Shang NS,Cui BH,Wang C,et al.A prospective randomized controlled study of the application effect of hydrogel dressings on deep partial-thickness burn wounds after dermabrasion and tangential excision[J].Chin J Burns,2021,37(11):1085-1089.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210419-00133.
Citation: Shang NS,Cui BH,Wang C,et al.A prospective randomized controlled study of the application effect of hydrogel dressings on deep partial-thickness burn wounds after dermabrasion and tangential excision[J].Chin J Burns,2021,37(11):1085-1089.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210419-00133.

A prospective randomized controlled study of the application effect of hydrogel dressings on deep partial-thickness burn wounds after dermabrasion and tangential excision

doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210419-00133
Funds:

Zibo Key Research and Development Plan 2019ZC010216

More Information
  • Corresponding author: Huo Ran, Email: huoran@medmail.com.cn
  • Received Date: 2021-04-19
  •   Objective  To investigate the clinical effect of applying hydrogel dressings in deep partial-thickness burn wounds after dermabrasion and tangential excision.  Methods  A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted. From November 2015 to August 2019, 168 patients with deep partial-thickness burns hospitalized in Zibo Sixth People's Hospital met the inclusion criteria. According to the random number table, the patients were divided into hydrogel dressing+vaseline gauze group (84 cases, 67 males and 17 females) and vaseline gauze only group (84 cases, 65 males and 19 females) who were aged (31±16) and (35±17) years, respectively, and were given corresponding treatment after dermabrasion and tangential excision. The dressings were changed every 3-5 days. Autologous skin grafting was performed with split-thickness or medium-thickness skin grafts taken from trunk or thigh if the wounds failed to heal over 21 days or the wounds were less than 21 days but located in the joints, which might affect the functional activities at later stage. After operation, the general condition of the wounds was observed continuously and dynamically till the wounds were healed. The degree of dressing adhesion was evaluated during the first 4 dressing changes after operation, and the degree of pain was evaluated using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). The wound healing rate on post operation day (POD) 3, 6, and 15 was calculated. The positive proportion of bacterial culture of wound exudates/cleanout fluid on admission and at dressing change on POD 3, 6, and 15 was calculated. The number of dressing changes were recorded, the rate of skin grafting operation was calculated, and the time of complete wound healing was recorded. Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) was used in 6 months of follow-up to evaluate the hyperplasia of scar. Data were statistically analyzed with analysis of variance for repeated measurement, independent sample t test, Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test or Fisher's exact probability test, and Bonferroni correction.  Results  During the observation period after operation, the wound was moist with less exudates and the wound healed much faster in patients of hydrogel dressing+vaseline gauze group, with the inner dressing being easier to remove with mild pain, while the wounds showed more exudates and slower healing in patients of vaseline gauze only group with the obvious adhesions of inner dressing, stronger pain, and bleeding in the wounds. Compared with those in vaseline gauze only group, the degree of dressing adhesion and pain NRS score of patients in hydrogel dressing+vaseline gauze group decreased significantly during the first 4 dressing changes after operation (χ2=52.625, Z=-10.854, P<0.01), the wound healing rate increased significantly at dressing change on POD 3, 6, and 15 (t=10.347, 41.150, 167.627, P<0.01), the positive proportion of wound exudates/cleanout fluid bacterial culture did not change significantly on admission or at dressing change on POD 3 (P>0.05) but decreased significantly at dressing change on POD 6 and 15 (χ2=15.616, 15.226, P<0.01), the dressing change times was significantly reduced (t=-11.986, P<0.01), and the rate of skin grafting operation was significantly decreased (χ2=35.850, P<0.01). The complete wound healing time of patients in hydrogel dressing+vaseline gauze group was (17.6±2.8) d, significantly shorter than (27.1±3.0) d in vaseline gauze only group (t=-21.288, P<0.01). During the follow-up of 6 months, the VSS score of scar hyperplasia of patients in hydrogel dressing+vaseline gauze group was significantly lower than that in vaseline gauze only group (Z=-11.287, P<0.01).  Conclusions  Compared with the use of vaseline gauze only, the application of vaseline gauze coated with hydrogel dressing in deep partial-thickness burn wounds after dermabrasion and tangential excision is more effective in moisturizing, significantly reducing the degree of dressing adhesion and patients' pain during dressing change, increasing wound healing rate, decreasing wound infection rate and the rate of skin grafting operation, and reducing the number of dressing changes. It shortens the time for complete wound healing, and effectively relieves scar hyperplasia.

     

  • [1]
    赵冉,曹永倩,臧成瑜,等.烧伤创面磨痂术研究进展[J].中华烧伤杂志,2018,34(3):187-189.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.03.016.
    [2]
    KwaKAA,GoeiH,BreederveldRS,et al.A systematic review on surgical and nonsurgical debridement techniques of burn wounds[J].J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg,2019,72(11):1752-1762.DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2019.07.006.
    [3]
    邬业强,熊秉刚,黎明华,等.早期磨削痂联合负压封闭引流治疗Ⅱ度烧伤合并糖尿病患者的临床疗效观察[J].现代诊断与治疗,2019,30(17):2996-2998.
    [4]
    王德昌,赵冉.重视磨痂术在早期深Ⅱ度烧伤创面的应用[J].中华烧伤杂志,2020,36(6):506-509.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20190115-00007.
    [5]
    夏卫东,叶媛媛,杨锐金,等.早期磨削痂后负压封闭引流治疗糖尿病合并烧伤患者深Ⅱ度创面的疗效[J].中华烧伤杂志,2017,33(7):442-444.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2017.07.011.
    [6]
    李波,张承德,徐向荣.磨痂术联合DR脱细胞异种皮移植术治疗四肢深Ⅱ度烧伤的临床效果及安全性分析[J].医学理论与实践,2020,33(12):1989-1990.DOI: 10.19381/j.issn.1001-7585.2020.12.050.
    [7]
    周忠志,黄新灵.重组人表皮生长因子凝胶联合纳米银敷料对深Ⅱ度烧伤患者创面总体细菌培养阳性率及愈合时间的影响[J].中国地方病防治杂志,2017,32(12):1400.
    [8]
    梁康,赵利敏,农玮,等.水凝胶敷料联合VSD技术治疗四肢开放性骨折术后难愈创面的临床效果[J].微创医学,2021,16(1):90-92.DOI: 10.11864/j.issn.1673.2021.01.24.
    [9]
    黄锐娜,黄锐佳,牛彩丽,等.五种常用敷料治疗压疮疗效的网状Meta分析[J].中国组织工程研究,2020,24(16):2614-2619.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2293.
    [10]
    蔡伟杰,韩培.水凝胶敷料治疗慢性创面研究进展[J].国际骨科学杂志,2020,41(4):195-198.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-7083.2020.04.001.
    [11]
    李文甜,涂计,高飞,等.凝胶敷料用于骨外露创面的修复:创新与发展[J].中国组织工程研究,2017,21(10):1617-1622.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2017.10.023.
    [12]
    朱朝军,张朝晖,马静,等.干性与湿性愈合疗法在糖尿病足坏疽治疗中的应用[J/CD].中华损伤与修复杂志:电子版,2014,9(2):186-188.DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2014.02.017.
    [13]
    SajidMT,MustafaQu,ShaheenN,et al. Comparison of negative pressure wound therapy using vacuum-assisted closure with advanced moist wound therapy in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers[J].J Coll Physicians Surg Pak,2015,25(11):789-793.
    [14]
    中华医学会烧伤外科学分会.磨痂术在烧伤创面中的临床应用全国专家共识(2021版)[J].中华烧伤杂志,2021,37(6):501-507.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210110-00013.
    [15]
    陈雄林,曹小明,江和,等.临床敷料在皮肤创伤中的应用[J].实用临床医学,2017,18(10):98-102.DOI: 10.13764/j.cnki.lcsy.2017.10.039.
    [16]
    RutterL.Obtaining the optimum moist wound healing environment[J].Br J Community Nurs,2017,22(Suppl 12):S36-40.DOI: 10.12968/bjcn.2017.22.Sup12.S36.
    [17]
    谭谦,徐晔.慢性创面治疗的理论和策略[J].中华烧伤杂志,2020,36(9):798-802.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200728-00361.
    [18]
    廖昭会,付强,王达利,等.无定形水凝胶敷料对大鼠皮肤烫伤及创伤模型的疗效分析[J]. 解剖学杂志,2017,40(4):444-448.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1633.2017.04.019.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(21)

    1. 严炯,张钒,秦宏波,贾志刚. rhEGF凝胶联合水凝胶敷料对烧伤后瘢痕皮肤软组织扩张术后患者创面愈合及生长因子的影响. 天津药学. 2025(01): 70-73 .
    2. 胡东升. TAO联合rh-bFGF凝胶对深Ⅱ度烧伤患者症状消失时间及炎症因子的影响. 现代医药卫生. 2024(09): 1502-1505+1510 .
    3. 武胡雯,邓晗彬,周涵,张培深,范闻轩,李嘉诚,程少文. 水凝胶敷料减轻烧伤创面瘢痕的研究进展. 海南医学院学报. 2024(13): 1027-1034 .
    4. 李树松,马滢,吴晓明,赵晓玉,李丽. 胸腺素β4联合水胶体敷料对深Ⅱ度烧伤大鼠创面愈合及p38丝裂原活化蛋白激酶信号转导通路的影响. 河北医科大学学报. 2024(07): 832-838 .
    5. 高学坡,李茂清,贾鸿飞. 纳米银敷料辅助治疗对深度大面积烧伤患者创面愈合及血清VEGF、EGF水平的影响. 中国医师杂志. 2024(08): 1211-1215 .
    6. 高东东,侯国玲,张宏峰. 两种敷料结合自体细胞喷雾技术对手部深Ⅱ度烧伤的疗效观察. 国际医药卫生导报. 2024(17): 2905-2910 .
    7. 郑祥兵,阴俊,叶凌霄,陈诚,胡涛涛,邹勇,刘兵. 湿润烧伤膏对老年烧伤整形术后患者创面愈合及PI3K/Akt/eNOS通路的影响. 分子诊断与治疗杂志. 2024(10): 1965-1969 .
    8. 张国辉,张海博,曹东升. 紫花牡荆素对浅Ⅱ度烧伤大鼠创面愈合的影响及机制研究. 中国药房. 2024(21): 2603-2608 .
    9. 王亮琴,邱思花,肖晓青,兰加寿. 四维子宫输卵管超声造影对输卵管阻塞性病变诊断价值及不良反应研究. 中外医学研究. 2023(01): 84-87 .
    10. 罗高兴,卢毅飞,黄灿. 功能性水凝胶促进皮肤创面的修复. 中华烧伤与创面修复杂志. 2023(01): 9-14 . 本站查看
    11. 李芳,蒋海涛,张恺,秦莹,郑纪伟. 双层型脱细胞真皮基质对大鼠伤口愈合的实验研究. 医学信息. 2023(02): 49-53 .
    12. 张申,凡会霞,刘思琦,杨会举,刘世举,刘佃温. “偎脓长肉”理论与“湿性愈合”理论在创伤修复中的相关性探究. 中医学报. 2023(03): 556-566 .
    13. 马丽,潘孙峰,王振君,方高丰,朱敏达,胡衍泽,王晶. 保留变性真皮二期植皮法治疗四肢关节部位深Ⅱ度烧伤的临床效果. 浙江医学. 2023(04): 399-403 .
    14. 杨春艳,柳研,李艳,唐明秀,杨文信. 复方芙蓉花叶提取物对烧伤后创面感染大鼠创面愈合的影响及其作用机制. 中华医院感染学杂志. 2023(12): 1783-1787 .
    15. 陈才,田文艳,寇新燕. 创面磨削痂术联合外用rhGM-CSF对Ⅱ度烧伤患儿创面愈合的影响. 中国美容医学. 2023(07): 28-31 .
    16. 王林,陈剑利,高小春,邹才学. 两种不同敷料联合自体微粒皮种植术治疗深Ⅱ度烧伤效果对比. 中国美容医学. 2023(08): 52-55 .
    17. 王爱环,何军霞,冯慧芳,纠湘涵. PRP联合次氯酸清洁敷料在烧伤后创面愈合中的作用. 中国医疗美容. 2023(09): 19-22 .
    18. 邓雪,李宁静,柳鹏. rh-aFGF外用联合水凝胶敷料治疗Ⅱ度烧伤创面. 中国美容医学. 2023(11): 50-53 .
    19. 王阳,刘军,李为朋,郭秀侠,卢亚洁. rhGM-CSF凝胶联合磺胺嘧啶银对面部深Ⅱ度烧伤创面愈合质量的影响. 中国美容医学. 2023(12): 33-36 .
    20. 王娇,蒋红英,余曦,吴姁怿. 自体富血小板血浆联合湿性愈合敷料治疗老年深Ⅱ度烧伤难愈合创面的临床观察. 老年医学与保健. 2022(03): 659-663 .
    21. 张小华,林光明,郭鹏,熊鑫,苏刚,刘杨,胡大迁,张旭东. 清创联合负压封闭引流治疗对深Ⅱ度烧伤病人创面愈合及感染情况的影响. 临床外科杂志. 2022(12): 1115-1118 .

    Other cited types(1)

  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(1)  / Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (377) PDF downloads(58) Cited by(22)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return