Yu Qing, Xiao Yongqiang, Hu Xiaoyan, et al. Cognitive level of first aid knowledge regarding small area burn among 2 723 child caregivers in Shanghai: a cross-sectional survey and analysis[J]. Chin j Burns, 2019, 35(3): 198-204. Doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2019.03.007
Citation: Yu Qing, Xiao Yongqiang, Hu Xiaoyan, et al. Cognitive level of first aid knowledge regarding small area burn among 2 723 child caregivers in Shanghai: a cross-sectional survey and analysis[J]. Chin j Burns, 2019, 35(3): 198-204. Doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2019.03.007

Cognitive level of first aid knowledge regarding small area burn among 2 723 child caregivers in Shanghai: a cross-sectional survey and analysis

doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2019.03.007
  • Received Date: 2018-10-03
    Available Online: 2021-10-28
  • Publish Date: 2019-03-20
  • Objective To assess the cognitive level of first aid knowledge regarding the small area burn among the child caregivers in Shanghai and improve the level of first aid for small area burn in children. Methods From November 2017 to March 2018, 7 municipal districts in Shanghai were selected according to the random number table, from which 2 750 students of 4 nurseries, 5 kindergartens, 6 primary schools, and 2 junior middle schools were selected by adopting the convenience sampling method. Each student was limited to one caregiver as the research object. A cross-sectional survey was conducted on the cognitive level of first aid knowledge regarding small area burn among the caregivers with self-designed questionnaire through WeChat and Tencent QQ. The age, burn experience, and scarring after burns in children, the prevalence rate of burn in children of different age groups, the educational background of caregivers and their social relationship with their children, and the measures taken by caregivers firstly after small area burn occurred among their children were recorded. The choices of applying the folk prescription drugs to the wounds of their children made by caregivers and those with different educational backgrounds were recorded. The choices of applying daily necessities to the wound of their children made by caregivers were recorded. The caregivers′ knowledge of standard first aid measures for small area burn, and the knowledge of caregivers with different educational backgrounds of all standard first aid measures for small area burn were recorded. The caregivers′ choices of hospitals for treatment the first time, and the choices of going to the Grade Ⅲ Level A hospital with burn specialty for treatment made by caregivers with different knowledge levels about first aid measures for small area burn and those by caregivers whose children did or didn′t have burn experience were recorded. The caregivers′ choices of different types of medical institutions with burn specialty or specialized in burn treatment, and choices of going to burn department of comprehensive Grade Ⅲ Level A hospital for treatment made by caregivers with different knowledge levels about first aid measures for small area burn were recorded. Data were processed with Pearson chi-square test and partitions of chi-square test. Results The effective recovery rate of questionnaire was 99.0% (2 723/2 750). The ages of children were mainly 6-11 years [64.7% (1 762/2 723)]The prevalence of burn in children was 19.4% (527/2 723). There was no statistically significant difference in the overall comparison of burn prevalence of children among the age groups (χ2=1.424, P>0.05). The percentage of scar formation after burn in children was 27.3% (144/527). The education backgrounds of caregivers were mainly undergraduate [40.2% (1 094/2 723)], and their social relationships with children were mainly children′s mothers [74.6% (2 030/2 723)]. Assuming that their children suffered from minor burns, the measures firstly taken by 74.0% (2 016/2 723) of the caregivers was to immediately access cool running water and remove clothing on the wound of children. Totally 19.2% (523/2 723) of the caregivers chose to apply folk prescription drugs for their burn children by themselves, and the percentage of caregivers with education background of junior middle school choosing to apply folk prescription drugs for their burn children by themselves was significantly higher than that of caregivers with education background of junior college, undergraduate, or graduate (χ2=18.502, 20.642, 13.319, P<0.05). Totally 49.2% (1 340/2 723) of caregivers chose to daub many kinds of daily necessities for their burn children by themselves. Totally 39.2% (1 068/2 723) of caregivers knew all standard first aid measures for small area burn, the percentage of caregivers with education background of undergraduate knowing all standard first aid measures for small area burn was significantly higher than that of caregivers with education background of senior high school and secondary specialized school (χ2=11.234, P<0.05). Assuming that their children suffered from minor burns, 39.0% (1 063/2 723) of the caregivers chose to go to the nearest hospital for treatment the first time, the percentage of caregivers who knew all standard first aid measures for small area burn choosing to go to Grade Ⅲ Level A hospital with burn specialty for treatment the first time was similar with that of caregivers who did not know/did not fully know (χ2=3.528, P>0.05), and the percentage of caregivers whose children had burn experience choosing to go to Grade Ⅲ Level A hospital with burn specialty for treatment in the first time was similar with that of caregivers whose children didn′t have burn experience (χ2=3.521, P>0.05). Among all medical institutions with burn specialty or specialized in burn treatment, 28.0% (762/2 723) of the caregivers chose to go to comprehensive Grade Ⅲ Level A hospital for treatment, and the percentage of caregivers who knew all standard first aid measures for small area burn choosing to go to comprehensive Grade Ⅲ Level A hospital for treatment was significantly higher than that of caregivers who did not know/did not fully know (χ2=4.890, P<0.05). Conclusions The caregivers of children are mainly children′s mothers with education background of undergraduate in Shanghai, and caregivers′ cognitive levels of first aid knowledge regarding the small area burn are low. Only a few caregivers know all standard first aid measures for small area burn, and there are still some caregivers who have the wrong idea of applying folk prescription drugs or daily necessities for children by themselves. The publicity and education of basic first aid knowledge of burn should be strengthened through various channels such as burn simulation exercise and network, and caregivers should be guided to take their children to hospitals with burn specialty for treatment after occurrence of burn in children, so as to obtain more professional medical treatment.

     

  • Relative Articles

    [1]Expert consensus on the treatment of second-degree burn wounds (2024 edition)Ⅰ: pre-hospital first aid and non-surgical treatment[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2024, 40(1): 1-18. doi: 10.3760/cmaj.cn501225-20231019-00120
    [2]Li Maojun, Chen Hualing, Ju Yangyang, Zeng Lijin, Li Ning. A cross-sectional survey and influencing factors analysis of knowledge, attitude, and behavior of enteral nutrition implemented by nurses in burn intensive care unit[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2023, 39(9): 874-881. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20220522-00198
    [3]Wang Shujun, Li Fangrong, Lu Hongyan, Chen Yuanyuan, Liu Xinzhu, Chen Lihua, Wang Yanhua, Yan Ziqing, Feng Ping, Wu Ying, Zhang Yan, Shen Chuan'an. A cross-sectional survey on the allocation of nursing human resources in burn centers in China[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2023, 39(4): 364-370. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20220613-00231
    [4]Shen Chuan'an, Liu Xinzhu, Xie Xiaoye, Zhang Bohan, Li Dawei, Liu Zhaoxing, Yuan Huageng. Establishment and application of the ten-fold rehydration formula for emergency resuscitation of pediatric patients after extensive burns[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2023, 39(1): 59-64. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20211111-00384
    [5]Shen Chuan'an, Liu Xinzhu, Li Dawei, Liu Zhaoxing, Zhang Bohan. Establishment and application of the tenfold rehydration formula for emergency resuscitation of adult patients after extensive burns[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2022, 38(3): 236-241. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20211109-00383
    [6]Huang Jie, Li Shuyuan, Wang Xuexin, Li Linhui, Ye Xiaofei, Ji Shizhao. A cross-sectional investigation and analysis of early treatment of partial-thickness burn wounds by professional burn medical staff in China[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2022, 38(6): 538-548. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20220317-00065
    [7]Jiang Qixia, Wang Yaling, Yijie Xie, Liu Xiaoqing, Xu Juan, Zheng Meichun, Feng Huan, Wang Weiwei, Sun Hongling, Zhu Shoulin, Li Wenjuan, Zhao Ning. Multicenter cross-sectional investigation on the cleaning status and influencing factors of skin cleaning outside the wound in adult trauma patients[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2021, 37(5): 429-436. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210116-00023
    [8]Hu Min, Chen Xiaojuan, Ren Linjie, Huang Jianqiong, Xu Xuewen. A cross-sectional investigation on the current status and influencing factors of kinesiophobia in adult burn patients[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2021, 37(6): 575-581. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200618-00313
    [9]Yao Zeming, Leng Min, Wang Hong. Research advances on assisted analgesic and sedative treatment of burn children[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2020, 36(10): 979-982. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20190731-00327
    [10]Xi Maomao, Lei Fang, Xie Weiguo. Advances in the research of psychological rehabilitation of pediatric burn patients[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2020, 36(6): 519-522. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20190308-00095
    [11]Zhu Hongjuan, Wang Shujun, Yang Hua, Li Dongjie, Chi Yunfei, Li Jie. Cross-sectional survey of life quality of patients with deep partial-thickness and above burns on head and face at discharge and analysis of its influencing factors[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2019, 35(4): 292-297. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2019.04.009
    [12]Shi Jiajia, Shen Aiming, Sun Ying, Li Yajun, Wang Sainan, Pan Shanshan, Li Zhou, Jiao Long. Occupational activity disorders of extremely severe mass burn patients in recovery period after injury: a cross-sectional survey[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2018, 34(9): 624-628. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.09.012
    [13]Jia Chiyu. To further strengthen the construction of emergency medical treatment system of massive burn[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2017, 33(3): 136-138. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2017.03.002
    [14]Tan Qian, Qiu Haibo, Sun Bingwei, Shen Yuming, Nie Lanjun, Zhang Hongwei. Model and enlightenment from rescue of August 2nd Kunshan explosion casualty[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2016, 32(1): 26-30. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2016.01.008
    [15]Liu Feng, Huang Zhenggen, Peng Yizhi, . Clinical randomized controlled trial on the feasibility and validity of continuous blood purification during the early stage of severe burn[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2016, 32(3): 152-153. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2016.03.005
    [16]WANG Fei, QIU Lin. Advancement in the research of growth hormone in treating pediatric burn patients[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2013, 29(1): 18-21. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2013.01.006
    [17]XIE Wei-guo. An overview on the establishment of the system of burn prevention and treatment in China by comparing with that of foreign countries[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2013, 29(2): 126-129. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2013.02.009
    [18]GAO Hui, LI Wei, ZHAO Yuan-dan. Epidemiological investigation of 615 patients with chemical burns in eastern China[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2012, 28(6): 411-414. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2012.06.004
    [20]CHENG Tian-min, RAN Xin-ze. Studies on the treatment of combined radiation-burn injury[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2008, 24(5): 387-389.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(11)

    1. 宝亚男,周彪,巴特,德奇,李洋洋,海日罕. 光子治疗仪在深Ⅱ度烧伤创面治疗中的应用体会. 中国冶金工业医学杂志. 2025(01): 9-10 .
    2. 卢学兰,刘应平,刘一伟,刁杰林,王丰,钟方宇,何家乐,陈朗. 学龄前儿童烧伤后心理应激障碍发生情况的横断面调查及影响因素分析. 中华烧伤与创面修复杂志. 2024(04): 373-379 . 本站查看
    3. 郭正祥,廖米荣,傅建剑,王慧利. 幼儿手足烧伤原因分布特点及关节功能障碍的影响因素分析. 中国妇幼保健. 2023(15): 2847-2851 .
    4. 林玉丹,黄顺红,缪羽,许翠玲,江晓声,黄书润. 驻闽部队官兵对烧伤认知及应急处置能力的调查. 中国急救复苏与灾害医学杂志. 2023(09): 1233-1236 .
    5. 叶道琳,马蕾,徐邦红,马雪,徐源媛,汪玉霄. 系统放松疗法对烧伤患儿家长创伤后应激障碍的影响. 中国实用护理杂志. 2022(02): 105-110 .
    6. 叶翠萍,李勤,张晋蔚,闫静,周晓红,曾凤兰,叶雪梅. 2017—2020年广州市某医院烧烫伤病例流行病学特征. 职业卫生与应急救援. 2022(01): 90-94 .
    7. 胡蛟,李玲,陈炜. 小儿烧伤影响因素及干预策略研究进展. 中华烧伤与创面修复杂志. 2022(09): 883-886 . 本站查看
    8. 杨瑞,王亚. 纳米银烧伤贴对小面积烧伤创面的治疗效果观察. 贵州医药. 2022(09): 1421-1423 .
    9. 蒋琪霞,王亚玲,解怡洁,刘晓晴,徐娟,郑美春,冯欢,王蔚蔚,孙红玲,朱守林,李文娟,赵宁. 成年创伤患者创面以外皮肤清洗现况及影响因素的多中心横断面调查. 中华烧伤杂志. 2021(05): 429-436 .
    10. 黄婷苑,秦发举,段丹萍,林伟权,刘览,秦鹏哲,刘华章,梁伯衡. 重大传染病疫情防控期间广州市伤害病例流行状况. 中国慢性病预防与控制. 2021(09): 715-718 .
    11. 胡晓燕,唐洪泰,肖仕初,冯苹,周万芳,夏照帆. 新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情期间儿童烧伤防治的探讨. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版). 2020(03): 192-194 .

    Other cited types(0)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-042024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-0302.557.51012.515
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 15.3 %FULLTEXT: 15.3 %META: 75.9 %META: 75.9 %PDF: 8.8 %PDF: 8.8 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 10.0 %其他: 10.0 %China: 1.8 %China: 1.8 %上海: 0.6 %上海: 0.6 %临沂: 0.6 %临沂: 0.6 %内江: 0.6 %内江: 0.6 %北京: 0.6 %北京: 0.6 %北方邦: 0.6 %北方邦: 0.6 %南京: 0.6 %南京: 0.6 %南充: 2.4 %南充: 2.4 %哥伦布: 0.6 %哥伦布: 0.6 %太原: 0.6 %太原: 0.6 %延边朝鲜族自治州: 0.6 %延边朝鲜族自治州: 0.6 %弗吉: 1.8 %弗吉: 1.8 %张家口: 1.8 %张家口: 1.8 %成都: 1.2 %成都: 1.2 %扬州: 1.8 %扬州: 1.8 %昆明: 2.9 %昆明: 2.9 %沃思堡: 1.2 %沃思堡: 1.2 %济南: 0.6 %济南: 0.6 %温州: 0.6 %温州: 0.6 %漯河: 1.2 %漯河: 1.2 %潍坊: 0.6 %潍坊: 0.6 %绍兴: 1.2 %绍兴: 1.2 %芒廷维尤: 56.5 %芒廷维尤: 56.5 %西宁: 1.8 %西宁: 1.8 %贵阳: 0.6 %贵阳: 0.6 %运城: 0.6 %运城: 0.6 %遂宁: 1.2 %遂宁: 1.2 %郑州: 1.8 %郑州: 1.8 %重庆: 2.9 %重庆: 2.9 %黄冈: 0.6 %黄冈: 0.6 %其他China上海临沂内江北京北方邦南京南充哥伦布太原延边朝鲜族自治州弗吉张家口成都扬州昆明沃思堡济南温州漯河潍坊绍兴芒廷维尤西宁贵阳运城遂宁郑州重庆黄冈

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (127) PDF downloads(15) Cited by(11)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return