Email Alerts
RSS
Volume 38 Issue 7
Jul.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS  > 2022  >  38(7): 650-660
Liu YF,Jiang ZQ,Huang Y,et al.Feasibility study on the preparation of novel negative pressure materials for constructing new matrix of full-thickness skin defect wounds in rats[J].Chin J Burns Wounds,2022,38(7):650-660.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210401-00113.
Citation: Liu YF,Jiang ZQ,Huang Y,et al.Feasibility study on the preparation of novel negative pressure materials for constructing new matrix of full-thickness skin defect wounds in rats[J].Chin J Burns Wounds,2022,38(7):650-660.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210401-00113.
shu

Feasibility study on the preparation of novel negative pressure materials for constructing new matrix of full-thickness skin defect wounds in rats

doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210401-00113

  • Wound Healing Centre, Emergency Department, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China

Funds:

General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China 81671917

Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai 19ZR1432200

More Information
    Abstract
  •   Objective  To explore the feasibility on the preparation of novel negative pressure materials for constructing new matrix of full-thickness skin defect wounds in rats.  Methods  The experimental research method was applied. The microstructure of polyurethane foam dressing which was commonly used in negative pressure treatment was observed under scanning electron microscope, and its pore diameter was detected (n=5). Polycaprolactone (PCL) and polybutylene succinate (PBS) were used respectively as raw materials for the preparation of PCL and PBS negative pressure materials by melt spinning technology, with the measured pore diameter of polyurethane foam dressing as the spinning spacing at the spinning rates of 15, 25, and 35 mm/s, respectively. The microstructures of the prepared negative pressure materials were observed under scanning electron microscope, and their fiber diameters were measured. The tensile strength and tensile modulus of the prepared negative pressure materials and polyurethane foam dressing were measured by tensile testing machine and composite testing machine, respectively (n=5), to screen the spinning rate for subsequent preparation of negative pressure materials. Human skin fibroblasts (Fbs) in logarithmic growth phase were co-cultured with PCL negative pressure material and PBS negative pressure material prepared at the selected spinning rate, respectively. After 1, 4, and 7 day (s) of co-culture, the cell activity and adhesion in the materials was detected by living/dead cells detection kit, and the cell proliferation level in the materials was detected by cell counting kit 8 method (n=5). A full-thickness skin defect wound was prepared on the back of 18 5-6 weeks old Sprague-Dawley rats (gender unlimited). Immediately after injury, the injured rats were divided into PCL+polyurethane group, PBS+polyurethane group, and polyurethane alone group according to the random number table (with 6 rats in each group). The wounds were covered with materials containing corresponding component and performed with continuous negative pressure suction at the negative pressure of -16.7 kPa. The wound tissue along with materials directly contacted to the wound (hereinafter referred to as wound specimens) were collected from 3 rats in each group after 7 and 14 days of negative pressure treatment (NPT), respectively. The growth of granulation tissue and the attachment of material to wound surface were observed after hematoxylin-eosin staining, the collagen fiber deposition was observed after Masson staining, and CD34 and interleukin-6 (IL-6) positive cells were detected and counted by immunohistochemical staining. Data were statistically analyzed with one-way analysis of variance, analysis of variance for factorial design, least significant difference-t test, Kruskal-Wallis H test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Bonferroni correction.  Results  The microstructure of polyurethane foam dressing was loose and porous, with the pore diameter of (815±182) μm. The spinning spacing for the subsequent negative pressure material was set as 800 μm. The microstructures of PBS negative pressure material and PCL negative pressure material were regular, with vertically interconnected layers and continuous fibers in even thickness, but the fibers of PBS negative pressure material were straighter than those of PCL negative pressure material. There was no obvious difference in the microstructure of negative pressure materials prepared from the same raw material at different spinning rates. The fiber diameters of PCL negative pressure materials prepared at three spinning rates were similar (P>0.05). The fiber diameters of PBS negative pressure materials prepared at spinning rates of 25 mm/s and 35 mm/s were significantly smaller than the fiber diameter of PBS negative pressure material prepared at the spinning rate of 15 mm/s (with t values of 4.99 and 6.40, respectively, P<0.01). Both the tensile strength and tensile modulus of PCL negative pressure materials prepared at three spinning rates were similar (P>0.05). The tensile strength of PBS negative pressure materials prepared at spinning rates of 15 mm/s and 25 mm/s was significantly lower than that of PBS negative pressure materials prepared at the spinning rate of 35 mm/s (with t values of 9.20 and 8.92, respectively, P<0.01), and the tensile modulus was significantly lower than that of PBS negative pressure materials prepared at the spinning rate of 35 mm/s (with t values of 2.58 and 2.47, respectively, P<0.05). Subsequently, PCL negative pressure material was prepared at the spinning rate of 35 mm/s, and PBS negative pressure material was prepared at the spinning rate of 15 mm/s. After 1, 4, and 7 day (s) of co-culture, the number of human skin Fbs that adhered to PCL negative pressure material and PBS negative pressure material increased with time, and there was no significant difference between the two materials. After 1 and 7 day (s) of co-culture, the proliferation levels of human skin Fbs between the two negative pressure materials were similar (P>0.05). After being co-cultured for 4 days, the proliferation level of human skin Fbs in PBS negative pressure material was significantly higher than that in PCL negative pressure material (t=6.37, P<0.01). After 7 days of NPT, the materials were clearly identifiable and a small amount of collagen fibers were also observed in the wound specimens of rats in the three groups; a small amount of granulation tissue was observed in the wound specimens of rats in polyurethane alone group. After 14 days of NPT, a large number of granulation tissue and collagen fibers were observed in the wound specimens of rats in the three groups; the materials and wound tissue in the wound specimens of rats in PCL+polyurethane group could not be clearly distinguished. After 7 and 14 days of NPT, the collagen fibers in the wound specimens of rats in polyurethane alone group were denser than those in the other two groups. After 7 days of NPT, the number of CD34 positive cells in the wound specimens of rats in PBS+polyurethane group was 14.8±3.6 per 400 times visual field, which was significantly less than 27.8±9.1 in polyurethane alone group (t=3.06, P<0.05); the number of IL-6 positive cells was 60 (49, 72), which was significantly more than 44 (38, 50) in polyurethane alone group (Z=2.41, P<0.05). After 14 days of NPT, the number of IL-6 positive cells in the wound specimens of rats in PBS+polyurethane group was 19 (12, 28) per 400 times visual field, which was significantly more than 3 (1, 10) in PCL+polyurethane group and 9 (2, 13) in polyurethane alone group (with Z values of 2.61 and 2.40, respectively, P<0.05).  Conclusions  The prepared PCL negative pressure material and PBS negative pressure material have good biocompatibility, and can successfully construct the new matrix of full-thickness skin defect wounds in rats. PCL negative pressure material is better than PBS negative pressure material in general.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(34)
  • [1]
    HanG,CeilleyR.Chronic wound healing: a review of current management and treatments[J].Adv Ther,2017,34(3):599-610.DOI: 10.1007/s12325-017-0478-y.
    [2]
    MenkeNB,WardKR,WittenTM,et al.Impaired wound healing[J].Clin Dermatol,2007,25(1):19-25.DOI: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2006.12.005.
    [3]
    MandellJC,KhuranaB,SmithJT,et al.Osteomyelitis of the lower extremity: pathophysiology, imaging, and classification, with an emphasis on diabetic foot infection[J].Emerg Radiol,2018,25(2):175-188.DOI: 10.1007/s10140-017-1564-9.
    [4]
    MueckKM,KaoLS.Patients at high-risk for surgical site infection[J].Surg Infect (Larchmt),2017,18(4):440-446.DOI: 10.1089/sur.2017.058.
    [5]
    EomY,WooKJ.Negative-pressure wound therapy for managing complicated wounds at extracorporeal membrane oxygenation sites[J].Adv Skin Wound Care,2019,32(4):183-189.DOI: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000553596.11034.d7.
    [6]
    Sandy-HodgettsK,LeslieGD,ParsonsR,et al.Prevention of postsurgical wound dehiscence after abdominal surgery with NPWT: a multicentre randomised controlled trial protocol[J].J Wound Care,2017,26(Suppl 2):S23-26.DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2017.26.Sup2.S23.
    [7]
    LiuZ,DumvilleJC,HinchliffeRJ,et al.Negative pressure wound therapy for treating foot wounds in people with diabetes mellitus[J].Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2018,10(10):CD010318.DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010318.pub3.
    [8]
    BiermannN,GeisslerEK,BrixE,et al.Pressure distribution and flow characteristics during negative pressure wound therapy[J].J Tissue Viability,2020,29(1):32-36.DOI: 10.1016/j.jtv.2019.12.004.
    [9]
    MazochM,MontgomeryC.Retained wound vacuum foam in non-healing wounds: a real possibility[J].J Wound Care,2015,24(6 Suppl):S18-20.DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2015.24.Sup6.S18.
    [10]
    AnagnostakosK,ThieryA,SahanI.Retained negative pressure wound therapy foams as a cause of infection persistence[J].Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle),2021,10(12):699-710.DOI: 10.1089/wound.2019.1088.
    [11]
    AnesäterE,BorgquistO,HedströmE,et al.The influence of different sizes and types of wound fillers on wound contraction and tissue pressure during negative pressure wound therapy[J].Int Wound J,2011,8(4):336-342.DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2011.00790.x.
    [12]
    BiH,JinY.Current progress of skin tissue engineering: seed cells, bioscaffolds, and construction strategies[J/OL].Burns Trauma,2013,1(2):63-72[2021-04-01]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27574627/.DOI: 10.4103/2321-3868.118928.
    [13]
    Rahmani Del BakhshayeshA,AnnabiN,KhalilovR,et al.Recent advances on biomedical applications of scaffolds in wound healing and dermal tissue engineering[J].Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol,2018,46(4):691-705.DOI: 10.1080/21691401.2017.1349778.
    [14]
    YaoQ,CosmeJG,XuT,et al.Three dimensional electrospun PCL/PLA blend nanofibrous scaffolds with significantly improved stem cells osteogenic differentiation and cranial bone formation[J].Biomaterials,2017,115:115-127.DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.11.018.
    [15]
    林皓,刘瑞来,齐小宝,等.PLLA/PCL复合纳米纤维三维多孔支架的制备及细胞相容性研究[J].高分子通报,2019(6):60-67.DOI: 10.14028/j.cnki.1003-3726.2019.06.007.
    [16]
    SoccioM,DominiciF,QuattrosoldiS,et al.PBS-based green copolymer as an efficient compatibilizer in thermoplastic inedible wheat flour/poly(butylene succinate) blends[J].Biomacromolecules,2020,21(8):3254-3269.DOI: 10.1021/acs.biomac.0c00701.
    [17]
    LiY,ZhangM,WengY,et al.Effects of microencapsulated abamectin on the mechanical, cross-linking, and release properties of PBS[J].Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces,2020,196:111290.DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.111290.
    [18]
    BakhshandehB,ZarrintajP,OftadehMO,et al.Tissue engineering; strategies, tissues, and biomaterials[J].Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev,2017,33(2):144-172.DOI: 10.1080/02648725.2018.1430464.
    [19]
    ZhangY,Enhejirigala,YaoB,et al.Using bioprinting and spheroid culture to create a skin model with sweat glands and hair follicles[J/OL].Burns Trauma,2021,9:tkab013[2022-04-01]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34213515/.DOI: 10.1093/burnst/tkab013.
    [20]
    OhHJ,KimDK,ChoiYC,et al.Fabrication of piezoelectric poly(L-lactic acid)/BaTiO3 fibre by the melt-spinning process[J].Sci Rep,2020,10(1):16339.DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-73261-3.
    [21]
    林志骁,张玉恒,黄容,等.负载大鼠表皮干细胞的聚己内酯-乙酸纤维素纳米纤维支架对大鼠全层皮肤缺损创面愈合的影响及其机制[J].中华烧伤杂志,2021,37(5):460-468.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210104-00005.
    [22]
    HuP,ChiariniA,WuJ,et al.Exosomes of adult human fibroblasts cultured on 3D silk fibroin nonwovens intensely stimulate neoangiogenesis[J/OL].Burns Trauma,2021,9:tkab003 [2022-04-01]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34212056/.DOI: 10.1093/burnst/tkab003.
    [23]
    Iheozor-EjioforZ,NewtonK,DumvilleJC,et al.Negative pressure wound therapy for open traumatic wounds[J].Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2018,7(7):CD012522.DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012522.pub2.
    [24]
    AgarwalP,KukreleR,SharmaD.Vacuum assisted closure (VAC)/negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) for difficult wounds: a review[J].J Clin Orthop Trauma,2019,10(5):845-848.DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2019.06.015.
    [25]
    RodriguesM,KosaricN,BonhamCA,et al.Wound healing: a cellular perspective[J].Physiol Rev,2019,99(1):665-706.DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00067.2017.
    [26]
    BergerP,de BieD,MollFL,et al.Negative pressure wound therapy on exposed prosthetic vascular grafts in the groin[J].J Vasc Surg,2012,56(3):714-720.DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.02.007.
    [27]
    DessyLA,SerratoreF,CorriasF,et al.Retention of polyurethane foam fragments during VAC therapy: a complication to be considered[J].Int Wound J,2015,12(2):132-136.DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12062.
    [28]
    MalmsjöM,GustafssonL,LindstedtS,et al.Negative pressure wound therapy-associated tissue trauma and pain: a controlled in vivo study comparing foam and gauze dressing removal by immunohistochemistry for substance P and calcitonin gene- related peptide in the wound edge[J].Ostomy Wound Manage,2011,57(12):30-35.
    [29]
    LohML,GohBKL,KongY,et al.Combination therapy of oxidised regenerated cellulose/collagen/silver dressings with negative pressure wound therapy for coverage of exposed critical structures in complex lower-extremity wounds[J].Int Wound J,2020,17(5):1356-1365.DOI: 10.1111/iwj.13406.
    [30]
    BauermeisterAJ,ZuriarrainA,NewmanMI.Three-dimensional printing in plastic and reconstructive surgery: a systematic review[J].Ann Plast Surg,2016,77(5):569-576.DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000671.
    [31]
    AravinthanA,ParkJK,HossainMA,et al.Collagen-based sponge hastens wound healing via decrease of inflammatory cytokines[J].3 Biotech,2018,8(12):487.DOI: 10.1007/s13205-018-1497-3.
    [32]
    MaZ,LiZ,ShouK,et al.Negative pressure wound therapy: regulating blood flow perfusion and microvessel maturation through microvascular pericytes[J].Int J Mol Med,2017,40(5):1415-1425.DOI: 10.3892/ijmm.2017.3131.
    [33]
    Sivan-LoukianovaE,AwadOA,StepanovicV,et al.CD34+ blood cells accelerate vascularization and healing of diabetic mouse skin wounds[J].J Vasc Res,2003,40(4):368-377.DOI: 10.1159/000072701.
    [34]
    SapienzaP,MingoliA,BorrelliV,et al.Inflammatory biomarkers, vascular procedures of lower limbs, and wound healing[J].Int Wound J,2019,16(3):716-723.DOI: 10.1111/iwj.13086.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]Li Wei, Kong Weishi, Bao Yulu, Sun Yu. Research advances of skin tissue engineering scaffolds loaded with adipose-derived stem cells in wound repair[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2023, 39(11): 1090-1095. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20221123-00502
    [2]Li Yang, Xi Taotao, Zheng Dongmei, Ge Jun, Luo Xiao'e, Wang Lin. Recent advances of skin tissue engineering based on three-dimensional bioprinting technology[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2023, 39(11): 1096-1100. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20230131-00029
    [3]Zhu Dongzhen, Yao Bin, Yan Ziqiang, Huang Sha, Fu Xiaobing. Research advances on the construction of an ideal scar model in vitro based on innovative tissue engineering technology[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2022, 38(10): 983-988. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210723-00257
    [4]Ji Chao, Xiao Shichu. Clinical application and related research advances of negative pressure wound therapy in wound treatment[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2022, 38(6): 585-589. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210511-00179
    [5]Wang Xuexin, Xiang Yang, Meng Yao, Ma Bing, Hu Xiaoyan, Tang Hongtai, Ben Daofeng, Xiao Shichu. Clinical effects of negative pressure wound therapy in treating the poor healing of incisions after different abdominal operations[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2021, 37(11): 1054-1060. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210518-00194
    [6]Zeng Yingnan, Kang Yangbo, Xu Yong'an. Research advances on skin sweat gland regeneration induced by stem cells and tissue engineering[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2021, 37(9): 900-904. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200624-00328
    [7]Xiao Shichu, Zheng Yongjun. Status and challenges of tissue-engineered skin[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2020, 36(3): 166-170. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20191202-00449
    [8]Jiang Yaonan, Wang Yuxiang, Zheng Yongjun, Hu Xiaoyan, He Fei, Shi Wenjun, Wu Qiong, Xia Zhaofan, Xiao Shichu. Clinical study of cell sheets containing allogeneic keratinocytes and fibroblasts for the treatment of partial-thickness burn wounds[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2020, 36(3): 171-178. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20191113-00426
    [9]Lyu Guozhong, Yang Minlie. Normative application of negative-pressure wound therapy to improve the wound repair level[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2020, 36(7): 523-527. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200522-00280
    [10]Zhao Yaohua, Xia Chengde, Shao Guoyi, Feng Yuhong, Xiong Wei, Shen Yaoming, Xu Lihong, Huang Weiqi, Deng Haitao, Yuan Dongliang. Clinical application of self-made drainage tubes in different layers of soft tissue for negative-pressure wound therapy in 33 patients[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2020, 36(6): 493-496. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20190327-00142
    [11]Zhu Zhikang, Wu Pan, Wang Xingang, Han Chunmao. Advances in the research of sensory nerve regeneration in tissue engineering skin[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2019, 35(3): 237-240. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2019.03.016
    [12]Chen Xiaoqiang, Zhang Wei, Li Xueyong. Advances in the research of biomechanical effects of negative-pressure wound therapy in promoting wound healing[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2018, 34(4): 243-246. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.04.010
    [13]Xie Shanliang, Guo Guanghua, Min Dinghong. Advances in the research of application of vacuum-assisted closure in wound healing and its mechanism[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2017, 33(6): 397-400. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2017.06.024
    [14]Lin Junhan, Chen Jiong, Xue Dijian, Huang Wenxiang, Su Guoliang. Influence of different inner dressings in negative-pressure wound therapy on escharectomy wound of full-thickness burn rabbits[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2017, 33(7): 431-436. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2017.07.008
    [15]Shao Huawei, Wang Xin′gang, You Chuan′gang, Han Chunmao. Advances in the research of negative-pressure wound therapy inducing the vascularization of dermal substitute[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2017, 33(8): 523-525. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2017.08.019
    [16]Liu Yang, Hu Dahai. Advances in the research of molecular mechanism of negative pressure wound therapy in improving wound healing[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2017, 33(11): 718-720. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2017.11.015
    [17]Lyu Guozhong. Reaffirmation on rational application of negative pressure wound therapy technique[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2015, 31(2): 84-85. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2015.02.002
    [18]Chai Jiake, Shen Chuanan. Lay emphasis on the application of negative pressure wound therapy technique in burn surgery[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2015, 31(2): 81-83. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2015.02.001
    [19]HAN Chun-mao, WANG Xin-gang. Tissue engineered skin and regenerative wound repair[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2013, 29(2): 122-125. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2013.02.008
    [20]ZHOU Ye-ping. Current situation of negative-pressure wound therapy[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2011, 27(4): 253-254. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2011.04.003
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-030510152025
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 22.0 %FULLTEXT: 22.0 %META: 74.3 %META: 74.3 %PDF: 3.7 %PDF: 3.7 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 3.7 %其他: 3.7 %China: 0.4 %China: 0.4 %上海: 1.2 %上海: 1.2 %东莞: 0.2 %东莞: 0.2 %佛山: 0.4 %佛山: 0.4 %北京: 0.8 %北京: 0.8 %北方邦: 0.2 %北方邦: 0.2 %十堰: 0.2 %十堰: 0.2 %南京: 0.4 %南京: 0.4 %南宁: 0.2 %南宁: 0.2 %南昌: 0.8 %南昌: 0.8 %南通: 0.2 %南通: 0.2 %合肥: 0.4 %合肥: 0.4 %吉林: 0.2 %吉林: 0.2 %吕梁: 0.4 %吕梁: 0.4 %哥伦布: 0.2 %哥伦布: 0.2 %大连: 0.2 %大连: 0.2 %天津: 0.2 %天津: 0.2 %威海: 0.4 %威海: 0.4 %宿州: 0.2 %宿州: 0.2 %山景城: 0.4 %山景城: 0.4 %广州: 0.2 %广州: 0.2 %张家口: 2.8 %张家口: 2.8 %拉贾斯坦邦: 1.8 %拉贾斯坦邦: 1.8 %新乡: 0.2 %新乡: 0.2 %无锡: 0.2 %无锡: 0.2 %昆明: 1.8 %昆明: 1.8 %杭州: 0.4 %杭州: 0.4 %格兰特县: 0.2 %格兰特县: 0.2 %武汉: 0.4 %武汉: 0.4 %济南: 0.8 %济南: 0.8 %海口: 0.2 %海口: 0.2 %海得拉巴: 0.6 %海得拉巴: 0.6 %深圳: 0.6 %深圳: 0.6 %温州: 0.4 %温州: 0.4 %漯河: 0.8 %漯河: 0.8 %潍坊: 0.4 %潍坊: 0.4 %石家庄: 0.2 %石家庄: 0.2 %福州: 1.2 %福州: 1.2 %芒廷维尤: 63.7 %芒廷维尤: 63.7 %芝加哥: 0.4 %芝加哥: 0.4 %苏州: 1.2 %苏州: 1.2 %莆田: 0.2 %莆田: 0.2 %西宁: 2.4 %西宁: 2.4 %西安: 0.4 %西安: 0.4 %运城: 0.2 %运城: 0.2 %郑州: 0.2 %郑州: 0.2 %里约热内卢: 0.2 %里约热内卢: 0.2 %重庆: 5.3 %重庆: 5.3 %银川: 0.2 %银川: 0.2 %长春: 0.2 %长春: 0.2 %长沙: 1.0 %长沙: 1.0 %青岛: 0.2 %青岛: 0.2 %驻马店: 0.2 %驻马店: 0.2 %其他China上海东莞佛山北京北方邦十堰南京南宁南昌南通合肥吉林吕梁哥伦布大连天津威海宿州山景城广州张家口拉贾斯坦邦新乡无锡昆明杭州格兰特县武汉济南海口海得拉巴深圳温州漯河潍坊石家庄福州芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州莆田西宁西安运城郑州里约热内卢重庆银川长春长沙青岛驻马店

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(8)  / Tables(4)

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (377) PDF downloads(19) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    Copyright © Chinese Journal of Burns京ICP备07035254号-14

    E-mail：shaoshangzazhi@163.com

    Website：https://zhsszz.xml-journal.net/

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return