Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Tian Yongsheng,Zhang Yuji,Wu Junbang,et al.A prospective clinical study of superselective digital subtraction angiography combined with color doppler ultrasound in anterolateral thigh flap reconstruction of extremity skin and soft tissue defects[J].Chin J Burns Wounds,2026,42(10):1-10.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20260317-00110.
Citation: Tian Yongsheng,Zhang Yuji,Wu Junbang,et al.A prospective clinical study of superselective digital subtraction angiography combined with color doppler ultrasound in anterolateral thigh flap reconstruction of extremity skin and soft tissue defects[J].Chin J Burns Wounds,2026,42(10):1-10.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20260317-00110.

A prospective clinical study on the application of SS-DSA combined with CDU in ALTF reconstruction of extremity soft tissue defects

doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20260317-00110
Funds:

Suzhou Key Medical Discipline SZXK202532

Suzhou Applied Basic Research (Medical and Health) Science and Technology Innovation Project SYWD2024085

Suzhou "Strengthening Health through Science and Education" Project MSXM2025081

More Information
  •   Objective  To investigate the clinical efficacy of superselective digital subtraction angiography (SS-DSA) combined with color Doppler ultrasound (CDU) in assisting anterolateral thigh flap (ALTF) reconstruction of extremity soft tissue defects.  Methods  This was a prospective case series study. From October 2024 to August 2025, 50 patients (37 males and 13 females, aged 35-76 years) with extremity soft tissue defects who met the inclusion criteria were treated at Suzhou Ruihua Orthopedic Hospital, and all underwent ALTF reconstruction. Preoperatively, CDU and SS-DSA were used to determine the number and locations of perforators in the flap donor site, as well as the characteristics of their source arteries. The findings from SS-DSA and CDU were integrated (i.e., combined method) to identify the dominant perforator and target source artery and to develop an individualized flap design. Thorough debridement was performed, and the post-debridement defect size ranged from 8 cm×6 cm to 32 cm×20 cm. The flaps were harvested and transferred to the recipient site. Under an operating microscope, end-to-end or end-to-side anastomosis was performed between the flap vessels and the recipient vessels, and then the wound was closed. The flap was designed to extend approximately 1 cm beyond the margins of the recipient-site defect. A total of 51 flaps were harvested from the 50 patients. Donor site wounds of flap were repaired by direct suture or full-thickness skin grafting. Intraoperatively, the number and locations of the observed perforators and their source arteries were recorded. Flap thickness and vascular pedicle length were also documented. Using intraoperative exploration as the gold standard, the sensitivity and positive predictive value among CDU, SS-DSA, and the combined method for perforator localization were compared. The distances between the perforator localization points determined by the three methods and the actual intraoperative perforator entry points (i.e., perforator localization error distance) were compared. The accuracy of the combined method in predicting the source artery of perforators was calculated. In performing SS-DSA perforator localization, the total procedure time, dose-area product (DAP), fluoroscopy time (FT), and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) before and after angiography were caculated. The puncture site was observed after angiography. Postoperatively, flap survival and healing of donor site wounds were observed.  Results  A total of 89 ALTF perforators were identified intraoperatively, including 47 oblique, 32 descending, 5 anterior, 3 transverse, and 2 ascending branches; 69 perforators were actually used, including 43 oblique, 19 descending, 5 anterior, and 2 ascending branches. The mean flap thickness was (1.4±0.5) cm, and the mean pedicle length was (13±3) cm. The sensitivities of CDU, SS-DSA, and the combined method were 86.52%, 85.39%, and 95.51%, respectively, and the corresponding positive predictive values were 87.50%, 87.36%, and 96.59%, respectively. The perforator localization error distance of the combined method was 0.31 (0.25, 0.37) cm, which was significantly shorter than those of CDU (0.66 (0.58, 0.74) cm) and SS-DSA (0.67 (0.58, 0.75) cm), respectively, with Z values of -7.82 and -7.45, respectively, both P values <0.05. The combined method achieved 100%(89/89) accuracy in predicting the source artery of perforators. The total procedure time of SS-DSA ranged from 19-47 min, the DAP was 102.05 (76.90, 128.50) Gy·cm², and the FT was 6.08 (4.42, 7.20) min. There was no statistically significant difference in eGFR between post-angiography and pre-angiography (P>0.05). No obvious complications were observed at the puncture site after angiography. Postoperatively, all flaps survived, and all donor site wounds healed well.  Conclusions  SS-DSA combined with CDU provides accurate perforator localization for anterolateral thigh flaps, facilitates individualized flap design, and demonstrates good safety, with satisfactory outcomes in the reconstruction of extremity soft tissue defects.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    董帅,王石,滕志成,等. 吲哚菁绿血管造影在皮瓣穿支定位中的应用[J]. 中华手外科杂志,2025,41(1):46-51. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn311653-20240629-00181.
    [2]
    吴成龙, 张岩, 程俊楠, 等. “三源四线法”在小腿前外侧穿支皮瓣设计与切取中的临床应用效果[J]. 中华烧伤与创面修复杂志, 2026, 42(3): 252-260. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20250328-00148.
    [3]
    程贺云, 巨积辉, 赵强, 等. CDU精准定位下游离一侧下肢多个小腿外侧穿支皮瓣修复手指不同部位多个创面的效果[J]. 中华烧伤与创面修复杂志, 2026, 42(2): 182-188. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20241210-00484.
    [4]
    崔轶,王玉垒,罗屹,等. 股前外侧皮瓣穿支定位导航系统的研发与临床应用[J]. 中华骨科杂志,2026,46(7):480-486. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121113-20250110-00030.
    [5]
    徐永清,唐举玉,刘元波,等. 股前外侧皮瓣穿支解剖学特征与定位方法的专家共识(2024版)[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志,2024,42(5):489-499. DOI: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2024.5.01.
    [6]
    高登文,任忠亮,郝青晔,等. 股前外侧皮瓣联合髂骨瓣移植同期修复中足大面积软组织合并大段骨缺损[J]. 中华整形外科杂志,2026,42(7):785-792. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn114453-20251023-00275.
    [7]
    魏鹏飞,张建华,谢振军,等. 长段移植动、静脉束桥接股前外侧皮瓣主干血管在小腿复杂创面修复中的应用[J]. 中华显微外科杂志,2026,49(3):328-334. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441206-20251208-00198.
    [8]
    陈涛, 邓呈亮, 高绍莹, 等. 垂直褥式缝合联合水滴形动脉端侧吻合技术在游离皮瓣移植修复四肢创面中的临床应用效果[J]. 中华烧伤与创面修复杂志, 2026, 42(5): 428-435. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20260131-00061.
    [9]
    孙丰坤, 王立民, 宋兴华, 等. 彩色多普勒超声探测下应用以旋股外侧动脉斜支为蒂的ALTPF修复四肢皮肤软组织缺损的临床效果[J]. 中华烧伤与创面修复杂志, 2026, 42(1): 81-90. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20240623-00247.
    [10]
    杨林,曹阳,程俊楠,等.以旋股外侧动脉斜支为蒂股前外侧皮瓣的穿支分布特点与临床应用[J].中华整形外科杂志,2023,39(5):463-471.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn114453-20230213-00031.
    [11]
    李雷,周正虎,鞠文,等.以膝降动脉为蒂的游离股前外侧穿支皮瓣修复小腿保肢术后创面的临床效果[J].中华烧伤与创面修复杂志,2023,39(5):450-455.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20220725-00308.
    [12]
    杨亮, 周荣, 巨积辉, 等. 游离双侧股前外侧内增压型串联皮瓣修复足踝部大面积创面的临床疗效[J]. 中华烧伤与创面修复杂志, 2025, 41(1): 61-69. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20240508-00164.
    [13]
    车德惠,戴佳慧,吕阳,等. 分叶股前外侧皮瓣在复杂性软组织缺损修复中的选择应用[J]. 中华显微外科杂志,2026,49(3):308-312. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441206-20260106-00003.
    [14]
    陆征峰,张乾,魏苏明,等. 游离股前外侧次级穿支分叶皮瓣修复手部不规则创面[J]. 中华手外科杂志,2026,42(3):229-232. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn311653-20260102-00002.
    [15]
    周飞亚,张弦,褚庭纲,等. 以彩色多普勒术前定位的短蒂股前外侧穿支皮瓣游离移植修复四肢中小面积皮肤缺损[J]. 中华手外科杂志,2023,39(1):77-80. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn311653-20201203-00397.
    [16]
    莫勇军,杨克勤,谭海涛,等. CTA联合彩色多普勒超声检测在股前外侧穿支皮瓣中的应用[J]. 中华显微外科杂志,2018,41(1):68-72. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-2036.2018.01.017.
    [17]
    陈永沛,仲海燕,陈勇,等. 数字减影血管造影在腓动脉穿支皮瓣移植中的应用[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版),2023,18(6):507-510. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2023.06.010.
    [18]
    李昌松,李雷,周正虎,等. 3D数字减影血管造影联合彩色多普勒超声穿支血管定位技术在股前外侧穿支皮瓣修复小腿创面中的临床应用[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版),2025,20(1):7-12. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2025.01.002.
    [19]
    李雷,巨积辉,周正虎,等. DSA技术结合多普勒彩超在股前外侧皮瓣穿支定位中的应用[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志,2020,38(3):331-334. DOI: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2020.03.017.
    [20]
    HanT, KhavaninN, ZhuS, et al. A Comparison of Handheld Doppler and Indocyanine Green Angiography for Perforator Localization[J]. Ann Plast Surg, 2022, 89(1): 89-94. DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003203.
    [21]
    MattisonGL, LewisPG, GuptaSC, et al. SPY Imaging Use in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction Patients: Preventative or Overly Conservative?[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2016, 138(1): 15e-21e. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002266.
    [22]
    芮永军,张雁,杨红,等. 术前不同定位方法在股前外侧穿支皮瓣应用的对比分析[J]. 中华显微外科杂志,2015,38(1):33-37. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-2036.2015.01.009.
    [23]
    许甜甜,林平,陈爱兰,等. 红外热像仪联合高频彩色多普勒超声在股前外侧穿支皮瓣移植术前穿支定位中的应用[J]. 中华手外科杂志,2018,34(6):414-417. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-054X.2018.06.006.
    [24]
    SchiltzD, LenhardJ, KleinS, et al. Do-It-Yourself Preoperative High-Resolution Ultrasound-Guided Flap Design of the Superficial Circumflex Iliac Artery Perforator Flap (SCIP)[J]. J Clin Med, 2021, 10(11): 2427. DOI: 10.3390/jcm10112427.
    [25]
    李俊明,庄艳芳,马广辉,等. 超声辅助下穿支螺旋桨皮瓣修复足踝部软组织缺损26例[J]. 中华显微外科杂志,2024,47(3):273-279. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441206-20231117-00080.
    [26]
    唐举玉, 卿黎明, 贺继强, 等. 数字化技术辅助旋股外侧动脉降支分叶穿支皮瓣设计的初步应用[J].中华显微外科杂志,2016,39(2):123-126. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-2036.2016.02.006.
    [27]
    张月恒,宋坤修,刘小智,等. 改良穿支体区CTA三维重建在股前外侧穿支皮瓣及腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣中的应用[J]. 中华显微外科杂志,2022,45(5):521-527. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441206-20220319-00056.
    [28]
    LanY, LiuR, GuoL, et al. Advancing Preoperative Planning in Perforator Flap Surgery with Photon-Counting Computed Tomography Angiography: Less Challenges with More Precision[J]. Aesthetic Plast Surg, 2025, 49(17): 4888-4900. DOI: 10.1007/s00266-025-04861-5.
    [29]
    李雪栋,赵刚,潘筱云,等. 非增强和增强核磁共振定位股前外侧皮瓣穿支的临床对照研究[J]. 中华手外科杂志,2021,37(1):27-30. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn311653-20200323-00140.
    [30]
    XiaoW, LiK, Kiu-Huen NgS, et al. A Prospective Comparative Study of Color Doppler Ultrasound and Infrared Thermography in the Detection of Perforators for Anterolateral Thigh Flaps[J]. Ann Plast Surg, 2020,84(5S Suppl 3):S190-S195. DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002369.
    [31]
    La PadulaS, HersantB, MeningaudJP. Intraoperative use of indocyanine green angiography for selecting the more reliable perforator of the anterolateral thigh flap: A comparison study[J]. Microsurgery, 2018, 38(7): 738-744. DOI: 10.1002/micr.30326.
    [32]
    岳帅联合应用吲哚菁绿血管造影技术和荧光成像系统实现术中导航穿支血管定位中国医学科学院2022

    岳帅. 联合应用吲哚菁绿血管造影技术和荧光成像系统实现术中导航穿支血管定位[D]. 中国医学科学院,2022.

    [33]
    罗思思,杨喆,李养群. 吲哚菁绿血管造影技术在评价带蒂皮瓣血流灌注中的研究进展[J]. 中华整形外科杂志,2024,40(5):571-575. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn114453-20221031-00347.
    [34]
    董帅, 王石, 滕志成, 等. 吲哚菁绿血管造影联合彩色多普勒超声在股前外侧穿支皮瓣穿支定位中的临床应用效果[J].中华烧伤与创面修复杂志,2025,41(11):1091-1100. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20240629-00254.
    [35]
    杨勇,李斌,李金勇,等. 基于CDU和DSA穿支定位的分层切取方案在削薄股前外侧皮瓣中的应用[J]. 中华显微外科杂志,2024,47(3):248-253. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441206-20231215-00103.
    [36]
    董帅,王石,滕志成,等. 皮瓣穿支定位技术的研究进展[J]. 中国美容整形外科杂志,2025,36(7):411-415,437. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-7040.2025.07.007.
    [37]
    程俊楠,柳志锦,杨林,等. 基于解剖学研究的三级命名法在旋股外侧动脉主要分支命名中的应用探讨[J]. 中华解剖与临床杂志,2022,27(1):13-18. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn101202-20210410-00093.
    [38]
    TaylorGI, PalmerJH. The vascular territories (angiosomes) of the body: experimental study and clinical applications[J]. Br J Plast Surg, 1987,40(2):113-141. DOI: 10.1016/0007-1226(87)90185-8.
    [39]
    TaylorGI, CorlettRJ, AshtonMW. The Functional Angiosome: Clinical Implications of the Anatomical Concept[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2017,140(4):721-733. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003694.
    [40]
    杨成鹏. 以旋股外侧动脉前支为蒂的股前外侧皮瓣临床应用研究[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版),2025,20(1):92. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2025.01.016.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(4)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (40) PDF downloads(5) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return