Lin Nan, Li Ming, Guo Zhihui, et al. A multicenter prospective randomized controlled clinical study of 5-fluorouracil in different mass concentrations combined with triamcinolone in the treatment of keloids[J]. Chin j Burns, 2021, 37(5): 437-445. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200315-00168
Citation: Lin Nan, Li Ming, Guo Zhihui, et al. A multicenter prospective randomized controlled clinical study of 5-fluorouracil in different mass concentrations combined with triamcinolone in the treatment of keloids[J]. Chin j Burns, 2021, 37(5): 437-445. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200315-00168

A multicenter prospective randomized controlled clinical study of 5-fluorouracil in different mass concentrations combined with triamcinolone in the treatment of keloids

doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200315-00168
  • Received Date: 2020-03-15
    Available Online: 2021-10-28
  • Publish Date: 2021-05-20
  • Objective To evaluate the clinical effects of 5-fluorouracil in different mass concentrations combined with triamcinolone in the treatment of keloids. Methods From March 2018 to March 2019, 29 patients with 31 keloids receipted in the Department of Plastic Surgery of Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, 11 patients with 20 keloids receipted in the Department of Dermatology of Pingtan Comprehensive Experimental Area Hospital, and 9 patients with 9 keloids receipted in the Fuzhou Heisey-Dea Aesthetic Clinic were included in this prospectively randomized control study, with 27 males and 22 females, aged (30±9) years. According to the random number table, the keloids were divided into low mass concentration group (19 keloids, 17 patients), medium mass concentration group (21 keloids, 19 patients), and high mass concentration group (20 keloids, 17 patients). Then 5-fluorouracil at mass concentrations of 0.5, 5.0, and 12.5 mg/mL combined with triamcinolone acetonide were injected respectively, once every 4 weeks, for a total of 3 times. Before the first treatment and in 3 months after the last treatment, the appearance of keloids was evaluated by Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) and pain and pruritus of keloids were evaluated by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Then the score differences before and after the treatment were calculated. In 6 months after the last treatment, the patients' efficacy satisfaction was evaluated by efficacy satisfaction rating scale. Adverse reactions during the treatment were recorded. In the follow-up of one year after the last treatment, the recurrence rates of keloids were counted. Data were statistically analyzed with chi-square test, one-way analysis of variance, paired sample

    t

    test, least significant difference

    t

    test, Wilcoxon rank sum test, Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test, or Fisher′s exact probability test. Results Before the first treatment, the appearance VSS scores of appearance of keloids in the three groups were similar (

    F=

    0.039,

    P

    >0.05). In 3 months after the last treatment, the appearance VSS scores of keloids in low mass concentration group were significantly higher than those in medium mass concentration group and high mass concentration group (

    t

    =2.267, 4.086,

    P

    <0.05 or

    P

    <0.01). In 3 months after the last treatment, the appearance VSS scores of keloids in low mass concentration group, medium mass concentration group, and high mass concentration group were significantly decreased compared with those before the first treatment (

    t

    =18.222, 44.272, 22.523,

    P

    <0.01). The differences of appearance VSS scores of keloids in low mass concentration group before and after treatment were significantly lower than those in medium mass concentration group and high mass concentration group (

    t

    =-4.096, -6.357,

    P

    <0.01), and the differences of appearance VSS scores of keloids in medium mass concentration group before and after treatment were significantly lower than those in high mass concentration group (

    t

    =-2.368,

    P

    <0.05). Before the first treatment, the pain and pruritus VAS scores of keloids in the three groups were similar (

    χ

    2=0.149,

    P

    >0.05). In 3 months after the last treatment, the pain and pruritus VAS scores of keloids in low mass concentration group were significantly higher than those in medium mass concentration group and high mass concentration group (

    Z

    =2.191, 4.386,

    P

    <0.05 or

    P

    <0.01), and the pain and pruritus VAS scores of keloids in medium mass concentration group were significantly higher than those in high mass concentration group (

    Z

    =2.276,

    P

    <0.05). In 3 months after the last treatment, the pain and pruritus VAS scores of keloids in medium mass concentration group and high mass concentration group were significantly decreased compared with those before the first treatment (

    Z=

    -3.904, -3.844,

    P

    <0.01). The differences of pain and pruritus VAS scores of keloids in low mass concentration group before and after treatment were significantly lower than those in medium mass concentration group and high mass concentration group (

    Z=

    -4.265, -6.104,

    P

    <0.01). In 6 months after the last treatment, the efficacy satisfaction scores of the corresponding patients of keloids were (88±8) points in high mass concentration group, which were significantly higher than (76±8) points in medium mass concentration group and (60±8) points in low mass concentration group (

    t

    =-3.820, -6.675,

    P

    <0.01), and the efficacy satisfaction scores of the corresponding patients of keloids in medium mass concentration group were significantly higher than those in high mass concentration group (

    t

    =-2.984,

    P

    <0.05). There was only statistically significant difference in pain within the 3 groups (

    P

    <0.01). In the follow-up of one year after the last treatment, the recurrence rate of keloids in high mass concentration group was significantly lower than that in low mass concentration group (

    χ

    2=8.313,

    P

    <0.01), and the recurrence rate of keloids in medium mass concentration group was similar to the recurrence rates in low mass concentration group and high mass concentration group (

    P

    >0.05). Conclusions After treating keloids with high mass concentration of 5-fluorouracil combined with triamcinolone acetonide, the symptoms were significantly improved, the efficacy satisfaction of patients was increased, with no obvious adverse reactions but long lasting efficacy. Their overall effects are better than treatment using medium and low mass concentrations of 5-fluorouracil, which is worthy of clinical promotion.

     

  • Relative Articles

    [1]Mu Zelan, Teng Yongxiang, Zhang Jian, Bai Nan, Fu Yanjie. Research advances on the roles of metabolic remodeling and protein acylation modification in keloids[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2024, 40(6): 589-593. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20231207-00229
    [2]Cao Tao, Ji Peng, Zhang Zhi, Xiao Dan, Wang Kejia, Li Na, Li Wen, Jin Guangjun, Hao Tong, Tao Ke. A prospective randomized controlled study of antibiotic bone cement in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcer[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2023, 39(4): 311-318. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20221111-00485
    [3]Su Yinghong, Xia Wenzheng, Huang Xin, Xu Ruoqing, Yimin Khoong, Zan Tao. Research advances in the treatment of keloid with glucocorticoids[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2023, 39(9): 886-890. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20230602-00198
    [4]Xu Qi, Liu Wei. Research advances on the influence of poor dietary habits on the development of keloids[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2022, 38(4): 389-393. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210401-00112
    [5]Wang Yunzhang, Su Chen, Fu Siqi, Liu Liqiang. Research advances on the characteristics of fibroblast in keloid[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2022, 38(6): 590-594. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210510-00176
    [6]Lei Ying, Tan Jun, Ouyang Huawei, Liu Xiaojia, Yu Yiling. Effects of composite laser technique combined with multipoint microinjection of triamcinolone acetonide in the treatment of hypertrophic scars in burn children[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2022, 38(9): 810-815. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20220519-00192
    [7]Liu Zhennan, Zhou Yuemin, Liu Ruoxuan, Li Yaling, Li Qing, Zhang Ting, Zhang Shuman. Clinical effects of pulsed dye laser dynamically combined with triamcinolone acetonide in the treatment of keloids[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2022, 38(9): 822-829. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20220620-00249
    [8]Lei Ji'an, Zhou Yuan, Qin Zelian. Research advances on inflammatory responses involved in keloid development[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2021, 37(6): 591-595. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200312-00154
    [9]Zhang Mengyuan, Ding Gaofeng, He Qiong, Liu Jinling, Wang Tong, Zhang Baolin. Bibliometric and visual analysis of current status and trends of international research on keloids[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2021, 37(3): 263-270. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200226-00093
    [10]Cao Zhendong, Liu Wei. Examining the pathogenesis and therapeutic strategy of keloids from the perspective of systemic inflammation[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2020, 36(5): 334-338. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200401-00205
    [11]Liu Xinjian, Cui Zhengjun, Zhang Shutang, Su Weiguo, Meng Qingnan, Guo Pengfei, Wei Aizhou, Zhou Jian, Wang Changyin, Zou Shibo, Sun Jialin, Wang Xu. Meta-analysis of the effects of triamcinolone acetonide alone and in combination with 5-fluorouracil for treating keloids[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2020, 36(12): 1191-1198. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20190930-00390
    [12]Song Chenlu, Yao Min. Advances in the research of relationship between CD26 and hypertrophic scar and keloid[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2018, 34(1): 54-56. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.01.011
    [14]Fu Jile, Zhang Gang, Liang Jie, Mei Xuece. Mutations in A (8) and A (9) loci of exon 8 of retinoblastoma protein-interacting zinc finger gene of keloid patients[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2018, 34(9): 643-647. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.09.015
    [15]Guo Qige, Yao Min. Advances in the research of drug intralesional injection therapy in keloid[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2018, 34(6): 415-418. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.06.024
    [16]Chen Junjie, Wu Xiaojing, Zhang Zhenyu, Chen Zhixing, Cen Ying. Study of the correlation between the expression of angiotensin Ⅱ and its receptors and collagen deposition in human keloid[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2016, 32(11): 653-657. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2016.11.004
    [17]Song Mei, Liu Yi. Analysis on polymorphism at-509C/T site of TGF-β1 gene in patients with keloids[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2014, 30(6): 482-486. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2014.06.004
    [20]LIU Wang, JIANG You-hui, LI You-liang, LIN Zi-hao, JIANG Hua, TAN Qian, ZHANG Jian-lin, WANG Zi-min. Experimental study on p53 gene mutation in keloid fibroblasts[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BURNS AND WOUNDS, 2004, 20(2): 85-87.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(14)

    1. 朱广乾,李亚君,张靖微. 5-氟尿嘧啶联合A型肉毒毒素对增生性瘢痕患者瘢痕血流灌注量及血清学指标的影响. 中国医疗美容. 2025(01): 46-50 .
    2. 米萱,李胜旭,张秀丽,高婧. 核心切除术联合曲安奈德注射治疗耳部瘢痕疙瘩的临床研究. 中国医疗美容. 2025(01): 31-35 .
    3. 李晓建,邰海军,郭金华,刘倩,史玉玲. CO_2点阵激光用于瘢痕疙瘩治疗的有效性分析. 临床医学工程. 2024(02): 137-138 .
    4. 王玉珍,张丽,张平安. 火针联合低压无针瘢痕内注射复方倍他米松治疗瘢痕疙瘩疗效及对生长因子水平、瘢痕状态的影响. 现代中医药. 2024(03): 83-87 .
    5. 张中良,瞿伟. 复方倍他米松(斯瑞)联合氟尿嘧啶局部注射治疗瘢痕疙瘩的疗效及安全性. 航空航天医学杂志. 2024(08): 946-949 .
    6. 杨庆燕. 龙血竭紫草油膏联合曲安奈德注射治疗老年瘢痕疙瘩的临床疗效. 中国老年学杂志. 2024(17): 4147-4150 .
    7. 付秀娟. 低浓度5-氟尿嘧啶与曲安奈德治疗增生性瘢痕的疗效. 吉林医学. 2024(09): 2202-2205 .
    8. 朱东宁,安庆. 曲安奈德对特应性皮炎小鼠血清白细胞介素-33、白细胞介素-25、胸腺基质淋巴细胞生成素和Th1/Th2平衡影响的实验研究. 陕西医学杂志. 2023(01): 7-11+27 .
    9. 符军. 瘢痕疙瘩患者采用曲安奈德联合氟尿嘧啶局部注射治疗的效果观察. 黑龙江医药. 2023(01): 154-156 .
    10. 周湘荣,林小永,郑臣校. 桃红四物汤加减方联合弹力绷带对植皮术后供皮区增生性疤痕的疗效观察. 广州中医药大学学报. 2023(11): 2764-2768 .
    11. 左楠,王远,王爽. 骨髓间充质干细胞移植联合多点微量注射曲安奈德对兔耳增生性瘢痕及创面巨噬细胞极化的影响. 陕西医学杂志. 2022(02): 140-144 .
    12. 潘盛盛,倪彬婷,何玉仓. 不同浓度5-氟尿嘧啶联合曲安奈德治疗耳廓瘢痕疙瘩的效果观察. 浙江医学. 2022(07): 737-741 .
    13. 薛佳杰,任忠亮,马平,郭雷,高登文,郝青晔,高富成,王耀军. 复方倍他米松联合曲安奈德序贯注射治疗瘢痕疙瘩的疗效及作用机制研究. 海南医学. 2022(15): 1966-1970 .
    14. 杨远超,凌小红. 曲安奈德、复方倍他米松及强的松龙注射液治疗瘢痕疙瘩的效果及影响因素分析. 临床医学工程. 2022(10): 1365-1366 .

    Other cited types(3)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-03051015202530
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 3.6 %其他: 3.6 %其他: 0.7 %其他: 0.7 %Central District: 1.0 %Central District: 1.0 %China: 0.7 %China: 0.7 %United States: 0.3 %United States: 0.3 %上海: 1.0 %上海: 1.0 %东莞: 1.0 %东莞: 1.0 %佛山: 0.7 %佛山: 0.7 %北京: 3.3 %北京: 3.3 %北方邦: 0.3 %北方邦: 0.3 %南京: 0.3 %南京: 0.3 %南昌: 0.7 %南昌: 0.7 %呼和浩特: 0.3 %呼和浩特: 0.3 %哥伦布: 0.3 %哥伦布: 0.3 %嘉兴: 0.3 %嘉兴: 0.3 %天津: 1.3 %天津: 1.3 %山景城: 1.0 %山景城: 1.0 %平顶山: 0.3 %平顶山: 0.3 %广州: 1.0 %广州: 1.0 %张家口: 6.6 %张家口: 6.6 %德罕: 1.0 %德罕: 1.0 %成都: 0.7 %成都: 0.7 %扬州: 0.7 %扬州: 0.7 %揭阳: 0.3 %揭阳: 0.3 %昆明: 1.0 %昆明: 1.0 %曲靖: 0.7 %曲靖: 0.7 %杭州: 1.0 %杭州: 1.0 %武汉: 0.3 %武汉: 0.3 %沈阳: 0.7 %沈阳: 0.7 %泰州: 0.3 %泰州: 0.3 %洛阳: 1.0 %洛阳: 1.0 %海口: 0.3 %海口: 0.3 %海得拉巴: 1.0 %海得拉巴: 1.0 %漯河: 1.0 %漯河: 1.0 %石家庄: 0.3 %石家庄: 0.3 %福州: 1.7 %福州: 1.7 %芒廷维尤: 52.0 %芒廷维尤: 52.0 %芝加哥: 0.7 %芝加哥: 0.7 %西宁: 1.0 %西宁: 1.0 %运城: 0.3 %运城: 0.3 %邯郸: 0.7 %邯郸: 0.7 %重庆: 4.3 %重庆: 4.3 %长沙: 2.6 %长沙: 2.6 %陶朗加: 0.3 %陶朗加: 0.3 %青岛: 0.7 %青岛: 0.7 %香港: 0.7 %香港: 0.7 %其他其他Central DistrictChinaUnited States上海东莞佛山北京北方邦南京南昌呼和浩特哥伦布嘉兴天津山景城平顶山广州张家口德罕成都扬州揭阳昆明曲靖杭州武汉沈阳泰州洛阳海口海得拉巴漯河石家庄福州芒廷维尤芝加哥西宁运城邯郸重庆长沙陶朗加青岛香港

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (239) PDF downloads(23) Cited by(17)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return