Zou Xinhua, Zhu Youpeng, Ren Guoqiang, et al. Significance of bacteria detection with filter paper method on diagnosis of diabetic foot wound infection[J]. Chin j Burns, 2017, 33(2): 83-88. Doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2017.02.005
Citation: Zou Xinhua, Zhu Youpeng, Ren Guoqiang, et al. Significance of bacteria detection with filter paper method on diagnosis of diabetic foot wound infection[J]. Chin j Burns, 2017, 33(2): 83-88. Doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2017.02.005

Significance of bacteria detection with filter paper method on diagnosis of diabetic foot wound infection

doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2017.02.005
  • Received Date: 2016-04-01
    Available Online: 2021-10-28
  • Publish Date: 2017-02-20
  • Objective To evaluate the significance of bacteria detection with filter paper method on diagnosis of diabetic foot wound infection. Methods Eighteen patients with diabetic foot ulcer conforming to the study criteria were hospitalized in Liyuan Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology from July 2014 to July 2015. Diabetic foot ulcer wounds were classified according to the University of Texas diabetic foot classification (hereinafter referred to as Texas grade) system, and general condition of patients with wounds in different Texas grade was compared. Exudate and tissue of wounds were obtained, and filter paper method and biopsy method were adopted to detect the bacteria of wounds of patients respectively. Filter paper method was regarded as the evaluation method, and biopsy method was regarded as the control method. The relevance, difference, and consistency of the detection results of two methods were tested. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of filter paper method in bacteria detection were calculated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn based on the specificity and sensitivity of filter paper method in bacteria detection of 18 patients to predict the detection effect of the method. Data were processed with one-way analysis of variance and Fisher's exact test. In patients tested positive for bacteria by biopsy method, the correlation between bacteria number detected by biopsy method and that by filter paper method was analyzed with Pearson correlation analysis. Results (1) There were no statistically significant differences among patients with wounds in Texas grade 1, 2, and 3 in age, duration of diabetes, duration of wound, wound area, ankle brachial index, glycosylated hemoglobin, fasting blood sugar, blood platelet count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, aspartate aminotransferase, serum creatinine, and urea nitrogen (with F values from 0.029 to 2.916, P values above 0.05), while there were statistically significant differences among patients with wounds in Texas grade 1, 2, and 3 in white blood cell count and alanine aminotransferase (with F values 4.688 and 6.833 respectively, P<0.05 or P<0.01). (2) According to the results of biopsy method, 6 patients were tested negative for bacteria, and 12 patients were tested positive for bacteria, among which 10 patients were with bacterial number above 1×105/g, and 2 patients with bacterial number below 1×105/g. According to the results of filter paper method, 8 patients were tested negative for bacteria, and 10 patients were tested positive for bacteria, among which 7 patients were with bacterial number above 1×105/g, and 3 patients with bacterial number below 1×105/g. There were 7 patients tested positive for bacteria both by biopsy method and filter paper method, 8 patients tested negative for bacteria both by biopsy method and filter paper method, and 3 patients tested positive for bacteria by biopsy method but negative by filter paper method. Patients tested negative for bacteria by biopsy method did not tested positive for bacteria by filter paper method. There was directional association between the detection results of two methods (P=0.004), i. e. if result of biopsy method was positive, result of filter paper method could also be positive. There was no obvious difference in the detection results of two methods (P=0.250). The consistency between the detection results of two methods was ordinary (Kappa=0.68, P=0.002). (3) The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of filter paper method in bacteria detection were 70%, 100%, 1.00, 0.73, and 83.3%, respectively. Total area under ROC curve of bacteria detection by filter paper method in 18 patients was 0.919 (with 95% confidence interval 0-1.000, P=0.030). (4) There were 13 strains of bacteria detected by biopsy method, with 5 strains of Acinetobacter baumannii, 5 strains of Staphylococcus aureus, 1 strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 1 strain of Streptococcus bovis, and 1 strain of bird Enterococcus. There were 11 strains of bacteria detected by filter paper method, with 5 strains of Acinetobacter baumannii, 3 strains of Staphylococcus aureus, 1 strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 1 strain of Streptococcus bovis, and 1 strain of bird Enterococcus. Except for Staphylococcus aureus, the sensitivity and specificity of filter paper method in the detection of the other 4 bacteria were all 100%. The consistency between filter paper method and biopsy method in detecting Acinetobacter baumannii was good (Kappa=1.00, P<0.01), while that in detecting Staphylococcus aureus was ordinary (Kappa=0.68, P<0.05). (5) There was no obvious correlation between the bacteria number of wounds detected by filter paper method and that by biopsy method (r=0.257, P=0.419). There was obvious correlation between the bacteria numbers detected by two methods in wounds with Texas grade 1 and 2 (with r values as 0.999, P values as 0.001). There was no obvious correlation between the bacteria numbers detected by two methods in wounds with Texas grade 3 (r=-0.053, P=0.947). Conclusions The detection result of filter paper method is in accordance with that of biopsy method in the determination of bacterial infection, and it is of great importance in the diagnosis of local infection of diabetic foot wound.

     

  • Relative Articles

    [1]Practical guidelines for the diagnosis, prevention and treatment of invasive fungal infection post burn injury in China: 2024 edition[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2024, 40(7): 604-617. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20240103-00003
    [2]Luo Gaoxing, Zhan Rixing, Yuan Zhiqiang, Peng Yizhi. Discussion on classification and diagnostic nomenclature of burn infection[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2023, 39(4): 301-304. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20221206-00528
    [3]Bian Ruihao, Huang Shixin, Zhu Jiayuan, Wu Jun, Fan Kunwu, Hu Zhicheng, Xu Yingbin, Yu Qiuhua, Zhang Tao, Li Xueyi, Chen Shaozhen. Establishment of a topographic map assessment system for facial and cervical wounds and scars of burn patients based on the Delphi method[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2023, 39(12): 1115-1121. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20230905-00075
    [4]Chen Wei, Chang Shusen, Zhou Jian, Zhang Fang, Yang Chenglan, Nie Kaiyu, Deng Chengliang, Wei Zairong. Clinical effects of antibiotic bone cement combined with free anterolateral thigh flap in sequential treatment of diabetic foot ulcer[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2023, 39(4): 319-324. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20220628-00267
    [5]He Ting, Liu Wei, Shen Chuan'an. Research advances on application of pancreatic stone protein in the early diagnosis of sepsis[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2023, 39(10): 985-988. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20221120-00498
    [6]He Zeliang, Li Jin, Sui Zhenyang, Zhang Julei, An Liang'en, Liu Lingling, Zhang Chengliang, Yao Yuanyuan, Qiu Shulin, Li Xiaodong. Application and clinical efficacy of ultrasound debridement method in residual burn wounds[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2022, 38(11): 1034-1039. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20211123-00396
    [7]Yang Lan, Yang Qingwen, Fu Yanjie. Research advances on the pathogenesis and diagnosis of pyoderma gangrenosum[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2022, 38(6): 569-573. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20220331-00117
    [8]Yang Li, Li Kelin, Pang Yuanxiang, Zhou Wenchang. Clinical effects of free descending branch tissue flap of lateral circumflex femoral artery in repairing Wagner grade 3 or 4 diabetic foot wounds[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2022, 38(12): 1148-1155. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20220321-00076
    [9]Shen Yuming. Strategies on the prevention and treatment of surgical site infection and the resulting wound[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2021, 37(3): 207-212. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210105-00006
    [10]Liu Jiang, Liu Yi. Research advances on the formation mechanism and diagnosis of bacteria biofilms in chronic wounds[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2021, 37(7): 692-696. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200327-00198
    [11]Ruan Qiongfang, Xia Chen, Xie Weiguo. Histopathological and genetical diagnosis of one case of neonatal ectodermal dysplasia/skin fragility syndrome[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2020, 36(6): 500-502. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20190329-00148
    [12]Wang Tianyuan, Chen Yinchen, Wang Wei, Jiang Dong, Liu Lan, Yang Hui, Wang Aiping. Mechanism of maggot debridement therapy in promoting wound angiogenesis in patients with diabetic foot ulcer[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2020, 36(11): 1040-1049. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20191022-00409
    [16]Zhou Jian, Wang Shuqin, Lin Yue, Zheng Dongfeng, Tan Qian. Early diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in patients with skin and soft tissue defects after trauma[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2019, 35(5): 351-355. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2019.05.005
    [17]Huang Hongjun, Niu Xihua, Yang Guanlong, Wang Liying, Shi Fanchao, Xu Shaojun, Xu Lingang, Li Yonglin. Clinical effects of application of antibiotic bone cement in wounds of diabetic foot ulcers[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2019, 35(6): 464-466. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2019.06.013
    [19]LIU Si-rong, RONG Xin-zhou, FAN Gui- cheng, LI Qing-hui, WEI Ya-ming. Determination and correlation analysis of contents of putrescine, cadaverine, and histamine in nec- rotic tissue, blood, and urine of patients with diabetic foot[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2013, 29(6): 526-530. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2013.06.009
    [20]HUANG Yao, QIAN Pei-fen. System of classification of diabetic foot and its appraisal[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2012, 28(1): 47-50. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2012.01.011
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(5)

    1. 刘可,张成敏,李志恒,柯为,王丽华. 感染创面病原微生物采样方法的临床研究. 智慧健康. 2023(17): 37-40+53 .
    2. 胡慧萍,杨庆宇,刘君. 糖尿病足患者合并感染的病原菌特点与血清瘦素的表达及其临床意义. 中国病原生物学杂志. 2022(02): 216-219 .
    3. 徐朝健,田志,冯毅,韩鹏飞,潘永春,房瑞玲,张龙,吕智. Gustilo Ⅲ型开放性胫腓骨骨折创面细菌分布特征及其治疗策略. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志. 2020(02): 194-196 .
    4. 胡敬梅,银玲,邓蓉,唐秀英,徐辉,高志文. 糖尿病足溃疡感染患者病原菌特点及其与下肢血管病变程度的关系. 实用医院临床杂志. 2018(04): 77-79 .
    5. 赵玲,楼波,金华,崔伟娟,孟祥君. 糖尿病住院患者医院感染病原菌分布及炎症因子变化情况研究. 中华医院感染学杂志. 2017(23): 5340-5343 .

    Other cited types(4)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-042024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-0302.557.51012.515
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 15.3 %FULLTEXT: 15.3 %META: 81.9 %META: 81.9 %PDF: 2.8 %PDF: 2.8 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 1.1 %其他: 1.1 %[]: 1.7 %[]: 1.7 %乐山: 1.7 %乐山: 1.7 %北京: 2.8 %北京: 2.8 %北方邦: 0.6 %北方邦: 0.6 %南充: 0.6 %南充: 0.6 %南昌: 1.7 %南昌: 1.7 %合肥: 0.6 %合肥: 0.6 %哈尔滨: 1.1 %哈尔滨: 1.1 %哥伦布: 0.6 %哥伦布: 0.6 %张家口: 1.7 %张家口: 1.7 %新乡: 1.1 %新乡: 1.1 %无锡: 1.1 %无锡: 1.1 %芒廷维尤: 72.9 %芒廷维尤: 72.9 %衢州: 1.1 %衢州: 1.1 %西宁: 9.0 %西宁: 9.0 %运城: 0.6 %运城: 0.6 %其他[]乐山北京北方邦南充南昌合肥哈尔滨哥伦布张家口新乡无锡芒廷维尤衢州西宁运城

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (144) PDF downloads(5) Cited by(9)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return