Email Alerts
RSS
Volume 40 Issue 12
Dec.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS  > 2024  >  40(12): 1123-1131
Cheng Lin, Du Weili, Zhang Ying, et al. Staged repair strategy for chronic sacrococcygeal radiation ulcer[J]. Chin j Burns, 2021, 37(3): 225-231. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210104-00003
Citation: Pan YY,Fan YF.Effects of analgesic and sedation management in critical care medicine on patients with severe burns combined with inhalation injuries and the factors affecting tracheal intubation time[J].Chin J Burns Wounds,2024,40(12):1123-1131.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20240625-00248.
shu

Effects of analgesic and sedation management in critical care medicine on patients with severe burns combined with inhalation injuries and the factors affecting tracheal intubation time

doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20240625-00248

  • Department of Burns, Ningbo No. 2 Hospital, Ningbo315000, China

Funds:

Ningbo Top Medical and Health Research Program 2023030615

Project of Ningbo Leading Medical & Health Discipline 2022-F17

Zhejiang Provincial Medical and Health Science and Technology Plan 2021KY1004

More Information
    Abstract
  •   Objective  To analyze the effects of analgesic and sedation management in critical care medicine on patients with severe burns combined with inhalation injuries and the factors affecting the tracheal intubation time.  Methods  The study was a historical controlled study. A total of 157 patients with severe burns combined with inhalation injuries who met the inclusion criteria were admitted to the Department of Burns of Ningbo No. 2 Hospital from January 2017 to December 2022, including 126 males and 31 females, aged 14-87 years. Medical records of patients were collected before adopting the analgesic and sedation management in critical care medicine from January 2017 to December 2019 (before intervention, 77 patients) and after adopting the analgesic and sedation management in critical care medicine from January 2020 to December 2022 (after intervention, 80 patients), including the total burn area, degree of inhalation injury, abbreviated burn severity index (ABSI) score, and other general information; the number of patients, dosage, and days of using analgesic drugs (tramadol, fentanyl, and remifentanil), and the total cases and days of analgesia; the number of patients, dosage, days of using sedative drugs (midazolam, dexmedetomidine, and lytic cocktail), and the total cases and days of sedation; the days of tracheal intubation, hospitalization costs, cases and days of mechanical ventilation, and incidence of complications (secondary pneumonia and hypotension). The effects of analgesic and sedation management in critical care medicine on the time of tracheal intubation were analyzed using the interrupted time-series (ITS) analysis and univariate Fine-Gray competing risk model, and the independent factors affecting the time of tracheal intubation were screened using univariate and multivariate Fine-Gray competing risk model.  Results  There were no significant differences in the total burn area, degree of inhalation injury, and ABSI score between patients before and after intervention (P>0.05). The total sedation days and total analgesia days in patients after intervention were 7.0 (2.0, 14.0) and 7.0 (4.0, 14.0) d, respectively, which were significantly more than 3.0 (1.0, 5.0) and 4.0 (3.0, 7.0) d in patients before intervention (with Z values of -2.84 and -2.91, respectively, P<0.05). Compared with those in patients before intervention, the proportions of patients and days of using midazolam and fentanyl were significantly higher (with χ2 values of 5.68 and 6.19, Z values of -3.67 and -2.16, respectively, P<0.05), and the proportion of patients using tramadol was significantly higher (χ2=6.57, P<0.05), while the dosage of dexmedetomidine and the proportion of patients using lytic cocktail were significantly lower after intervention (Z=-2.17, χ2=14.54, P<0.05). The day of tracheal intubation in patients after intervention was 15.0 (9.0, 31.0) d, which was significantly more than 12.0 (9.0, 16.5) d before intervention (Z=-2.57, P<0.05). Compared with those in patients before intervention, the hospitalization costs, the proportion of patients and days of undergoing mechanical ventilation, and the proportion of patients with secondary pneumonia were significantly increased in patients after intervention (Z=-2.62, χ2=8.79, Z=-3.80, χ2=8.67, P<0.05). ITS analysis showed that the days of tracheal intubation in patients decreased by 0.57 d per half year before intervention (P<0.05), and the days of tracheal intubation increased by 0.62 d per half year after intervention (P<0.05). The analysis of univariate Fine-Gray competing risk model showed that after controlling the competing risk event, the day of tracheal intubation in patients in before intervention was significantly shorter than that after intervention (Z=44.81, P<0.05). Multivariate Fine-Gray competing risk model analysis showed that the ABSI score, underlying disease, and days of using midazolam were the independent factors affecting the days of tracheal intubation (with risk ratios of 0.67, 0.34, and 1.93, 95% confidence intervals of 0.66-0.73, 0.16-0.73, and 1.04-3.60, respectively, P<0.05).  Conclusions  After adopting the analgesic and sedation management in critical care medicine in patients with severe burns and inhalation injury, the total days of analgesia and sedation were significantly prolonged, and the days of tracheal intubation, days of mechanical ventilation, and hospitalization costs are increased. The proportions of patients receiving mechanical ventilation and the incidence of secondary pneumonia are also increased. The ABSI score, underlying disease, and days of using midazolam are the independent factors affecting the time of tracheal intubation.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(55)
  • [1]
    YangJ,TianG,LiuJ,et al.Epidemiology and clinical characteristics of burns in mainland China from 2009 to 2018[J/OL].Burns Trauma,2022,10:tkac039[2024-06-25]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36196302/. DOI: 10.1093/burnst/tkac039.
    [2]
    OpriessnigE,LuzeH,SmolleC,et al.Epidemiology of burn injury and the ideal dressing in global burn care - regional differences explored[J].Burns,2023,49(1):1-14.DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2022.06.018.
    [3]
    ChimaAM, MahmoudMA, NarayanasamyS. What is the role of dexmedetomidine in modern anesthesia and critical care? [J]. Adv Anesth, 2022,40(1):111-130. DOI: 10.1016/j.aan.2022.06.003.
    [4]
    ChanquesG,ConstantinJM,DevlinJW,et al.Analgesia and sedation in patients with ARDS[J].Intensive Care Med,2020,46(12):2342-2356.DOI: 10.1007/s00134-020-06307-9.
    [5]
    EgbutaC,MasonKP.Current state of analgesia and sedation in the pediatric intensive care unit[J].J Clin Med,2021,10(9):1847.DOI: 10.3390/jcm10091847.
    [6]
    BarrJ,FraserGL,PuntilloK,et al.Clinical practice guidelines for the management of pain, agitation, and delirium in adult patients in the intensive care unit[J].Crit Care Med,2013,41(1):263-306.DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182783b72.
    [7]
    DevlinJW,SkrobikY,GélinasC,et al.Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and management of pain, agitation/sedation, delirium, immobility, and sleep disruption in adult patients in the ICU[J].Crit Care Med,2018,46(9):e825-e873.DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003299.
    [8]
    HinkelbeinJ, LampertiM, AkesonJ, et al. European Society of Anaesthesiology and European Board of Anaesthesiology guidelines for procedural sedation and analgesia in adults[J]. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2018, 35(1):6-24. DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000683.
    [9]
    中华医学会重症医学分会.中国成人ICU镇痛和镇静治疗指南[J].中华危重病急救医学,2018,30(6):497-514.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2018.06.001.
    [10]
    CinottiR,BesnardN,DesmedtL,et al.Feasibility and impact of the implementation of a clinical scale-based sedation-analgesia protocol in severe burn patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. A before-after bi-center study[J].Burns,2020,46(6):1310-1317.DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2020.02.009.
    [11]
    朱峰,夏照帆.成人重症烧伤镇痛镇静管理[J].中华烧伤杂志,2018,34(6):407-411.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.06.022.
    [12]
    杨宗城.烧伤治疗学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社, 2006.
    [13]
    吴军,唐丹,李曾慧平.烧伤康复治疗学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社, 2015.
    [14]
    路卫,夏照帆,陈旭林.吸入性损伤后预防性气管切开与紧急气管切开的临床研究[J].中华烧伤杂志,2003,19(4):233-235.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2003.04.013.
    [15]
    GigengackRK,CleffkenBI,LoerSA.Advances in airway management and mechanical ventilation in inhalation injury[J].Curr Opin Anaesthesiol,2020,33(6):774-780.DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000929.
    [16]
    李世杰, 申传安. 烧伤合并吸入性损伤患者呼吸机相关肺炎的研究现状[J/CD]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 9(4):351-355. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2024.04.014
    [17]
    中国老年医学学会烧创伤分会. 吸入性损伤临床诊疗全国专家共识(2018版)[J]. 中华烧伤杂志,2018,34(11):770-775. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.11.010.
    [18]
    UsmaniA,PipalDK,BaglaH,et al.Prediction of mortality in acute thermal burn patients using the abbreviated burn severity index score: a single-center experience[J].Cureus,2022,14(6):e26161.DOI: 10.7759/cureus.26161.
    [19]
    ZhangM,YangP,YuT,et al.Lytic cocktail: an effective method to alleviate severe burn induced hyper-metabolism through regulating white adipose tissue browning[J].Heliyon,2022,8(3):e09128.DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09128.
    [20]
    曾宪锋,刘伟,李景春.冬眠Ⅰ号与地西泮治疗颅脑外伤伴躁动患者的疗效对比研究[J].临床合理用药杂志,2014,7(12C):59-60.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-3296.2014.36.040.
    [21]
    邵华,王琦琦,胡跃华,等.中断时间序列分析及其在公共卫生领域中的应用[J].中华流行病学杂志,2015,36(9):1015-1017.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2015.09.023.
    [22]
    MagransR,FerreiraF,SarlabousL,et al.The effect of clusters of double triggering and ineffective efforts in critically ill patients[J].Crit Care Med,2022,50(7):e619-e629.DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005471.
    [23]
    AustinPC, PutterH, LeeDS,et al.Estimation of the absolute risk of cardiovascular disease and other events: issues with the use of multiple Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard models[J].Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes,2022,15(2):e008368. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.121.008368.
    [24]
    JakobSM,RuokonenE,GroundsRM,et al.Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam or propofol for sedation during prolonged mechanical ventilation: two randomized controlled trials[J].JAMA,2012,307(11):1151-1160.DOI: 10.1001/jama.2012.304.
    [25]
    HughesCG,MaillouxPT,DevlinJW,et al.Dexmedetomidine or propofol for sedation in mechanically ventilated adults with sepsis[J].N Engl J Med,2021,384(15):1424-1436.DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2024922.
    [26]
    中华医学会急诊医学分会危重症学组,中国急诊成人镇痛、镇静与谵妄管理专家共识组.中国急诊成人镇痛、镇静与谵妄管理专家共识[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2023,32(12):1594-1609.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2023.12.004.
    [27]
    中华医学会儿科学分会急救学组,中华医学会急诊医学分会儿科学组,中华儿科杂志编辑委员会.中国儿童重症监护病房镇痛和镇静治疗专家共识(2024)[J].中华儿科杂志,2024,62(3):196-203.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112140-20231130-00400.
    [28]
    中华医学会呼吸病学分会,中国医师协会呼吸医师分会危重症医学专家组.成人呼吸危重症患者镇痛镇静管理及相关问题专家共识[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2023,46(12):1162-1175.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112147-20230901-00123.
    [29]
    张晗希,韩孟杰,周郁,等.应用中断时间序列分析我国“四免一关怀”政策实施前后对艾滋病相关病死率的影响[J].中华流行病学杂志,2020,41(3):406-411.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2020.03.024.
    [30]
    肖桂真,杨蕾,吴优优,等.中断时间序列分析在基本医疗保险支付方式改革效果评估中的应用研究[J].中国卫生统计,2024,41(3):360-364.DOI: 10.11783/j.issn.1002-3674.2024.03.007.
    [31]
    文静,张鹏,曹英南,等.基于中断时间序列分析的髋和膝关节置换术患者住院费用变化趋势研究[J].中国医院管理, 2023, 43(10):42-47.
    [32]
    FaginA,PalmieriTL.Considerations for pediatric burn sedation and analgesia[J/OL].Burns Trauma,2017,5:28[2024-06-25]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29051890/. DOI: 10.1186/s41038-017-0094-8.
    [33]
    ReadeMC,FinferS.Sedation and delirium in the intensive care unit[J].N Engl J Med,2014,370(5):444-454.DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra1208705.
    [34]
    BaldoBA. Toxicities of opioid analgesics: respiratory depression, histamine release, hemodynamic changes, hypersensitivity, serotonin toxicity[J].Arch Toxicol,2021,95(8):2627-2642. DOI: 10.1007/s00204-021-03068-2.
    [35]
    RyanNM,IsbisterGK.Tramadol overdose causes seizures and respiratory depression but serotonin toxicity appears unlikely[J].Clin Toxicol (Phila),2015,53(6):545-550.DOI: 10.3109/15563650.2015.1036279.
    [36]
    ParkS, LeeGH, KimS, et al.Risk factors for respiratory depression associated with tramadol based on the Global Pharmacovigilance Database (VigiBase)[J].Pharmaceuticals (Basel),2024,17(2):205. DOI: 10.3390/ph17020205.
    [37]
    郭光华,江政英.小儿吸入性损伤[J].中华烧伤杂志,2020,36(4):247-251.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20191002-00393.
    [38]
    HolleyAD, ReadeMC, LipmanJ, et al.There is no fire without smoke! Pathophysiology and treatment of inhalational injury in burns: a narrative review[J].Anaesth Intensive Care,2020,48(2):114-122. DOI: 10.1177/0310057X20913282.
    [39]
    郭光华.重度吸入性损伤的呼吸支持与治疗[J].中华烧伤杂志, 2013, 29(2):134-138. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2013.02.011.
    [40]
    RikerRR,ShehabiY,BokeschPM,et al.Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for sedation of critically ill patients: a randomized trial[J].JAMA,2009,301(5):489-499.DOI: 10.1001/jama.2009.56.
    [41]
    XiaoK,ChenWX,LiXJ.Analysis of risk factors of prolonged mechanical ventilation in patients with severe burn injury[J].Clin Respir J,2023,17(8):791-798.DOI: 10.1111/crj.13673.
    [42]
    SchreiberAF, CerianaP, AmbrosinoN, et al.Physiotherapy and weaning from prolonged mechanical ventilation[J].Respir Care,2019,64(1):17-25. DOI: 10.4187/respcare.06280.
    [43]
    TrudzinskiFC,NeetzB,BornitzF,et al.Risk factors for prolonged mechanical ventilation and weaning failure: a systematic review[J].Respiration,2022,101(10):959-969.DOI: 10.1159/000525604.
    [44]
    RossettiAO, ClaassenJ, GaspardN. Status epilepticus in the ICU[J].Intensive Care Med,2024,50(1):1-16. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-023-07263-w.
    [45]
    娄林娟.咪达唑仑用于重症监护患者镇静的效果评价[J].中国药业,2013,22(5):9-10.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-4931.2013.05.005.
    [46]
    GarciaR, SalluhJIF, AndradeTR, et al.A systematic review and meta-analysis of propofol versus midazolam sedation in adult intensive care (ICU) patients[J].J Crit Care,2021,64:91-99. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2021.04.001.
    [47]
    BaarslagMA,AllegaertK,KnibbeCA,et al.Pharmacological sedation management in the paediatric intensive care unit[J].J Pharm Pharmacol,2017,69(5):498-513.DOI: 10.1111/jphp.12630.
    [48]
    FaginA,PalmieriT,GreenhalghD,et al.A comparison of dexmedetomidine and midazolam for sedation in severe pediatric burn injury[J].J Burn Care Res,2012,33(6):759-763.DOI: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e318254d48e.
    [49]
    LewisK, AlshamsiF, CarayannopoulosKL, et al.Dexmedetomidine vs other sedatives in critically ill mechanically ventilated adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials[J].Intensive Care Med,2022,48(7):811-840. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-022-06712-2.
    [50]
    杨毅,邱海波.镇痛和镇静治疗的进步:从改善患者舒适度到器官功能保护[J].中华内科杂志,2011,50(10):809-811.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1426.2011.10.001.
    [51]
    VincentJL,ShehabiY,WalshTS,et al.Comfort and patient-centred care without excessive sedation: the eCASH concept[J].Intensive Care Med,2016,42(6):962-971.DOI: 10.1007/s00134-016-4297-4.
    [52]
    王桥生,罗琼,蒋志华,等.以eCASH理念为基础的镇静策略对ICU患者的效果[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2021,30(2):226-230.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2021.02.017.
    [53]
    StollingsJL,BalasMC,ChanquesG.Evolution of sedation management in the intensive care unit (ICU)[J].Intensive Care Med,2022,48(11):1625-1628.DOI: 10.1007/s00134-022-06806-x.
    [54]
    ShehabiY,BellomoR,ReadeMC,et al.Early goal-directed sedation versus standard sedation in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients: a pilot study*[J].Crit Care Med,2013,41(8):1983-1991.DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31828a437d.
    [55]
    舒开丽,燕朋波,曹文理,等.早期目标导向型镇静策略对术后机械通气患者的临床效果观察[J].中国中西医结合外科杂志,2023,29(1):34-37.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-6948.2023.01.007.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]Li Jun, Liu Mengdong, Zhu Liang, Luo Yuming, Yang Qiying, Gao Xiaowen, Han Juntao. Clinical effect of unilateral superior gluteal artery perforator propeller flap combined with contralateral centripetal advancement flap in repairing huge pressure ulcers in the sacrococcygeal region[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2024, 40(6): 551-556. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20231031-00158
    [2]Qi Jianwu, Chen Shao, Sun Binhong, Chai Yitong, Huang Jian, Li Yi, Yang Keyue, Sun Heyang, Chen Hong. Clinical effects of free latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap combined with artificial dermis and split-thickness skin graft in the treatment of degloving injury in lower extremity[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2022, 38(4): 347-353. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210421-00145
    [3]Li Gang, Zhang Zhi, Li Yeyang, Wang Jinlun. Clinical effects of flaps with cervical cutaneous branch of transverse cervical artery in repairing neck radiation ulcers[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2021, 37(12): 1116-1121. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200807-00371
    [4]Chen Liming, Xu Liwei, Liu Yi, Wang Gang. Effects of free perforator propeller flap from buttock in repairing deep wound of buttock[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2020, 36(2): 106-109. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2020.02.005
    [5]Ma Chao, Tao Ran, Shu Jun, Lei Yonghong, Han Yan. Methods of repairing large soft tissue defect with latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap and management of secondary wound in donor site[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2020, 36(12): 1199-1203. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20191121-00439
    [6]Sun Jialin, Guo Pengfei, Cui Zhengjun, Meng Qingnan, Wei Aizhou, Zhou Jian. Clinical effects of superior gluteal artery perforator " buddy flap" in repairing pressure ulcer in sacrococcygeal region[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2020, 36(8): 726-729. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20190607-00265
    [7]Shi Chenshuo, Tang Xiujun, Wang Dali, Wei Zairong, Wang Bo, Wu Bihua, Liu Zhiyuan. Clinical effects of superior gluteal artery perforator island flap in repair of sacral pressure ulcer[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2019, 35(5): 367-370. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2019.05.008
    [10]Ning Fanggang, Qin Fengjun, Chen Xin, Zhang Guoan. Repair of cervical postradiation ulcer following radical mastectomy with lower trapezius myocutaneous flap[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2015, 31(6): 421-423. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2015.06.006
    [14]LI Yong-lin, XIAO Hai-tao, QI Qiang, ZHOU Zhao-ping, OKA Hiroaki, MORIGUCHI Takahaki. Clinical efficacy of artery pedorator-based flap in the repair of gluteal-sacral pressure sores[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2007, 23(1): 32-35.
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(11)

    1. 李莉莉，于文昌，李波，吴德勇，王进勇，邹晓辉，汪明柱，徐向荣. 脊柱内固定术后患者难愈性创面的修复方法及其效果. 中华烧伤与创面修复杂志. 2024(06): 529-535 . 本站查看
    2. 沈余明，胡云刚. 慢性放射性溃疡的诊疗策略. 中华烧伤与创面修复杂志. 2024(06): 501-506 . 本站查看
    3. 杜伟力，沈余明，程琳，代强，车可心. 乳腺癌根治术后胸部放射性溃疡的修复策略及其临床效果. 中华烧伤与创面修复杂志. 2024(06): 521-528 . 本站查看
    4. 中国老年医学学会烧创伤分会，中华医学会组织修复与再生分会，中国康复医学会再生医学与康复专业委员会，中国抗癌协会肿瘤整形外科专业委员会，《中华烧伤与创面修复杂志》编辑委员会. 放射性皮肤损伤的诊断和治疗专家共识(2024版). 中华烧伤与创面修复杂志. 2024(08): 701-712 . 本站查看
    5. 官世水，沈佳祚，张力，林建聪. 臀下动脉股后复合组织瓣修复骶尾部巨大压力性创面. 局解手术学杂志. 2024(09): 800-804 .
    6. 王思思，肖逵，李罡，陈宾，张志，李孝建. Flexi-Seal粪便管理系统联合负压封闭引流技术辅助皮瓣修复会阴部放射性溃疡一例. 中国临床新医学. 2023(07): 739-741 .
    7. 牧晶，宋增丽，代红雨，王志敏，叶建州. 中药内外合治子宫内膜癌术后放射性窦道一例. 环球中医药. 2022(10): 1714-1716 .
    8. 吴德金，赵遵江，张保德，章荣涛，王修坤，刘勇. 封闭负压引流联合脱细胞真皮和自体刃厚皮移植治疗足踝部创面30例. 感染、炎症、修复. 2022(03): 145-147+193 .
    9. 刘毅. 重视医源性创面的防治. 中华烧伤杂志. 2021(03): 213-215 .
    10. 肖敏，朱媛，张伟旭. 游离股前外侧皮瓣修复头部严重放射性溃疡1例. 山东大学学报(医学版). 2021(08): 122-124 .
    11. 郑梁，杨帆，徐风瑞，李江华，赵坤，吴桐，杨银辉. 4T原则在修复难愈性压疮中的临床应用. 中国美容整形外科杂志. 2021(10): 610-612+616 .

    Other cited types(1)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0305101520
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 16.0 %FULLTEXT: 16.0 %META: 76.5 %META: 76.5 %PDF: 7.5 %PDF: 7.5 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 0.9 %其他: 0.9 %Sandy Hook: 1.4 %Sandy Hook: 1.4 %五指山: 1.9 %五指山: 1.9 %伦敦: 1.9 %伦敦: 1.9 %儋州: 0.9 %儋州: 0.9 %北京: 1.4 %北京: 1.4 %北方邦: 0.5 %北方邦: 0.5 %哥伦布: 0.9 %哥伦布: 0.9 %唐山: 0.9 %唐山: 0.9 %商丘: 0.5 %商丘: 0.5 %天津: 0.9 %天津: 0.9 %常州: 1.9 %常州: 1.9 %张家口: 7.5 %张家口: 7.5 %昆明: 1.4 %昆明: 1.4 %法尔肯施泰因: 2.8 %法尔肯施泰因: 2.8 %洛阳: 0.5 %洛阳: 0.5 %湖州: 1.9 %湖州: 1.9 %芒廷维尤: 60.6 %芒廷维尤: 60.6 %荆州: 0.5 %荆州: 0.5 %西宁: 8.0 %西宁: 8.0 %运城: 0.5 %运城: 0.5 %重庆: 0.9 %重庆: 0.9 %长沙: 0.5 %长沙: 0.5 %青岛: 0.5 %青岛: 0.5 %黄冈: 0.5 %黄冈: 0.5 %其他Sandy Hook五指山伦敦儋州北京北方邦哥伦布唐山商丘天津常州张家口昆明法尔肯施泰因洛阳湖州芒廷维尤荆州西宁运城重庆长沙青岛黄冈

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(2)  / Tables(6)

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (411) PDF downloads(16) Cited by(12)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Copyright © Chinese Journal of Burns京ICP备07035254号-14

    E-mail：shaoshangzazhi@163.com

    Website：https://zhsszz.xml-journal.net/

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return