Wang WP,Ji R,Zhang Z,et al.Regulatory effects of bio-intensity electric field on transformation of human skin fibroblasts[J].Chin J Burns Wounds,2022,38(4):354-362.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210112-00017.
Citation: Wang WP,Ji R,Zhang Z,et al.Regulatory effects of bio-intensity electric field on transformation of human skin fibroblasts[J].Chin J Burns Wounds,2022,38(4):354-362.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210112-00017.

Regulatory effects of bio-intensity electric field on transformation of human skin fibroblasts

doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210112-00017
Funds:

General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China 82072172

Special Project for Scientific and Technological Innovation Ability Improvement of Army Medical University 2020XQN12

More Information
  • Corresponding author: Jiang Xupin, Email: jiangxupin@126.com; Teng Miao, Email: happysean2004@foxmail.com
  • Received Date: 2021-01-12
  •   Objective  To investigate the regulatory effects of bio-intensity electric field on the transformation of human skin fibroblasts (HSFs).  Methods  The experimental research methods were used. HSFs were collected and divided into 200 mV/mm electric field group treated with 200 mV/mm electric field for 6 h and simulated electric field group placed in the electric field device without electricity for 6 h. Changes in morphology and arrangement of cells were observed in the living cell workstation; the number of cells at 0 and 6 h of treatment was recorded, and the rate of change in cell number was calculated; the direction of cell movement, movement velocity, and trajectory velocity within 3 h were observed and calculated (the number of samples was 34 in the simulated electric field group and 30 in 200 mV/mm electric field group in the aforementioned experiments); the protein expression of α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) in cells after 3 h of treatment was detected by immunofluorescence method (the number of sample was 3). HSFs were collected and divided into simulated electric field group placed in the electric field device without electricity for 3 h, and 100 mV/mm electric field group, 200 mV/mm electric field group, and 400 mV/mm electric field group which were treated with electric fields of corresponding intensities for 3 h. Besides, HSFs were divided into simulated electric field group placed in the electric field device without electricity for 6 h, and electric field treatment 1 h group, electric field treatment 3 h group, and electric field treatment 6 h group treated with 200 mV/mm electric field for corresponding time. The protein expressions of α-SMA and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) were detected by Western blotting (the number of sample was 3). Data were statistically analyzed with Mann-Whitney U test, one-way analysis of variance, independent sample t test, and least significant difference test.  Results  After 6 h of treatment, compared with that in simulated electric field group, the cells in 200 mV/mm electric field group were elongated in shape and locally adhered; the cells in simulated electric field group were randomly arranged, while the cells in 200 mV/mm electric field group were arranged in a regular longitudinal direction; the change rates in the number of cells in the two groups were similar (P>0.05). Within 3 h of treatment, the cells in 200 mV/mm electric field group had an obvious tendency to move toward the positive electrode, and the cells in simulated electric field group moved around the origin; compared with those in simulated electric field group, the movement velocity and trajectory velocity of the cells in 200 mV/mm electric field group were increased significantly (with Z values of -5.33 and -5.41, respectively, P<0.01), and the directionality was significantly enhanced (Z=-4.39, P<0.01). After 3 h of treatment, the protein expression of α-SMA of cells in 200 mV/mm electric field group was significantly higher than that in simulated electric field group (t=-9.81, P<0.01). After 3 h of treatment, the protein expressions of α-SMA of cells in 100 mV/mm electric field group, 200 mV/mm electric field group, and 400 mV/mm electric field group were 1.195±0.057, 1.606±0.041, and 1.616±0.039, respectively, which were significantly more than 0.649±0.028 in simulated electric field group (P<0.01). Compared with that in 100 mV/mm electric field group, the protein expressions of α-SMA of cells in 200 mV/mm electric field group and 400 mV/mm electric field group were significantly increased (P<0.01). The protein expressions of α-SMA of cells in electric field treatment 1 h group, electric field treatment 3 h group, and electric field treatment 6 h group were 0.730±0.032, 1.561±0.031, and 1.553±0.045, respectively, significantly more than 0.464±0.020 in simulated electric field group (P<0.01). Compared with that in electric field treatment 1 h group, the protein expressions of α-SMA in electric field treatment 3 h group and electric field treatment 6 h group were significantly increased (P<0.01). After 3 h of treatment, compared with that in simulated electric field group, the protein expressions of PCNA of cells in 100 mV/mm electric field group, 200 mV/mm electric field group, and 400 mV/mm electric field group were significantly decreased (P<0.05 or P<0.01); compared with that in 100 mV/mm electric field group, the protein expressions of PCNA of cells in 200 mV/mm electric field group and 400 mV/mm electric field group were significantly decreased (P<0.05 or P<0.01); compared with that in 200 mV/mm electric field group, the protein expression of PCNA of cells in 400 mV/mm electric field group was significantly decreased (P<0.01). Compared with that in simulated electric field group, the protein expressions of PCNA of cells in electric field treatment 1 h group, electric field treatment 3 h group, and electric field treatment 6 h group were significantly decreased (P<0.01); compared with that in electric field treatment 1 h group, the protein expressions of PCNA of cells in electric field treatment 3 h group and electric field treatment 6 h group were significantly decreased (P<0.05 or P<0.01); compared with that in electric field treatment 3 h group, the protein expression of PCNA of cells in electric field treatment 6 h group was significantly decreased (P<0.01).  Conclusions  The bio-intensity electric field can induce the migration of HSFs and promote the transformation of fibroblasts to myofibroblasts, and the transformation displays certain dependence on the time and intensity of electric field.

     

  • [1]
    JiR,TengM,ZhangZ,et al.Electric field down-regulates CD9 to promote keratinocytes migration through AMPK pathway[J].Int J Med Sci,2020,17(7):865-873.DOI: 10.7150/ijms.42840.
    [2]
    YanT,JiangX,GuoX,et al.Electric field-induced suppression of PTEN drives epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition via mTORC1 activation[J].J Dermatol Sci,2017,85(2):96-105.DOI: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2016.11.007.
    [3]
    BostanLE,AlmqvistS,PullarCE.A pulsed current electric field alters protein expression creating a wound healing phenotype in human skin cells[J].Regen Med,2020,15(5):1611-1623.DOI: 10.2217/rme-2019-0087.
    [4]
    NuccitelliR.A role for endogenous electric fields in wound healing[J].Curr Top Dev Biol,2003,58:1-26.DOI: 10.1016/s0070-2153(03)58001-2.
    [5]
    AbeR,DonnellySC,PengT,et al.Peripheral blood fibrocytes: differentiation pathway and migration to wound sites[J].J Immunol,2001,166(12):7556-7562.DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.166.12.7556.
    [6]
    DeesC,ChakrabortyD,DistlerJHW.Cellular and molecular mechanisms in fibrosis[J].Exp Dermatol,2021,30(1):121-131.DOI: 10.1111/exd.14193.
    [7]
    RemstDF,Blaney DavidsonEN,van der KraanPM.Unravelling osteoarthritis-related synovial fibrosis: a step closer to solving joint stiffness[J].Rheumatology (Oxford),2015,54(11):1954-1963.DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kev228.
    [8]
    KamilS,MohanRR.Corneal stromal wound healing: major regulators and therapeutic targets[J].Ocul Surf,2021,19:290-306.DOI: 10.1016/j.jtos.2020.10.006.
    [9]
    刘杰,任淅,郭小伟,等.直流电场对BALB/c小鼠乳鼠真皮成纤维细胞定向迁移与排列的作用及其机制[J].中华烧伤杂志,2016,32(4):224-231.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2016.04.007.
    [10]
    冀然,张泽,王文平,等.生物强度电场对人表皮细胞株HaCaT和小鼠表皮细胞运动性及CD9表达的影响[J].中华烧伤杂志,2021,37(1):34-41.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200115-00023.
    [11]
    TredgetEE,LeviB,DonelanMB.Biology and principles of scar management and burn reconstruction[J].Surg Clin North Am,2014,94(4):793-815.DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2014.05.005.
    [12]
    BarrettLW,FearVS,WaithmanJC,et al.Understanding acute burn injury as a chronic disease[J/OL].Burns Trauma,2019,7:23[2022-03-16].https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31534977/. DOI: 10.1186/s41038-019-0163-2.
    [13]
    DesmoulièreA,DarbyIA,GabbianiG.Normal and pathologic soft tissue remodeling: role of the myofibroblast, with special emphasis on liver and kidney fibrosis[J].Lab Invest,2003,83(12):1689-1707.DOI: 10.1097/01.lab.0000101911.53973.90.
    [14]
    CulleyOJ,LouisB,PhilippeosC,et al.Differential expression of insulin-like growth factor 1 and Wnt family member 4 correlates with functional heterogeneity of human dermal fibroblasts[J].Front Cell Dev Biol,2021,9:628039.DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2021.628039.
    [15]
    TomasekJJ,GabbianiG,HinzB,et al.Myofibroblasts and mechano-regulation of connective tissue remodelling[J].Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol,2002,3(5):349-363.DOI: 10.1038/nrm809.
    [16]
    XinY,MinP,XuH,et al.CD26 upregulates proliferation and invasion in keloid fibroblasts through an IGF-1-induced PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway[J/OL].Burns Trauma,2020,8:tkaa025[2022-03-16].https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33150188/. DOI: 10.1093/burnst/tkaa025.
    [17]
    ModarressiA,PietramaggioriG,GodboutC,et al.Hypoxia impairs skin myofibroblast differentiation and function[J].J Invest Dermatol,2010,130(12):2818-2827.DOI: 10.1038/jid.2010.224.
    [18]
    Demidova-RiceTN,HamblinMR,HermanIM.Acute and impaired wound healing: pathophysiology and current methods for drug delivery, part 2: role of growth factors in normal and pathological wound healing: therapeutic potential and methods of delivery[J].Adv Skin Wound Care,2012,25(8):349-370.DOI: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000418541.31366.a3.
    [19]
    PutnikP,KresojaŽ,BosiljkovT,et al.Comparing the effects of thermal and non-thermal technologies on pomegranate juice quality: a review[J].Food Chem,2019,279:150-161.DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.11.131.
    [20]
    SnyderS,DeJuliusC,WillitsRK.Electrical stimulation increases random migration of human dermal fibroblasts[J].Ann Biomed Eng,2017,45(9):2049-2060.DOI: 10.1007/s10439-017-1849-x.
    [21]
    SuessPM,SmithSA,MorrisseyJH.Platelet polyphosphate induces fibroblast chemotaxis and myofibroblast differentiation[J].J Thromb Haemost,2020,18(11):3043-3052.DOI: 10.1111/jth.15066.
    [22]
    NguyenEB,WishnerJ,SlowinskaK.The effect of pulsed electric field on expression of ECM proteins: collagen, elastin, and MMP1 in human dermal fibroblasts[J].J Electroanal Chem (Lausanne),2018,812:265-272.DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2018.01.050.
    [23]
    ChaponnierC,GabbianiG.Pathological situations characterized by altered actin isoform expression[J].J Pathol,2004,204(4):386-395.DOI: 10.1002/path.1635.
    [24]
    FroidureA,Marchal-DuvalE,Homps-LegrandM,et al.Chaotic activation of developmental signalling pathways drives idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis[J].Eur Respir Rev,2020,29(158):190140. DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0140-2019.
    [25]
    Vaamonde-GarciaC,MalaiseO,CharlierE,et al.15-Deoxy-Δ-12, 14-prostaglandin J2 acts cooperatively with prednisolone to reduce TGF-β-induced pro-fibrotic pathways in human osteoarthritis fibroblasts[J].Biochem Pharmacol,2019,165:66-78.DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2019.03.039.
    [26]
    SidgwickGP,BayatA.Extracellular matrix molecules implicated in hypertrophic and keloid scarring[J].J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol,2012,26(2):141-152.DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2011.04200.x.
    [27]
    TanJ,WuJ.Current progress in understanding the molecular pathogenesis of burn scar contracture[J/OL].Burns Trauma,2017,5:14[2022-03-16]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28546987/. DOI: 10.1186/s41038-017-0080-1.
    [28]
    WangL,KongW,LiuB,et al.Proliferating cell nuclear antigen promotes cell proliferation and tumorigenesis by up-regulating STAT3 in non-small cell lung cancer[J].Biomed Pharmacother,2018,104:595-602.DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.05.071.
    [29]
    ZhengW,XuS.Analysis of differential expression proteins of paclitaxel-treated lung adenocarcinoma cell A549 using tandem mass tag-based quantitative proteomics[J].Onco Targets Ther,2020,13:10297-10313.DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S259895.
    [30]
    ChiangCP,LangMJ,LiuBY,et al.Expression of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) in oral submucous fibrosis, oral epithelial hyperkeratosis and oral epithelial dysplasia in Taiwan[J].Oral Oncol,2000,36(4):353-359.DOI: 10.1016/s1368-8375(00)00014-2.
    [31]
    ChenW,WuC,ChenY,et al.Downregulation of ceramide synthase 1 promotes oral cancer through endoplasmic reticulum stress[J].Int J Oral Sci,2021,13(1):10.DOI: 10.1038/s41368-021-00118-4.
    [32]
    KisK,LiuX,HagoodJS.Myofibroblast differentiation and survival in fibrotic disease[J].Expert Rev Mol Med,2011,13:e27.DOI: 10.1017/S1462399411001967.
    [33]
    ShenM,YoungA,C.PCNAAutexier, a focus on replication stress and the alternative lengthening of telomeres pathway[J].DNA Repair (Amst),2021,100:103055.DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2021.103055.
    [34]
    DharadharS,van DijkWJ,ScheffersS,et al.Insert L1 is a central hub for allosteric regulation of USP1 activity[J].EMBO Rep,2021,22(4):e51749.DOI: 10.15252/embr.202051749.
    [35]
    LiB,WangR,WangY,et al.Regulation of smooth muscle contraction by monomeric non-RhoA GTPases[J].Br J Pharmacol,2020,177(17):3865-3877.DOI: 10.1111/bph.15172.
    [36]
    PfitzerG,WirthA,LuciusC,et al.Regulation of smooth muscle contraction by calcium, monomeric GTPases of the Rho subfamily and their effector kinases[J].Adv Exp Med Biol,2003,538:89-99; discussion 99.DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-9029-7_8.
    [37]
    LiX,WangF,LanY,et al.GDF-5 induces epidermal stem cell migration via RhoA-MMP9 signalling[J].J Cell Mol Med,2021,25(4):1939-1948.DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.15925.
    [38]
    QiY,LiangX,DaiF,et al.RhoA/ROCK pathway activation is regulated by AT1 receptor and participates in smooth muscle migration and dedifferentiation via promoting actin cytoskeleton polymerization[J].Int J Mol Sci,2020,21(15):5398. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21155398.
    [39]
    LeinhosL,PetersJ,KrullS,et al.Hypoxia suppresses myofibroblast differentiation by changing RhoA activity[J].J Cell Sci,2019,132(5):jcs223230. DOI: 10.1242/jcs.223230.
    [40]
    TsaiCH, LinBJ, ChaoPH. α2β1 integrin and RhoA mediates electric field-induced ligament fibroblast migration directionality[J].J Orthop Res, 2013,31(2):322-327. DOI: 10.1002/jor.22215.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]Heng Xue, Li Buying, Gao Shijie, Lu Changjin, Zhang Xiaorong, Hu Xiaohong, Luo Gaoxing, Li Haisheng. Role and mechanism of P311 in the differentiation of mouse skin fibroblasts into myofibroblasts[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2024, 40(9): 849-856. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20231215-00245
    [2]Wu Yating, Zhang Ze, Ji Ran, Zhang Shuhao, Wang Wenping, Wu Chao, Zhang Jiaping, Jiang Xupin, Zhang Hengshu. Regulatory effects of bio-intensity electric field on microtubule acetylation in human epidermal cell line HaCaT[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2022, 38(11): 1066-1072. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20211105-00377
    [3]Wang Chang, Chen Wei, Wang Baojia. Regulatory effects and signaling mechanism of sodium ferulate on the proliferation and apoptosis of human skin hypertrophic scar fibroblasts[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2022, 38(5): 471-480. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20201120-00484
    [4]Zhang Can, Zhang Qiong, Zhang Junhui, Wang Fan, Zhang Jiaping. Effects and molecular mechanism of histone deacetylase 6 inhibitor Tubastatin A on the prolifera- tion and movement of human skin fibroblasts[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2021, 37(9): 853-859. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200519-00274
    [5]Wang Zhiyong, Wang Xiqiao, Liu Yingkai, Yuan Bo, Dong Jiaoyun, Song Fei, Jiang Yuzhi, Lu Shuliang. Effects of denatured collagen type Ⅰ on differentiation of human fibroblasts into myofibroblasts[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2018, 34(2): 96-101. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.02.007
    [6]Zhao Bin, Han Fu, Zhang Wei, Wang Xujie, Zhang Jian, Yang Fangfang, Shi Jihong, Su Linlin, Hu Dahai. Effects of hypoxia on the phenotype transformation of human dermal fibroblasts to myofibroblasts and the mechanism[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2017, 33(6): 368-373. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2017.06.016
    [7]Wu Qi′er, Lyu Lu, Xin Haiming, Luo Liang, Tong Yalin, Mo Yongliang, Yue Yigang. Effects of culture supernatant of human amnion mesenchymal stem cells on biological characteristics of human fibroblasts[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2016, 32(6): 370-375. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2016.06.013
    [8]LIU Jia-qi, PAN Qing, WANG Yun-chuan, LIU Yang, WANG Yao-jun, BAI Li, BAI Xiao-zhi, HU Da-hai. Effects of Wnt/β-catenin signaling on the phenotype change of human dermal fibroblasts and its mechanism[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2012, 28(4): 282-287. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2012.04.017
    [9]BAI Xiao-zhi, HU Da-hai, BAI Li, LIU Yang, SU Ying-jun, TANG Chao-wu. Effects of myrrh extract on proliferation and collagen mRNA expression of human fibroblasts in vitro[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2012, 28(2): 130-133. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2012.02.013
    [10]JIANG Qiong, WU Bo-yu, CHEN Xiao-dong. Effect of oleic acid on the proliferation and secretion of pro-inflammatory mediators of human nor- mal fibroblasts and scar fibroblasts[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2012, 28(6): 444-450. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2012.06.015
    [11]WANG Yu, WANG Gui-xue, LUO Xiang-dong, QIU Ju-hui. Effect of substrate stiffness on biological behavior of fibroblasts[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2011, 27(6): 427-431. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2011.06.006
    [12]XIE You-fu, ZHANG Jun-cheng, LIU Si-jun, DAI Li-bing, DU Gao-wei. Effect of melatonin on proliferation and apoptosis of fibroblasts in human hypertrophic scar[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2011, 27(6): 422-426. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2011.06.005
    [13]YANG Chong-zhi, ZHANG Hui-tang, WANG Gong-sheng, ZHOU Hai-quan, MA Chi, HU Da-hai. Mechanism underlying the inhibitory effects of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ agonists on transforming growth factor β1 in adult skin fibroblasts[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2010, 26(6): 448-451. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2010.06.015
    [14]CHEN Jing, WANG Jia-han. Influence of epidermis from different sources on the proliferation and collagen content of fibroblasts[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2007, 23(3): 195-197.
    [15]CHENG Biao, LIU Hong-wei, FU Xiao-bing, SHENG Zhi-yong, ZHANG Ping, MENG Ji-hong. The role of in fibroblast growth factor-2 on expression of S100 protein in apoptosis of fibroblasts after heat stress[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2006, 22(2): 109-112.
    [16]QI Sbao- bai, XU Ying-bin, BIAN Hui-ning, LIU Po, XIE Ju-lin, HE Jie-hua, SHU Bin, LI Tian-zeng. Effects of citrus reticulata blanco extract on fibroblasts from human hypertrophic scar in vitro[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2006, 22(4): 269-272.
    [17]CHEN Jing, WANG Jia-han, ZHUANG Hong-xing. Influence of substance P on the proliferation and apoptosis of fibroblasts of pathological scars[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2006, 22(4): 277-280.
    [18]DUAN Xiao-jun, YANG Liu, ZHOU Yue, TANG Kang-lai, WANG Dong-wu. Influence of fluorescent protein expression on the proliferation of NIH3T3 cells in vitro[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2005, 21(5): 374-377.
    [19]LIANG Guang-ping, LUO Xiang-dong, YANG Zong-cheng. Influence of human telomerase reverse transcriptase gene transfection on the proliferation of human embryonic fibroblasts[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2005, 21(1): 30-32.
    [20]ZHANG Cheng-de, ZHANG Cai-ping, SONG Lan, LONG Shi-yin, TIAN Ying. An experimental study on the role of protein kinase C in the down-regulation of fibroblast proliferation in normal skin and hyperplastic scar by adrenaline[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2005, 21(6): 448-451.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(7)  / Tables(2)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (415) PDF downloads(30) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return