床治疗骶尾部压疮的研究[J].医学研究与战创伤救治,2023,36(6):590-593.DOI: 10.16571/j.cnki.2097-2768.2023.06.006.
    [21]
    MervisJS,PhillipsTJ.Pressure ulcers: pathophysiology, epidemiology, risk factors, and presentation[J].J Am Acad Dermatol,2019,81(4):881-890.DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.12.069.
    [22]
    ZhouJ,MoX,XiaoS,et al.A guide to perforator flap selection for buttock pressure sore reconstruction[J].Ann Plast Surg,2024,92(2):222-229.DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003753.
    [23]
    李军, 刘梦栋, 朱靓, 等. 单侧臀上动脉穿支螺旋桨皮瓣联合对侧向心性推进皮瓣修复骶尾部巨大压疮的临床效果[J]. 中华烧伤与创面修复杂志, 2024, 40(6): 551-556. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20231031-00158..
    [24]
    刘衍松,伊力扎提·伊力哈木,曹天勇,等.臀上动脉螺旋桨皮瓣联合术后封闭负压治疗臀部压力性损伤效果分析[J].第三军医大学学报,2021,43(11):1057-1062.DOI: 10.16016/j.1000-5404.202101047.
    [25]
    徐风瑞,杨帆,郑梁,等.双侧臀上动脉肌皮瓣修复骶尾部巨大压疮的疗效观察[J].中华解剖与临床杂志,2024,29(10):701-704.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn101202-20240111-00021.
    [26]
    徐培,张红玲,龙忠恒,等. 臀上或臀下动脉双叶皮瓣修复老年臀部压疮的效果[J]. 实用老年医学,2023,37(6):577-580,585. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-9198.2023.06.010.
    [27]
    ParkSJ,LeeKT,JeonBJ,et al.The use of magnetic resonance imaging in planning a pedicled perforator flap for pressure sores in the gluteal region[J].Int J Low Extrem Wounds,2018,17(2):106-112.DOI: 10.1177/1534734618772399.
    [28]
    ChangCK,WuCJ,ChenCY,et al.Intraoperative indocyanine green fluorescent angiography-assisted modified superior gluteal artery perforator flap for reconstruction of sacral pressure sores[J].Int Wound J,2017,14(6):1170-1174.DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12781.
    [29]
    沈佳祚,官世水,郑毅全,等.臀上动脉穿支肌皮瓣修复腰骶部深度缺损难愈合创面[J].临床骨科杂志,2023,26(6):809-812.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0287.2023.06.016.
    [30]
    杨远明,王先成,熊祥,等.自由式局部穿支皮瓣在臀部褥疮修复中的应用[J].中华整形外科杂志,2020,36(5):531-535.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn114453-20191017-00310.
    [31]
    ÖzkanB,AlbayatiA,TatarBE,et al.The use of mathematically standardized bilobed design perforator flaps for coverage of sacral pressure ulcers[J].Microsurgery,2023,43(3):229-237.DOI: 10.1002/micr.30973.
    [32]
    张功林,王行高,胡军,等.臀股部双V-Y皮瓣治疗坐骨部压疮[J].中华显微外科杂志,2019,42(1):79-81.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-2036.2019.01.025.
    [33]
    ScaglioniMF,GrufmanV,MeroniM,et al.Soft tissue coverage of a total gluteal defect with a combination of perforator-based flaps: a case report[J].Microsurgery,2020,40(7):797-801.DOI: 10.1002/micr.30605.
    [34]
    BaekSO,KimSR,KimHS,et al.Rotational V-Y fasciocutaneous advancement island flap to cover deep sacrococcygeal defects due to pilonidal disease, pressure ulcers, and other inflammatory conditions[J].Am Surg,2024,90(4):770-779.DOI: 10.1177/00031348231211034.
    [35]
    邓如非,宋松华,陈嘉欣,等.股薄肌肌瓣联合臀下动脉穿支皮瓣修复坐骨结节Ⅳ期压疮[J].中国美容医学,2025,34(2):37-40.DOI: 10.15909/j.cnki.cn61-1347/r.006691.
    [36]
    兰俊红, 陈昭宏, 范月莹, 等. 骶旁动脉穿支皮瓣治疗藏毛疾病的临床应用[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2024, 27(9): 970-973. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20231017-00137.
    [37]
    EllabbanMA,WyckmanA,AbdelrahmanI,et al.Dual reconstruction of lumbar and gluteal defects with freestyle propeller flap and muscle flap[J].Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open,2021,9(1):e3376.DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003376.
    [38]
    BurgadeR, Bisson-PatoueA, RossetP, et al. Anatomical basis of gluteus maximus and application as a pedicled cover flap for pelvic tumor resections[J]. Ann Chir Plast Esthet, 2022, 67(1): 35-41.DOI: 10.1016/j.anplas.2021.09.001.
    [39]
    BianK,QiuC,LuGJ,et al.Combined application of gluteus maximus muscle flaps and random pattern skin flaps in repairing sacrococcygeal sinus tracts: a prospective study and technical note[J].Updates Surg,2024,76(3):1009-1014.DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01707-0.
    [40]
    程琳,杜伟力,张颖,等.骶尾部慢性放射性溃疡的分期修复策略[J].中华烧伤杂志,2021,37(3):225-231.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210104-00003.
    [41]
    徐培,龙忠恒,张祥明,等.双侧髋部及骶尾部Ⅳ期复杂性压疮一例[J].中华显微外科杂志,2017,40(4):407-408.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-2036.2017.04.031.
    [42]
    佟琳, 张万福, 韩飞, 等. 膜诱导技术联合局部肌皮瓣修复大转子区窦腔型压力性损伤的临床疗效[J]. 中华烧伤与创面修复杂志, 2024, 40(5): 443-450. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20231029-00144.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]Zhu Chan, He Lin, He Ting, Liang Ying, Zhang Bowen, Zhao Haiyang, Guan Hao, Yang Xuekang, Hu Dahai, Han Juntao, Liu Jiaqi. Clinical effects of early rehabilitation treatment after repair surgery of skin and soft tissue defects accompanied by extensor tendon injury on the back of hand[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2024, 40(4): 365-372. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20230820-00057
    [2]Wu Haibo, Jin Guangzhe, Li Jin, Zhang Yan, Wang Kai, Wang Qiang, Tang Xiaoqiang, Ju Jihui, Hou Ruixing. Effects of the first dorsal metatarsal artery terminal branch flaps in repairing skin and soft tissue defects of fingers[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2024, 40(10): 963-970. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20231226-00271
    [3]Zhou Feiya, Zhang Xian, Cai Leyi, Chen Mingming, Tao Zhenyu, Zhu Xuwei, Gao Weiyang. Effect of accurately localized mini anterolateral thigh perforator flap in repairing medium-sized skin and soft tissue defects in fingers[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2024, 40(2): 165-171. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20231030-00150
    [4]Zheng Yun, Cheng Liangkun, Cui Liuchao, Tan Yuzhong, Tian Lin. Clinical effects of free dorsal interosseous artery perforator flaps in repairing multi-finger skin and soft tissue defects[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2024, 40(5): 476-481. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20231130-00221
    [5]Li Jun, Liu Mengdong, Zhu Liang, Luo Yuming, Yang Qiying, Gao Xiaowen, Han Juntao. Clinical effect of unilateral superior gluteal artery perforator propeller flap combined with contralateral centripetal advancement flap in repairing huge pressure ulcers in the sacrococcygeal region[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2024, 40(6): 551-556. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20231031-00158
    [6]Deng Rufei, Long Luyao, Chen Yanwei, Jiang Zhenyu, Jiang Lan, Zou Lijin, Zhang Youlai. Clinical repair strategy for ischial tuberosity pressure ulcers based on the sinus tract condition and range of skin and soft tissue defects[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2024, 40(1): 64-71. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20231114-00194
    [7]Zhu Haitao, Cao Yujue, Tu Haixia, Yu Bin, Jiang Jiulong, Chen Fan. Clinical effects of anterograde sural neurovascular flap in repairing skin and soft tissue defect around the knee[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2021, 37(2): 187-190. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200108-00012
    [8]Cheng Lin, Du Weili, Zhang Ying, Chen Zhong, Shen Yuming. Staged repair strategy for chronic sacrococcygeal radiation ulcer[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2021, 37(3): 225-231. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210104-00003
    [9]Shen Yunbiao, Xia Mao, Ke Haiwen, Zhang Lisen, Xia Laiqi, Gao Caihong, Liu Li. Thirty-nine cases of stage 4 pressure ulcers treated by a two-stage method of debridement and skin flap transfer[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2020, 36(9): 870-872. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20190729-00318
    [10]Gao Qiufang, Niu Xuetao, Ma Bin, Li Zibiao, Zhang Wanfeng, Guan Hao. Effects of pedicled anterolateral thigh flaps in repairing skin and soft tissue defects in perineal region caused by necrotizing fasciitis[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2020, 36(8): 738-742. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20190528-00257
    [11]Wu Xueren, Wei Panjie, Zhao Yaohua, Li Weizhong, Wang Shuli, Duan Zhaopin, Liu Chang. Effects of ilioinguinal composite tissue flaps in repairing skin and soft tissue defects on hand or foot[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2020, 36(8): 722-725. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20190408-00171
    [12]Sun Jialin, Guo Pengfei, Cui Zhengjun, Meng Qingnan, Wei Aizhou, Zhou Jian. Clinical effects of superior gluteal artery perforator " buddy flap" in repairing pressure ulcer in sacrococcygeal region[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2020, 36(8): 726-729. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20190607-00265
    [13]Shi Chenshuo, Tang Xiujun, Wang Dali, Wei Zairong, Wang Bo, Wu Bihua, Liu Zhiyuan. Clinical effects of superior gluteal artery perforator island flap in repair of sacral pressure ulcer[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2019, 35(5): 367-370. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2019.05.008
    [16]Huang Xiaoyuan. To further improve the techniques for repair and reconstruction of skin and soft tissue defects around the knee joints[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2015, 31(5): 325-326. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2015.05.002
    [17]Feng Shiming, Wang Aiguo, Gao Shunhong. Repair of perforating skin and soft tissue defects of the palms with dorsalis pedis parallel flaps[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2015, 31(2): 112-115. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2015.02.009
    [18]ZHENG Zhao, HU Da- hai, ZHU Xiong-xiang, HAN Jun-tao, WANG Yao-jun, LI Na, HAN Fu, XU Ming-da. Microsurgical repair of skin and soft tissue defects on head, face, and neck[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2010, 26(4): 263-267. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2010.04.005
    [19]ZHU Xiong-xiang, HU Da-hai, ZHENG Zhao, HAN Jun-tao, DONG Mao-long, WANG Hong-tao, TAO Ke, CHEN Gang. Surgical treatment of multiple pressure scores[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2008, 24(1): 6-8.
    [20]LI Yong-lin, XIAO Hai-tao, QI Qiang, ZHOU Zhao-ping, OKA Hiroaki, MORIGUCHI Takahaki. Clinical efficacy of artery pedorator-based flap in the repair of gluteal-sacral pressure sores[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2007, 23(1): 32-35.
  • 邓如非-视频摘要.mp4
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-030255075100125
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 12.0 %FULLTEXT: 12.0 %META: 67.6 %META: 67.6 %PDF: 20.4 %PDF: 20.4 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 11.3 %其他: 11.3 %Seattle: 0.7 %Seattle: 0.7 %上海: 2.8 %上海: 2.8 %乌鲁木齐: 0.7 %乌鲁木齐: 0.7 %包头: 0.7 %包头: 0.7 %北京: 4.9 %北京: 4.9 %南京: 2.8 %南京: 2.8 %南昌: 4.2 %南昌: 4.2 %合肥: 1.4 %合肥: 1.4 %吉安: 0.7 %吉安: 0.7 %哥伦布: 1.4 %哥伦布: 1.4 %商洛: 0.7 %商洛: 0.7 %大连: 0.7 %大连: 0.7 %天津: 0.7 %天津: 0.7 %太原: 3.5 %太原: 3.5 %宜宾: 1.4 %宜宾: 1.4 %山东省: 1.4 %山东省: 1.4 %庆阳: 0.7 %庆阳: 0.7 %张家口: 7.0 %张家口: 7.0 %德阳: 0.7 %德阳: 0.7 %扬州: 0.7 %扬州: 0.7 %昆明: 4.2 %昆明: 4.2 %杭州: 5.6 %杭州: 5.6 %济宁: 0.7 %济宁: 0.7 %芒廷维尤: 8.5 %芒廷维尤: 8.5 %芝加哥: 1.4 %芝加哥: 1.4 %苏州: 0.7 %苏州: 0.7 %衡水: 0.7 %衡水: 0.7 %西宁: 5.6 %西宁: 5.6 %西安: 2.1 %西安: 2.1 %邯郸: 0.7 %邯郸: 0.7 %郑州: 3.5 %郑州: 3.5 %重庆: 14.8 %重庆: 14.8 %长春: 0.7 %长春: 0.7 %长沙: 1.4 %长沙: 1.4 %其他Seattle上海乌鲁木齐包头北京南京南昌合肥吉安哥伦布商洛大连天津太原宜宾山东省庆阳张家口德阳扬州昆明杭州济宁芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州衡水西宁西安邯郸郑州重庆长春长沙

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(7)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (95) PDF downloads(29) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return